pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23494 · v1 · pith:QAS5RZVInew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ⚛️ physics.geo-ph

Integrating b-Value and Background Seismicity Rate for Spatial Earthquake Forecasting in the Alborz Region, Northern Iran

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.geo-ph
keywords earthquake forecastingb-valuebackground seismicity rateAlborz regionspatial forecastingMolchan diagramsIran seismicity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The combined b-value and background seismicity rate provides the most efficient spatial forecast for earthquakes in the Alborz region.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper evaluates maps of the b-value and background seismicity rate μ as spatial predictors of future earthquakes using a catalog of 23,961 events from 2006 to 2024. The background rate μ shows strong skill on its own, while b-value adds value mainly for larger magnitudes. Their combination detects over 80 percent of M greater than or equal to 4 events while flagging less than half the region as alarm areas. This matters because it suggests a practical way to combine stress and loading indicators for better targeted forecasts in active seismic zones.

Core claim

The combined b--μ forecast achieves detection rates of 0.81--0.83 at spatial alarm rates of 0.43 and 0.36 for M ≥ 4.0 and M ≥ 4.5, respectively, representing the most efficient forecast configuration among all tested models.

What carries the argument

The b-value from the frequency-magnitude distribution and the background seismicity rate μ, which map complementary stress-state and tectonic-loading patterns across the region.

Load-bearing premise

The homogenized catalog of 23,961 events provides an unbiased representation of spatial seismicity patterns without significant location or magnitude errors.

What would settle it

An independent test period in which the combined b-μ model fails to reach higher detection rates than μ alone at the same spatial alarm rates.

read the original abstract

In this study, we evaluate the spatial forecasting skill of the $b$-value and background seismicity rate $\mu$ across the Alborz region using a homogenized catalog of 23,961 earthquakes ($M \geq 1.5$) recorded by the Iranian Seismological Center between 2006 and 2024. Forecast performance for $M \geq 4.0$ and $M \geq 4.5$ is assessed using Molchan error diagrams, probability gain, probability difference, and the modified area skill score. The results show that $\mu$ provides a consistently strong spatial signal, with Molchan curves well below the random baseline and probability gains of 5--6 at low alarm rates, reflecting the persistent clustering of seismicity along major Alborz faults. The $b$-value exhibits limited skill at lower magnitudes but improves steadily with increasing magnitude; its skill score becomes positive above $M \approx 5.3$, indicating that $b$-value anomalies begin to capture meaningful stress concentrations only for larger events. Spatial patterns reveal low $b$ zones along active reverse and strike-slip structures and high $\mu$ zones following long-term seismicity clusters, underscoring their complementary physical roles. Retrospective testing confirms this complementarity: the combined $b$--$\mu$ forecast achieves detection rates of 0.81--0.83 at spatial alarm rates of 0.43 and 0.36 for $M \geq 4.0$ and $M \geq 4.5$, respectively, representing the most efficient forecast configuration among all tested models. These findings demonstrate that integrating stress-state and tectonic-loading indicators yields a more efficient and physically grounded framework for operational earthquake forecasting in the Alborz region.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper evaluates spatial earthquake forecasting skill in the Alborz region by mapping b-value and background rate μ from a homogenized catalog of 23,961 events (M ≥ 1.5, 2006–2024). It reports that μ alone yields strong Molchan performance and probability gains of 5–6, while b-value skill improves with magnitude threshold; the combined b–μ model achieves detection rates of 0.81–0.83 at alarm rates of 0.43 and 0.36 for M ≥ 4.0 and M ≥ 4.5, respectively, outperforming the separate maps according to Molchan diagrams, probability gain, probability difference, and modified area skill score.

Significance. If the catalog-derived maps are robust, the work supplies a concrete demonstration that stress-state (b-value) and tectonic-loading (μ) indicators are complementary for spatial forecasts, with the combined model showing the highest efficiency among tested configurations. The use of standard non-circular metrics (Molchan error diagrams, probability gain) and retrospective testing against independent later events is a strength that allows direct comparison with other forecasting studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Data section] Abstract and Data section: The claim that the 23,961-event catalog is “homogenized” and supplies unbiased b-value and μ maps is load-bearing for the reported Molchan detection rates (0.81–0.83) and the complementarity conclusion, yet no magnitude-of-completeness (Mc) estimate, declustering procedure for μ, or location-error analysis is supplied; without these, it is impossible to verify that low-b zones or high-μ clusters are not artifacts of incompleteness or catalog bias.
  2. [Results section] Results section (Molchan performance paragraph): The efficiency advantage of the combined b–μ forecast over the individual maps is asserted on the basis of the spatial patterns, but the absence of any sensitivity test to Mc or to catalog location uncertainty means the skill scores cannot be shown to be stable under plausible data perturbations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recognizing the potential significance of integrating b-value and background rate for spatial forecasting. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested documentation and tests.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / Data section] Abstract and Data section: The claim that the 23,961-event catalog is “homogenized” and supplies unbiased b-value and μ maps is load-bearing for the reported Molchan detection rates (0.81–0.83) and the complementarity conclusion, yet no magnitude-of-completeness (Mc) estimate, declustering procedure for μ, or location-error analysis is supplied; without these, it is impossible to verify that low-b zones or high-μ clusters are not artifacts of incompleteness or catalog bias.

    Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of Mc, the declustering method, and location-error considerations is required to support the robustness claims. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in the Data section that (i) estimates Mc via the maximum-curvature method on the full catalog, (ii) specifies the declustering algorithm applied to obtain μ, and (iii) quantifies typical location uncertainties and their possible influence on the mapped b-value and μ fields. These additions will allow readers to assess whether the reported spatial patterns could be catalog artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section] Results section (Molchan performance paragraph): The efficiency advantage of the combined b–μ forecast over the individual maps is asserted on the basis of the spatial patterns, but the absence of any sensitivity test to Mc or to catalog location uncertainty means the skill scores cannot be shown to be stable under plausible data perturbations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that stability under plausible data perturbations must be demonstrated. In the revised Results section we will include sensitivity experiments that (i) recompute all maps and Molchan scores for Mc values shifted by ±0.2 magnitude units and (ii) perturb event locations within the reported horizontal and depth uncertainties before recalculating b and μ. The resulting changes in detection rates, probability gain, and area skill score will be reported to confirm that the superiority of the combined model is not sensitive to these choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives spatial b-value and μ maps directly from the 23,961-event catalog via standard maximum-likelihood estimation and declustering, then evaluates the resulting forecasts on the same catalog's larger events using Molchan diagrams, probability gain, and skill scores. No step reduces by construction to its inputs (no self-definitional mapping, no fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no load-bearing self-citation, no imported uniqueness theorem, no smuggled ansatz). The evaluation metrics are externally defined and falsifiable against the observed event locations, making the central claim self-contained against independent benchmarks rather than tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; full methods section unavailable. The central claim rests on the assumption that the provided catalog is suitable for b-value and μ calculation.

free parameters (1)
  • Magnitude cutoffs for forecast testing (M=4.0 and 4.5)
    Chosen thresholds for evaluating skill on larger events; exact justification not given in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The earthquake catalog is homogenized and complete above M=1.5 across the study area
    Stated as the data foundation for computing b-value and μ maps.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5880 in / 1315 out tokens · 54250 ms · 2026-05-25T02:47:17.634565+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Ozturk, S

    Ahadov, B. and Ozturk, S. , title =. Natural Hazards , volume =. 2022 , doi =

  2. [2]

    Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo , volume =

    Aki, Keiiti , title =. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo , volume =

  3. [3]

    Bakun, W. H. and Lindh, A. G. , title =. Science , volume =. 1985 , doi =

  4. [4]

    and van den Ende, M

    Beall, A. and van den Ende, M. and Ampuero, J. P. and Capitanio, F. A. and Fagereng, A. , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. 2022 , doi =

  5. [5]

    and Yeats, R

    Berberian, M. and Yeats, R. S. , title =. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume =. 1999 , doi =

  6. [6]

    and Segou, Margarita and Mousavi, S

    Beroza, Gregory C. and Segou, Margarita and Mousavi, S. Mostafa , title =. Nature Communications , volume =. 2021 , doi =

  7. [7]

    Brodsky, E. E. , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. 2006 , doi =

  8. [8]

    Cavallo, Eduardo and Powell, Andrew and Becerra, Oscar , title =

  9. [9]

    and Jones, Lucy M

    Jordan, Thomas H. and Jones, Lucy M. , title =. Seismological Research Letters , volume =. 2010 , doi =

  10. [10]

    and Tramelli, A

    Convertito, V. and Tramelli, A. and Godano, C. , title =. Scientific Reports , volume =. 2024 , doi =

  11. [11]

    Natural Hazards , volume =

    Cui, Peng and Zhu, Xing-Hua and Han, Yong-Shun and Chen, Xiao-Qing and Zhuang, Jian-Qi , title =. Natural Hazards , volume =. 2011 , doi =

  12. [12]

    and Eaton, David W

    El-Isa, Zuhair H. and Eaton, David W. , title =. Tectonophysics , volume =. 2014 , doi =

  13. [13]

    and Jackson, David D

    Geller, Robert J. and Jackson, David D. and Kagan, Yan Y. and Mulargia, Francesco , title =. Science , volume =. 1997 , doi =

  14. [14]

    Gheitanchi, M. R. , title =. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Geosciences , volume =

  15. [15]

    and Richter, C

    Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. , title =. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume =. 1944 , doi =

  16. [16]

    and Ogata, Y

    Hainzl, S. and Ogata, Y. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume =. 2005 , doi =

  17. [17]

    and Kraft, T

    Hainzl, S. and Kraft, T. and Wassermann, J. and Igel, H. and Schmedes, E. , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. 2006 , doi =

  18. [18]

    Constitutive law for earthquake production based on rate-and-state friction:

    Heimisson, El. Constitutive law for earthquake production based on rate-and-state friction:. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume =. 2018 , doi =

  19. [19]

    and Moinfar, A

    Karimiparidari, S. and Moinfar, A. A. and Maleki, M. , title =. Journal of Seismology , volume =. 2013 , doi =

  20. [20]

    Soils and Foundations , volume =

    Kazama, Motoki and Noda, Toshihiro , title =. Soils and Foundations , volume =. 2012 , doi =

  21. [21]

    Keilis-Borok, V. I. and Knopoff, L. and Kossobokov, V. G. and Rotvain, I. M. , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. 1990 , doi =

  22. [22]

    Keilis-Borok, V. I. and Kossobokov, V. G. , title =. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors , volume =. 1990 , doi =

  23. [23]

    King, Geoffrey C. P. and Stein, Ross S. and Lin, Jian , title =. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume =. 1994 , doi =

  24. [24]

    Geoenvironmental Disasters , volume =

    Lamessa, Gidisa and Mammo, Tilahun and Raghuvanshi, Tarun Kumar , title =. Geoenvironmental Disasters , volume =. 2019 , doi =

  25. [25]

    and McBride, Sara K

    Michael, Andrew J. and McBride, Sara K. and Hardebeck, Jeanne L. and Barall, Michael and Martinez, Elizabeth and Page, Morgan T. and Wein, Anne M. , title =. Seismological Research Letters , volume =. 2020 , doi =

  26. [26]

    Molchan, G. M. , title =. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors , volume =. 1990 , doi =

  27. [27]

    and Mostafazadeh, M

    Mousaviyan, S. and Mostafazadeh, M. , title =. Acta Geophysica , volume =. 2025 , doi =

  28. [28]

    and Ouillon, G

    Nandan, S. and Ouillon, G. and Wiemer, S. and Sornette, D. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume =. 2017 , doi =

  29. [29]

    Nanjo, K. Z. and Hirata, N. and Obara, K. and Kasahara, K. , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. 2012 , doi =

  30. [30]

    Nanjo, K. Z. and Izutsu, J. and Orihara, Y. and Kamogawa, M. , title =. Tectonophysics , volume =. 2022 , doi =

  31. [31]

    , title =

    Ogata, Y. , title =. Earth, Planets and Space , volume =. 2022 , doi =

  32. [32]

    2020 , howpublished =

    Hierarchical Space-Time Point-Process Models (HIST-PPM): Software documentation , author =. 2020 , howpublished =

  33. [33]

    Sarlis, N. V. and Skordas, E. S. and Varotsos, P. A. and Nagao, T. and Kamogawa, M. and Uyeda, S. , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2015 , doi =

  34. [34]

    Scholz, C. H. , title =. Geophysical Research Letters , volume =. 2015 , doi =

  35. [35]

    and Wiemer, S

    Schorlemmer, D. and Wiemer, S. and Wyss, M. , title =. Nature , volume =. 2005 , doi =

  36. [36]

    Shahvar, M. P. and Zare, M. , title =. Natural Hazards , volume =. 2013 , doi =

  37. [37]

    and Meng, L

    Shi, H. and Meng, L. and Zhang, X. and Chang, Y. and Yang, Z. and Xie, W. and Hattori, K. and Han, P. , title =. Chinese Journal of Geophysics , volume =. 2018 , doi =

  38. [38]

    and Bolt, B

    Shi, Y. and Bolt, B. A. , title =. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume =. 1982 , doi =

  39. [39]

    Stevens, V. L. and Avouac, J. P. , title =. Geophysical Journal International , volume =. 2021 , doi =

  40. [40]

    and Jackson, J

    Tatar, M. and Jackson, J. and Hatzfeld, D. and Bergman, E. , title =. Geophysical Journal International , volume =. 2007 , doi =

  41. [41]

    and Isik, V

    Tourani, M. and Isik, V. and Saber, R. and Caglayan, A. and Chitea, F. , title =. Journal of Seismology , volume =. 2024 , doi =

  42. [42]

    and Zhuang, J

    van Stiphout, T. and Zhuang, J. and Marsan, D. , title =. Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis , pages =. 2012 , doi =

  43. [43]

    and Nilforoushan, F

    Vernant, P. and Nilforoushan, F. and Chery, J. and Bayer, R. and Djamour, Y. and Masson, F. and Nankali, H. and Martinod, J. and Tavakoli, F. , title =. Earth and Planetary Science Letters , volume =. 2004 , doi =

  44. [44]

    Wang, Y. C. and Mora, P. and Yin, C. and Place, D. , title =. Pure and Applied Geophysics , volume =. 2004 , doi =

  45. [45]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume =

    Wiemer, Stefan and Wyss, Max , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume =. 1997 , doi =

  46. [46]

    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume =

    Wiemer, Stefan and Wyss, Max , title =. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume =. 2000 , doi =

  47. [47]

    Advances in Geophysics , volume =

    Wiemer, Stefan and Wyss, Max , title =. Advances in Geophysics , volume =. 2002 , doi =

  48. [48]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume =

    Zaliapin, Ilya and Ben-Zion, Yehuda , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume =. 2013 , doi =

  49. [49]

    and Jordan, Thomas H

    Zechar, Jeremy D. and Jordan, Thomas H. , title =. Annals of Geophysics , volume =. 2010 , doi =

  50. [50]

    and Wang, R

    Zhang, Y. and Wang, R. and Shi, H. and Miao, M. and Zhuang, J. and Chang, Y. and Hattori, K. and Han, P. , title =. Entropy , volume =. 2025 , doi =

  51. [51]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume =

    Zhuang, Jiancang and Ogata, Yosihiko and Vere-Jones, David , title =. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume =. 2002 , doi =

  52. [52]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume=

    Underestimation of microearthquake size by the magnitude scale of the Japan Meteorological Agency: Influence on earthquake statistics , author=. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  53. [53]

    2020 , note =

    Hierarchical Space-Time Point-Process Models (HIST-PPM): Software documentation , author =. 2020 , note =

  54. [54]

    Journal of Seismology , volume=

    Empirical global relations converting M_S and m_b to moment magnitude , author=. Journal of Seismology , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  55. [55]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , author =

    The. Journal of the American Statistical Association , author =. 1949 , pmid =. doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 , number =

  56. [56]

    Creating a

    van den Ende, Martijn and Bruhat, Lucile and Funning, Gareth and Gabriel, Alice-Agnes and Hicks, Stephen and Jolivet, Romain and Lecocq, Thomas and Rowe, Christie , month = jul, year =. Creating a. doi:10.31223/X5304V , type =

  57. [57]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.4455036 , type =

    trichter/rf: v1.1.1 , author =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4455036 , type =

  58. [58]

    and Frankel, A.D

    Mueller, C.S. and Frankel, A.D. and Petersen, M.D. and Leyendecker, E.V. , year =. Documentation for 2003

  59. [59]

    and Ozturk, S

    Ahadov, B. and Ozturk, S. Spatial variations of fundamental seismotectonic parameters for the earthquake occurrences in the Eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus . Natural Hazards, 111 0 (3): 0 2177--2192, 2022. doi:10.1007/s11069-021-05136-1

  60. [60]

    Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula N = a - bM and its confidence limits

    Aki, K. Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula N = a - bM and its confidence limits. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 43: 0 237--239, 1965

  61. [61]

    Bakun, W. H. and Lindh, A. G. The Parkfield, California , earthquake prediction experiment. Science, 229 0 (4714): 0 619--624, 1985. doi:10.1126/science.229.4714.619

  62. [62]

    P., Capitanio, F

    Beall, A., van den Ende, M., Ampuero, J. P., Capitanio, F. A., and Fagereng, A. Linking Earthquake Magnitude-Frequency Statistics and Stress in Visco-Frictional Fault Zone Models. Geophysical Research Letters, 49 0 (17): 0 e2022GL099247, 2022. doi:10.1029/2022GL099247

  63. [63]

    and Yeats, R

    Berberian, M. and Yeats, R. S. Patterns of historical earthquake rupture in the Iranian Plateau . Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89 0 (1): 0 120--139, 1999. doi:10.1785/BSSA0890010120

  64. [64]

    C., Segou, M., and Mousavi, S

    Beroza, G. C., Segou, M., and Mousavi, S. M. Machine learning and earthquake forecasting--next steps. Nature Communications, 12: 0 5056, 2021. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25375-3

  65. [65]

    Brodsky, E. E. Long-range triggered earthquakes that continue after the wave train passes. Geophysical Research Letters, 33 0 (15): 0 L15313, 2006. doi:10.1029/2006GL026605

  66. [66]

    Estimating the Direct Economic Damage of the Earthquake in Haiti

    Cavallo, E., Powell, A., and Becerra, O. Estimating the Direct Economic Damage of the Earthquake in Haiti . Working Paper Series IDB-WP-163, Inter-American Development Bank, 2010

  67. [67]

    b -map evaluation and on-fault stress state for the Antakya 2023 earthquakes

    Convertito, V., Tramelli, A., and Godano, C. b -map evaluation and on-fault stress state for the Antakya 2023 earthquakes. Scientific Reports, 14 0 (1): 0 1596, 2024. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50837-3

  68. [68]

    The Wenchuan earthquake ( May 12, 2008 ), Sichuan Province, China , and resulting geohazards

    Cui, P., Zhu, X.-H., Han, Y.-S., Chen, X.-Q., and Zhuang, J.-Q. The Wenchuan earthquake ( May 12, 2008 ), Sichuan Province, China , and resulting geohazards. Natural Hazards, 56 0 (1): 0 19--36, 2011. doi:10.1007/s11069-009-9489-1

  69. [69]

    El-Isa, Z. H. and Eaton, D. W. Spatiotemporal variations in the b -value of earthquake magnitude--frequency distributions: Classification and causes. Tectonophysics, 615--616: 0 1--11, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2013.12.001

  70. [70]

    J., Jackson, D

    Geller, R. J., Jackson, D. D., Kagan, Y. Y., and Mulargia, F. Earthquakes cannot be predicted. Science, 275 0 (5306): 0 1616--1617, 1997. doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1616

  71. [71]

    Gheitanchi, M. R. Source characteristics of the 28th May 2004 Baladeh-Kojour destructive earthquake in Central Alborz , revealed from far field waveform data. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Geosciences, 14 0 (55): 0 154--163, 2005

  72. [72]

    and Richter, C

    Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. Frequency of earthquakes in California . Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34 0 (4): 0 185--188, 1944. doi:10.1785/BSSA0340040185

  73. [73]

    and Ogata, Y

    Hainzl, S. and Ogata, Y. Detecting fluid signals in seismicity data through statistical earthquake modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 110 0 (B5): 0 B05S07, 2005. doi:10.1029/2004JB003247

  74. [74]

    Evidence for rainfall-triggered earthquake activity

    Hainzl, S., Kraft, T., Wassermann, J., Igel, H., and Schmedes, E. Evidence for rainfall-triggered earthquake activity. Geophysical Research Letters, 33 0 (19): 0 L19303, 2006. doi:10.1029/2006GL027642

  75. [75]

    Heimisson, E. R. and Segall, P. Constitutive law for earthquake production based on rate-and-state friction: Dieterich 1994 revisited. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123 0 (5): 0 4141--4156, 2018. doi:10.1029/2018JB015525

  76. [76]

    Jordan, T. H. and Jones, L. M. Operational earthquake forecasting: Some thoughts on why and how. Seismological Research Letters, 81 0 (4): 0 571--574, 2010. doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.4.571

  77. [77]

    A., and Maleki, M

    Karimiparidari, S., Moinfar, A. A., and Maleki, M. Iranian earthquakes, a uniform catalog with moment magnitudes. Journal of Seismology, 17 0 (3): 0 897--911, 2013. doi:10.1007/s10950-013-9360-y

  78. [78]

    and Noda, T

    Kazama, M. and Noda, T. Damage statistics (summary of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake damage). Soils and Foundations, 52 0 (5): 0 780--792, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.003

  79. [79]

    Keilis-Borok, V. I. and Kossobokov, V. G. Premonitory activation of earthquake flow: Algorithm M8 . Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 61 0 (1-2): 0 73--83, 1990. doi:10.1016/0031-9201(90)90096-G

  80. [80]

    King, G. C. P., Stein, R. S., and Lin, J. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84 0 (3): 0 935--953, 1994. doi:10.1785/BSSA0840030935

Showing first 80 references.