Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benign Overfitting in Classification: Provably Counter Label Noise with Larger Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.00501 v2 pith:P62N22PW submitted 2022-06-01 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords benignoverfittinganalysisbenignlyclassificationimagenetlabellarger
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Studies on benign overfitting provide insights for the success of overparameterized deep learning models. In this work, we examine whether overfitting is truly benign in real-world classification tasks. We start with the observation that a ResNet model overfits benignly on Cifar10 but not benignly on ImageNet. To understand why benign overfitting fails in the ImageNet experiment, we theoretically analyze benign overfitting under a more restrictive setup where the number of parameters is not significantly larger than the number of data points. Under this mild overparameterization setup, our analysis identifies a phase change: unlike in the previous heavy overparameterization settings, benign overfitting can now fail in the presence of label noise. Our analysis explains our empirical observations, and is validated by a set of control experiments with ResNets. Our work highlights the importance of understanding implicit bias in underfitting regimes as a future direction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Instance-dependent Early Stopping

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    IES removes already-mastered training examples from backpropagation using a threshold on the second-order difference of their loss, achieving comparable accuracy with 10-50% less backpropagation.

Pith tools