Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.08893 v1 pith:PRXHHE3N submitted 2020-02-20 hep-ph astro-ph.COcond-mat.mtrl-scihep-exphysics.ins-det

Comment on A dark matter interpretation of excesses in multiple direct detection experiments [arXiv:2002.06937]

classification hep-ph astro-ph.COcond-mat.mtrl-scihep-exphysics.ins-det
keywords arxivdarkdetectionmatterpossibleproposedsignalassume
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In their recent preprint [arXiv:2002.06937], Kurinsky, Baxter, Kahn, and Krnjaic assume an unphysical ionization yield for plasmon excitations in order to claim a possible dark matter signal. Their proposed signal is not possible based on known physics, but their proposed detection method warrants further investigation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.