Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ChatGPT: A Study on its Utility for Ubiquitous Software Engineering Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.16837 v1 pith:RBQ4KVGF submitted 2023-05-26 cs.SE cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.AIcs.LG
keywords chatgpttaskssoftwareengineeringanswerscommonexpertexplore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is a chatbot launched by OpenAI on November 30, 2022. OpenAI's GPT-3 family of large language models serve as the foundation for ChatGPT. ChatGPT is fine-tuned with both supervised and reinforcement learning techniques and has received widespread attention for its articulate responses across diverse domains of knowledge. In this study, we explore how ChatGPT can be used to help with common software engineering tasks. Many of the ubiquitous tasks covering the breadth of software engineering such as ambiguity resolution in software requirements, method name suggestion, test case prioritization, code review, log summarization can potentially be performed using ChatGPT. In this study, we explore fifteen common software engineering tasks using ChatGPT. We juxtapose and analyze ChatGPT's answers with the respective state of the art outputs (where available) and/or human expert ground truth. Our experiments suggest that for many tasks, ChatGPT does perform credibly and the response from it is detailed and often better than the human expert output or the state of the art output. However, for a few other tasks, ChatGPT in its present form provides incorrect answers and hence is not suited for such tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SAGE: A Context-Aware Approach for Mining Privacy Requirements Relevant Reviews from Mental Health Apps

    cs.SE 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    SAGE combines domain-specific NLI hypotheses with a zero-shot GPT classifier to identify privacy-related app reviews, reporting F1 0.85 on 1,376 labels and extracting 748 new privacy reviews.

  2. CMER: A Context-Aware Approach for Mining Ethical Concern-related App Reviews

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A hybrid NLI-plus-LLM pipeline with finance-specific hypotheses extracted 2,178 manually validated privacy/security reviews from mobile investment app reviews.

Pith tools