Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CogNav: Cognitive Process Modeling for Object Goal Navigation with LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.10439 v3 pith:R34D23SA submitted 2024-12-11 cs.CV cs.RO

classification cs.CVcs.RO
keywords cognitiveobjectprocessstatescognavdynamicallyenvironmentsfine-grained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Object goal navigation (ObjectNav) is a fundamental task in embodied AI, requiring an agent to locate a target object in previously unseen environments. This task is particularly challenging because it requires both perceptual and cognitive processes, including object recognition and decision-making. While substantial advancements in perception have been driven by the rapid development of visual foundation models, progress on the cognitive aspect remains constrained, primarily limited to either implicit learning through simulator rollouts or explicit reliance on predefined heuristic rules. Inspired by neuroscientific findings demonstrating that humans maintain and dynamically update fine-grained cognitive states during object search tasks in novel environments, we propose CogNav, a framework designed to mimic this cognitive process using large language models. Specifically, we model the cognitive process using a finite state machine comprising fine-grained cognitive states, ranging from exploration to identification. Transitions between states are determined by a large language model based on a dynamically constructed heterogeneous cognitive map, which contains spatial and semantic information about the scene being explored. Extensive evaluations on the HM3D, MP3D, and RoboTHOR benchmarks demonstrate that our cognitive process modeling significantly improves the success rate of ObjectNav at least by relative 14% over the state-of-the-arts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BoxFusion: Reconstruction-Free Open-Vocabulary 3D Object Detection via Real-Time Multi-View Box Fusion

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BoxFusion fuses per-frame 3D bounding box proposals from Cubify Anything and CLIP semantics into open-vocabulary 3D detections, reporting state-of-the-art AP among online methods without dense reconstruction.

  2. TrackVLA: Embodied Visual Tracking in the Wild

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single vision-language-action model jointly trained on recognition and tracking data follows described targets at the best reported levels on a public benchmark and transfers zero-shot from simulation to a real quad...

  3. A Survey: Learning Embodied Intelligence from Physical Simulators and World Models

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Embodied intelligence learning is reviewed through the complementary lenses of physical simulators and world models, with a proposed IR-L0 to IR-L4 robot capability taxonomy.

Pith tools