Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving Factuality of Abstractive Summarization via Contrastive Reward Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.04507 v1 pith:QFXFCN55 submitted 2023-07-10 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords learningcontrastivefactualityrewardsummariessummarizationabstractivefactual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modern abstractive summarization models often generate summaries that contain hallucinated or contradictory information. In this paper, we propose a simple but effective contrastive learning framework that incorporates recent developments in reward learning and factuality metrics. Empirical studies demonstrate that the proposed framework enables summarization models to learn from feedback of factuality metrics using contrastive reward learning, leading to more factual summaries by human evaluations. This suggests that further advances in learning and evaluation algorithms can feed directly into providing more factual summaries.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning to Substitute Words with Model-based Score Ranking

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A BERT model fine-tuned with ranking losses against BARTScore substitutes words to improve that score, outperforming supervised and LLM baselines on BARTScore-based metrics without human labels.

Pith tools