REVIEW 2 cited by
Sub-Sentence Encoder: Contrastive Learning of Propositional Semantic Representations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce sub-sentence encoder, a contrastively-learned contextual embedding model for fine-grained semantic representation of text. In contrast to the standard practice with sentence embeddings, where the meaning of an entire sequence of text is encoded into a fixed-length vector, the sub-sentence encoder learns to produce distinct contextual embeddings corresponding to different atomic propositions, i.e. atomic units of meaning expressed within a text sequence. The sub-sentence embeddings are contrastively learned to recognize (inferred) semantic equivalence between propositions across different text sequences. Our experiments show the effectiveness of sub-sentence encoders in applications, such as retrieving supporting facts for fine-grained text attribution or recognizing the conditional semantic similarity between texts. In practice, we demonstrate that sub-sentence encoders keep the same level of inference cost and space complexity compared to sentence encoders.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Evaluate Summarization in Fine-Granularity: Auto Evaluation with LLM
SumAutoEval is an LLM-based entity-level summarization evaluator with four dimensions; its claimed human-correlation advantage is not consistently supported by the experiments.
-
DnDScore: Decontextualization and Decomposition for Factuality Verification in Long-Form Text Generation
Factuality scores for long-form text depend heavily on how decomposition and decontextualization are ordered; the new DnDScore verifies atomic subclaims together with their decontextualized context.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.