pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30717 · v2 · pith:OPXWJF3Xnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · ✦ hep-th · nlin.SI

The auxiliary-deformed Breitenlohner-Maison model: duality frames and higher-dimensional origin

Daniele Bielli , Mattia Ces\`aro This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 20:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th nlin.SI
keywords Breitenlohner-Maison modelauxiliary fieldsduality framesKaluza-Klein reductionhigher-derivative gravityintegrable deformationsmu-framenu-frame
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Breitenlohner-Maison model admits auxiliary deformations in both nu- and mu-frames that uplift to a four-dimensional higher-derivative theory lacking manifest diffeomorphism invariance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the mu-frame auxiliary field perspective for the two-dimensional Breitenlohner-Maison model, an integrable subsector of four-dimensional general relativity obtained by Kaluza-Klein reduction with two commuting Killing isometries. It then constructs explicit uplifts to D=4 for both the existing nu-frame and the new mu-frame using an ansatz drawn from duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein theory. A sympathetic reader cares because the construction supplies higher-dimensional origins for the deformed models and identifies a resulting higher-derivative theory whose lack of manifest diffeomorphism invariance raises questions about consistency and physical interpretation in four dimensions.

Core claim

We first extend this point of view by deriving the complementary auxiliary field perspective known as mu-frame, and then explicitly construct the uplift to D=4 of both descriptions, relying on an ansatz inspired by duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein theory. The resulting four-dimensional deformed model thus obtained is a higher-derivative theory which lacks manifest diffeomorphism invariance in both frames.

What carries the argument

The mu-frame auxiliary field perspective together with the duality-invariant ansatz used to lift both deformed frames from two to four dimensions.

If this is right

  • The four-dimensional model obtained is a higher-derivative theory.
  • The uplifted theory lacks manifest diffeomorphism invariance in both the nu-frame and the mu-frame.
  • Resolutions of the diffeomorphism invariance feature can be considered.
  • The physical interpretation of the model in four dimensions admits direct discussion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same uplift ansatz could be tested on other integrable two-dimensional models obtained by dimensional reduction.
  • The absence of manifest diffeomorphism invariance might be removable by a field redefinition or by adding further auxiliary structures not present in the current construction.
  • This approach may link to broader efforts that introduce controlled higher-derivative corrections while preserving integrability.

Load-bearing premise

An ansatz inspired by duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein theory is sufficient to uplift the two-dimensional auxiliary-deformed models to consistent four-dimensional higher-derivative theories.

What would settle it

An explicit check of the equations of motion derived from the uplifted four-dimensional Lagrangian that fails to reproduce the expected auxiliary-deformed dynamics, or a concrete counter-example in which the ansatz yields inconsistent field equations.

read the original abstract

The two-dimensional Breitenlohner-Maison (BM) model is a classically integrable subsector of $D=4$ general relativity endowed with two commuting Killing isometries, obtained via Kaluza-Klein reduction to $D=2$. Integrable deformations of such a theory have recently been constructed via auxiliary fields in the so-called $\nu$-frame. In this work we first extend this point of view by deriving the complementary auxiliary field perspective known as $\mu$-frame, and then explicitly construct the uplift to $D=4$ of both descriptions, relying on an ansatz inspired by duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein theory. The resulting four-dimensional deformed model thus obtained is a higher-derivative theory which lacks manifest diffeomorphism invariance in both frames. We comment on possible resolutions of this puzzling feature and on the physical interpretation of the model in $D=4$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper extends the auxiliary-field deformation of the two-dimensional Breitenlohner-Maison model (a Kaluza-Klein reduction of D=4 gravity with two commuting Killing vectors) by deriving the complementary μ-frame, then uplifts both the ν-frame and μ-frame descriptions to four dimensions via an ansatz drawn from duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations of Einstein gravity. The resulting 4D model is a higher-derivative theory that lacks manifest diffeomorphism invariance in either frame; the authors comment on possible resolutions and physical interpretation.

Significance. If the uplift construction is internally consistent, the work supplies an explicit higher-dimensional origin for auxiliary-deformed integrable models and illustrates how duality frames can be lifted while preserving the deformation structure. The explicit acknowledgment that diffeomorphism invariance is not manifest provides a concrete starting point for further analysis of the model's geometric status.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction state that the 4D uplift relies on 'an ansatz inspired by duality-invariant Lagrangian formulations,' but the precise form of the ansatz (including any free functions or coefficient choices) should be written explicitly in the section describing the uplift, together with a short verification that it reproduces the 2D deformed equations upon reduction.
  2. Notation for the auxiliary fields (μ versus ν) and the associated frames is introduced gradually; a single table or paragraph early in the manuscript that contrasts the two frames (field content, Lagrangian terms, duality properties) would improve readability.
  3. The discussion of possible resolutions for the missing manifest diffeomorphism invariance would benefit from a brief comparison to known higher-derivative gravity models that restore invariance via auxiliary fields or non-local terms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, accurate description of its scope, and recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments appear in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses external ansatz as input

full rationale

The paper extends the ν-frame to the μ-frame via auxiliary fields and constructs the D=4 uplift of both using an ansatz drawn from duality-invariant Einstein Lagrangians. This ansatz is introduced as an assumption to enable the higher-dimensional lift, not derived from or equivalent to the target 4D model by construction. No fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force the result, and no self-citation chain bears the central claim. The resulting higher-derivative theory is presented as exploratory, with the lack of manifest diffeomorphism invariance explicitly noted rather than hidden. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text needed for ledger.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5681 in / 1077 out tokens · 21490 ms · 2026-07-02T20:20:09.875770+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    V. A. Belinsky and V. E. Zakharov,Integration of the Einstein Equations by the Inverse Scattering Problem Technique and the Calculation of the Exact Soliton Solutions,Sov. Phys. JETP48(1978) 985–994

    1978

  2. [2]

    Maison,Are the stationary, axially symmetric Einstein equations completely integrable?,Phys

    D. Maison,Are the stationary, axially symmetric Einstein equations completely integrable?,Phys. Rev. Lett.41(1978) 521

    1978

  3. [3]

    R. P. Geroch,A Method for generating solutions of Einstein’s equations,J. Math. Phys.12(1971) 918–924

    1971

  4. [4]

    R. P. Geroch,A Method for generating new solutions of Einstein’s equation. 2,J. Math. Phys.13(1972) 394–404

    1972

  5. [5]

    Julia,Group disintegrations,Conf

    B. Julia,Group disintegrations,Conf. Proc. C8006162(1980) 331–350

    1980

  6. [6]

    Julia,Infinite Lie algebras in physics, in5th Johns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Theory: Unified Field Theories and Beyond, pp

    B. Julia,Infinite Lie algebras in physics, in5th Johns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Theory: Unified Field Theories and Beyond, pp. 23–41, 6, 1981

    1981

  7. [7]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison,On the Geroch Group,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.46(1987) 215

    1987

  8. [8]

    "Separation of Variables and Hamiltonian Formulation for the Ernst Equation"

    D. Korotkin and H. Nicolai,Separation of variables and Hamiltonian formulation for the Ernst equation,Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995) 1272–1275, [hep-th/9412072]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  9. [9]

    Isomonodromic Quantization of Dimensionally Reduced Gravity

    D. Korotkin and H. Nicolai,Isomonodromic quantization of dimensionally reduced gravity,Nucl. Phys. B475(1996) 397–439, [hep-th/9605144]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  10. [10]

    Quantization of coset space sigma-models coupled to two-dimensional gravity

    D. Korotkin and H. Samtleben,Quantization of coset space sigma models coupled to two-dimensional gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.190(1997) 411–457, [hep-th/9607095]. 40

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  11. [11]

    Poisson Realization and Quantization of the Geroch Group

    D. Korotkin and H. Samtleben,Poisson realization and quantization of the Geroch group,Class. Quant. Grav.14(1997) L151–L156, [gr-qc/9611061]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  12. [12]

    Yangian Symmetry in Integrable Quantum Gravity

    D. Korotkin and H. Samtleben,Yangian symmetry in integrable quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B527(1998) 657–689, [hep-th/9710210]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  13. [13]

    Nicolai,The Integrability ofN= 16Supergravity,Phys

    H. Nicolai,The Integrability ofN= 16Supergravity,Phys. Lett. B194(1987) 402

    1987

  14. [14]

    Nicolai and N

    H. Nicolai and N. P. Warner,The Structure ofN= 16Supergravity in Two-dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.125(1989) 369

    1989

  15. [15]

    E$_9$ exceptional field theory I. The potential

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt, and H. Samtleben,E 9 exceptional field theory. Part I. The potential,JHEP03(2019) 089, [arXiv:1811.04088]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt, and H. Samtleben,E 9 exceptional field theory. Part II. The complete dynamics,JHEP05(2021) 107, [arXiv:2103.12118]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, and A. Kleinschmidt,Maximal D = 2 supergravities from higher dimensions,JHEP01(2024) 046, [arXiv:2309.07232]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    L. T. Cole and P. Weck,Integrability in gravity from Chern-Simons theory,JHEP 10(2024) 080, [arXiv:2407.08782]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Costello and M

    K. Costello and M. Yamazaki,Gauge Theory And Integrability, III, arXiv:1908.02289

    work page arXiv 1908

  20. [20]

    Vicedo,4D Chern–Simons theory and affine Gaudin models,Lett

    B. Vicedo,4D Chern–Simons theory and affine Gaudin models,Lett. Math. Phys. 111(2021), no. 1 24, [arXiv:1908.07511]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Delduc, S

    F. Delduc, S. Lacroix, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo,A unifying 2d action for integrable σ-models from 4d Chern-Simons theory,arXiv:1909.13824

    work page arXiv 1909

  22. [22]

    Babelon, D

    O. Babelon, D. Bernard, and M. Talon,Introduction to Classical Integrable Systems. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    2003

  23. [23]

    Dorey, G

    P. Dorey, G. Korchemsky, N. Nekrasov, V. Schomerus, D. Serban, and L. Cugliandolo, eds.,Integrability: From Statistical Systems to Gauge Theory, vol. 106 ofLecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School. Oxford University Press, 7, 2019. 41

    2019

  24. [24]

    An Integrability Primer for the Gauge-Gravity Correspondence: an Introduction

    D. Bombardelli, A. Cagnazzo, R. Frassek, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, F. Loebbert, S. Negro, I. M. Szecsenyi, A. Sfondrini, S. J. van Tongeren, and A. Torrielli,An integrability primer for the gauge-gravity correspondence: An introduction,J. Phys. A49(2016), no. 32 320301, [arXiv:1606.02945]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview

    N. Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,Lett. Math. Phys. 99(2012) 3–32, [arXiv:1012.3982]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik,N=3 supersymmetric Born-Infeld theory,Nucl. Phys. B618(2001) 3–20, [hep-th/0110074]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  27. [27]

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik,New representation for Lagrangians of selfdual nonlinear electrodynamics, in4th International Workshop on Supersymmetry and Quantum Symmetries: 16th Max Born Symposium, pp. 235–250, 2002. hep-th/0202203

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  28. [28]

    Borsato, C

    R. Borsato, C. Ferko, and A. Sfondrini,Classical integrability of root-TT¯flows, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 8 086011, [arXiv:2209.14274]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Ferko, S

    C. Ferko, S. M. Kuzenko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Duality-invariant nonlinear electrodynamics and stress tensor flows,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023), no. 10 106021, [arXiv:2309.04253]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Ferko and L

    C. Ferko and L. Smith,Infinite Family of Integrable Sigma Models Using Auxiliary Fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 13 131602, [arXiv:2405.05899]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Fukushima and K

    O. Fukushima and K. Yoshida,4D Chern-Simons theory with auxiliary fields,JHEP 09(2025) 001, [arXiv:2407.02204]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,hep-th/0401146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    $T \bar{T}$-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories

    A. Cavagli` a, S. Negro, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi, and R. Tateo,T¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,JHEP10(2016) 112, [arXiv:1608.05534]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Ferko, A

    C. Ferko, A. Sfondrini, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Root-T ¯T Deformations in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022), no. 20 201604, [arXiv:2206.10515]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory,Commun

    Y. Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory,Commun. Theor. Phys.73(2021), no. 5 057201, [arXiv:1904.13376]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    S. He, Y. Li, H. Ouyang, and Y. Sun,T Tdeformation: Introduction and some recent advances,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68(2025), no. 10 101001, [arXiv:2503.09997]. 42

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,On space of integrable quantum field theories,Nucl. Phys. B915(2017) 363–383, [arXiv:1608.05499]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Integrable higher-spin deformations of sigma models from auxiliary fields,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 6 066010, [arXiv:2407.16338]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, M. Galli, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Higher-spin currents and flows in auxiliary field sigma models,JHEP08(2025) 078, [arXiv:2504.17294]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,T Duality and TT¯-like Deformations of Sigma Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 10 101601, [arXiv:2407.11636]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Auxiliary field sigma models and Yang-Baxter deformations,JHEP05(2025) 223, [arXiv:2408.09714]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Ces` aro, A

    M. Ces` aro, A. Kleinschmidt, and D. Osten,Integrable auxiliary field deformations of coset models,JHEP11(2024) 028, [arXiv:2409.04523]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Auxiliary field deformations of (semi-)symmetric space sigma models,JHEP01(2025) 096, [arXiv:2409.05704]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Ces` aro and D

    M. Ces` aro and D. Osten,Integrable deformations of dimensionally reduced gravity, JHEP06(2025) 064, [arXiv:2502.01750]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Ferko, M

    C. Ferko, M. Galli, Z. Huang, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Soliton surfaces and the geometry of integrable deformations of theCP N−1 model,JHEP03(2026) 144, [arXiv:2509.05081]

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Baglioni, D

    N. Baglioni, D. Bielli, M. Galli, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,Relating auxiliary field formulations of4dduality-invariant and2dintegrable field theories, arXiv:2512.21982

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    The classical Yangian symmetry of Auxiliary Field Sigma Models

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, M. Galli, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli,The classical Yangian symmetry of Auxiliary Field Sigma Models,arXiv:2605.18213

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik,New approach to nonlinear electrodynamics: Dualities as symmetries of interaction,Phys. Atom. Nucl.67(2004) 2188–2199, [hep-th/0303192]. 43

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  49. [49]

    Higher Derivative Corrections, Dimensional Reduction and Ehlers Duality

    Y. Michel and B. Pioline,Higher derivative corrections, dimensional reduction and Ehlers duality,JHEP09(2007) 103, [arXiv:0706.1769]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Enhanced Coset Symmetries and Higher Derivative Corrections

    N. Lambert and P. C. West,Enhanced Coset Symmetries and Higher Derivative Corrections,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 065002, [hep-th/0603255]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    Duality Groups, Automorphic Forms and Higher Derivative Corrections

    N. Lambert and P. C. West,Duality Groups, Automorphic Forms and Higher Derivative Corrections,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 066002, [hep-th/0611318]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    L. Bao, M. Cederwall, and B. E. W. Nilsson,Aspects of higher curvature terms and U-duality,Class. Quant. Grav.25(2008) 095001, [arXiv:0706.1183]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    Ehlers symmetry at the next derivative order

    C. Colonnello and A. Kleinschmidt,Ehlers symmetry at the next derivative order, JHEP08(2007) 078, [arXiv:0706.2816]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B 37(1971) 95–97

    1971

  55. [55]

    S. P. Novikov,The Hamiltonian formalism and a many valued analog of Morse theory,Usp. Mat. Nauk37N5(1982), no. 5 3–49

    1982

  56. [56]

    Witten,Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,Commun

    E. Witten,Nonabelian Bosonization in Two-Dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys.92 (1984) 455–472

    1984

  57. [57]

    Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-models and dS/AdS T-duality

    C. Klimcik,Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality,JHEP12(2002) 051, [hep-th/0210095]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  58. [58]

    On integrability of the Yang-Baxter $\si$-model

    C. Klimcik,On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model,J. Math. Phys.50 (2009) 043508, [arXiv:0802.3518]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  59. [59]

    Integrability of the bi-Yang-Baxter sigma-model

    C. Klimˇ c´ ık,Integrability of the bi-Yang-Baxter sigma-model,Lett. Math. Phys.104 (2014) 1095–1106, [arXiv:1402.2105]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals

    K. Sfetsos,Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals, Nucl. Phys. B880(2014) 225–246, [arXiv:1312.4560]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    Integrability in Sigma-Models

    K. Zarembo,Integrability in Sigma-Models,arXiv:1712.07725

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    Integrable models with twist function and affine Gaudin models

    S. Lacroix,Integrable models with twist function and affine Gaudin models. PhD thesis, Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure, 2018.arXiv:1809.06811

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Hoare,Integrable deformations of sigma models,J

    B. Hoare,Integrable deformations of sigma models,J. Phys. A55(2022), no. 9 093001, [arXiv:2109.14284]. 44

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Borsato,Lecture notes on current–current deformations,Eur

    R. Borsato,Lecture notes on current–current deformations,Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024), no. 6 648, [arXiv:2312.13847]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Integrable sigma models with Haantjes structure on ${H_{4}}$ Lie group

    M. Bahadori, A. Eghbali, and A. Rezaei-Aghdam,Integrable sigma models with Haantjes structure onH 4 Lie group,Nucl. Phys. B1028(2026) 117491, [arXiv:2605.20851]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  66. [66]

    Nicolai,Two-dimensional gravities and supergravities as integrable system,Lect

    H. Nicolai,Two-dimensional gravities and supergravities as integrable system,Lect. Notes Phys.396(1991) 231–273

    1991

  67. [67]

    Integrable Classical and Quantum Gravity

    H. Nicolai, D. Korotkin, and H. Samtleben,Integrable classical and quantum gravity, inNATO Advanced Study Institute on Quantum Fields and Quantum Space Time, pp. 203–243, 12, 1996.hep-th/9612065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  68. [68]

    Selfduality of d=2 Reduction of Gravity Coupled to a Sigma-Model

    L. Paulot,Selfduality of d=2 reduction of gravity coupled to a sigma-model,Phys. Lett. B609(2005) 367–371, [hep-th/0412157]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  69. [69]

    Weyl,Electron and Gravitation

    H. Weyl,Electron and Gravitation. 1. (In German),Z. Phys.56(1929) 330–352

    1929

  70. [70]

    J. W. Maluf,The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity,Annalen Phys.525 (2013) 339–357, [arXiv:1303.3897]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Non-linear parent action and dual gravity

    N. Boulanger and O. Hohm,Non-linear parent action and dual gravity,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 064027, [arXiv:0806.2775]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  72. [72]

    Duality in linearized gravity

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,Duality in linearized gravity,Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 024018, [gr-qc/0408101]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  73. [73]

    Gravitational Electric-Magnetic Duality, Gauge Invariance and Twisted Self-Duality

    C. Bunster, M. Henneaux, and S. Hortner,Gravitational Electric-Magnetic Duality, Gauge Invariance and Twisted Self-Duality,J. Phys. A46(2013) 214016, [arXiv:1207.1840]. [Erratum: J.Phys.A 46, 269501 (2013)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  74. [74]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschits,The Classical Theory of Fields, vol. Volume 2 of Course of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975

    1975

  75. [75]

    Krssak, R

    M. Krssak, R. J. van den Hoogen, J. G. Pereira, C. G. B¨ ohmer, and A. A. Coley, Teleparallel theories of gravity: illuminating a fully invariant approach,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 18 183001, [arXiv:1810.12932]

    work page arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Coller,On the Localization of the energy of a physical system in the general theory of relativity,Annals Phys.4(1958) 347–371

    C. Coller,On the Localization of the energy of a physical system in the general theory of relativity,Annals Phys.4(1958) 347–371

    1958

  77. [77]

    Consistent Interactions Between Gauge Fields: The Cohomological Approach

    M. Henneaux,Consistent interactions between gauge fields: The Cohomological approach,Contemp. Math.219(1998) 93–110, [hep-th/9712226]. 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  78. [78]

    Local BRST cohomology in Einstein--Yang--Mills theory

    G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux,Local BRST cohomology in Einstein Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B455(1995) 357–408, [hep-th/9505173]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  79. [79]

    Modified teleparallel gravity: inflation without inflaton

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini,Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without inflaton, Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 084031, [gr-qc/0610067]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  80. [80]

    On Born-Infeld Gravity in Weitzenbock spacetime

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini,On Born-Infeld Gravity in Weitzenbock spacetime,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 124019, [arXiv:0812.1981]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

Showing first 80 references.