Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Study on Developer Behaviors for Validating and Repairing LLM-Generated Code Using Eye Tracking and IDE Actions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.16081 v1 pith:PG2HEXAC submitted 2024-05-25 cs.SE cs.HC

classification cs.SEcs.HC
keywords codedevelopersllm-generatedcopilotprovenancesoftwarebehaviorscognitive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing use of large language model (LLM)-powered code generation tools, such as GitHub Copilot, is transforming software engineering practices. This paper investigates how developers validate and repair code generated by Copilot and examines the impact of code provenance awareness during these processes. We conducted a lab study with 28 participants, who were tasked with validating and repairing Copilot-generated code in three software projects. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: one informed about the provenance of LLM-generated code and the other not. We collected data on IDE interactions, eye-tracking, cognitive workload assessments, and conducted semi-structured interviews. Our results indicate that, without explicit information, developers often fail to identify the LLM origin of the code. Developers generally employ similar validation and repair strategies for LLM-generated code, but exhibit behaviors such as frequent switching between code and comments, different attentional focus, and a tendency to delete and rewrite code. Being aware of the code's provenance led to improved performance, increased search efforts, more frequent Copilot usage, and higher cognitive workload. These findings enhance our understanding of how developers interact with LLM-generated code and carry implications for designing tools that facilitate effective human-LLM collaboration in software development.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineering

    cs.SE 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    High-velocity agentic coding becomes governable when engineers convert recurring structural failures into durable, machine-actionable governance mechanisms rather than relying on continuous human code review.

  2. Risk Assessment Framework for Code LLMs via Leveraging Internal States

    cs.SE 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PtTrust pre-trains a sparse autoencoder on LLM hidden states at line boundaries, then trains a small ranker to identify erroneous code lines, reporting state-of-the-art cross-task and cross-language results.

Pith tools