REVIEW 1 cited by
Does Nature allow formation of ultra-compact black hole X-ray binaries via accretion-induced collapse of neutron stars?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The formation path to ultra-compact X-ray binaries (UCXBs) with black hole (BH) accretors is still unclear. In the classical formation scenario, it is difficult to eject the massive envelope of the progenitor star of the BH via common envelope process. Given that some neutron stars (NSs) in binary systems evidently have birth masses close to $\sim 2.0\;M_\odot$, we explore here the possibility that BH-UCXBs may form via accretion-induced collapse (AIC) of accreting NSs, assuming that these previously evolved in LMXBs to masses all the way up to the maximum limit of a NS. We demonstrate this formation path by modelling a few cases of NS-UCXBs with initial NS masses close to the maximum mass of a NS that evolve into BH-UCXBs after the NS accretes material from its He~WD companion. We follow the evolution of the post-AIC BH-UCXB and, based on simple arguments, we anticipate that there is about one BH-UCXB with an AIC origin and a He~WD donor within the current sample of known UCXBs and that 2--5 such BH-UCXBs may be detected in gravitational waves by LISA. In addition, we find that the X-ray luminosity of NS-UCXBs near their orbital period minimum exceeds $\sim 10^{39}\;{\rm erg\;s^{-1}}$ and thus such systems may appear as ultraluminous X-ray sources.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Helium-shell Burning Blue Horizontal Branch Star Produced from Common Envelope Evolution
Feige 64 is a 0.35 solar mass helium-shell-burning BHB star in a 0.826-day orbit with a 1.26 solar mass white dwarf, best explained as a common-envelope remnant.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.