Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Is Private Learning Possible with Instance Encoding?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.05315 v2 pith:Q7S7N5AE submitted 2020-11-10 cs.CR cs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.CVcs.LG
keywords encodinginstancelearningprivatealgorithmattackmodelpossible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A private machine learning algorithm hides as much as possible about its training data while still preserving accuracy. In this work, we study whether a non-private learning algorithm can be made private by relying on an instance-encoding mechanism that modifies the training inputs before feeding them to a normal learner. We formalize both the notion of instance encoding and its privacy by providing two attack models. We first prove impossibility results for achieving a (stronger) model. Next, we demonstrate practical attacks in the second (weaker) attack model on InstaHide, a recent proposal by Huang, Song, Li and Arora [ICML'20] that aims to use instance encoding for privacy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CrypTorch: PyTorch-based Auto-tuning Compiler for Machine Learning with Multi-party Computation

    cs.CR 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An MPC-ML compiler that modularizes and auto-tunes operator approximations, delivering 1.2–1.8x speedups over an optimized baseline under user-set accuracy bounds.

  2. Position: Machine Learning Conferences Should Establish a "Refutations and Critiques" Track

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ML conferences should create an official peer-reviewed track dedicated to refuting and critiquing previously published work.

Pith tools