REVIEW 2 cited by
Counterexamples to "The Blessings of Multiple Causes" by Wang and Blei
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This note has been updated (April, 2020) to respond to "Towards Clarifying the Theory of the Deconfounder" by Yixin Wang, David M. Blei (arXiv:2003.04948). This original note, posted in January, 2020, is meant to complement our previous comment on "The Blessings of Multiple Causes" by Wang and Blei (2019). We provide a more succinct and transparent explanation of the fact that the deconfounder does not control for multi-cause confounding. The argument given in Wang and Blei (2019) makes two mistakes: (1) attempting to infer independence conditional on one variable from independence conditional on a different, unrelated variable, and (2) attempting to infer joint independence from pairwise independence. We give two simple counterexamples to the deconfounder claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Spectral Structure of Latent Treatment Effects
After shared-subspace compression, the difference of treatment-arm proxy quotient operators is similar to the diagonal of latent treatment effects, whose eigenvalues and lifted eigenvectors recover the full mixture.
-
Causal Inference with Categorical Unobserved Confounder via Mixture Learning
Causal effects are identifiable for categorical unobserved confounders via mixture learning and tensor decomposition, yielding consistent estimators with non-asymptotic guarantees.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.