pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21536 · v1 · pith:PPAZR5TInew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 📊 stat.AP

High-Volume Plaintiff-Side Counsel and Single-Appearance Eviction Cases in Philadelphia

Marios Papamichalis , Regina Ruane This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 01:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.AP
keywords evictionlandlord-tenanthigh-volume counselsingle-appearance casesPhiladelphiacase outcomesfiling volumedefault judgment
0
0 comments X

The pith

High-volume landlord lawyers in Philadelphia evictions increase filing volume and reach but show no broad rise in tenant defaults or judgments once the same landlord and property are compared.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether high-volume plaintiff counsel in eviction cases produces systematically worse results for tenants who appear only once. Using 755,000 Philadelphia records and focusing on within-plaintiff and within-plaintiff-at-same-property comparisons, it finds no consistent premium on defaults, judgments, or fees after a landlord switches to such counsel. The clearest effect is organizational: monthly filings and the number of distinct buildings reached each rise by roughly 2-5 percent. A reader cares because the result separates the volume of eviction activity from the severity of any single case outcome and therefore changes how one might target policy on tenant representation or counsel regulation.

Core claim

Analysis of 396,163 single-appearance residential eviction cases shows that unadjusted comparisons link high-volume counsel to further procedural advancement, yet the same-plaintiff and same-plaintiff-same-property contrasts eliminate any broad premium on default, judgment, or fee outcomes. After a plaintiff adopts or switches into high-volume counsel, monthly filings rise 2-5 percent and distinct buildings reached increase by a similar margin. Continuances under specialist counsel correlate more closely with default, while local differences appear near the prior-year top-10 attorney threshold. The paper concludes that high-volume counsel operates primarily as a mechanism of filing scale and

What carries the argument

Within-plaintiff and within-plaintiff-at-same-property comparisons that hold landlord identity and property fixed while measuring changes after adoption of high-volume counsel.

If this is right

  • Landlords increase monthly eviction filings by 2-5 percent and reach more buildings after adopting high-volume counsel without producing higher default or judgment rates in matched comparisons.
  • Single-appearance by tenants is not produced by high-volume counsel itself.
  • Continuances handled by specialist counsel are more strongly associated with eventual default than continuances under other counsel.
  • Local differences in default and enforcement appear near the threshold for top-10 attorney volume.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Efforts to restrict high-volume eviction counsel might reduce overall filing volume without necessarily improving the outcome distribution inside the cases that still occur.
  • The scale of a landlord's eviction activity may matter more for neighborhood-level displacement than the procedural aggressiveness of counsel in any one case.
  • Similar within-plaintiff designs could be applied to other high-volume legal services such as debt collection or foreclosure to test whether scale effects dominate outcome effects elsewhere.

Load-bearing premise

The within-plaintiff and within-plaintiff-at-same-property comparisons sufficiently control for selection effects, plaintiff strategy changes, and unmeasured confounders that could otherwise explain differences in case outcomes or filing volume.

What would settle it

A finding that, for the identical landlord at the identical property, default rates or writ-of-possession rates rise sharply and persistently after switching to high-volume counsel would falsify the claim of no broad premium on adverse outcomes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21536 by Marios Papamichalis, Regina Ruane.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Three components of the single-appearance result. (A) Unadjusted ladder: specialist [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Synthesis of the single-appearance tenant results. Panel A shows the unadjusted outcome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Among 755,004 Philadelphia landlord--tenant records filed during 1969-2022, 396,163 residential cases involve tenants who appear exactly once in the observed docket. In unadjusted comparisons, single-appearance cases handled by high-volume plaintiff-side counsel are more likely to advance to the writ-of-possession and served-writ stages, but no more likely to end in default. Comparisons within the same plaintiff, and within the same plaintiff at the same property, show no broad premium on adverse case outcomes such as default, judgment, or fees. The clearer pattern is organizational: after a plaintiff adopts or switches into high-volume counsel, monthly filings rise by about 2-5% and the number of distinct buildings reached rises by a similar margin; near the prior-year top-10 attorney threshold, cases display local differences in default and enforcement; and continuances under specialist counsel are more closely linked to default. Non-flat pre-treatment trends and imprecise reverse-direction estimates from attorney exits restrict the strength of any causal claim. High-volume plaintiff-side counsel therefore functions as a mechanism of filing scale and procedural sequence, not as a uniform escalator of case outcomes or as a cause of any individual tenant becoming single-appearance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes 755,004 Philadelphia landlord-tenant records (1969-2022), focusing on 396,163 single-appearance residential cases. Unadjusted comparisons indicate high-volume plaintiff-side counsel cases are more likely to reach writ-of-possession and served-writ stages but not default. Within-plaintiff and within-plaintiff-at-same-property comparisons show no broad premium on adverse outcomes such as default, judgment, or fees. Adoption of high-volume counsel is associated with 2-5% increases in monthly filings and distinct buildings reached. Local differences appear near the prior-year top-10 threshold, and continuances under specialist counsel link more closely to default. Non-flat pre-treatment trends and imprecise attorney-exit estimates limit causal claims. The authors conclude high-volume counsel operates as a filing-scale and procedural mechanism rather than a uniform escalator of outcomes or cause of single-appearance cases.

Significance. If the within-plaintiff comparisons hold after addressing selection, the results offer important descriptive evidence that high-volume counsel primarily expands filing volume and procedural reach without systematically worsening tenant outcomes in eviction dockets. This has direct relevance for housing court policy, legal services allocation, and understanding organizational drivers of eviction volume. The use of administrative records over five decades and explicit acknowledgment of pre-trend and exit-estimate limitations are strengths that support the paper's contribution to empirical work on plaintiff-side representation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and within-plaintiff comparisons] Abstract and identification discussion: the claim that within-plaintiff and within-plaintiff-at-same-property comparisons show 'no broad premium' on default, judgment, or fees rests on the assumption that counsel adoption is conditionally independent of time-varying case factors (tenant responsiveness, enforcement priority, or plaintiff strategy shifts). The abstract's explicit note of non-flat pre-treatment trends for filing-scale results raises a parallel risk for the outcome comparisons; without additional robustness checks (e.g., trend controls or leads/lags around adoption), the null could reflect residual selection rather than a true absence of effect.
  2. [Filing volume and adoption results] The central organizational claim (2-5% rise in filings and buildings reached post-adoption) is load-bearing for the conclusion that counsel functions as a 'mechanism of filing scale.' Given the acknowledged non-flat pre-trends, the manuscript should report the exact specification for these volume regressions, including any plaintiff fixed effects, time trends, or property-level controls, and test sensitivity to the high-volume threshold definition.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Data and variable construction] Define the high-volume counsel threshold more explicitly (e.g., exact case-volume cutoff or top-10 ranking rule) and note how it is held constant or updated across the 1969-2022 span.
  2. [Procedural sequence results] The statement that 'continuances under specialist counsel are more closely linked to default' would benefit from the specific coefficient or marginal effect and the comparison group used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recommendation of minor revision. We address each major comment below and will make the suggested changes to improve transparency and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and within-plaintiff comparisons] Abstract and identification discussion: the claim that within-plaintiff and within-plaintiff-at-same-property comparisons show 'no broad premium' on default, judgment, or fees rests on the assumption that counsel adoption is conditionally independent of time-varying case factors (tenant responsiveness, enforcement priority, or plaintiff strategy shifts). The abstract's explicit note of non-flat pre-treatment trends for filing-scale results raises a parallel risk for the outcome comparisons; without additional robustness checks (e.g., trend controls or leads/lags around adoption), the null could reflect residual selection rather than a true absence of effect.

    Authors: We agree that the within-plaintiff comparisons rest on the assumption of conditional independence from time-varying factors and that the noted non-flat pre-trends for the filing results create a parallel concern for the outcome analyses. While the manuscript already flags these limitations, we will add robustness checks in the revision, including plaintiff-specific linear time trends and leads/lags specifications around adoption dates, to further assess whether the null results on default, judgment, and fees hold after these controls. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Filing volume and adoption results] The central organizational claim (2-5% rise in filings and buildings reached post-adoption) is load-bearing for the conclusion that counsel functions as a 'mechanism of filing scale.' Given the acknowledged non-flat pre-trends, the manuscript should report the exact specification for these volume regressions, including any plaintiff fixed effects, time trends, or property-level controls, and test sensitivity to the high-volume threshold definition.

    Authors: We agree that greater detail on the volume regression specifications is needed given the pre-trend limitations. In the revised manuscript we will report the full regression tables, explicitly describing the plaintiff fixed effects, time controls or trends, and property-level variables used. We will also add sensitivity analyses that vary the high-volume threshold (e.g., top-5 and top-15 definitions) to confirm the robustness of the 2-5% estimates. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational fixed-effects comparisons on administrative data

full rationale

The paper reports direct empirical estimates from 755,004 Philadelphia eviction records using within-plaintiff and within-plaintiff-at-same-property comparisons. These are standard fixed-effects style contrasts on observed outcomes (default, judgment, fees, filings) and do not reduce any reported result to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition by construction. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that equate outputs to inputs. The analysis is self-contained against the docket data with explicit caveats on pre-treatment trends and causal strength.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on administrative court data completeness over 53 years and the validity of single-appearance as a meaningful category; no new physical or mathematical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • High-volume counsel threshold
    Definition of high-volume plaintiff-side counsel (e.g., top-10 ranking or volume cutoff) is used to categorize cases and is chosen rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Single-appearance tenant cases form a coherent analytical category that isolates meaningful variation in procedural outcomes.
    The paper centers its analysis on the 396,163 cases where tenants appear exactly once, treating this as a stable lens for examining counsel effects.
  • domain assumption Within-plaintiff and within-plaintiff-at-same-property comparisons adequately isolate counsel effects from plaintiff-specific strategies and property characteristics.
    This matching strategy underpins the claim of no broad outcome premium and is invoked to move from unadjusted to adjusted comparisons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5746 in / 1515 out tokens · 50017 ms · 2026-05-22T01:46:06.833864+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

154 extracted references · 154 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Rural Inclusion in AI Policy: Rural Disadvantage in Policy Participation , author=

    work page

  2. [2]

    Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , pages=

    Gaps in artificial intelligence research for rural health in the United States: a scoping review , author=. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    2025 , note =

    Andrew Aitken , title =. 2025 , note =

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Sensors , volume=

    Toward the next generation of digitalization in agriculture based on digital twin paradigm , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Frontiers in Blockchain , volume=

    What blockchain are we talking about? An analytical framework for understanding blockchain applications in agriculture and food , author=. Frontiers in Blockchain , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    2025 , publisher=

    ICT for Rural Development: Bridging the Digital Divide , author=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Oxford Intersections:

    Jasmine McNealy , title =. Oxford Intersections:. 2025 , doi =

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Brown and Sharon E

    Katherine E. Brown and Sharon E. Davis , title =. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , year =. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaf206 , note =

    work page doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaf206

  9. [9]

    Preprints , volume =

    Emmanuel Idowu , title =. Preprints , volume =. 2025 , note =

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09653 , year=

    Recognizing Every Voice: Towards Inclusive ASR for Rural Bhojpuri Women , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09653 , year=

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Patient Preference and Adherence , volume =

    Jeong-Hui Park and Min Jee Lee and Meng-Han Tsai and Huan-Ju Shih and Jongwha Chang , title =. Patient Preference and Adherence , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Bhogale and Nikhil Narasimhan and Mitesh M

    Sakshi Joshi and Eldho Ittan George and Tahir Javed and Kaushal S. Bhogale and Nikhil Narasimhan and Mitesh M. Khapra , title =. Proceedings of Interspeech 2025 , year =

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Digital Health , volume=

    When telehealth fails rural communities: The 40\ author=. Digital Health , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Frontiers in Education , volume=

    Empowering educational leaders for AI integration in rural STEM education: challenges and strategies , author=. Frontiers in Education , volume=. 2025 , organization=

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Science , volume=

    Realizing the potential of digital development: The case of agricultural advice , author=. Science , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Journal of monetary economics , volume=

    Will the AI revolution cause a great divergence? , author=. Journal of monetary economics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Lending My Voice to AI: Exploring How Data Cooperatives Enable Social Impact , author=

    work page

  18. [18]

    A Call to Action for Closing the Digital Access, Design, and Use Divides—2024 National Educational Technology Plan , author=

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    JAMIA open , volume=

    Social vulnerability, lower broadband internet access, and rurality associated with lower telemedicine use in US Counties , author=. JAMIA open , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Jama , volume=

    Geographic distribution of US cohorts used to train deep learning algorithms , author=. Jama , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Intelligent Hospital , pages=

    Telehealth in rural areas: bridging the gaps through policy drivers , author=. Intelligent Hospital , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    PLOS Digital Health , volume=

    Eliminating the AI digital divide by building local capacity , author=. PLOS Digital Health , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Scientific African , volume=

    Exploring digital transforming challenges in rural areas of South Africa through a systematic review of empirical studies , author=. Scientific African , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Journal of rural studies , volume=

    Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas , author=. Journal of rural studies , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    PLOS digital health , volume=

    Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review , author=. PLOS digital health , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP World

    The state and fate of linguistic diversity and inclusion in the NLP world , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09095 , year=

    work page arXiv 2004

  27. [27]

    PLOS Digital Health , volume=

    Community-engaged artificial intelligence research: a scoping review , author=. PLOS Digital Health , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Computer , volume=

    The emergence of edge computing , author=. Computer , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Artificial intelligence and statistics , pages=

    Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data , author=. Artificial intelligence and statistics , pages=. 2017 , organization=

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Foundations and trends

    Advances and open problems in federated learning , author=. Foundations and trends. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Data Cooperatives: Towards a Foundation for Decentralized Personal Data Management

    Data cooperatives: Towards a foundation for decentralized personal data management , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.08819 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  32. [32]

    Big Data & Society , volume=

    Emerging models of data governance in the age of datafication , author=. Big Data & Society , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    2021 , month = nov, day =

    Khojasteh, Maryam , title =. 2021 , month = nov, day =

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    2024 , publisher=

    Beyond connectivity: The role of broadband in rural economic growth and resilience , author=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Telecommunications Policy , volume=

    Broadband׳ s contribution to economic growth in rural areas: Moving towards a causal relationship , author=. Telecommunications Policy , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Econ Focus , volume=

    Features: The Philanthropy Gap in Rural America , author=. Econ Focus , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    2021 , publisher=

    Rural Blind Spot , author=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    2026 , url =

    Computational Social Science Lab , author =. 2026 , url =

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    2026 , url =

    Computational Social Science for Business , author =. 2026 , url =

    work page 2026

  40. [40]

    2026 , url =

    AI + Society , author =. 2026 , url =

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    2026 , url =

    Micro and Nano Fluidics Lab , author =. 2026 , url =

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    2026 , url =

    Point of Care Diagnostics (Lab on Chip) , author =. 2026 , url =

    work page 2026

  43. [43]

    Kagan Research Group , author =

    Cherie R. Kagan Research Group , author =. 2026 , url =

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    2026 , url =

    Charlotte Ren, PhD (Faculty Profile) , author =. 2026 , url =

    work page 2026

  45. [45]

    Telecom , volume=

    Navigating the Future of Education: A Review on Telecommunications and AI Technologies, Ethical Implications, and Equity Challenges , author=. Telecom , volume=. 2026 , organization=

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    2025 , url =

    Andrew Aitken , title =. 2025 , url =

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Brown and Sharon E

    Katherine E. Brown and Sharon E. Davis , title =. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , year =

    work page

  48. [48]

    Brown and Bradley A

    Katherine E. Brown and Bradley A. Malin and Sharon E. Davis , title =. medRxiv , year =

    work page

  49. [50]

    George and Tahir Javed and Kaushal Bhogale and Nikhil Narasimhan and Mitesh M

    Sakshi Joshi and Eldho I. George and Tahir Javed and Kaushal Bhogale and Nikhil Narasimhan and Mitesh M. Khapra , title =. Proc.\ Interspeech 2025 , year =

    work page 2025

  50. [51]

    Andrew Aitken , title =

    work page

  51. [52]

    Preprints , volume =

    Emmanuel Idowu , title =. Preprints , volume =. doi:10.20944/preprints202504.1679.v1 , year =

    work page doi:10.20944/preprints202504.1679.v1

  52. [53]

    Bhogale and Nikhil Narasimhan and Mitesh M

    Sakshi Joshi and Eldho Ittan George and Tahir Javed and Kaushal S. Bhogale and Nikhil Narasimhan and Mitesh M. Khapra , title =. Proc. Interspeech 2025 , year =

    work page 2025

  53. [54]

    Preprints , volume =

    Tanuj Saxena and Sandeep Kumar , title =. Preprints , volume =. doi:10.20944/preprints202503.0090.v1 , year =

    work page doi:10.20944/preprints202503.0090.v1

  54. [55]

    IEEE Internet Computing , volume =

    Panos Patros and Melanie Ooi and Victoria Huang and Michael Mayo and Chris Anderson and Stephen Burroughs and Matt Baughman and Osama Almurshed and Omer Rana and Ryan Chard and Kyle Chard and Ian Foster , title =. IEEE Internet Computing , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    work page 2023

  55. [56]

    Foundation grants to rural areas from 2005 to 2010: Trends and patterns , author=

    work page 2005

  56. [57]

    Reimagining rural policy: Organizing federal assistance to maximize rural prosperity , author=

    work page

  57. [58]

    Nature Communications , year =

    Kim, Steven and Heo, Seong , title =. Nature Communications , year =

    work page

  58. [59]

    2024 , doi =

    Heo, Seong , title =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  59. [60]

    Sensors , year =

    Peladarinos, Nikolaos and Piromalis, Dimitrios and Cheimaras, Vasileios and Tserepas, Efthymios and Munteanu, Radu Adrian and Papageorgas, Panagiotis , title =. Sensors , year =

    work page

  60. [61]

    Smart Agricultural Technology , year =

    Goldenits, Georg and Mallinger, Kevin and Raubitzek, Sebastian and Neubauer, Thomas , title =. Smart Agricultural Technology , year =

    work page

  61. [62]

    Bridging the Divide: A Tech-Based Economic Development Model for Rural America , institution =

    work page

  62. [63]

    Weinstein, Amanda and Erouart, May and Dewbury, Adam , title =

    work page

  63. [64]

    Econ Focus , year =

    Sablik, Tim , title =. Econ Focus , year =

    work page

  64. [65]

    Stanford Social Innovation Review , year =

    Atkins, Robert and Allred, Sarah and Hart, Daniel , title =. Stanford Social Innovation Review , year =

    work page

  65. [66]

    Brendan and Avent, Brendan and others , title =

    Kairouz, Peter and McMahan, H. Brendan and Avent, Brendan and others , title =. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning , year =

    work page

  66. [67]

    2019 , eprint =

    Hardjono, Thomas and Pentland, Alex , title =. 2019 , eprint =

    work page 2019

  67. [68]

    and Balch, Justin A

    Loftus, Tyler J. and Balch, Justin A. and Abbott, Karen L. and others , title =. PLOS Digital Health , year =

    work page

  68. [69]

    Nat'l Civic Rev

    Bridging the Divide: How Smaller Communities Can Thrive in the Tech Economy , author=. Nat'l Civic Rev. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

  69. [70]

    Journal of the Knowledge Economy , volume=

    Defining rural smartness and its impact: A systematic literature review , author=. Journal of the Knowledge Economy , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  70. [71]

    Housing Policy Debate , volume=

    Evictions: The hidden housing problem , author=. Housing Policy Debate , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    work page 2003

  71. [72]

    American economic review , volume=

    Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects , author=. American economic review , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    work page 2020

  72. [73]

    Journal of econometrics , volume=

    Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects , author=. Journal of econometrics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  73. [74]

    Journal of econometrics , volume=

    Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing , author=. Journal of econometrics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  74. [75]

    Journal of econometrics , volume=

    Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods , author=. Journal of econometrics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  75. [76]

    American journal of sociology , volume=

    Eviction and the reproduction of urban poverty , author=. American journal of sociology , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    work page 2012

  76. [77]

    Social forces , volume=

    Eviction's fallout: housing, hardship, and health , author=. Social forces , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    work page 2015

  77. [78]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Estimating eviction prevalence across the United States , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  78. [79]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    A comprehensive demographic profile of the US evicted population , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    work page 2023

  79. [80]

    Cityscape , volume=

    Estimating the prevalence of eviction in the United States , author=. Cityscape , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  80. [81]

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=

    Eviction and poverty in American cities , author=. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.