Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Twin-Merging: Dynamic Integration of Modular Expertise in Model Merging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.15479 v2 pith:QIAZTPDD submitted 2024-06-17 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords mergingmodelmodelsperformanceknowledgedataexclusivefine-tuned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In the era of large language models, model merging is a promising way to combine multiple task-specific models into a single multitask model without extra training. However, two challenges remain: (a) interference between different models and (b) heterogeneous data during testing. Traditional model merging methods often show significant performance gaps compared to fine-tuned models due to these issues. Additionally, a one-size-fits-all model lacks flexibility for diverse test data, leading to performance degradation. We show that both shared and exclusive task-specific knowledge are crucial for merging performance, but directly merging exclusive knowledge hinders overall performance. In view of this, we propose Twin-Merging, a method that encompasses two principal stages: (1) modularizing knowledge into shared and exclusive components, with compression to reduce redundancy and enhance efficiency; (2) dynamically merging shared and task-specific knowledge based on the input. This approach narrows the performance gap between merged and fine-tuned models and improves adaptability to heterogeneous data. Extensive experiments on $20$ datasets for both language and vision tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, showing an average improvement of $28.34\%$ in absolute normalized score for discriminative tasks and even surpassing the fine-tuned upper bound on the generative tasks. Our implementation is available in \url{https://github.com/LZY-the-boys/Twin-Merging}

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unraveling LoRA Interference: Orthogonal Subspaces for Robust Model Merging

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Initializing LoRA's A matrix with the smallest-eigenvalue eigenvectors of other tasks' feature covariance reduces interference when merging task-specific LoRA models, improving average merged accuracy.

  2. Decouple and Orthogonalize: A Data-Free Framework for LoRA Merging

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A data-free LoRA merging framework that decouples weight magnitude from direction and orthogonalizes directions to reduce task interference, outperforming existing merging methods across vision, language and multimoda...

  3. Continual Learning in Transition

    cs.LG 2026-08 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A tri-axial framework of When, Where, and How organizes the ongoing transition of continual learning from parameter-centric updates to system-level capability evolution.

  4. Intrinsic Strain-Driven Topological Evolution in SrRuO3 via Flexural Strain Engineering

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The abstract reports a 21% anomalous Hall conductivity increase in flexurally strained SrRuO3, but the submitted full text belongs to a different machine learning paper.

Pith tools