Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T21:10:06.693153Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 100 of 122 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.00829.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T21:10:06.693153Z
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-07-12T09:10:11.585499Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-10T23:45:52.892312Z
100 of 122 outbound references displayed
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Observation f3225ebe-ba01-415d-a6b1-f2e49bf161f7 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Control-flow integrity principles, implementations, and applications
Reference 1
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 20e5481e-c1dd-4cb4-8266-d5ec09ef84c6 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing O1 is less powerful than o1-preview due to the less time it spends on thinking (compute time)
Reference 2
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c52a4c27-1a57-42bc-82d8-84bf99629e55 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Performance of o1 vs
Reference 3
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 0bc2b123-44fc-41b7-ad5e-c87f867638bd · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Introducing the model context protocol
Reference 4
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4b2a3b2a-8ab9-42ae-b9a1-98df2d552953 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Detecting and countering malicious uses of claude: March
Reference 5
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9f02aa17-409e-458c-ba92-f1e86240ef77 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Non-Determinism of "Deterministic" LLM Settings
Reference 6
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 79c07c35-0da4-4725-a9c9-b13bbc0ce8b0 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Llms for in- telligent software testing: A comparative study
Reference 7
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 3a3130f6-fb7e-4477-8583-3d0b2e9b30f0 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Ai angst
Reference 8
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation db27d6d7-8b52-4b3f-9cef-cd3d16cb0fb3 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Generative ai at work
Reference 9
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation a8c7c9e9-7929-42f3-aaa1-8ff06219a2b6 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing On large language models in national security applications
Reference 10
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 8d5ef76a-0a9c-4c1f-b2e5-e2cc2aeb42f7 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Leveling up fuzzing: Finding more vulnerabilities with ai
Reference 11
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3b15cd00-5170-4d33-8115-3ae182f709bb · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing LlamaFirewall: An open source guardrail system for building secure AI agents
Reference 12
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4eb133aa-2187-46b2-bd27-e30ccb9f55ff · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Extracting memorized pieces of (copyrighted) books from open-weight language models
Reference 13
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5ce74feb-3325-4a0e-9b06-7afa0861bf4a · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Bias and unfairness in information retrieval systems: New challenges in the llm era
Reference 14
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 13f48b7b-a5e2-4441-b83d-18379d1ebc07 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Defeating Prompt Injections by Design
Reference 15
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 30d47ca5-84a4-4b08-bd8a-ac56e8aed790 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing {PentestGPT}: Evaluating and harnessing large language models for automated penetration testing
Reference 16
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9b660b0f-7c10-41c1-a9ad-a195665dba64 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Schumpeter’s creative destruction: A review of the evidence
Reference 17
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2f9e4508-1887-4c13-9e0f-e6ccd1f843c3 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing The explainability challenge of generative ai and llms
Reference 18
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation adaae1a6-4744-4256-ab3f-615205f224de · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing The potential for jurisdictional challenges to ai or llm training datasets
Reference 19
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7ad48560-dfdf-49fc-9dd1-92c5c61be25a · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Large language models in information security research: A january 2024 survey
Reference 20
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 667e80d5-d5e8-4bc9-9437-a1d6061ceb1a · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Google’s approach for secure ai agents
Reference 21
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 642e0ffe-f561-4d7d-9dfe-e25d84ae1e4a · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Gpts are gpts: Labor market impact potential of llms
Reference 22
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 351a2e6a-ccff-421d-9007-946b0c54f360 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilities
Reference 23
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7f7d507f-19ff-43c2-8dca-6943b95dbe52 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Llm agents can autonomously hack websites, 2024
Reference 24
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation fac21925-22f5-4eca-b4be-f76d5119c601 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Teams of LLM Agents can Exploit Zero-Day Vulnerabilities
Reference 25
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation a63c52cf-7bc2-4218-b509-de8ffb86a80a · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Wormgpt: a large language model chatbot for criminals
Reference 26
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3cd811ee-0138-4314-8cbd-db11bcedce08 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Who’s asking? user personas and the mechanics of latent misalignment
Reference 27
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4d7d9d3d-5ce4-418b-a742-22dd271fc41d · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
Reference 28
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 352318db-05e8-4bc1-a136-2a0e310be3ba · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Project naptime: Evaluating offensive security capabilities of large language models
Reference 29
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ac7dec3a-805f-4039-b198-e63a9802c4f9 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Adversarial misuse of generative ai
Reference 30
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b1a09501-8220-4633-b105-9be022bec520 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge
Reference 31
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 575a2042-aec6-40b3-b019-087c8aebb908 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing How we built our multi-agent research system
Reference 32
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 82093bb9-bcdb-4380-af6e-0a3aa0f4ac5e · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Getting pwn’d by ai: Penetration testing with large language models
Reference 33
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b64cde0e-e664-414b-892a-6ce2c38a81d6 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Understanding hackers’ work: An empirical study of offensive security practitioners
Reference 34
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation bed81608-05d1-4c89-a81a-27894b52f624 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Benchmarking Practices in LLM-driven Offensive Security: Testbeds, Metrics, and Experiment Design
Reference 35
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5409c3b5-13cd-4e16-a2a8-3d490009a0f6 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Recognition Without Mitigation: Ethical Frameworks in Autonomous Offensive-LLM Agent Research
Reference 36
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 7232b88f-5019-4a15-b0b6-63694ce69ce9 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Can LLMs Hack Enterprise Networks? Autonomous Assumed Breach Penetration-Testing Active Directory Networks
Reference 37
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 7ca824d5-1b66-4f31-a69c-4bc534fafbc1 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Llms as hackers: Autonomous linux privilege escalation attacks
Reference 38
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 824535aa-baff-4a58-9a00-e3275372f47e · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Cyber Defences: Opportunities and Directions
Reference 39
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d885cf06-eb21-412e-b80c-2f725fe7200c · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Does prompt formatting have any impact on llm performance?,
Reference 40
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation a756b40d-d815-44d0-aa17-4e521e5cb53d · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing How i used o3 to find cve-2025-37899, a remote zeroday vulnerability in the linux kernel’s smb implementation
Reference 41
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7d980772-7ee5-44f6-83a5-9fd4bb7610d1 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Ai and the increase of productivity and labor inequality in latin america: Potential impact of large language models on latin american workforce
Reference 42
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9a2fb4a9-d0b9-401d-bd66-52ba8e377ad2 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?
Reference 43
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 934cfb72-d162-4124-9093-7f5d8f904889 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversations
Reference 44
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 1a4bd8c7-32bd-4450-b98b-9d9485beea19 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Ethics and algorithms
Reference 45
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d83347f0-7bba-4c01-9f4f-d1c037e52658 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Uncertainty of thoughts: Uncertainty-aware planning enhances information seeking in llms
Reference 46
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ef64c1d6-acf3-4aa8-9cef-9c39043fc37d · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing How hungry is ai? benchmarking energy, water, and carbon footprint of llm inference, 2025
Reference 47
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 97326b02-7ed5-4e50-893f-3bacf69d6168 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing From LLMs to LLM-based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey of Current, Challenges and Future
Reference 48
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2c901dc0-205b-44f7-bba4-f82be3990337 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing 2024 isc2 cybersecurity workforce study
Reference 49
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 76e18fe3-4ef6-465a-bae8-ea273ed2ea40 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Advances in llms with focus on reasoning, adaptability, efficiency and ethics
Reference 50
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 0e6b257d-38d6-4045-8e09-46aa422153ac · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing A survey of llm-driven ai agent communication: Protocols, security risks, and defense countermeasures, 2025
Reference 51
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 8ef0c43c-fd67-4030-b82a-de8f52a34551 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Generation, Detection, and Evaluation of Role-play based Jailbreak attacks in Large Language Models
Reference 52
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d76cb56b-025a-4ac3-8a7b-1f5937f3182a · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task
Reference 53
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 38a60a22-f8bf-4d99-bd1c-d079e507966f · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Revolutionizing talent: the path in 21st century workforce transformation
Reference 54
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5f620134-4133-4460-ac39-cd37a3c7b458 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing VulnBot: Autonomous Penetration Testing for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework
Reference 55
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9770da71-26cb-4f25-824d-f95688174039 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Shade-arena: Evaluating sabotage and monitoring in llm agents
Reference 56
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation a943492c-c5fc-4534-b50c-a02ab8c4a18e · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation
Reference 57
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 753acd2e-50e0-4d0b-9b36-9024c953804f · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 58
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 941fbd55-c03d-4a9b-a1b9-8e0f023b5ed1 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More?
Reference 59
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 73e34ba9-3a85-4509-baa3-3fe265b8d32f · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing I think i’m done thinking about genai for now
Reference 60
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d6943c7f-25d7-4208-8584-8dea67852ca9 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Operating multi-client influ- ence networks across platforms
Reference 61
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9f76e63d-8118-4da8-88da-7a5654e0c337 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Malla: Demystifying real-world large language model integrated malicious services
Reference 62
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation cdbc0a5f-136d-49ff-833f-e1e91ac638f3 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Ai-powered fuzzing: Breaking the bug hunting barrier
Reference 63
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 6cfbdbc0-3553-41da-9d06-9a8b602012f7 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Unresolved cited work
Reference 64
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f6d90882-42a1-4a02-9b4d-b17aaff211e0 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing When Thinking Fails: The Pitfalls of Reasoning for Instruction-Following in LLMs
Reference 65
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation fd554f45-1f6a-4fd8-aacf-30328e9f2855 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Troy, Stuart J
Reference 66
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5a67be7a-4fcd-46e8-b0bd-2665d1676dc3 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Llm dataset inference: Did you train on my dataset? Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 37:124069–124092, 2024
Reference 67
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2064aa91-2129-48b3-b60f-39c01393918b · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing LLM Cyber Evaluations Don't Capture Real-World Risk
Reference 68
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 527d6ca1-fbff-49aa-a0de-c5a81fee8ce2 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing The dual-use security dilemma and the social construction of insecurity
Reference 69
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7a73bf9f-fdc7-4f23-8b9d-8ec1da972092 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Llama prompt guard 2
Reference 70
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation f0a075df-f788-413b-b3d5-1ec21f4e1f96 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Large Language Models as General Pattern Machines
Reference 71
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 8cdebbe3-21a2-4fd5-8731-bdc14bbde1f4 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Why using chatgpt is not bad for the environment - a cheat sheet
Reference 72
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 662b7cca-2024-463e-bec2-9520076fd46b · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Mavikumbure, Victor Cobilean, Chathurika S
Reference 73
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f02c66bd-d8c0-4d03-ab22-6e32659f1f97 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: State-of-the-Art
Reference 74
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ca887944-91c6-436c-ad1f-c28a8bb08463 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Influence and cyber operations: an up- date
Reference 75
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 698337fb-0bdc-415a-8372-a560aa84f6cf · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing The threat of offensive ai to organizations
Reference 76
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 8c162f27-3027-4da3-b2d9-3a43952d4639 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Global ransomware damage costs predicted to exceed $275 billion by 2031
Reference 77
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 0e0b8246-7a41-489c-a403-b45879be233b · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Introducting chatgpt
Reference 78
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 0790fb15-a216-4c14-aa4a-318c8af564b9 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Introducing openai o1
Reference 79
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 7c54e393-af43-4a89-82e9-72d3fe751ce9 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Disrupting malicious uses of ai: June 2025
Reference 80
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 4f70c9e9-1810-44ec-9fbe-c06c02ded2a1 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Disrupting malicious uses of ai: February 2025
Reference 81
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 571dd12d-aa7e-403e-bd5d-1c666edd50f7 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiad
Reference 82
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation efb000e8-90cc-4a31-a9cf-7692ecbdea01 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Cipher: Cyberse- curity intelligent penetration-testing helper for ethical researcher
Reference 83
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 459fd750-7c0a-4363-948f-c74a99703929 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing My ai skeptic friends are all nuts
Reference 84
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation ee14fad6-56cc-4a15-b823-0e4e40406d1a · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Disrupting malicious uses of ai by state-affiliated threat actors
Reference 85
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 1b63a2a8-0fb5-4b1a-97ad-5252ff786855 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Annual share of organizations affected by ransomware at- tacks worldwide from 2018 to 2023
Reference 86
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 2a2862cf-5373-44b2-9608-044e88ade227 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Anderson, Edward W
Reference 87
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation a0e3fa75-76a2-41c3-a90e-714a8f0405ac · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs for Solving Offensive Security Challenges
Reference 88
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c5fa02d9-f373-44db-93ea-6c0320e3148e · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Future of work with ai agents: Auditing automation and augmentation potential across the u.s
Reference 89
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2cddee42-f3aa-4465-9b39-adbb27e6b83c · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Complementarity, Augmentation, or Substitutivity? The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the U.S. Federal Workforce
Reference 90
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation cfeb8941-1cb2-47e7-ad14-f552855b4ab5 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Llm-based design pattern detection,
Reference 91
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation d446b817-71c4-460d-93c4-1843012c972e · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing LLM-Based Design Pattern Detection
Reference 92
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 37b9e362-dabc-4594-9cf4-593d5dadabd0 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Announcing the agent2agent protocol (a2a)
Reference 93
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 474c657b-c803-4db8-a3d6-ed2534922675 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates
Reference 94
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 8c6994cc-c998-441c-937c-3c9232052e30 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing From naptime to big sleep: Using large language models to catch vulnerabilities in real-world code
Reference 95
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 8ebe2604-da0a-468a-89dd-3d2cc62a406f · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity
Reference 96
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e79bed61-a8e8-4bd1-8b9b-dc0e8799e91b · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing On the feasibility of using llms to execute multistage network attacks
Reference 97
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c04cfdd0-1812-4a2e-8697-2babd1f60407 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Outside the closed world: On using machine learning for network intrusion detection
Reference 98
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation ec2808ef-23f9-4135-add9-3963cb3bcf77 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing Rainbows End: A Novel With One Foot In The Future
Reference 99
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation 8ae6a063-c6fc-4d39-824d-bb6363b39682 · outbound
On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing "Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letters
Reference 100
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5ff18c7b-91bd-477f-95d3-153df0404d8b · inbound
Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing
Reference 45
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation a471ea7d-910a-43e2-ac91-5381519797e2 · inbound
A Survey of LLM-Driven Penetration Testing: Taxonomy, Co-Evolution, and Open Challenges On the Surprising Efficacy of LLMs for Penetration-Testing
Reference 38
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.