Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On the Detectability of ChatGPT Content: Benchmarking, Methodology, and Evaluation through the Lens of Academic Writing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.05524 v2 pith:PIJ26HKD submitted 2023-06-07 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords chatgptcontentacademicbenchmarkingcheckgptdetectabilitywritingabstracts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With ChatGPT under the spotlight, utilizing large language models (LLMs) to assist academic writing has drawn a significant amount of debate in the community. In this paper, we aim to present a comprehensive study of the detectability of ChatGPT-generated content within the academic literature, particularly focusing on the abstracts of scientific papers, to offer holistic support for the future development of LLM applications and policies in academia. Specifically, we first present GPABench2, a benchmarking dataset of over 2.8 million comparative samples of human-written, GPT-written, GPT-completed, and GPT-polished abstracts of scientific writing in computer science, physics, and humanities and social sciences. Second, we explore the methodology for detecting ChatGPT content. We start by examining the unsatisfactory performance of existing ChatGPT detecting tools and the challenges faced by human evaluators (including more than 240 researchers or students). We then test the hand-crafted linguistic features models as a baseline and develop a deep neural framework named CheckGPT to better capture the subtle and deep semantic and linguistic patterns in ChatGPT written literature. Last, we conduct comprehensive experiments to validate the proposed CheckGPT framework in each benchmarking task over different disciplines. To evaluate the detectability of ChatGPT content, we conduct extensive experiments on the transferability, prompt engineering, and robustness of CheckGPT.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stylometry recognizes human and LLM-generated texts in short samples

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Stylometric features and tree-based classifiers separate human-written Wikipedia summaries from LLM-generated texts with high cross-validated accuracy on a new seven-class benchmark, though performance drops on other ...

  2. StylOch at PAN: Gradient-Boosted Trees with Frequency-Based Stylometric Features

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A non-neural stylometric detector using LightGBM on spaCy-derived features reached a final mean score of 0.897 on the PAN 2025 task, below the 0.922 TF-IDF SVM baseline.

Pith tools