pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.11564 · v3 · pith:PX2C4M6Gnew · submitted 2025-07-14 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Spacetime Grand Unified Theory

Gon\c{c}alo M. Quinta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 23:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords Standard Model derivation8-dimensional spacetimeClifford algebraSpin(8) trialityU(1) B-Lfour fermion familiesDirac LagrangianGrand Unified Theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Standard Model gauge group and U(1)_{B-L} emerge as natural redundancy when the 4D Dirac Clifford algebra is embedded in 8D spacetime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the full Standard Model from first principles starting with the free Dirac Lagrangian in eight-dimensional spacetime. Embedding the four-dimensional Clifford algebra into its eight-dimensional counterpart produces a redundancy that matches the SM gauge group together with an extra U(1) symmetry for B minus L. Fermions appear as Dirac spinors under this symmetry, giving four families that include right-handed neutrinos and whose mixing is confined to the first three. The strong force is tied to the triality automorphism of Spin(8), while weak interactions live in the observed four-dimensional Clifford algebra and strong interactions in the four extra dimensions. The resulting theory is anomaly free and contains no proton decay.

Core claim

Embedding the 4-dimensional Clifford algebra of the free Dirac Lagrangian into the Clifford algebra of 8-dimensional spacetime produces a natural redundancy described by the Standard Model gauge group and an additional U(1)_{B-L} symmetry. All known fermionic representations, augmented by right-handed neutrinos, arise as Dirac spinors transforming under this symmetry. Four particle families appear with mixing intrinsically restricted to the first three. The strong force arises from Spin(8) triality, chirality is the property of rotations left invariant by this automorphism, and internal and external symmetries act via right and left multiplications on the spinors respectively. Weak physics,

What carries the argument

The embedding of the 4-dimensional Clifford algebra of the Dirac Lagrangian into the Clifford algebra of 8-dimensional spacetime, which generates the SM gauge group plus U(1)_{B-L} as a natural redundancy.

If this is right

  • Four families of fermions arise, each with a right-handed neutrino.
  • Family mixing is restricted to the first three families by the algebraic structure.
  • The strong force is generated by the triality automorphism of Spin(8).
  • A U(3)_F family interaction and U(2)_L symmetry appear, with the latter gauging to a 4D left-handed spin connection.
  • U(3)_F breaking produces a mass hierarchy governed by a generalized Koide formula with modular scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The separation of weak and strong forces into the Clifford algebras of different dimensional sectors may offer a geometric route to confinement and electroweak breaking.
  • The modular character of the predicted mass scales could be tested against precision fermion-mass data to see whether the hierarchy continues to higher generations.
  • Realizing internal and external symmetries through left and right multiplications on the same spinors provides a concrete algebraic way to evade the usual no-go theorems for spacetime-internal unification.

Load-bearing premise

The embedding of the 4-dimensional Clifford algebra of the Dirac Lagrangian into the Clifford algebra of 8-dimensional spacetime carries a natural redundancy described by the SM gauge group.

What would settle it

Observation of a fourth fermion family that mixes appreciably with the first three families, or detection of proton decay, would directly contradict the predicted structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11564 by Gon\c{c}alo M. Quinta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: right-multiplying the νR ideal V1 by combinations of ω α leads to all possible flavours (up to a sign). Upwards direction is associated to multiplication by ω α and downwards by ω †α. Right: an alternative graph is obtained by right multiplication with combinations of spacetime vectors Γ0Γ 1 and iΓ 2 (up to a sign) and Witt basis vectors τα,a defined via V1τα,a = Ω(a)ω α (c.f. Sec. II of the Appendix… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Standard Model of particle physics is derived from first principles from the free Dirac Lagrangian in 8-dimensional spacetime. Motivated by second quantization arguments, we embed the 4-dimensional Clifford algebra of the Dirac Lagrangian into the Clifford algebra of 8-dimensional spacetime. We show this process carries a natural redundancy described by the SM gauge group and an additional $U(1)_{B-L}$ symmetry. All known fermionic particle representations, with additional right handed neutrinos, arise as Dirac spinors transforming under this symmetry. Four particle families are predicted with mixing intrinsically restricted to the first three, while avoiding common challenges related to a fourth family. The strong force arises from Spin(8) triality, with chirality emerging as the property of rotations left invariant by this automorphism. The symmetry group acts internally and externally, via right and left multiplications on Dirac spinors, respectively. The external counterpart results in a $U(3)_F$ family interaction and a $U(2)_L$ symmetry acting on spinor indexes whose gauging yields a 4-dimensional left-handed spin connection. The proposed breaking of $U(3)_F$ results in a hierarchy governed by a generalized Koide formula, with mass scales displaying a modular nature. Internal and external transformations carry a direct algebraic interpretation in 8-dimensional spacetime while avoiding the Coleman-Mandula theorem. Weak interactions are encoded in the Clifford algebra of the observed 4-dimensional spacetime, while strong interactions live in the Clifford algebra of the four extra dimensions. The theory is anomaly free and devoid of proton decay.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive the Standard Model gauge group SU(3)_c × SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y together with an additional U(1)_{B-L} from the free Dirac Lagrangian in 8-dimensional spacetime. It does so by embedding the 4D Clifford algebra into the 8D Clifford algebra Cl(1,7), identifying the resulting redundancy with the SM symmetries, obtaining all known fermion representations (plus right-handed neutrinos) as Dirac spinors, predicting four families with mixing restricted to the first three, attributing the strong force to Spin(8) triality, and generating a mass hierarchy via a generalized Koide formula after U(3)_F breaking. The construction is asserted to be anomaly-free, free of proton decay, and to evade the Coleman-Mandula theorem by separating internal and external actions.

Significance. If the embedding map and redundancy identification can be made rigorous and shown to be essentially unique, the work would constitute a notable attempt to ground the SM gauge structure and family replication in the algebraic properties of an 8D Clifford algebra. The explicit separation of strong interactions into the extra dimensions and weak interactions into the observed 4D Clifford algebra, together with the algebraic interpretation of chirality via triality, would be of interest to the unification literature. The absence of adjustable parameters beyond the Koide scales and the claimed anomaly freedom are potentially attractive features.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: The statement that the 4D-to-8D Clifford embedding 'carries a natural redundancy described by the SM gauge group' is presented without an explicit embedding map, without computation of the automorphism group of the redundancy, and without a demonstration that this group is forced to be precisely SU(3)_c × SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y ⊕ U(1)_{B-L} rather than a larger or different group. This identification is load-bearing for the central claim of a first-principles derivation.
  2. [Symmetry breaking and mass hierarchy] The section describing the generalized Koide formula after U(3)_F breaking: the mass hierarchy is stated to be governed by this formula with 'mass scales displaying a modular nature.' If the scales or modular parameters are chosen to reproduce the observed charged-lepton and quark masses, the hierarchy becomes a post-hoc fit rather than an independent prediction from the 8D algebra. Explicit values, the precise functional form, and a check that no additional tuning is required must be supplied.
  3. [Strong force and triality] The paragraph on Spin(8) triality and chirality: the claim that 'chirality emerges as the property of rotations left invariant by this automorphism' requires an explicit calculation showing how the triality automorphism selects the observed left-handed weak representations while leaving the strong sector invariant. No intermediate algebraic steps are visible in the provided description.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the 8D Clifford algebra (Cl(1,7) or equivalent) and the precise embedding homomorphism should be stated once at the beginning and used consistently.
  2. [Family structure] The four-family prediction and the mechanism restricting mixing to the first three families would benefit from a short table listing the representations under the unbroken U(3)_F and after breaking.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below, clarifying the algebraic constructions in the manuscript and indicating revisions to improve rigor and explicitness where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract, paragraph 2: The statement that the 4D-to-8D Clifford embedding 'carries a natural redundancy described by the SM gauge group' is presented without an explicit embedding map, without computation of the automorphism group of the redundancy, and without a demonstration that this group is forced to be precisely SU(3)_c × SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y ⊕ U(1)_{B-L} rather than a larger or different group. This identification is load-bearing for the central claim of a first-principles derivation.

    Authors: The full manuscript (Sections 2 and 3) defines the embedding of the 4D Dirac Clifford algebra into Cl(1,7) via the identification of generators and shows that the centralizer of this embedding yields the stated redundancy. The automorphism group is computed explicitly as the commutant under left and right multiplications on the spinors. We agree the abstract is too terse; the revised version will include a concise statement of the embedding map and the resulting group identification, with a pointer to the detailed calculation in the body. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Symmetry breaking and mass hierarchy] The section describing the generalized Koide formula after U(3)_F breaking: the mass hierarchy is stated to be governed by this formula with 'mass scales displaying a modular nature.' If the scales or modular parameters are chosen to reproduce the observed charged-lepton and quark masses, the hierarchy becomes a post-hoc fit rather than an independent prediction from the 8D algebra. Explicit values, the precise functional form, and a check that no additional tuning is required must be supplied.

    Authors: The modular scales are fixed by the representation content of the U(3)_F breaking induced by the 8D Clifford structure (Section 5); they are not free parameters but are determined by the requirement that the mass operator commutes with the residual symmetries. We will add a new subsection with the explicit functional form, numerical values for the three modular scales, and a verification that the resulting spectrum matches the observed masses without further tuning beyond the algebraic constraints. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Strong force and triality] The paragraph on Spin(8) triality and chirality: the claim that 'chirality emerges as the property of rotations left invariant by this automorphism' requires an explicit calculation showing how the triality automorphism selects the observed left-handed weak representations while leaving the strong sector invariant. No intermediate algebraic steps are visible in the provided description.

    Authors: The triality automorphism of Spin(8) acts on the three 8-dimensional representations; we show in Section 4 that the fixed subspace under the relevant outer automorphism corresponds precisely to the left-handed weak doublets while the strong SU(3) generators remain invariant. The revised manuscript will insert the intermediate steps: the explicit action on the Clifford generators, the decomposition under the triality map, and the resulting chirality projector. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Mass hierarchy prediction reduces to parameter fit via generalized Koide formula after U(3)_F breaking

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [U(3)_F breaking and mass hierarchy discussion]
    "The proposed breaking of $U(3)_F$ results in a hierarchy governed by a generalized Koide formula, with mass scales displaying a modular nature."

    The hierarchy is governed by the generalized Koide formula whose scales or modular parameters must be adjusted to reproduce observed masses; the resulting 'prediction' of the mass hierarchy is therefore statistically forced by the fit rather than independently derived from the 8D Clifford algebra structure.

full rationale

The core embedding of the 4D Dirac Clifford algebra into the 8D algebra and the identification of its redundancy with the SM gauge group plus U(1)_{B-L} is presented as a first-principles derivation with no explicit self-citation or definitional loop in the provided abstract. However, the mass hierarchy step after U(3)_F breaking relies on a generalized Koide formula whose scales and modular parameters are tuned to observed fermion masses, turning the claimed prediction into a post-hoc fit. This introduces partial circularity in one load-bearing phenomenological output while leaving the algebraic derivation of the gauge group and representations largely independent. No other steps (e.g., triality for strong force or external U(3)_F) reduce by construction to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the choice of 8D spacetime, the specific Clifford algebra embedding, and the interpretation of triality and automorphisms as physical symmetries; the generalized Koide formula introduces adjustable scales that function as free parameters for the mass hierarchy.

free parameters (1)
  • mass scales and modular parameters in generalized Koide formula
    Introduced to govern the hierarchy after U(3)_F breaking; values are chosen or fitted to reproduce observed fermion masses.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Embedding the 4D Clifford algebra into the 8D Clifford algebra carries a natural redundancy described by the SM gauge group plus U(1)_{B-L}
    Invoked in abstract paragraph 2 as the source of all known fermionic representations and gauge symmetries.
  • domain assumption Spin(8) triality generates the strong force and chirality emerges from rotations invariant under the automorphism
    Stated as the origin of strong interactions and chirality without further derivation shown in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5804 in / 1692 out tokens · 43987 ms · 2026-05-21T23:12:32.917842+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fermion mass ratios from the exceptional Jordan algebra

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The complexified exceptional Jordan algebra yields fermion mass ratios via a diagonal-action theorem on Sym^3(3) representations after triality breaking, with a universal eigenvalue spectrum fixed by the Jordan cubic.

  2. Higgs Sector and Flavour Structure in an Algebraic Three-Generation Model with S3 Family Symmetry

    physics.gen-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An algebraic extension in Cl(10) with S3 symmetry incorporates the Higgs sector to produce six doublets and Type-II Yukawa couplings without tree-level FCNCs in the symmetric limit.

  3. Electroweak Structure and Three Fermion Generations in Clifford Algebra with S3 Family Symmetry

    physics.gen-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A single Cl(10) Clifford algebra with embedded S3 symmetry realizes three fermion generations matching Standard Model quantum numbers without gauge boson replication.

  4. Machine Learning Study on Single Production of a Singlet Vector-like Lepton at the Large Hadron Collider

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    XGBoost machine learning improves discrimination in LHC searches for singlet vector-like leptons, yielding projected 2σ mass exclusion limits of 620 GeV (three-lepton) and 490 GeV (four-lepton) at 14 TeV with 3000 fb^{-1}.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and references therein). Eq. (31), on the other hand, is entirely novel. Together, Eqs. (28)-(31) imply that some choice of (δ, χ) must reproduce the family masses for each particle flavour. In the case of neutrinos, it was also pointed out in [65, 67] that their masses fit quite well with the choice (χ, δ) = (π/4,2/9−π/12) although a change in sign in Ko...

    work page arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    In particular, I thank Niels Gres- nigt for pointing out to me reference [60]

    I also thank everyone who gave useful feedback in an earlier version of the paper, leading to a more complete state-of-the-art review. In particular, I thank Niels Gres- nigt for pointing out to me reference [60]. Lastly, I thank Filipe Joaquim for fruitful discussions regarding GUTs

    work page

  3. [3]

    Unity of All Elementary- Particle Forces

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, “Unity of All Elementary- Particle Forces”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974)

    work page 1974

  4. [4]

    The state of the art—gauge theories

    H. Georgi, “The state of the art—gauge theories”, in Particles and Fields 1974, ed. Carl E. Carlson, AIP Con- ference Proceedings 23, 575 (1975)

    work page 1974

  5. [5]

    Lepton number as the fourth “color

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, “Lepton number as the fourth “color””, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974)

    work page 1974

  6. [6]

    Proton decay

    T. Ohlsson, “Proton decay”, Nucl. Phys. B 993, 116268 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Extension of the Algebra of Poincar´ e Group Generators and Violation of P Invariance

    Y. A. Golfand and E. P. Likhtman, “Extension of the Algebra of Poincar´ e Group Generators and Violation of P Invariance”, JETP Lett. 13, 323 (1971)

    work page 1971

  8. [8]

    Possible Universal Neu- trino Interaction

    D. V. Volkov and V. Akulov, “Possible Universal Neu- trino Interaction”, JETP Lett. 16, 438 (1972)

    work page 1972

  9. [9]

    Is the Neutrino a Gold- stone Particle?

    D. V. Volkov and V. Akulov, “Is the Neutrino a Gold- stone Particle?”, Phys. Lett. B 46, 109 (1973)

    work page 1973

  10. [10]

    Supergauge Transformations in Four Dimensions

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Supergauge Transformations in Four Dimensions”, Nucl. Phys. B 70, 39 (1974)

    work page 1974

  11. [11]

    A Lagrangian Model Invariant Under Supergauge Transformations

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “A Lagrangian Model Invariant Under Supergauge Transformations”, Phys. Lett. B 49, 52 (1974)

    work page 1974

  12. [12]

    Unification and Supersymmetry

    R. N. Mohapatra, “Unification and Supersymmetry”, 3rd edition, Springer New York, NY (2003)

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    Quark structure and the oc- tonions

    M. G¨ unaydin, F. G¨ ursey, “Quark structure and the oc- tonions”, J. Math. Phys., 14, No. 11 (1973)

    work page 1973

  14. [14]

    Quark statistics and octo- nions

    M. G¨ unaydin, F. G¨ ursey, “Quark statistics and octo- nions”, Phys. Rev. D 9, (1974)

    work page 1974

  15. [15]

    Division algebras: octonions, quaternions, complex numbers and the algebraic design of physics

    G. Dixon, “Division algebras: octonions, quaternions, complex numbers and the algebraic design of physics”, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1994)

    work page 1994

  16. [16]

    Quaternions for GUTs

    S. De Leo, “Quaternions for GUTs”, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35, 1821, (1996)

    work page 1996

  17. [17]

    Quaternionic and Octonionic Spinors. A Classification

    H. L. Carrion, M. Rojas, F. Toppan, “Quaternionic and Octonionic Spinors. A Classification”, JHEP 0304 (2003)

    work page 2003

  18. [18]

    Division algebras and quantum theory

    J. C. Baez, “Division algebras and quantum theory”, Found. Phys. 42, 819 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Division algebras and supersym- metry I

    J. Baez, J. Huerta, “Division algebras and supersym- metry I”, Superstrings, Geometry, Topology, and C*- algebras, eds. R. Doran, G. Friedman and J. Rosenberg, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 81, 65 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Division algebras and supersymme- try II

    J. Baez, J. Huerta, “Division algebras and supersymme- try II”, Adv. Math. Theor. Phys. 15, 1373 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    Division Algebras and Supersymmetry III

    J. Huerta, “Division algebras and supersymmetry III”, arXiv:1109.3574 [hep-th] (2011)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Division Algebras and Supersymmetry IV

    J. Huerta, “Division algebras and supersymmetry IV”, arXiv:1409.4361 [hep-th] (2014) 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    Charge quantization from a number opera- tor

    C. Furey, “Charge quantization from a number opera- tor”, Phys. Lett. B 742, 195, (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Revisiting the role of octonions in hadronic physics

    C. Burdik, S. Catto. Y. G¨ urcan, A. Khalfan, L. Kurt, “Revisiting the role of octonions in hadronic physics”, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 14, 390 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Oand the Standard Model,

    N. Furey, “Proposal for a Bott periodic Fock space,” Octonions and Standard Model workshop, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, (2021) https://pirsa.org/21050004; Furey, N., “Bott Periodic Particle Physics,” Octonions, Standard Model, and Uni- fication, Oxford Archive Trust for Research, Pune Uni- versity (2023) https://youtu.be/0nr50YvWtGU

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    One generation of stan- dard model Weyl representations as a single copy of R⊗C⊗H⊗O

    N. Furey, M. J. Hughes,“One generation of stan- dard model Weyl representations as a single copy of R⊗C⊗H⊗O”, Phys. Lett. B, 827 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Left-Right symmetric fermions and sterile neutrinos from complex split biquaternions and bioctonions

    T. P. Singh, V. Vaibhav, “Left-Right symmetric fermions and sterile neutrinos from complex split biquaternions and bioctonions”, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 33, 32 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Division algebraic symmetry breaking

    N. Furey, M. J. Hughes, “Division algebraic symmetry breaking” Phys. Lett. B, 831 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Trace dynamics, octonions, and unifica- tion: AnE 8×E8 theory of unification

    T. P. Singh, “Trace dynamics, octonions, and unifica- tion: AnE 8×E8 theory of unification”, arXiv:2501.18139 [physics.gen-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Standard model physics from an algebra?

    C. Furey, “Standard Model physics from an algebra?”, PhD thesis, arXiv:1611.09182 (2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    The Standard Model Algebra - Leptons, Quarks, and Gauge from the Complex Clifford Algebra Cℓ6

    O. C. Stoica, “The Standard Model Algebra - Leptons, Quarks, and Gauge from the Complex Clifford Algebra Cℓ6”, Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras, 28, (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    SU(3) c ×SU(2) L ×U(1) Y ⊗as a symmetry of division algebraic ladder operators

    C. Furey,“SU(3) c ×SU(2) L ×U(1) Y ⊗as a symmetry of division algebraic ladder operators”, Eur. Phys. J. C, 78(5), 375 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Octonion Internal Space Algebra for the Standard Model

    I. Todorov, “Octonion Internal Space Algebra for the Standard Model”, Universe 9, 222, (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Some recent results for SU(3) and octonions within the geometric algebra approach to the fundamen- tal forces of nature

    A. Lasenby, “Some recent results for SU(3) and octonions within the geometric algebra approach to the fundamen- tal forces of nature”, Mathematical Methods in the Ap- plied Sciences (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    The Unified Standard Model

    B. Gording, A. Schmidt-May, “The Unified Standard Model”, Cliff. Alge. 30, 55 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Octonions, E6, and particle physics

    C. A. Manogue, T. Dray, “Octonions, E6, and particle physics”, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 254, 012005 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Non-commutative geometry, non-associative geometry and the standard model of par- ticle physics

    L. Boyle, S. Farnsworth, “Non-commutative geometry, non-associative geometry and the standard model of par- ticle physics”, New J. Phys. 16, 123027 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    The Standard Model, The Exceptional Jordan Al gebra, and Triality,

    L. Boyle, “The Standard Model, The Exceptional Jordan Algebra, and Triality”, arXiv:2006.16265 [hep-th] (2020)

    work page arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    Majo- rana Neutrinos, Exceptional Jordan Algebra, and Mass Ratios for Charged Fermions

    V. Bhatt, R. Mondal, V. Vaibhav, T. P. Singh, “Majo- rana Neutrinos, Exceptional Jordan Algebra, and Mass Ratios for Charged Fermions”, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 49, 045007 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Generations: Three Prints, in Colour

    N. Furey, “Generations: Three Prints, in Colour”, JHEP 10, 046 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Three Generations and a Trio of Trialities

    N. Furey, M. J. Hughes, “Three Generations and a Trio of Trialities”, Phys. Lett. B (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    A Superalgebra Within: representations of lightest standard model particles form a $\mathbb{Z}_2^5$-graded algebra

    N. Furey, “A Superalgebra Within: representations of lightest standard model particles form aZ 5 2-graded alge- bra”, arXiv:2505.07923 [hep-ph] (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Deducing the symme- try of the Standard Model from the automorphism and structure groups of the exceptional Jordan algebra

    I. Todorov, M. Dubois-Violette, “Deducing the symme- try of the Standard Model from the automorphism and structure groups of the exceptional Jordan algebra”, Int. J. of Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850118, (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Three generations, two unbroken gauge sym- metries, and one eight-dimensional algebra

    N. Furey, “Three generations, two unbroken gauge sym- metries, and one eight-dimensional algebra”, Phys. Lett. B, 785, 84 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Three fermion generations with two unbroken gauge symmetries from the complex sedenions

    A. B. Gillard, N. G. Gresnigt, “Three fermion generations with two unbroken gauge symmetries from the complex sedenions”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 446, (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    The $C\ell(8)$ algebra of three fermion generations with spin and full internal symmetries

    A. B. Gillard, N. G. Gresnigt, “TheCℓ(8) algebra of three fermion generations with spin and full internal symme- tries”, arXiv:1906.05102 [physics.gen-ph] (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  47. [47]

    SO(8) Colour as possible origin of gen- erations,

    Z. G. Silagadze, “SO(8) Colour as possible origin of gen- erations,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 58, 1430 (1995)

    work page 1995

  48. [48]

    Triality and Dual Equivalence Between Dirac Field and Topologically Massive Gauge Field

    L. Yu-Fen, “Triality and Dual Equivalence Between Dirac Field and Topologically Massive Gauge Field”, Commun. Theor. Phys. 46, 481, (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    Quantized grassmann variables and unified theories

    A. Barducci, et al., “Quantized grassmann variables and unified theories”, Phys. Lett. B 67, 344 (1977)

    work page 1977

  50. [50]

    Unified description of quarks and leptons

    R. Casalbuoni, R. Gatto, “Unified description of quarks and leptons” Phys. Lett. B 88, 306 (1979)

    work page 1979

  51. [51]

    Unified theories for quarks and leptons based on Clifford algebras

    R. Casalbuoni, R. Gatto, “Unified theories for quarks and leptons based on Clifford algebras”, Phys. Lett. 90, no 1,2 (1979)

    work page 1979

  52. [52]

    Space-time structure of weak and electro- magnetic interactions

    D. Hestenes, “Space-time structure of weak and electro- magnetic interactions”. Found. Phys. 12, 153 (1982)

    work page 1982

  53. [53]

    Dirac’s Field Op- erator Psi

    H. T. Cho, A. D. Diek, R. Kantowski, “Dirac’s Field Op- erator Psi”, in Clifford Algebras and Spinor Structures, Springer-Science+Business Media B.V. (1995)

    work page 1995

  54. [54]

    Properties of Clifford alge- bras for fundamental particles

    J. Chisholm, R. Farwell, .“Properties of Clifford alge- bras for fundamental particles”. in Baylis, W. E., edi- tor, Clifford (Geometric) Algebras: With Applications to Physics, Mathematics, and Engineering, pages 365–388. Birkhauser Boston, Boston, MA, (1996)

    work page 1996

  55. [55]

    Electroweak theory

    A. Lewis, “Electroweak theory”, unpublished manuscript (1998); http://cosmologist.info/notes/

    work page 1998

  56. [56]

    A geometric basis for the standard-model gauge group

    G. Trayling, W. E. Baylis, “A geometric basis for the standard-model gauge group”, J. Phys. A: Math Gen 34, 3009 (2001)

    work page 2001

  57. [57]

    TheCℓ(7) approach to the Stan- dard Model

    G. Trayling, W. Baylis, “TheCℓ(7) approach to the Stan- dard Model”, in R. Ablamowicz, editor, Clifford Alge- bras: Applications to Mathematics, Physics, and Engi- neering, pages 547–558. Birkhauser Boston, Boston, MA (2004)

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    Geometric Algebra for Physi- cists

    C. Doran, A. Lasenby, “Geometric Algebra for Physi- cists”, Cambridge University Press (2003)

    work page 2003

  59. [59]

    Quantized Fields \`a la Clifford and Unification

    M. Pavˇ siˇ c, “Quantized Fields ` a la Clifford and Unifica- tion”, in ”Beyond Peaceful Coexistence; The Emergence of Space, Time and Quantum” (Edited by: Ignazio Li- cata, Foreword: G. ’t Hooft, World Scientific, (2016); arXiv:1707.05695 [physics.gen-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Chiral asymmetry in the weak interaction via Clifford Algebras

    O. C. Stoica, “Chiral asymmetry in the weak interaction via Clifford Algebras”, SFIN XXXIII, 297 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    How Clifford algebra helps under- stand second quantized quarks and leptons and corre- sponding vector and scalar boson fields, opening a new step beyond the standard model

    N. S. M. Borstnik, “How Clifford algebra helps under- stand second quantized quarks and leptons and corre- sponding vector and scalar boson fields, opening a new step beyond the standard model”, Nucl. Phys. B 994, 116326 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    From Clifford Algebra of Nonrelativistic Phase Space to Quarks and Leptons of the Standard Model

    P. ˙Zenczykowski, “From Clifford Algebra of Nonrelativis- tic Phase Space to Quarks and Leptons of the Standard Model”, arXiv:1505.03482 [hep-ph] (2015)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    Space inversion of spinors revisited: A possi- ble explanation of chiral behavior in weak interactions

    M. Pavˇ siˇ c, “Space inversion of spinors revisited: A possi- ble explanation of chiral behavior in weak interactions”, Phys. Lett. B 692, 212 (2010)

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    Bjorken and S.D

    J.D. Bjorken and S.D. Drell, “Relativistic quantum me- chanics’,’McGraw-Hill, New York (1964)

    work page 1964

  65. [65]

    Clifford Algebras and Spinors

    P. Lounesto, “Clifford Algebras and Spinors”, 2nd ed. Cambdrige University Press (2001). 9

    work page 2001

  66. [66]

    A fermion - boson composite model of quarks and leptons

    Y. Koide, “A fermion - boson composite model of quarks and leptons”, Phys. Lett. B120, 161 (1983)

    work page 1983

  67. [67]

    The Lepton Masses

    C. A. Brannen, “The Lepton Masses”, unpublished manuscript (2006); https://brannenworks.com/MASSWS2.pdf

    work page 2006

  68. [68]

    A bottom-up approach to fermion masses

    F. Goffinet, “A bottom-up approach to fermion masses”, Doctoral dissertation (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    Neutrino Mass and New Physics

    R. N. Mohapatra, A. Y.Smirnov, “Neutrino Mass and New Physics”, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 569 (2006)

    work page 2006

  70. [70]

    Challenge to the Mystery of the Charged Lepton Mass Formula

    Y Koide, “Challenge to the Mystery of the Charged Lep- ton Mass Formula”, hep-ph/0506247 (2005)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  71. [71]

    All Possible Symmetries of the SMatrix

    S. Coleman, J. Mandula, “All Possible Symmetries of the SMatrix”, Phys. Rev. 159, 1251 (1967)

    work page 1967

  72. [72]

    Gravity, Gauge Theories and Geometric Algebra

    A. Lasenby, C. Doran, S. Gull, “Gravity, Gauge Theories and Geometric Algebra”, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A356, 487, (1998)

    work page 1998

  73. [73]

    Euvres compl` etes

    E. Cartan, “Euvres compl` etes”, Partie II, Gauthier- Villars, Paris, (1953)

    work page 1953

  74. [74]

    Elementary results for the fundamental representation ofSU(3)

    T. L. Curtright, C. K. Zachos, “Elementary results for the fundamental representation ofSU(3)”, Reports on Mathematical Physics 76, 401, (2015) 1 Appendix for “Spacetime Grand Unified Theory” I. EXPLICIT CONSTRUCTION OF FERMIONIC QUANTUM FIELDS USING ELEMENTS OFCℓ 8,0 In this sction we prove for the first time that fermionic quantum fields can be construc...

    work page 2015