REVIEW 2 cited by
Is Private Learning Possible with Instance Encoding?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A private machine learning algorithm hides as much as possible about its training data while still preserving accuracy. In this work, we study whether a non-private learning algorithm can be made private by relying on an instance-encoding mechanism that modifies the training inputs before feeding them to a normal learner. We formalize both the notion of instance encoding and its privacy by providing two attack models. We first prove impossibility results for achieving a (stronger) model. Next, we demonstrate practical attacks in the second (weaker) attack model on InstaHide, a recent proposal by Huang, Song, Li and Arora [ICML'20] that aims to use instance encoding for privacy.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CrypTorch: PyTorch-based Auto-tuning Compiler for Machine Learning with Multi-party Computation
An MPC-ML compiler that modularizes and auto-tunes operator approximations, delivering 1.2–1.8x speedups over an optimized baseline under user-set accuracy bounds.
-
Position: Machine Learning Conferences Should Establish a "Refutations and Critiques" Track
ML conferences should create an official peer-reviewed track dedicated to refuting and critiquing previously published work.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.