Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.13933 v4 pith:OYZCPGHH submitted 2023-09-25 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords algorithmichiringfairnessworkbiasedmultidisciplinarysurveytechnology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Employers are adopting algorithmic hiring technology throughout the recruitment pipeline. Algorithmic fairness is especially applicable in this domain due to its high stakes and structural inequalities. Unfortunately, most work in this space provides partial treatment, often constrained by two competing narratives, optimistically focused on replacing biased recruiter decisions or pessimistically pointing to the automation of discrimination. Whether, and more importantly what types of, algorithmic hiring can be less biased and more beneficial to society than low-tech alternatives currently remains unanswered, to the detriment of trustworthiness. This multidisciplinary survey caters to practitioners and researchers with a balanced and integrated coverage of systems, biases, measures, mitigation strategies, datasets, and legal aspects of algorithmic hiring and fairness. Our work supports a contextualized understanding and governance of this technology by highlighting current opportunities and limitations, providing recommendations for future work to ensure shared benefits for all stakeholders.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Synthetic CVs To Build and Test Fairness-Aware Hiring Tools

    cs.CY 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new synthetic CV dataset, generated from donated real CVs, is proposed as a benchmark for fairness-aware algorithmic hiring research.

  2. A Tutorial On Intersectionality in Fair Rankings

    cs.CY 2025-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A tutorial and comparative review showing that fairness-aware ranking should consider multiple protected attributes together, and that intersectional correction need not destroy ranking utility.

Pith tools