pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01176 · v1 · pith:Q4RWIUKDnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 💻 cs.CV

High-dimensional Embedding Prior for Noisy K-space Domain MRIReconstruction

Yu Guan , Tianjia Huang , Qinrong Cai , Qiuyun Fan , Dong Liang , Qiegen Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 13:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords MRI reconstructionk-space domaindiffusion modelshigh-dimensional embeddingsinverse problemsnoisy reconstructiongenerative priors
0
0 comments X

The pith

High-dimensional embeddings improve diffusion-based reconstruction of noisy k-space MRI data without changing solvers

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that lifting k-space measurements into a higher-dimensional embedding space lets existing diffusion-based inverse solvers reconstruct MRI images more accurately from incomplete and noisy data. The method augments the representation rather than redesigning the solvers or their optimization steps. Experiments across public and in-house datasets show consistent quality gains that become largest under high noise levels, matching the paper's analysis of error propagation in high-dimensional spaces. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach offers a model-agnostic route to stronger generative priors for real-world noisy inverse problems.

Core claim

Rather than modifying the underlying optimization procedures, the proposed framework augments the data representation space, enabling existing diffusion-based solvers to operate on enriched k-space embeddings with improved expressiveness. This produces better reconstruction quality for multiple diffusion-based inverse solvers, with the largest gains observed in high-noise regimes, consistent with theoretical analysis of error propagation under high-dimensional representation.

What carries the argument

representation lifting via high-dimensional embeddings - augments the data representation space so diffusion solvers can work on enriched k-space embeddings with greater expressiveness

If this is right

  • The framework consistently improves reconstruction quality for multiple diffusion-based inverse solvers
  • Largest gains are observed in high-noise regimes
  • High-dimensional representation provides a general and model-agnostic mechanism for improving diffusion-based MRI reconstruction in noisy settings

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same representation-lifting idea might extend to other inverse problems that use diffusion priors with noisy measurements
  • Testing whether non-diffusion generative models also benefit would clarify if the gains are tied to diffusion specifically or to the embedding step itself
  • The error-propagation analysis could guide similar dimensionality strategies in related reconstruction tasks outside MRI

Load-bearing premise

Augmenting the data representation space with high-dimensional embeddings enables existing diffusion-based solvers to operate on enriched k-space embeddings with improved expressiveness without needing to modify the underlying optimization procedures

What would settle it

An experiment in which the high-dimensional embedding version shows no improvement or smaller gains than the baseline in high-noise regimes on the same datasets would falsify the central claim

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01176 by Dong Liang, Qiegen Liu, Qinrong Cai, Qiuyun Fan, Tianjia Huang, Yu Guan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Iterative pipelines of six representative diffusion-based methods for inverse problems. Guan Y, Huang TJ, Cai QR, et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 4 of 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Category-wise comparison of representative diffusion inverse solvers from the perspectives of conditioning input, 𝑥𝑡 → 𝑥𝑡−1 update formulation, and core optimization mechanism. The six solvers discussed above can be further compared from an operator-level perspective. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Forward and reverse processes of the diffusion model in k-space domain. An illustrative overview of the complete diffusion-based reconstruction process in the k-space domain is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of multi-channel and wavelet-transform HEP for complex-valued k-space. Real and imaginary components are lifted into high-dimensional representation and then aggregated back to original k-space domain. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Iterative reconstruction pipeline under the proposed high-dimensional k-space formulation 𝐾 = HEP (𝑘). Each subfigure illustrates iterative inference of a typical diffusion-based reconstruction solver in the embedded space. As a representative instantiation, HEP-DPS is presented in Algorithm 2. DPS is chosen for its explicit residual back-projection guidance from the denoised prediction. Under HEP, this gu… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: PCA analysis of diffusion-prior estimation errors. Residuals are projected onto the first two principal components, and ellipses indicate 95% confidence regions. HEP reduces residual dispersion, with multi-channel HEP showing the most compact distribution. Empirical Validation via PCA Analysis. To investigate the validity of the derived error bounds, we performed a PCA-based analysis of the diffusion prior… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Visual comparison of SIAT reconstructions under SNR = 20 dB and ×6 acceleration. Naive, multi-channel HEP, and wavelet￾transform HEP results are shown with zoomed regions and residual maps. Among the evaluated solvers, RED-diff exhibits the most consistent performance improvement with HEP. This observation aligns with the error-propagation analysis in Section 3.3.2, where RED-diff tightly couples denoiser￾… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Statistical quantitative assessment of fastMRI reconstructions with ×6 acceleration under multiple noise conditions. Violin plots visualize PSNR, SSIM and NMSE distributions of competing solvers for Poisson and radial sampling. Despite this degradation, HEP-based methods exhibit more stable performance distributions across different noise levels, as evidenced by the reduced spread in the violin plots. This… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative comparison of HEP on fastMRI under SNR = 10 dB and ×6 acceleration. Multi-channel HEP and wavelet transform HEP results are shown with reconstructions, zoomed regions, and residual maps. 5.3. Effect of undersampling Factor Based on the results in Sections 5.1 and 5.2, RED-diff is selected as a representative solver for further evaluation under more challenging undersampling conditions. This sel… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Illustration of iterative reconstruction under our high-dimensional k-space formulation 𝐾 = HEP(𝑘). Each subfigure depicts iterative inference of a typical diffusion reconstruction solver in the embedded space. 5.4. Compatibility with Low-rank Regularizers We further investigate whether the proposed HEP framework can be combined with classical structural prior. Low￾rank constraints have been widely used i… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Qualitative comparison of RED-diff variants with/without low-rank fusion on the fastMRI dataset (SNR = 20 dB, 2D Poisson sampling, 𝑅 = 6). Rows: reconstruction images, 2× magnified views of red-boxed regions, residual maps. 6. Conclusion In this work, we proposed a unified HEP framework for noisy k-space MRI reconstruction, designed to enhance diffusion-based inverse solvers from a representation perspect… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction under realistic acquisition conditions can be fundamentally viewed as estimating the underlying k-space distribution from incomplete and noise-corrupted measurements. While diffusion models have recently shown strong potential as generative prior for inverse problems,existingapproachesstruggletohandlenoisyreconstruction settings, especially when operating directly in k-space domain. In this work, we propose a unified high-dimensional k-space reconstruction framework tailored for noisy inverse problems, whichenhancesdiffusion-based solversthroughrepresentation lifting.Ratherthanmodifyingthe underlying optimization procedures, the proposed framework augments the data representation space, enabling existing diffusion-based solvers to operate on enriched k-space embeddings with improved expressiveness. Extensive experiments on both in-house and public datasets across varying noise levels and undersampled factors demonstrate that the proposed frame work consistently improves reconstruction quality for multiple diffusion-based inverse solvers. Notably, the largest gains are observed in high-noise regimes, which is consistent with our theoretical analysis of error propagation under high-dimensional representation. These results suggest that high-dimensional representation provides a general and model-agnostic mechanism for improving diffusion-based MRI reconstruction in noisy settings, offering a new perspective on robust k-space generative modeling for practical inverse problems. The code will be available at https://github.com/yqx7150/HEP-MRIRec.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a high-dimensional embedding prior (HEP) framework for noisy k-space MRI reconstruction. It augments the representation space with high-dimensional embeddings to improve existing diffusion-based inverse solvers without modifying their optimization procedures. Experiments on in-house and public datasets across noise levels and undersampling factors show consistent gains, largest in high-noise regimes, supported by a theoretical analysis of error propagation under high-dimensional representation. The approach is presented as model-agnostic and general for diffusion-based generative modeling in inverse problems.

Significance. If the central mechanism is sound, the work offers a potentially general, solver-independent route to robustify diffusion priors for noisy inverse problems in MRI, which is practically relevant given the prevalence of noise in clinical acquisitions. The promise of code release supports reproducibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that representation lifting enables 'existing diffusion-based solvers to operate on enriched k-space embeddings' without 'modifying the underlying optimization procedures' is load-bearing for the model-agnostic contribution. Lifting changes both the support of the data manifold and the effective noise schedule; the manuscript provides no derivation showing that a diffusion model trained on the original k-space distribution remains the exact score function (or equivalent) in the lifted coordinates. Without this justification or an explicit projection step that leaves the solver untouched, the reported gains are consistent with an altered prior rather than pure representation enrichment.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (theoretical analysis): The manuscript states that largest gains in high-noise regimes are 'consistent with our theoretical analysis of error propagation under high-dimensional representation,' yet no equations, assumptions, or proof sketch are supplied in the provided text. This analysis is central to explaining why the method succeeds where direct k-space diffusion fails; its absence prevents verification that the error-propagation argument actually supports the no-modification claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains multiple typographical errors and missing spaces (e.g., 'existingapproachesstruggletohandlenoisyreconstruction', 'whichenhancesdiffusion-based', 'frame work').
  2. [Abstract] The abstract references 'in-house and public datasets' and 'varying noise levels and undersampled factors' but supplies no dataset names, sizes, or quantitative metrics (PSNR/SSIM values, error bars).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our work. The two major points raised highlight areas where the manuscript's presentation of the model-agnostic claim and supporting theory can be strengthened. We address each below and commit to revisions that directly incorporate the requested justifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that representation lifting enables 'existing diffusion-based solvers to operate on enriched k-space embeddings' without 'modifying the underlying optimization procedures' is load-bearing for the model-agnostic contribution. Lifting changes both the support of the data manifold and the effective noise schedule; the manuscript provides no derivation showing that a diffusion model trained on the original k-space distribution remains the exact score function (or equivalent) in the lifted coordinates. Without this justification or an explicit projection step that leaves the solver untouched, the reported gains are consistent with an altered prior rather than pure representation enrichment.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the abstract's model-agnostic claim requires an explicit derivation to confirm that the score function correspondence holds under lifting without altering the solver. The current manuscript does not supply this derivation in the abstract or main text. We will add a new subsection (e.g., in the Methods) deriving the transformed score under the high-dimensional embedding, including the mapping that preserves the original optimization procedure while operating on the enriched space. This will demonstrate that the gains arise from representation enrichment rather than an altered prior. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (theoretical analysis): The manuscript states that largest gains in high-noise regimes are 'consistent with our theoretical analysis of error propagation under high-dimensional representation,' yet no equations, assumptions, or proof sketch are supplied in the provided text. This analysis is central to explaining why the method succeeds where direct k-space diffusion fails; its absence prevents verification that the error-propagation argument actually supports the no-modification claim.

    Authors: We agree that the theoretical analysis must be presented with explicit equations, assumptions, and a proof sketch to substantiate the error-propagation argument and its link to the no-modification claim. Although the abstract references this analysis, the provided manuscript text does not include the supporting details. In revision we will insert a dedicated theoretical subsection containing the error-propagation equations, the key assumptions (e.g., on noise statistics and manifold dimensionality), and a concise proof outline showing consistency with the observed high-noise gains. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; claims rest on empirical results and referenced analysis without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The provided abstract and description present the core mechanism as representation lifting to enrich k-space embeddings for use with unmodified existing diffusion solvers, with performance gains demonstrated via experiments on in-house and public datasets. The reference to 'our theoretical analysis of error propagation under high-dimensional representation' is noted but does not reduce any prediction or result to a fitted input or self-definition within the given text; no equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are quoted that would make the claimed improvements tautological by construction. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not match any enumerated circularity pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are specified in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5772 in / 1061 out tokens · 22444 ms · 2026-07-02T13:25:14.742546+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    IEEE Trans

    MoDL: Model-based deep learning architecture for inverse problems. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 394–405. doi:10.1109/TMI.2018.2865356. Block,K.,Uecker,M.,Frahm,J.,2007.UndersampledradialMRIwithmultiplecoils.Iterativeimagereconstructionusingatotalvariationconstraint. Magn. Reson. Med. 57, 1086–1098. doi:10.1002/mrm.21236. Boys, B., Girolami, M., Pidstrigac...

    work page doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2865356 2018

  2. [2]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10748 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.10748

    Deep data consistency: A fast and robust diffusion model-based solver for inverse problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10748 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.10748. Chen, M., Huang, K., Zhao, T., et al.,

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.10748

  3. [3]

    5327–5350

    Score approximation, estimation and distribution recovery of diffusion models on low-dimensional data, in: Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 5327–5350. Chung,H.,Kim,J.,McCann,M.,etal.,2023. Diffusionposteriorsamplingforgeneralnoisyinverseproblems,in:TheInternationalConferenceon Learning Representations. Chung, H., Kim, J., Ye, J.,

    2023

  4. [4]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01975

    Diffusion models for inverse problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01975 . Chung,H.,Sim,B.,Ryu,D.,etal.,2022. Improvingdiffusionmodelsforinverseproblemsusingmanifoldconstraints,in:Adv.NeuralInf.Process. Syst., pp. 25683–25696. Cole,E.,Cheng,J.,Pauly,J.,etal.,2021. Analysisofdeepcomplex-valuedconvolutionalneuralnetworksforMRIreconstructionandphase-focused ap...

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.28733 2022

  5. [5]

    A Survey on Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems

    A survey on diffusion models for inverse problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00083 . Dou, Z., Song, Y.,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    IEEE Signal Process

    Model-based image reconstruction for MRI. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 27, 81–89. doi:10.1109/MSP.2010.936726. Griswold,M., Jakob,P., Heidemann,R., etal.,

    work page doi:10.1109/msp.2010.936726 2010

  7. [7]

    GRAPPA:Generalized autocalibratingpartially parallelacquisitions. Magn. Reson.Med. 47, 1202–1210. doi:10.1002/mrm.10171. Guan, Y., Cai, Q., Li, W., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.10171

  8. [8]

    IEEE Trans

    Sub-DM: Subspace diffusion model with orthogonal decomposition for MRI reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 12, 309–320. doi:10.1109/TCI.2026.3653305. Guan, Y., Lu, Y., Cheng, J., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1109/tci.2026.3653305 2026

  9. [9]

    Distribution matching with subset-k-space embedding for multi-contrast MRI reconstruction. Med. Phys. 52, e18056. doi:10.1002/mp.18056. Guan, Y., Yu, C., Cui, Z., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1002/mp.18056

  10. [10]

    IEEE Trans

    Correlated and multi-frequency diffusion modeling for highly under-sampled MRI reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 43, 3490–3502. doi:10.1109/TMI.2024.3381610. Güngör, A., Dar, S., Öztürk, S., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1109/tmi.2024.3381610 2024

  11. [11]

    Adaptive diffusion priors for accelerated MRI reconstruction. Med. Image Anal. 88, 102872. doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102872. Haldar, J.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102872 2023

  12. [12]

    IEEE Trans

    Low-rank modeling of local k-space neighborhoods (LORAKS) for constrained MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 33, 668–681. doi:10.1109/TMI.2013.2293974. Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.,

    work page doi:10.1109/tmi.2013.2293974 2013

  13. [13]

    Image Comput

    Noise level adaptive diffusion model for robust reconstruction of accelerated MRI, in: Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., pp. 498–508. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72104-5_48. Hyun, C., Kim, H., Lee, S., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72104-5_48

  14. [14]

    Estimation of non-normalized statistical models by score matching. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 6, 695–709. Jin,K.,Lee,D.,Ye,J.,2016. AgeneralframeworkforcompressedsensingandparallelMRIusingannihilatingfilterbasedlow-rankHankelmatrix. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 2, 480–495. doi:10.1109/TCI.2016.2601296. Karras,T.,Aittala,M.,Laine,S.,etal.,2022. Elucidatingthedesi...

    work page doi:10.1109/tci.2016.2601296 2016

  15. [15]

    fastMRI: A publicly available raw k-space and DICOM dataset of knee images for accelerated MR image reconstruction using machine learning. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 2, e190007. doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190007. Lee, D., Yoo, J., Ye, J.,

    work page doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190007

  16. [16]

    IEEE Int

    Deep residual learning for compressed sensing MRI, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging, pp. 15–18. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2017.7950457. Guan Y, Huang TJ, Cai QR, et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 21 of 22 High-dimensional Embedding Prior for Noisy K-space Domain MRI Reconstruction Li, X., Kwon, S., Liang, S., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950457 2017

  17. [17]

    Decoupled data consistency with diffusion purification for image restoration,

    DCDP: Decoupled data consistency via diffusion purification for solving general inverse problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06054 . Liang, D., DiBella, E., Chen, R.R., et al.,

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    k-t ISD: Dynamic cardiac MR imaging using compressed sensing with iterative support detection. Magn. Reson. Med. 68, 41–53. doi:10.1002/mrm.23197. Lustig, M., Donoho, D., Pauly, J.,

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.23197

  19. [19]

    Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 58, 1182–1195. doi:10.1002/mrm.21391. Mardani, M., Song, J., Kautz, J., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.21391

  20. [20]

    A variational perspective on solving inverse problems with diffusion models, in: Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. Meng,X.,Kabashima,Y.,2025. Diffusionmodelbasedposteriorsamplingfornoisylinearinverseproblems,in:ProceedingsofMachineLearning Research. Nichol,A.,Dhariwal,P.,2021. Improveddenoisingdiffusionprobabilisticmodels,in:Proceedingsofthe38thInternationalCo...

    2025

  21. [21]

    IEEE Trans

    One-shot generative prior in Hankel-k-space for parallel imaging reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 42, 3012–3024. doi:10.1109/TMI.2023.3288219. Pruessmann, K., Weiger, M., Scheidegger, M., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1109/tmi.2023.3288219 2023

  22. [22]

    SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 952–962. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199911)42:5<952::AID-MRM16>3.0.CO;2-S. Qin,C.,Schlemper,J.,Caballero,J.,etal.,2019. ConvolutionalrecurrentneuralnetworksfordynamicMRimagereconstruction. IEEETrans.Med. Imaging 38, 280–290. doi:10.1109/TMI.2018.2863670. Robbins, H.,

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199911)42:5 2019

  23. [23]

    An empirical Bayes approach to statistics, in: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 157–163. Rout,L.,Chen,Y.,Kumar,A.,etal.,2024. Beyondfirst-orderTweedie:Solvinginverseproblemsusinglatentdiffusion,in:Proc.IEEE/CVFConf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 9472–9481. Ryu, K., Alkan, C., Choi, C., et al.,

    2024

  24. [24]

    IEEE Trans

    A deep cascade of convolutional neural networks for dynamic MR image reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 491–503. doi:10.1109/TMI.2017.2760978. Shen,G.,Li,M.,Farris,C.,etal.,2024. LearningtoreconstructacceleratedMRIthroughK-spacecolddiffusionwithoutnoise. Sci.Rep.14,22133. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-72820-2. Shin,P.,Larson,P.,Ohliger,M.,etal.,2014. C...

    work page doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2760978 2017

  25. [25]

    Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging 1, 1–28

    Joint frequency and image space learning for MRI reconstruction and analysis. Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging 1, 1–28. Sohl-Dickstein,J.,Weiss,E.,Maheswaranathan,N.,etal.,2015.Deepunsupervisedlearningusingnonequilibriumthermodynamics,in:Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2256–2265. Song, J., Vahdat, A., Marda...

    2015

  26. [26]

    Pseudoinverse-guided diffusion models for inverse problems, in: Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. Song,Y.,Ermon,S.,2019.Generativemodelingbyestimatinggradientsofthedatadistribution,in:Adv.NeuralInf.Process.Syst.,pp.11918–11930. Song, Y., Ermon, S.,

    2019

  27. [27]

    IEEE Trans

    Sampling possible reconstructions of undersampled acquisitions in MR imaging with a deep learned prior. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 41, 1885–1896. doi:10.1109/TMI.2022.3150853. Tu, Z., Liu, D., Wang, X., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3150853 2022

  28. [28]

    NMR Biomed

    WKGM: Weight-k-space generative model for parallel imaging reconstruction. NMR Biomed. 36, e5005. doi:10.1002/nbm.5005. Uecker, M., Lai, P., Murphy, M., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1002/nbm.5005

  29. [29]

    ESPIRiT—an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: Where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn. Reson. Med. 71, 990–1001. doi:10.1002/mrm.24751. Vincent, P.,

    work page doi:10.1002/mrm.24751

  30. [30]

    Neural Comput

    A connection between score matching and denoising autoencoders. Neural Comput. 23, 1661–1674. doi:10.1162/NECO_a_ 00142. Wang, S., Su, Z., Ying, L., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1162/neco_a_

  31. [31]

    IEEE Int

    Accelerating magnetic resonance imaging via deep learning, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging, pp. 514–517. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2016.7493320. Yu,J.,Ouyang,Z.,Deng,H.,etal.,2026. Understandinggeneralizationfromembeddingdimensionanddistributionalconvergence. arXivpreprint arXiv:2601.22756 . Zbontar, J., Knoll, F., Sriram, A., et al.,

    work page doi:10.1109/isbi.2016.7493320 2016

  32. [32]

    fastMRI: An Open Dataset and Benchmarks for Accelerated MRI

    fastMRI: An open dataset and benchmarks for accelerated MRI reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.08839 . Zhao,R.,Peng,X.,Kelkar,V.,etal.,2024. High-dimensionalMRreconstructionintegratingsubspaceandadaptivegenerativemodels. IEEETrans. Biomed. Eng. 71, 1969–1979. doi:10.1109/TBME.2024.3358223. Guan Y, Huang TJ, Cai QR, et al.:Preprint submitted to Else...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1109/tbme.2024.3358223 2024