REVIEW 1 cited by
Improving Factuality of Abstractive Summarization via Contrastive Reward Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Modern abstractive summarization models often generate summaries that contain hallucinated or contradictory information. In this paper, we propose a simple but effective contrastive learning framework that incorporates recent developments in reward learning and factuality metrics. Empirical studies demonstrate that the proposed framework enables summarization models to learn from feedback of factuality metrics using contrastive reward learning, leading to more factual summaries by human evaluations. This suggests that further advances in learning and evaluation algorithms can feed directly into providing more factual summaries.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Learning to Substitute Words with Model-based Score Ranking
A BERT model fine-tuned with ranking losses against BARTScore substitutes words to improve that score, outperforming supervised and LLM baselines on BARTScore-based metrics without human labels.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.