Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Joint Perception and Prediction for Autonomous Driving: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.14088 v1 pith:PYZBVBJX submitted 2024-12-18 cs.CV cs.RO

classification cs.CVcs.RO
keywords predictionperceptionjointtasksautonomousdrivinglimitationsmodules
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Perception and prediction modules are critical components of autonomous driving systems, enabling vehicles to navigate safely through complex environments. The perception module is responsible for perceiving the environment, including static and dynamic objects, while the prediction module is responsible for predicting the future behavior of these objects. These modules are typically divided into three tasks: object detection, object tracking, and motion prediction. Traditionally, these tasks are developed and optimized independently, with outputs passed sequentially from one to the next. However, this approach has significant limitations: computational resources are not shared across tasks, the lack of joint optimization can amplify errors as they propagate throughout the pipeline, and uncertainty is rarely propagated between modules, resulting in significant information loss. To address these challenges, the joint perception and prediction paradigm has emerged, integrating perception and prediction into a unified model through multi-task learning. This strategy not only overcomes the limitations of previous methods, but also enables the three tasks to have direct access to raw sensor data, allowing richer and more nuanced environmental interpretations. This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of joint perception and prediction for autonomous driving. We propose a taxonomy that categorizes approaches based on input representation, scene context modeling, and output representation, highlighting their contributions and limitations. Additionally, we present a qualitative analysis and quantitative comparison of existing methods. Finally, we discuss future research directions based on identified gaps in the state-of-the-art.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. To New Beginnings: A Survey of Unified Perception in Autonomous Vehicle Software

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A taxonomy that classifies unified perception methods in autonomous driving into Early, Late, and Full Unified Perception based on task integration, tracking formulation, and representation flow.

  2. HySafe-AI: Hybrid Safety Architectural Analysis Framework for AI Systems: A Case Study

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A hybrid FMEA/FTA safety-analysis framework for foundation-model-based autonomous driving, illustrated on a GenAD and GAIA-2 style reference architecture.

Pith tools