pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17063 · v1 · pith:QJAVMRX5new · submitted 2026-06-04 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph

The Competitiveness of Renewables: An Analysis of Magnitude, Geography, and Drivers

Pascal Fr\"ohlich , Maximilian Bernecker , Felix M\"usgens This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 23:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph
keywords renewable energyelectricity system modelCO2 pricingGermanyTexassolar PVcost competitivenessmarket equilibrium
0
0 comments X

The pith

Renewable generation reaches substantial market shares in cost-optimal electricity systems even without subsidies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies an electricity system model of investment and dispatch decisions to Germany and Texas using data from 2015 onward and projections to 2050. It computes market-equilibrium shares of renewables and tests the influence of CO2 prices, technology costs, and fuel prices through parameter variations. Results indicate that renewables attain considerable shares in both regions without subsidies; in Germany the rise is driven mainly by CO2 pricing together with falling renewable investment costs, while in Texas solar PV enters the optimal mix even without CO2 pricing and despite low natural-gas prices.

Core claim

Renewable generation achieves considerable market shares even without subsidies. In Germany, the increase in renewable generation is primarily driven by CO2 pricing, complemented by declining investment costs for renewable technologies. In Texas, solar PV is part of the cost-optimal system, even in the absence of CO2 pricing and despite low natural gas prices.

What carries the argument

Electricity system model that optimizes investment and dispatch decisions to find cost-minimal generation mixes under varying policy and cost assumptions.

If this is right

  • Renewables form a substantial part of the least-cost electricity mix in both a high-renewable European market and a low-gas-price US market.
  • CO2 pricing is the dominant driver of rising renewable shares in Germany, with technology-cost reductions providing secondary support.
  • Solar PV becomes cost-competitive in Texas without any carbon price signal.
  • Policy that internalizes carbon costs can accelerate renewable deployment even when fuel prices favor conventional generation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the modeled cost declines continue, renewable shares could rise further in later decades without additional subsidies.
  • The same modeling approach could be applied to other regions to test whether geography and local fuel prices alter the relative importance of CO2 pricing versus technology costs.
  • Observed market outcomes that deviate from the model's equilibrium could point to barriers such as grid constraints or permitting delays not captured in the optimization.

Load-bearing premise

The model's input values for technology costs, fuel prices, demand profiles, and technology performance accurately represent actual conditions and trends in the modeled years and regions.

What would settle it

Comparison of the model's predicted renewable shares for 2015-2024 against observed generation data in Germany and Texas; large, systematic divergence would indicate the cost-optimality claim does not hold under real conditions.

read the original abstract

While renewable energy sources are the fastest-growing electricity generation technology globally, their competitiveness is still the subject of controversy. This paper presents an electricity system model for investment and dispatch to determine the cost-optimal shares of renewable energy sources. We compute and analyse renewable generation shares in market equilibrium for Germany and Texas, using annual data for 2015 to 2024, and in five-year intervals for 2030 to 2050. Furthermore, we identify the key drivers of the renewable competitiveness and quantify their contribution through parameter variations. Our results show that renewable generation achieves considerable market shares even without subsidies. In Germany, the increase in renewable generation is primarily driven by CO2 pricing, complemented by declining investment costs for renewable technologies. In Texas, solar PV is part of the cost-optimal system, even in the absence of CO2 pricing and despite low natural gas prices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an electricity system model for investment and dispatch that computes cost-optimal renewable generation shares for Germany and Texas. Using annual data for 2015–2024 and five-year intervals to 2050, it concludes that renewables achieve considerable market shares even without subsidies; in Germany the increase is driven primarily by CO2 pricing together with falling renewable investment costs, while in Texas solar PV enters the cost-optimal mix even without CO2 pricing and despite low natural-gas prices. Parameter variations are used to quantify the contribution of individual drivers.

Significance. If the input data and model formulation are shown to be reliable, the work supplies quantitative, region-specific evidence on the economic competitiveness of renewables and the relative importance of carbon pricing versus technology-cost declines. The explicit decomposition of drivers via controlled parameter variations is a methodological strength that could be useful for policy analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Data and model inputs] The central claims rest on the accuracy of the exogenous technology costs, fuel prices, demand profiles, and capacity factors for both the historical (2015–2024) and future (2030–2050) periods, yet no validation of these inputs against realized market data or independent sources is reported. Systematic bias in any of these series would shift the location of the cost optimum and therefore the headline renewable shares.
  2. [Results for 2015–2024] For the 2015–2024 period the model produces cost-optimal generation shares, but the manuscript does not compare these outputs with observed historical generation mixes. Without such a back-test it is impossible to assess whether the model reproduces real-world outcomes under the chosen cost and price trajectories.
  3. [Driver analysis] The parameter-variation experiments quantify the contribution of CO2 price, investment-cost declines, etc., but the paper does not report whether the chosen central trajectories for these parameters lie within the range of realized or projected values from multiple independent sources; this leaves open the possibility that the reported driver rankings are sensitive to the particular point estimates adopted.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states results but supplies no information on model equations, data sources, or validation procedures; adding one sentence on each would improve reader orientation.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the optimization objective and constraints should be introduced consistently in the methods section and then used uniformly in the results tables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We agree that greater transparency on input validation, historical benchmarking, and parameter sourcing would strengthen the paper and will revise accordingly. Below we respond to each major comment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Data and model inputs] The central claims rest on the accuracy of the exogenous technology costs, fuel prices, demand profiles, and capacity factors for both the historical (2015–2024) and future (2030–2050) periods, yet no validation of these inputs against realized market data or independent sources is reported. Systematic bias in any of these series would shift the location of the cost optimum and therefore the headline renewable shares.

    Authors: Our technology costs are taken from IRENA and IEA reports, fuel prices from national statistics and EIA, demand from official load forecasts, and capacity factors from reanalysis data calibrated to observed weather. We will add a new subsection (Methods or Appendix) that tabulates our central assumptions alongside values from at least two additional independent sources (NREL ATB, BloombergNEF, national energy plans) for each key parameter, confirming that our trajectories lie within the ranges used in the broader literature. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results for 2015–2024] For the 2015–2024 period the model produces cost-optimal generation shares, but the manuscript does not compare these outputs with observed historical generation mixes. Without such a back-test it is impossible to assess whether the model reproduces real-world outcomes under the chosen cost and price trajectories.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of a back-test. Direct numerical agreement is not expected because historical mixes incorporate subsidies, permitting delays, and other non-cost factors absent from the model. Nevertheless, we will add a comparison (new figure or table in Results) of the model's 2020 and 2024 cost-optimal renewable shares against official statistics (Fraunhofer ISE for Germany, ERCOT for Texas) and discuss the sources of any differences, thereby providing readers with a transparent benchmark. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Driver analysis] The parameter-variation experiments quantify the contribution of CO2 price, investment-cost declines, etc., but the paper does not report whether the chosen central trajectories for these parameters lie within the range of realized or projected values from multiple independent sources; this leaves open the possibility that the reported driver rankings are sensitive to the particular point estimates adopted.

    Authors: Central trajectories were selected from the most recent IEA and IRENA median projections available at the time of analysis. In revision we will insert a short table or paragraph in the Methods section that places each central path within the envelope of alternative projections (IPCC AR6, NREL, national decarbonization roadmaps). Because the existing parameter-variation experiments already span plausible ranges around these points, the qualitative ranking of drivers is robust; we will state this explicitly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; forward simulation from independent inputs

full rationale

The paper runs a standard investment-and-dispatch optimization model whose objective and constraints are parameterized by exogenous technology costs, fuel prices, demand profiles, and performance data. Renewable shares emerge as model outputs, not quantities defined in terms of themselves or fitted to reproduce the same data. No equations or steps in the abstract reduce the headline result to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no details on free parameters, background axioms, or new entities are provided in the given text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5685 in / 1098 out tokens · 19780 ms · 2026-06-27T23:04:25.861941+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    World Energy Outlook 2024 2024

    IEA. World Energy Outlook 2024 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024 (accessed September 9, 2025)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Global Energy Review 2026 2026

    IEA. Global Energy Review 2026 2026. https://www.ie a.org/reports/global-energy-review- 2026/technology-solar-pv-and-wind (accessed May 12, 2026)

    2026

  3. [3]

    Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023 2024

    IRENA. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023 2024. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2024/Sep/Renewable-Power-Generation-Costs-in-2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    Levelized Cost of Electricity - Renewable Energy Technologies 2024

    Fraunhofer ISE . Levelized Cost of Electricity - Renewable Energy Technologies 2024. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/publications/studies/cost-of-electricity.html (accessed January 13, 2026)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Are renewable energy technologies cost competitive for elect ricity generation? Renewable Energy 2021;180:658–72

    Timilsina GR. Are renewable energy technologies cost competitive for elect ricity generation? Renewable Energy 2021;180:658–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.088

    work page doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.088 2021

  6. [7]

    Is Offshore Already Competitive? Analyzing German Offshore Wind Auctions

    Müsgens F, Riepin I. Is Offshore Already Competitive? Analyzing German Offshore Wind Auctions. 2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), 2018, p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2018.8469851

    work page doi:10.1109/eem.2018.8469851 2018

  7. [8]

    The cannibalization effect of intermittent renewables: Are wind and solar power in Germany still dependent on policy support? Journal of Environmental Management 2025;394:127415

    Tselika K, Tselika M, Demetriades E, Eskeland GS. The cannibalization effect of intermittent renewables: Are wind and solar power in Germany still dependent on policy support? Journal of Environmental Management 2025;394:127415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127415

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127415 2025

  8. [9]

    How Germany achieved a record share of renewables during the COVID -19 pandemic while relying on the European interconnected po wer network

    Halbrügge S, Buhl HU, Fridgen G, Schott P, Weibelzahl M, Weissflog J. How Germany achieved a record share of renewables during the COVID -19 pandemic while relying on the European interconnected po wer network. Energy 2022;246:123303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123303

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123303 2022

  9. [10]

    Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity

    Idel R. Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity. Energy 2022;259:124905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124905

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124905 2022

  10. [11]

    Levelized Cost of Load Coverage (LCOLC) – a Simple and Meaningful Cost measure for Electricity 2024

    Grimm V, Öchsle L, Zöttl G. Levelized Cost of Load Coverage (LCOLC) – a Simple and Meaningful Cost measure for Electricity 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5112248

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.5112248 2024

  11. [12]

    Exploring the feasibility of Europe’s renewable expansion plans based on their profitability in the market

    Finke J, Bertsch V, Di Cosmo V. Exploring the feasibility of Europe’s renewable expansion plans based on their profitability in the market. Energy Policy 2023;177:113566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113566

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113566 2023

  12. [13]

    Trade and

    Espa I, Marín Durán G. EU and WTO Regulatory Approaches to Renewable Energy Subsidies: Negative and Positive Integration. In: Krämer -Hoppe R, editor. Positive I ntegration - EU and WTO Approaches Towards the “Trade and” Debate, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020, p. 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25662-3_4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25662-3_4 2020

  13. [14]

    IMF Fossil Fuel Subsidies Data: 2023 Update

    Black S, Liu AA, Parry IWH, Vernon N. IMF Fossil Fuel Subsidies Data: 2023 Update. IMF Working Papers 2023;2023. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400249006.001.A001

    work page doi:10.5089/9798400249006.001.a001 2023

  14. [15]

    Business Economics

    Mankiw G, Taylor M, Ashwin A. Business Economics. 3rd ed. Andover: Cengage; 2018

    2018

  15. [16]

    Optimal investment paths for future renewable based energy syst ems— Using the optimisation model Balmorel

    Karlsson K, Meibom P. Optimal investment paths for future renewable based energy syst ems— Using the optimisation model Balmorel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2008;33:1777–

    2008

  16. [17]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.01.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.01.031 2008

  17. [18]

    The near -optimal feasible space of a renewable power system model

    Neumann F, Brown T. The near -optimal feasible space of a renewable power system model. Electric Power Systems Research 2021;190:106690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106690. 33

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106690 2021

  18. [19]

    Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market

    Özdemir Ö, Hobbs BF, van Hout M, Koutstaal PR. Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market. Energy Policy 2020;137:111166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111166

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111166 2020

  19. [20]

    How does climate change affect electricity system planning and optimal allocation of variable renewable energy? Applied Energy 2019;252:113397

    Peter J. How does climate change affect electricity system planning and optimal allocation of variable renewable energy? Applied Energy 2019;252:113397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113397

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113397 2019

  20. [21]

    The expansion of RES and the EU ETS – valuable addition or conflicting instruments? Energy Policy 2021;150:112125

    Anke C-P, Möst D. The expansion of RES and the EU ETS – valuable addition or conflicting instruments? Energy Policy 2021;150:112125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112125

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112125 2021

  21. [22]

    A model and appro ach to the challenge posed by optimal power systems planning

    O’Neill RP, Krall EA, Hedman KW, Oren SS. A model and appro ach to the challenge posed by optimal power systems planning. Math Program 2013;140:239 –66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-013-0695-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10107-013-0695-3 2013

  22. [23]

    Renewable energy sources in European energy supply and interactions with emission trading

    Möst D, Fichtner W. Renewable energy sources in European energy supply and interactions with emission trading. Energy Policy 2010;38:2898–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.023 2010

  23. [24]

    Quantifying value and representing competitiveness of electricity system technologies in economic models

    Mowers M, Mignone BK, Steinberg DC. Quantifying value and representing competitiveness of electricity system technologies in economic models. Applied Energy 2023;329:120132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120132

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120132 2023

  24. [25]

    Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach 2023

    IEA. Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-roadmap-a-global-pathway-to-keep-the-15-0c-goal-in- reach

    2023

  25. [26]

    Pay-back time: Increasing electricity prices and decreasing costs make renewable energy competitive

    Batz Liñeiro T, Müsgens F. Pay-back time: Increasing electricity prices and decreasing costs make renewable energy competitive. Energy Policy 2025;199:114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114523

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114523 2025

  26. [27]

    Offshore wind competitiveness in mature markets without subsidy

    Jansen M, Staffell I, Kitzing L, Quoilin S, Wiggelinkhuizen E, Bulder B, et al. Offshore wind competitiveness in mature markets without subsidy. Nat Energy 2020;5:614 –22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0661-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0661-2 2020

  27. [28]

    Global Cost of Renewables to Continue Falling in 2025 as China Extends Manufacturing Lead: BloombergNEF

    Catsaros O. Global Cost of Renewables to Continue Falling in 2025 as China Extends Manufacturing Lead: BloombergNEF. BloombergNEF 2025. https://about.bnef.com/insights/clean-energy/global-cost-of-renewables-to-continue-falling-in- 2025-as-china-extends-manufacturing-lead-bloombergnef/ (accessed February 9, 2026)

    2025

  28. [29]

    Successful renewable energy development in a competitive electricity market: A Texas case study

    Zarnikau J. Successful renewable energy development in a competitive electricity market: A Texas case study. Energy Policy 2011;39:3906–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.043

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.043 2011

  29. [30]

    ERCOT 2040: A Roadmap for Modernizing Texas’ Electricity Infrastructure 2023

    Rhodes J. ERCOT 2040: A Roadmap for Modernizing Texas’ Electricity Infrastructure 2023. https://blog.advancedenergyunited.org/reports/ercot_2040

    2040

  30. [31]

    The future of the European electricity system and the impact of fluctuating renewable energy – A scenario analysis

    Spiecker S, Weber C. The future of the European electricity system and the impact of fluctuating renewable energy – A scenario analysis. Energy Policy 2014;65:185–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.032 2014

  31. [32]

    Tightening EU ETS targets in line with the European Green Deal: Impacts on the decarbonization of the EU power sector

    Pietzcker RC, Osorio S, Rodrigues R. Tightening EU ETS targets in line with the European Green Deal: Impacts on the decarbonization of the EU power sector. Applied Energy 2021;293:116914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116914

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116914 2021

  32. [33]

    How CO2 prices accelerate decarbonisation – The case of coal- fired generation in Germany

    Sgarciu S, Scholz D, Müsgens F. How CO2 prices accelerate decarbonisation – The case of coal- fired generation in Germany. Energy Policy 2023;173:113375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113375

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113375 2023

  33. [34]

    Long-term equilibrium in electricity markets with renewables and energy storage only

    Tarel G, Korpås M, Botterud A. Long-term equilibrium in electricity markets with renewables and energy storage only. Energy Syst 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-024-00654-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s12667-024-00654-y 2024

  34. [35]

    Comparing open source power system models - A case study focusing on fundamental modeling parameters 34 for the German energy transition

    van Ouwerkerk J, Hainsch K, Candas S, Muschner C, Buchholz S, Günther S, et al. Comparing open source power system models - A case study focusing on fundamental modeling parameters 34 for the German energy transition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022;161:112331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112331

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112331 2022

  35. [36]

    Current and Prospective Costs of Electricity Generation until 2050 2013

    Schröder A, Kunz F, Meiss J, Mendelevitch R. Current and Prospective Costs of Electricity Generation until 2050 2013. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.424566.de/diw_datadoc_2013- 068.pdf

    2050

  36. [37]

    Cost and Performance Data for Power Generation Technologies 2012

    Black & Veatch. Cost and Performance Data for Power Generation Technologies 2012. https://refman.energytransitionmodel.com/publications/1921

    2012

  37. [38]

    Technology Data for Generation of Electricity and District Heating 2024

    Danish Energy Agency. Technology Data for Generation of Electricity and District Heating 2024. https://ens.dk/en/analyses-and-statistics/technology-data-generation-electricity-and-district- heating

    2024

  38. [39]

    Study on energy storage 2023

    ENTEC. Study on energy storage 2023. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2833/333409

    work page doi:10.2833/333409 2023

  39. [40]

    Cost of energy (LCOE) 2020

    Trinomics. Cost of energy (LCOE) 2020. https://doi.org/10.2833/779528

    work page doi:10.2833/779528 2020

  40. [41]

    The development of battery storage systems in Germany: A market review 2020;29

    Figgener J, Hecht C, Haberschusz D, Bors J, Spreuer KG, Kairies K-P, et al. The development of battery storage systems in Germany: A market review 2020;29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.101153

    work page doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101153 2020

  41. [42]

    Levelized Cost of Electricity - Renewable Energy Technologies 2024

    Kost C, Fraunhofer ISE. Levelized Cost of Electricity - Renewable Energy Technologies 2024. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/publications/studies/cost-of-electricity.html

    2024

  42. [43]

    GenCost project data 2025

    Graham, P, Hayward J, Foster J. GenCost project data 2025. https://data.csiro.au/collection/csiro:44228 (accessed May 12, 2025)

    2025

  43. [44]

    Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2015 2015

    IEA. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2015 2015. https://www.iea.org/reports/projected- costs-of-generating-electricity-2015

    2015

  44. [45]

    Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2020 2020

    IEA. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2020 2020. https://www.iea.org/reports/projected- costs-of-generating-electricity-2020

    2020

  45. [46]

    Levelized Cost Of Storage 2021

    Lazard. Levelized Cost Of Storage 2021. https://www.lazard.com/research -insights/levelized- cost-of-energy-levelized-cost-of-storage-and-levelized-cost-of-hydrogen-2021/

    2021

  46. [47]

    Levelized Cost of Energy+ n.d

    Lazard. Levelized Cost of Energy+ n.d. https://www.lazard.com/research-insights/levelized-cost- of-energyplus/

  47. [48]

    Fuel and c apital costs in the NEM 2008

    ACIL Tasman. Fuel and c apital costs in the NEM 2008. https://www.qca.org.au/wp- content/uploads/2019/05/22649_DD-ER-NEP910-ACIL-DraftDecBRCI-Report-1208-3.pdf

    2008

  48. [49]

    Archives: NREL ATB and Standard Scenarios 2023

    NREL. Archives: NREL ATB and Standard Scenarios 2023. https://atb.nrel.gov/archive (accessed May 12, 2025)

    2023

  49. [50]

    Capital Cost and Performance Characteristics for Utility -Scale Electric Power Generating Technologies 2024

    EIA. Capital Cost and Performance Characteristics for Utility -Scale Electric Power Generating Technologies 2024. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/powerplants/capitalcost/

    2024

  50. [51]

    Supply costs of green chemical energy carriers at the European border: A meta -analysis

    Genge L, Scheller F, Müsgens F. Supply costs of green chemical energy carriers at the European border: A meta -analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:38766– 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.180

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.180 2023

  51. [52]

    Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050

    Wiser R, Rand J, Seel J, Beiter P, Baker E, Lantz E, et al. Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050. Nat Energy 2021;6:555 –65. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00810-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00810-z 2050

  52. [53]

    Temporally- explicit and spatially-resolved global onshore wind energy potentials

    Bosch J, Staffell I, Hawkes AD. Temporally- explicit and spatially-resolved global onshore wind energy potentials. Energy 2017;131:207–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.052

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.052 2017

  53. [54]

    Dlubal Software 2025

    Ortsauswahl aus Deutschland-Karte und Ermittlung der Windlast nach DIN EN 1991-1-4. Dlubal Software 2025. https://www.dlubal.com/de/schnee -wind-erdbeben-lastzonen/wind-din-en-1991- 1-4.html (accessed May 12, 2025). 35

    1991

  54. [55]

    What Drives Wind and Flood Insurance? 2024

    Rudolph R. What Drives Wind and Flood Insurance? 2024. https://trerc.tamu.edu/article/what - drives-wind-and-flood-insurance/

    2024

  55. [56]

    Global-, Diffus- und Direktstrahlung (Monats- und Jahressummen sowie Abweichungen) 2023

    Deutscher Wetterdienst. Global-, Diffus- und Direktstrahlung (Monats- und Jahressummen sowie Abweichungen) 2023. https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/solarenergie/strahlungskarten_sum.html (accessed May 12, 2025)

    2023

  56. [57]

    The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB)

    Sengupta M, Xie Y, Lopez A, Habte A, Maclaurin G, Shelby J. The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018;89:51 –60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.003 2018

  57. [58]

    Ressource nbedarf für den Ausbau der Windenergie an Land 2023

    Deutscher Bundestag - wissenschaftliche Dienste. Ressource nbedarf für den Ausbau der Windenergie an Land 2023. https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/968860/8b7ca0fc7f267dd898de304b643c4f5d/WD-5- 070-23-pdf-data.pdf

    2023

  58. [59]

    Umweltverträgliche Standortsteuerung von Solar -Freiflächenanlagen 2022

    Umweltbundesamt. Umweltverträgliche Standortsteuerung von Solar -Freiflächenanlagen 2022. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/479/publikationen/texte_141- 2022_umweltvertraegliche_standortsteuerung_von_solar-freiflaechenanlagen.pdf

    2022

  59. [60]

    Analyse der kurz - und mittelfristigen Verfügbarkeit von Flächen für die Windenergienutzung an Land 2019

    Umweltbundesamt. Analyse der kurz - und mittelfristigen Verfügbarkeit von Flächen für die Windenergienutzung an Land 2019. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/376/publikationen/climate_change_ 38_2019_flaechenanalyse_windenergie_an_land.pdf

    2019

  60. [61]

    Neue Studie: Deutschland hat genug Fläche für 100 Prozent Strom aus erneuerbaren Energien 2018

    Diermann R. Neue Studie: Deutschland hat genug Fläche für 100 Prozent Strom aus erneuerbaren Energien 2018. https://www.pv- magazine.de/2018/10/16/neue-studie-deutschland-hat-genug- flaeche-fuer-100-prozent-strom-aus-erneuerbaren-energien/

    2018

  61. [62]

    Windpark- Datenbank Deutschland 2025

    The Wind Power. Windpark- Datenbank Deutschland 2025. https://www.thewindpower.net/country_windfarms_de_2_deutschland.php (accessed May 12, 2025)

    2025

  62. [63]

    Das sind die zehn größten Solarparks in Deutschland 2024

    Milos F. Das sind die zehn größten Solarparks in Deutschland 2024. https://www.dewezet.de/lokales/hameln-pyrmont/das-sind-die-zehn-groessten-solarparks-in- deutschland-TMSHR6NH75HJXH4DEIJM33QNSY.html

    2024

  63. [64]

    Offshore Windparks in Deutschland 2024

    Offshore-Windindustrie.de. Offshore Windparks in Deutschland 2024. https://www.offshore - windindustrie.de/windparks/deutschland

    2024

  64. [65]

    Texas solar farms n.d

    Thomas M. Texas solar farms n.d. https://cleanview.co/solar-farms/texas (accessed November 19, 2025)

    2025

  65. [66]

    Texas wind farms n.d

    Thomas M. Texas wind farms n.d. https://cleanview.co/wind-farms/texas (accessed November 19, 2025)

    2025

  66. [67]

    Department of Energy

    U.S. Department of Energy. Offshore Wind Market Report: 2023 Edition 2023. https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/articles/offshore-wind-market-report-2023-edition

    2023

  67. [68]

    https://www.renewables.ninja/ (accessed May 12, 2025)

    Renewables.ninja 2025. https://www.renewables.ninja/ (accessed May 12, 2025)

    2025

  68. [69]

    Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output

    Staffell I, Pfenninger S. Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output. Energy 2016;114:1224–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068 2016

  69. [70]

    Distributed photovoltaics provides key benefits for a highly renewable European energy system

    Rahdan P, Zeyen E, Gallego- Castillo C, Victoria M. Distributed photovoltaics provides key benefits for a highly renewable European energy system. Applied Energy 2024;360:122721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122721

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122721 2024

  70. [71]

    Transparency Platform 2025

    ENTSO-E. Transparency Platform 2025. https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ (accessed May 8, 2025)

    2025

  71. [72]

    Data Browsers 2025

    EIA. Data Browsers 2025. https://www.eia.gov/tools/ (accessed July 15, 2025). 36

    2025

  72. [73]

    Hydroelectric Power Overview 2023

    Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Hydroelectric Power Overview 2023. https://comptroller.texas.gov/economy/economic-data/energy/2023/hydro.php

    2023

  73. [74]

    Energy- Charts 2025

    Fraunhofer ISE. Energy- Charts 2025. https://www.energy- charts.info/index.html (accessed July 15, 2025)

    2025

  74. [75]

    ERCOT Load Zones 2025

    Lone Star. ERCOT Load Zones 2025. https://www.lonestartransmission.com/content/lonestar/us/en/what-we-do/ercot-load-zones.html (accessed July 15, 2025)

    2025

  75. [76]

    Reduced transmission grid representation using the St

    Martin H, Hamacher T, Deetjen TA, Webber ME. Reduced transmission grid representation using the St. Clair curve applied to the electric reliability council of Texas. 2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), 2017, p. 1– 5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981961

    work page doi:10.1109/eem.2017.7981961 2017

  76. [77]

    Market data 2025

    Smard. Market data 2025. https://www.smard.de/home/downloadcenter/download- marktdaten/ (accessed July 15, 2025)

    2025

  77. [78]

    Hourly L oad Data Archives 2024

    ERCOT. Hourly L oad Data Archives 2024. https://www.ercot.com/gridinfo/load/load_hist (accessed July 15, 2025)

    2024

  78. [79]

    How Germany can become climate -neutral by 2050 2020

    Agora. How Germany can become climate -neutral by 2050 2020. https://www.agora - energiewende.org/news-events/how-germany-can-become-climate-neutral-by-2050

    2050

  79. [80]

    New Texas energy dashboard maps future production and demand 2024

    Texas 2036. New Texas energy dashboard maps future production and demand 2024. https://texas2036.org/posts/new-texas-energy-dashboard-maps-future-production-and-demand/

    2036

  80. [81]

    Modelling uncertainty in coupled electricity and gas systems—Is it worth the effort? Applied Energy 2021;285:116363

    Riepin I, Möbius T, Müsgens F. Modelling uncertainty in coupled electricity and gas systems—Is it worth the effort? Applied Energy 2021;285:116363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116363

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116363 2021

Showing first 80 references.