pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.15752 · v3 · pith:P744DQFUnew · submitted 2025-04-22 · 🧮 math.OC

On the complexity of proximal gradient and proximal gradient-Newton-CG methods for \(ell₁\)-regularized Optimization

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords approximatesecond-ordermethodsproximalstationarycomplexityoptimizationpoint
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we propose two second-order methods for solving the \(\ell_1\)-regularized composite optimization problem, which are developed based on two distinct definitions of approximate second-order stationary points. We introduce a hybrid proximal gradient and negative curvature method, as well as an adaptive hybrid proximal gradient-Newton-CG method with negative curvature directions, to find a strong* approximate second-order stationary point and a weak approximate second-order stationary point for \(\ell_1\)-regularized optimization problems, respectively. Comprehensive analyses are provided regarding the iteration complexity, operation complexity (including gradient evaluations and Hessian-vector products), and the local superlinear convergence rates of the first phases of these two methods under specific error bound conditions. We demonstrate that the proximal gradient-Newton-CG method achieves the best-known iteration complexity for attaining the proposed weak approximate second-order stationary point, which is consistent with results for finding an approximate second-order stationary point in unconstrained optimization. Through a toy example, we show that our proposed methods can effectively escape first-order approximate solution. Numerical experiments implemented on the \(\ell_1\)-regularized Student's t-regression problem validate the effectiveness of both methods.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.