REVIEW 2 cited by
ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Dataset
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Online hate speech is a recent problem in our society that is rising at a steady pace by leveraging the vulnerabilities of the corresponding regimes that characterise most social media platforms. This phenomenon is primarily fostered by offensive comments, either during user interaction or in the form of a posted multimedia context. Nowadays, giant corporations own platforms where millions of users log in every day, and protection from exposure to similar phenomena appears to be necessary in order to comply with the corresponding legislation and maintain a high level of service quality. A robust and reliable system for detecting and preventing the uploading of relevant content will have a significant impact on our digitally interconnected society. Several aspects of our daily lives are undeniably linked to our social profiles, making us vulnerable to abusive behaviours. As a result, the lack of accurate hate speech detection mechanisms would severely degrade the overall user experience, although its erroneous operation would pose many ethical concerns. In this paper, we present 'ETHOS', a textual dataset with two variants: binary and multi-label, based on YouTube and Reddit comments validated using the Figure-Eight crowdsourcing platform. Furthermore, we present the annotation protocol used to create this dataset: an active sampling procedure for balancing our data in relation to the various aspects defined. Our key assumption is that, even gaining a small amount of labelled data from such a time-consuming process, we can guarantee hate speech occurrences in the examined material.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Datasets for Navigating Sensitive Topics in Recommendation Systems
Two benchmark datasets link user-preference data (MovieLens, Archive of Our Own) with community content-warning labels to study sensitive-content exposure in recommender systems.
-
Towards a Robust Framework for Multimodal Hate Detection: A Study on Video vs. Image-based Content
Simple embedding fusion improves F1 by 9.9 points on the HateMM video dataset but reaches only 0.628 AUROC on the Hateful Memes dataset, showing that fusion methods do not transfer across modality types.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.