Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Determination of toxic comments and unintended model bias minimization using Deep learning approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.04789 v1 pith:QEJ3ZV43 submitted 2023-11-08 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CY

Determination of toxic comments and unintended model bias minimization using Deep learning approach

classification cs.LG cs.CLcs.CY
keywords biasmodeltoxicbertidentitylearningunintendedaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Online conversations can be toxic and subjected to threats, abuse, or harassment. To identify toxic text comments, several deep learning and machine learning models have been proposed throughout the years. However, recent studies demonstrate that because of the imbalances in the training data, some models are more likely to show unintended biases including gender bias and identity bias. In this research, our aim is to detect toxic comment and reduce the unintended bias concerning identity features such as race, gender, sex, religion by fine-tuning an attention based model called BERT(Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers). We apply weighted loss to address the issue of unbalanced data and compare the performance of a fine-tuned BERT model with a traditional Logistic Regression model in terms of classification and bias minimization. The Logistic Regression model with the TFIDF vectorizer achieve 57.1% accuracy, and fine-tuned BERT model's accuracy is 89%. Code is available at https://github.com/zim10/Determine_Toxic_comment_and_identity_bias.git

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.