Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MadMiner: Machine learning-based inference for particle physics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.10621 v2 pith:OY575D4N submitted 2019-07-24 hep-ph hep-exphysics.data-anstat.ML

classification hep-phhep-exphysics.data-anstat.ML
keywords physicsmadmineranalysisarounddatadetectorhigh-dimensionalinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Precision measurements at the LHC often require analyzing high-dimensional event data for subtle kinematic signatures, which is challenging for established analysis methods. Recently, a powerful family of multivariate inference techniques that leverage both matrix element information and machine learning has been developed. This approach neither requires the reduction of high-dimensional data to summary statistics nor any simplifications to the underlying physics or detector response. In this paper we introduce MadMiner, a Python module that streamlines the steps involved in this procedure. Wrapping around MadGraph5_aMC and Pythia 8, it supports almost any physics process and model. To aid phenomenological studies, the tool also wraps around Delphes 3, though it is extendable to a full Geant4-based detector simulation. We demonstrate the use of MadMiner in an example analysis of dimension-six operators in ttH production, finding that the new techniques substantially increase the sensitivity to new physics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higgs Signal Strength Estimation with Machine Learning under Systematic Uncertainties

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAGE, a dual-branch GNN trained under nuisance fluctuations, estimates the Higgs signal strength with near-nominal coverage (0.662-0.683) but wider intervals than the top FAIR-HUC leaderboard methods.

  2. Unbinning global LHC analyses

    hep-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Simulation-based inference produces stronger combined LHC constraints on SMEFT Wilson coefficients than histogram-based inference for four di-boson processes.

  3. Communicating Likelihoods with Normalising Flows

    hep-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A normalizing-flow workflow compresses sample-based likelihoods into small files, validated with a radial Kolmogorov-Smirnov test on three high-energy physics examples.

Pith tools