pith. sign in

arxiv: 2307.09765 · v2 · pith:QPZVU2DYnew · submitted 2023-07-19 · 💻 cs.SE

Are We Ready to Embrace Generative AI for Software Q&A?

classification 💻 cs.SE
keywords answerschatgpt-generatedhuman-writtenoverflowstackchatgptgenerativerelease
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Stack Overflow, the world's largest software Q&A (SQA) website, is facing a significant traffic drop due to the emergence of generative AI techniques. ChatGPT is banned by Stack Overflow after only 6 days from its release. The main reason provided by the official Stack Overflow is that the answers generated by ChatGPT are of low quality. To verify this, we conduct a comparative evaluation of human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers. Our methodology employs both automatic comparison and a manual study. Our results suggest that human-written and ChatGPT-generated answers are semantically similar, however, human-written answers outperform ChatGPT-generated ones consistently across multiple aspects, specifically by 10% on the overall score. We release the data, analysis scripts, and detailed results at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GAI4SQA-FD5C.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.