pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01461 · v1 · pith:QNMAXLNOnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 💻 cs.SI

The Evolution of the Peridynamics Community in Its First Quarter Century

Biraj Dahal , Pablo Seleson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 00:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SI
keywords peridynamicsco-authorship networksnetwork analysisCOVID-19scientific collaborationcommunity evolutionfracture modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Co-authorship networks reveal a post-2019 shift in the peridynamics community tied to the COVID-19 pandemic.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a co-authorship network for each year from 2000 to 2024 in the peridynamics field. It tracks changes in network metrics over time to see how the community has grown and collaborated. A clear deviation appears in the trends after 2019. Country-based breakdowns point to the COVID-19 pandemic as a likely cause of altered collaboration patterns. This shows how external events can reshape scientific communities in measurable ways.

Core claim

The authors construct yearly peridynamics co-authorship networks and apply network metrics to quantify community evolution. They identify a deviation in these metrics since 2019 and link it through country analysis to impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic on how scientists co-author papers.

What carries the argument

Annual co-authorship networks where nodes are scientists and weighted links represent joint publications, analyzed with network-level and node-level metrics.

If this is right

  • Network metrics can track how a research field responds to global disruptions.
  • Post-2019, the peridynamics community may show more localized or changed international collaborations.
  • Key collaborative scientists' roles can be identified through node metrics before and after the shift.
  • Similar yearly network constructions could map evolution in other mechanics subfields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the same method to other fields could test if the pandemic effect is widespread.
  • If the trend reverses in post-2022 data, it might indicate recovery in collaboration patterns.
  • Funding or policy changes could be compared as alternative explanations using additional data sources.

Load-bearing premise

That observed changes in co-authorship patterns after 2019 can be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic rather than other concurrent factors such as shifts in funding, publication practices, or field maturation.

What would settle it

Finding similar deviations in co-authorship networks of fields unaffected by pandemic-specific restrictions, or showing that the timing of changes aligns better with other events like funding shifts.

read the original abstract

Peridynamics is a fast growing field of continuum mechanics, especially developed for the modeling and simulation of fracture problems, initiated a quarter century ago. In this study, we analyze the evolution of the peridynamics community since its inception in terms of publication co-authorship. For this purpose, we construct a peridynamics co-authorship network for each year from 2000 to 2024 and perform network analysis based on selected metrics. Nodes represent scientists, and links connect co-authoring scientists with link weights representing the number of co-authorships (based on the total number of co-authors per publication). Network-level metrics are used to quantify the evolution of the field, and node-level metrics are used to identify trends in the most collaborative scientists in peridynamics. We noticed a deviation in network trends that occurred in the years since 2019, and we subsequently performed a country-based analysis with insights about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the evolution of the peridynamics co-authorship network.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs annual co-authorship networks for the peridynamics field (2000–2024), applies standard network- and node-level metrics to quantify community evolution and identify key collaborators, observes a post-2019 deviation in trends, and performs a country-level breakdown that is presented as providing insights into COVID-19 pandemic effects on collaboration patterns.

Significance. If the post-2019 network changes could be shown to be driven by the pandemic rather than concurrent factors, the work would add a descriptive case study to the literature on external shocks to scientific collaboration networks. The analysis relies on off-the-shelf metrics applied to publication records and contains no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code releases, or falsifiable predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the country-based analysis section: the claim that the post-2019 deviation and country breakdown yield 'insights about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic' rests solely on temporal coincidence; no statistical tests, error bars, regression controls, difference-in-differences design, or comparison to unaffected subfields or periods are described to isolate pandemic effects from funding shifts, open-access changes, or field maturation.
  2. [Results] The soundness assessment notes that network metrics are computed without reported controls for confounding variables; this directly undermines the central interpretive claim about pandemic impact, as the deviation could arise from multiple concurrent global trends.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Data source and exact query used to retrieve peridynamics publications should be stated explicitly for reproducibility.
  2. [Methods] Clarify whether link weights are normalized by publication size or simply summed; the current description ('link weights representing the number of co-authorships based on the total number of co-authors per publication') is ambiguous.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. Our manuscript is a descriptive analysis of co-authorship network evolution using standard metrics on publication records. We agree that the post-2019 observations are based on temporal alignment with the pandemic and country-level patterns, without causal identification methods. We will revise the abstract, results, and country analysis sections to clarify the observational and suggestive nature of the findings and to avoid implying statistical isolation of pandemic effects. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the country-based analysis section: the claim that the post-2019 deviation and country breakdown yield 'insights about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic' rests solely on temporal coincidence; no statistical tests, error bars, regression controls, difference-in-differences design, or comparison to unaffected subfields or periods are described to isolate pandemic effects from funding shifts, open-access changes, or field maturation.

    Authors: We agree that the link rests on temporal coincidence and descriptive country breakdowns without formal causal designs or controls. The study applies off-the-shelf network metrics to annual co-authorship graphs and adds a country-level view to explore geographic patterns around 2019. We will revise the abstract and country-based analysis section to state that the post-2019 deviation and country patterns offer suggestive observations aligned with the pandemic timing, rather than statistically isolated evidence of pandemic impact. Phrases claiming direct 'insights about the impact' will be qualified or removed. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The soundness assessment notes that network metrics are computed without reported controls for confounding variables; this directly undermines the central interpretive claim about pandemic impact, as the deviation could arise from multiple concurrent global trends.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that no controls for confounders (e.g., funding shifts, open-access policies, or field maturation) are reported. The manuscript computes standard network- and node-level metrics on yearly peridynamics co-authorship networks and notes the post-2019 trend change. We will revise the results section to explicitly describe the analysis as observational, note that alternative concurrent factors cannot be ruled out, and adjust interpretive language to reflect descriptive trends rather than attributed pandemic effects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical network analysis uses external records and off-the-shelf metrics

full rationale

The paper constructs yearly co-authorship networks from publication data (2000–2024), computes standard network- and node-level metrics, observes a post-2019 deviation, and performs a descriptive country-level breakdown. None of these steps involve a claimed derivation, prediction, or first-principles result that reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation defined inside the paper. The central observation is a direct empirical finding from external data; the COVID-19 attribution is an interpretive comment rather than a load-bearing mathematical step. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or uniqueness-imported patterns appear.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that co-authorship accurately proxies collaboration and that publication databases are complete and unbiased; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Co-authorship links reflect meaningful scientific collaboration.
    Standard premise in bibliometric network studies; invoked when constructing the networks from publication records.
  • domain assumption Publication databases capture the full relevant literature without systematic bias.
    Required for the yearly networks to represent the true community evolution.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5705 in / 1228 out tokens · 23988 ms · 2026-07-03T00:40:06.105911+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2025 , url =

    Scopus , author =. 2025 , url =

    2025

  2. [2]

    Software: Practice and Experience , volume=

    Graph drawing by force-directed placement , author=. Software: Practice and Experience , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  3. [3]

    Journal of Informetrics , volume=

    Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting , author=. Journal of Informetrics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  4. [4]

    Nature Communications , volume=

    Potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on scientists , author=. Nature Communications , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  5. [5]

    Impact of the

    B. Impact of the. Nature Astronomy , volume=. 2023 , pages=

    2023

  6. [7]

    Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using

    Hagberg, Aric A and Schult, Daniel A and Swart, Pieter J , booktitle=. Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using. 2008 , doi=

    2008

  7. [8]

    2021 , doi=

    Deryugina, Tatyana and Shurchkov, Olga and Stearns, Jenna , booktitle=. 2021 , doi=

    2021

  8. [9]

    Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , volume=

    Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces , author=. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  9. [10]

    Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling , volume=

    The evolution of the peridynamics co-authorship network , author=. Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  10. [11]

    The silver lining of

    Garc. The silver lining of. Scientometrics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  11. [12]

    \ Liu, J

    bohm2023impact APACrefauthors B \"o hm, V. \ Liu, J. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on publishing in astronomy in the initial two years Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on publishing in astronomy in the initial two years . Nature Astronomy 7 1 105-112, APACrefDOI doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01830-9 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01830-9 2023

  12. [13]

    Web of Science

    wos APACrefauthors Clarivate Analytics APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Web of Science . Web of Science . https://www.webofknowledge.com/

    2024

  13. [14]

    \ Seleson, P

    dahal_2025_16897786 APACrefauthors Dahal, B. \ Seleson, P. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . PDnetwork . PDnetwork . Zenodo . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16897786

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16897786 2025

  14. [15]

    , Seleson, P

    dahal2023evolution APACrefauthors Dahal, B. , Seleson, P. Trageser, J. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . The evolution of the peridynamics co-authorship network The evolution of the peridynamics co-authorship network . Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling 5 3 311--355, APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s42102-022-00082-5 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1007/s42102-022-00082-5 2023

  15. [16]

    , Shurchkov, O

    deryugina2021covid APACrefauthors Deryugina, T. , Shurchkov, O. Stearns, J. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . COVID-19 disruptions disproportionately affect female academics COVID-19 disruptions disproportionately affect female academics . AEA Papers and Proceedings AEA Papers and Proceedings \ ( 111, \ 164--168)

    2021

  16. [17]

    scopus APACrefauthors Elsevier APACrefauthors \ 2025 . Scopus. Scopus. APACrefURL https://www.scopus.com/ APACrefURL Accessed: August 13, 2025

    2025

  17. [18]

    \ Reingold, E.M

    fruchterman1991graph APACrefauthors Fruchterman, T.M.J. \ Reingold, E.M. APACrefauthors \ 1991 . Graph drawing by force-directed placement Graph drawing by force-directed placement . Software: Practice and Experience 21 11 1129--1164, APACrefDOI doi:10.1002/spe.4380211102 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1002/spe.4380211102 1991

  18. [19]

    , Yin, Y

    gao2021potentially APACrefauthors Gao, J. , Yin, Y. , Myers, K.R. , Lakhani, K.R. Wang, D. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on scientists Potentially long-lasting effects of the pandemic on scientists . Nature Communications 12 1 6188, APACrefDOI doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26428-z APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26428-z 2021

  19. [20]

    , Grimaldo, F

    garcia2024silver APACrefauthors Garc \' a-Costa, D. , Grimaldo, F. , Bravo, G. , Mehmani, B. Squazzoni, F. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . The silver lining of COVID-19 restrictions: research output of academics under lockdown The silver lining of COVID-19 restrictions: research output of academics under lockdown . Scientometrics 129 3 1771--1786, APACrefDOI doi:...

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-024-04929-0 2024

  20. [21]

    , Schult, D.A

    hagberg2008exploring APACrefauthors Hagberg, A.A. , Schult, D.A. Swart, P.J. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX . Proceedings of the 7 ^ th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008) Proceedings of the 7 ^ th Python in Science Conferen...

    2008

  21. [22]

    , Waltman, L

    perianes2016constructing APACrefauthors Perianes-Rodriguez, A. , Waltman, L. Van Eck, N.J. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting . Journal of Informetrics 10 4 1178--1195, APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/j.jo...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006 2016

  22. [23]

    APACrefauthors \ 2000

    silling2000reformulation APACrefauthors Silling, S.A. APACrefauthors \ 2000 . Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces . Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 48 1 175--209, APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-5096(99)00029-0 2000