Chiral solitons in quadratic quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals

Hexiang He; Li Zhang; Qiuyi Ning; Wei Pang; Xuening Wang; Yongyao Li; Yuxin Guo; Zhaopin Chen; Zhiwei Fan

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 81 references

Chiral solitons in quadratic quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tilted crystal stripes create chiral light solitons.

desk verdict Neat idea and plausible numerics, but the semi-analytic derivation of the chiral flow is wrong as written; the optimal-inclination argument rests on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.09525 v1 pith:RERXSZM4 submitted 2025-07-13 physics.optics nlin.PS

Yuxin Guo , Xuening Wang , Zhiwei Fan , Zhaopin Chen , Qiuyi Ning , Hexiang He , Wei Pang , Li Zhang

show 1 more author

Yongyao Li

This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticsnlin.PS PACS 42.65.-k42.65.Ky

keywords chiralsolitonsquasi-phase-matchingartificialgaugefieldquadraticnonlinearopticssecond-harmonicgenerationenergyflowphotoniccrystals

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that tilting the ferroelectric polarization stripes in a quasi-phase-matched quadratic crystal acts as an artificial gauge field, but one carried by the nonlinear coupling rather than by linear tunnelling or coupling. In this setting, the fundamental-frequency (FF) and second-harmonic (SH) components of a soliton lock into a chiral state: their energy currents are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, so the two waves circulate around each other. The paper derives a semi-analytic expression for the chiral energy flow, $S_c = -\alpha\beta_1 P_u P_v/P$, and shows numerically that stable solitons exist, that an optimal stripe inclination maximizes the current, and that the solitons survive kicks and collisions. If correct, this gives a way to generate chiral optical currents using only standard poled crystals and a single pump beam.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the tilted-stripe quasi-phase-matching phase $\phi_d = (2\pi/\Lambda)\tan\theta\,X$, which converts the poling pattern into the phase factor $e^{i\alpha x}$ in the dimensionless coupled equations. Applying the rotating-wave-like reduction to the $m=\pm1$ Fourier components, this phase becomes a constant artificial vector potential $\alpha$ acting through the nonlinear terms. The current formula then follows from the stationary ansatz $\psi_u = \varphi_u e^{i\eta_u x}$, $\psi_v = \varphi_v e^{i\eta_v x}$ with the resonance condition $2\eta_u - \eta_v = \alpha$, which forces the two currents to balance.

What would settle it

Take the numerically converged chiral soliton from the paper's imaginary-time method, substitute it into the stationary equations (14)-(15), and compute the imaginary part of the FF equation; if the imaginary residue is not zero, or if the integrated energy current of the exact solution differs from Eq. (36), the central claim is contradicted. Alternatively, solve for stationary solutions without the constant-slope ansatz and check whether any localized solution with $\eta_u \neq 0$ exists.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a spatially linear phase ramp imposed on the quasi-phase-matching modulation, achieved by tilting the domain stripes by an angle $\theta$, behaves as an equivalent magnetic field in the coupled FF-SH equations. Under this field the stationary soliton develops opposite linear phase slopes for the two components, $\eta_u = \alpha P_v/(2P)$ and $\eta_v = -\alpha P_u/P$, so the FF and SH currents $S_u$ and $S_v$ are equal and opposite and the total chiral flow is $S_c = -\alpha\beta_1 P_u P_v/P$ (Eq. 36). The paper verifies by direct simulation and Bogoliubov-de Gennes analysis that these chiral solitons are stable over wide parameter ranges, finds an optimal inclination angle that maximizes $|S_c|$ for fixed power and detuning, and demonstrates kicked motion and near-elastic collisions.

Load-bearing premise

The whole analytic result depends on the assumption that a localized soliton can be written as a real profile times a plane-wave phase ramp with constant slope for each component; if the stationary equations forbid such a form, the current formula does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Stable chiral energy transport can be engineered into a bulk quadratic crystal by geometry alone, using only the poling tilt angle and a single pump beam.
The closed-form current $S_c = -\alpha\beta_1 P_uP_v/P$ provides a design rule for maximizing chiral flow by choosing the optimal inclination for given power and detuning.
Because the solitons respond to kicks and collide nearly elastically, they could serve as movable, reconfigurable carriers in nonlinear-photonic routing.
The stability regions in the $(\Omega,\alpha)$ plane map out where such chiral solitons can be observed in practice, guiding future experiments in lithium-niobate-style crystals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension is to repeat the tilted-stripe construction in two-dimensional poling patterns, where the synthetic field could support chiral edge transport or vortex solitons rather than single-peaked currents.
Measuring $S_c$ versus tilt angle in a short periodically poled sample would test the optimal-inclination prediction directly; the peak location should track the paper's $\alpha^{(\mathrm{OI})}(P,\Omega)$ curves.
An exact stationary-solution check, solving Eqs. (14)-(15) without the constant-slope ansatz, would show whether the analytic formula survives beyond the assumed phase-ramp form.
The same tilted-stripe gauge field may also couple to other nonlinear excitations in the crystal, such as vortices or dissipative solitons, giving a general tool for chiral nonlinear optics.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my read. The setup is genuinely neat: tilting the QPM stripes creates an x-dependent phase in the quadratic coupling, which you can view as an artificial gauge field acting on the nonlinear interaction. That specific mechanism I haven't seen before. And the numerics look like real work: ITP convergence, BdG stability, direct simulation, stability maps in the (Ω, α) plane, collisions, and a plausible experimental parameters section. If the existence of stable chiral solitons with counter-propagating FF/SH currents is correct, that is a valid subfield result.

The soft spots are, unfortunately, at the center. The semi-analytic derivation of the chiral flow doesn't hold. Substitute the ansatz (20)-(22) into the stationary equations (14)-(15). The kinetic terms generate imaginary parts -iηu φu' and -(i/2)ηv φv' that nothing balances; for localized real envelopes this forces ηu=ηv=0 and, from (22), α=0. So the derivation of ηu,ηv and formula (36) is not valid for tilted stripes. There is also a standalone algebraic error: integrating the current-conservation expression (29) gives ηu Pu + ηv Pv = 0, which with (22) yields ηu = α Pv/P, not α Pv/(2P). That changes Su, Sv and Sc by a factor of two. And the 'semi-analytical solution' is not a prediction—β1, Pu, Pv are read off the same numerically found solitons, so the optimal-inclination curve is a property of that numerical data, not an independent derivation.

I want to be clear: none of this disproves the numerical chiral solitons themselves. The stability maps and the observed counter-propagating currents may well be correct. But the paper's central analytic claim—the chiral flow formula and the optimal inclination argument—rests on the invalid ansatz. As written, I would not accept it. The authors could fix this by deriving the phase-gradient properly (allowing x-dependent η) or by dropping the semi-analytic claim and reporting the numerics alone. The topic is good enough that I'd send it to a knowledgeable referee rather than desk reject; hopefully they can untangle whether the numerical states survive scrutiny once the derivation is corrected.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a quasi-phase-matched (QPM) quadratic nonlinear photonic crystal in which tilted ferroelectric stripes encode an x-dependent phase that acts as an artificial gauge field in the nonlinear coupling. The authors report stable chiral solitons whose fundamental-frequency (FF) and second-harmonic (SH) components carry opposite energy currents, and they derive a semi-analytical formula for the chiral energy flow, Sc = -αβ1PuPv/P (Eq. 36). They further study the dependence of Sc on power, detuning, and stripe angle, identify an optimal inclination that maximizes Sc, show that kicked solitons move and collide nearly elastically, and provide an experimental parameter estimate. The numerical exploration is extensive, but the analytic derivation underlying Eq. (36) contains several specific technical errors that are load-bearing for the paper's central claims.

Significance. If correct, the proposal would be an interesting way to engineer synthetic gauge fields through the QPM geometry rather than through linear couplings, and the reported stable chiral solitons with coupled FF-SH currents would be a useful addition to nonlinear optics. The numerical stability maps (Fig. 4), the mobility and collision simulations (Figs. 9-10), and the experimental parameter estimates (Sec. V) are potentially valuable. However, the paper's headline analytic result is not sound: the stationary phase-ansatz used to derive Eq. (36) is inconsistent for nonzero α, and the derivation of the current formula contains algebraic and conceptual errors. Since the optimal-inclination claim is presented as following from this formula, the main conceptual conclusions are not established by the present analysis. The numerical phenomenology might still be publishable, but not with the current analytic scaffolding.

major comments (4)

[§II, Eqs. (20)-(22) and (14)-(15)] The stationary ansatz with real envelopes and constant phase slopes is inconsistent for α≠0. Substituting ψu=φu e^{iηu x} and ψv=φv e^{iηv x} with real φu,φv into Eq. (14) produces an imaginary term -ηu φu′ (and similarly -ηv φv′/2 in Eq. (15)) with no balancing imaginary source once Eq. (22) enforces the nonlinear phase. For localized non-constant envelopes this forces ηu=ηv=0 and hence α=0. Thus the assumed form cannot describe the tilted-stripe solitons, and the derivation of Eqs. (30)-(31) and Eq. (36) is unsupported.
[§II, Eqs. (27)-(29)] Eq. (28) is not a valid identity. Integrating Eq. (27) over x gives a boundary value of ju+2jv, not the local current density; the vanishing of the integral does not imply the local current vanishes. Consequently Eq. (29) does not follow as a local statement. In addition, direct calculation from Eqs. (7)-(8) shows that the nonlinear terms cancel in ∂z(|u|^2+2|v|^2), so the right-hand side of Eq. (27) should be zero, not -8Im(e^{iαx}ψu*^2ψv).
[§II, Eqs. (30)-(31) and (36)] The quoted values ηu=αPv/(2P) and ηv=-αPu/P are algebraically inconsistent with Eq. (22): substituting them gives 2ηu-ηv=α(Pu+Pv)/P, not α. Solving Eq. (22) together with the integrated current conservation ηuPu+ηvPv=0 gives ηu=αPv/P and ηv=-αPu/P. With these corrected values, Su and Sv are still equal and opposite, but Sc=Su-Sv becomes -2β1αPuPv/P, a factor of 2 different from Eq. (36). Thus the chiral-flow formula is not derived as stated.
[§III, Eq. (36) and Fig. 7] Even if Eq. (36) were algebraically correct, the claimed semi-analytical prediction is not independent: β1, Pu, and Pv are not input parameters but are quantities read off the numerically obtained solitons. The optimal inclination α(OI) is therefore a property of the numerically determined product αβ1PuPv/P, not a parameter-free prediction. The text's statement that Sc is "a quantity determined by the input parameters" is misleading in this context.

minor comments (3)

[Throughout] The manuscript contains multiple encoding artifacts, such as "dieresis.ts" in the references and "£º" after Eq. (27); these should be cleaned before any resubmission.
[§III, Fig. 2 and Fig. 6 captions] The text refers to panels (c1,c2) in Figs. 2 and 6, but the corresponding figure captions and panel layouts use (a3,a4,b3,b4) and (a,b); the panel labels and text references should be reconciled.
[§VI, Conclusion] The conclusion mentions verification with the "RTP method," whereas the introduction and Sec. III describe the ITP method and direct simulations; the acronyms and methods should be used consistently.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The advertised semi-analytical chiral-flow formula reduces to the phase-gradient ansatz plus numerically extracted powers/propagation constants, so the optimal-inclination claim is not an independent prediction.

self definitional [Section II, Eqs. (20)-(22) and Eqs. (29)-(36)]
"When α ⁄= 0, we assume: ψ u(x) = φ ueiη ux, (20) ψ v(x) = φ veiη v x, (21) where φ u(x) and φ v(x) represent the modulus of complex wave function of the FF and SH waves, ηu,v are two real numbers. According to the phase matching relationship between the two sides of the equality sign of the two equations, we can get: 2ηu −ηv =α. (22)"

The derivation of ηu, ηv and then Sc is made from the ansatz itself: the fields are written as real envelopes multiplied by e^{iηu x} and e^{iηv x}, the phase relation 2ηu−ηv=α is imposed so that the nonlinear phases cancel, and the currents are then defined through the same ηu and ηv in Eqs. (29)-(31). Substituting the ansatz into the stationary equations (14)-(15) gives imaginary kinetic terms proportional to ηu φu' and ηv φv' that have no balancing imaginary source once the nonlinear phases are forced real by Eq. (22); for localized envelopes this forces ηu=ηv=0 and hence α=0. Thus for the tilted stripes α≠0 considered in the paper, the assumed solution form is inconsistent with the field equations, and Eq. (36) is not a derived consequence of the model but a restatement of the ansatz.
fitted input called prediction [Section III, Eq. (36), Fig. 7, and the paragraph on the two ways to compute Sc]
"Regarding the chiral ﬂow Sc, there are two ways to calculate it. The ﬁrst one is to simulate it numerically directly, and the second one is to compute it using our semi-analytical solution, see Eq. (36). ... With Eq. (36) we can deduce that the presence of α (OI) is the result of a compromise of α with propagation constant and the power of two waves."

Equation (36), Sc = −αβ1PuPv/P, is not a parameter-free closed form: β1, Pu, and Pv are all read off the numerically converged soliton solutions (e.g., Fig. 5). The 'semi-analytical' curves in Fig. 7 are therefore obtained by inserting numerical data from the very same solutions from which the direct numerical Sc curves are computed, so the agreement between the two is a consistency check rather than an independent prediction. Consequently, the existence of an optimal inclination α(OI), and its growth with P and Ω, is a property of the numerically determined function αβ1PuPv/P, not a consequence derived from the model equations alone.

full rationale

The paper does introduce its own model and supports the existence/stability of solitons with direct numerical simulation and BdG analysis, so this is not a case of pure self-citation circularity; there is no load-bearing reliance on the authors' prior work. However, the central 'semi-analytical solution' for chiral energy flow does reduce to its own inputs by construction. First, the derivation of ηu, ηv and Sc starts from the phase-gradient ansatz (20)-(22) and uses the same ηu, ηv to define the currents, while substitution into the stationary equations produces imaginary terms that force ηu=ηv=0 for localized profiles, making the ansatz invalid for α≠0. Second, even granting the ansatz, Eq. (36) is evaluated with numerically extracted β1, Pu, and Pv, so comparing it with the direct numerical Sc and reading off an optimal inclination does not constitute a parameter-free prediction. The numerical soliton results themselves are self-contained, but the claimed semi-analytical chiral-flow formula and the optimal-inclination trend inherit the inputs they purport to explain. Score 6 reflects partial circularity of the central prediction rather than a completely vacuous derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or physical entities are introduced. The artificial gauge field is an interpretation of a real geometric phase produced by tilted QPM domains, and it is borrowed from prior literature rather than newly postulated. The main unstated input is the plane-wave phase ansatz, which is not consistent with the stationary equations for localized solutions.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Truncation of the QPM Fourier expansion to m = +/-1, a rotating-wave approximation.
Invoked after Eq. (4) and detailed in Appendix B to reduce the poled crystal to the two coupled equations (7,8). Standard in QPM modeling but not quantified with error estimates.
ad hoc to paper Plane-wave phase ansatz psi_u = phi_u exp(i*eta_u*x), psi_v = phi_v exp(i*eta_v*x) with real envelopes and constant real phase slopes.
Used in Eqs. (20,21). It forces the relation 2*eta_u - eta_v = alpha and generates an imaginary stationarity condition proportional to eta_u*phi_u' that is inconsistent for localized solitons.
standard math Energy conservation and continuity equation for the power density.
Used in Eqs. (23)-(29) to derive current densities. Standard, but the paper applies an unjustified integration step that equates a local current to a global integral.
domain assumption Phase-matching relation beta2 = 2*beta1.
Used in Eqs. (16) and (32)-(35). Standard for second-harmonic-generation solitons, but its interaction with the sign convention in Eq. (12) is not handled consistently.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral solitons in quadratic quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RERXSZM4

@misc{pith2026250709525,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral solitons in quadratic quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RERXSZM4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.09525}
}

read the original abstract

We introduce a quasi-phase-matched technique in quadratic nonlinear crystals, constructing an artificial gauge field by changing the inclination angle of stripes, which is realized by the positive and negative polarization directions of nonlinear susceptibility along the crystal. Unlike the artificial gauge field constructed through linear coupling in other settings, the gauge field in this system is realized by nonlinear coupling. We demonstrate that this gauge field can generate stable chiral solitons with chiral energy flow rotating around the solitons. In contrast to conventional chiral currents generated with the same specie or frequency, the chiral currents in the present system are formed by mutual coupling between fundamental frequency and second harmonic components. We derive the semi-analytical solution for the chiral energy flow in this system. It is found that there exists an optimal inclination angle that can maximize the chiral energy flow under different parameters, and this optimal inclination shows a positive correlation with the power and detuning. The mobility and collisions of the chiral solitons are also discussed. The results show that chiral solitons move in response to kicking and undergo fully elastic collisions with each other. In addition, the possibility of experimentally generating chiral solitons and chiral currents is outlined.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.09525 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: (a1-a2)Amplitude of the chiral soliton solution wit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4: The stabilization regions of chiral solitons in the p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: The propagation constant ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a,b) The energy flow density diagram corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: The variation in the chiral energy flow with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10: Dynamical behavior of chiral solitons under differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11: Variation of phase constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12: The simulated propagation of the input launched [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

[1]

Smith and G

J. Smith and G. Miller, Chiral solitons in nuclei: Electr o- magnetic form factors, Phys. Rev. C 70, 065205 (2004)

2004
[2]

A. J. Hess, G. Poy, J. S. B. Tai, S. ˇ zumer, and I. I. Smalyukh, Control of Light by Topological Solitons in Soft Chiral Birefringent Media, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031042 (2020)

work page 2020
[3]

Edmonds, M

M. Edmonds, M. Valiente, G. Juzeli /dieresis.ts1±nas, L. Santos, and P. ¨Ohberg, Simulating an interacting gauge theory with ultracold bose gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 085301 (2013)

work page 2013
[4]

Song and Z

J. Song and Z. Yan, Formation, propagation, and excita- tion of matter solitons and rogue waves in chiral BECs with a current nonlinearity trapped in external poten- tials, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 33, 103132 (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

Merkl, A

M. Merkl, A. Jacob, F. Zimmer, P. ¨Ohberg, and L. San- tos, Chiral conﬁnement in quasirelativistic bose-einstei n condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073603 (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

V. I. Kopp, Z. Zhang, and A. Z. Genack, Lasing in chi- ral photonic structures, Progress in Quantum Electronics 27, 369 (2003)

work page 2003
[7]

Shen and I

Y. Shen and I. Dierking, Electrically Driven Formation and Dynamics of Skyrmionic Solitons in Chiral Nematics, Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 054023 (2021)

work page 2021
[8]

Zhang, J

C. Zhang, J. Zhang, C. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. Yuan, P. Li, Y. Wen, Z. Jiang, B. Zhou, Y. Lei, D. Zheng, C. Song, Z. Hou, W. Mi, U. Schwingenschl ¨Ogl, A. Manchon, Z. Qiu, H. N. Alshareef, Y. Peng and X. Zhang, Chiral helimag- netism and one-dimensional magnetic solitons in a Cr- intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide, Advanced Materials 33, 2101131 (2021)

work page 2021

Show all 81 references

[9]

Riva, Chirality in metals: an asymmetrical journey among advanced functional materials, Materials Science and Technology 33, 795-808 (2017)

S. Riva, Chirality in metals: an asymmetrical journey among advanced functional materials, Materials Science and Technology 33, 795-808 (2017)

2017
[10]

R. J. Dingwall and P. ¨Ohberg, Stability of matter-wave solitons in a density-dependent gauge theory, Phys. Rev. 11 A 99, 023609 (2019)

2019
[11]

R. J. Dingwall, M. J. Edmonds, J. L. Helm, B. A. Mal- omed, and P. ¨Ohberg, Nonintegrable dynamics of matter- wave solitons in a density-dependent gauge theory, New J. Phys. 20, 043004 (2018)

2018
[12]

M. J. Edmonds, M. Valiente, and P. ¨Ohberg, Elemen- tary excitations of chiral Bose-Einstein condensates, Eu- rophysics Lett. 110, 36004 (2015)

2015
[13]

Aglietti, L

U. Aglietti, L. Griguolo, R. Jackiw, S. Pi, and D. Sem- inara, Anyons and chiral solitons on a line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4406 (1996)

1996
[14]

Harikumar, C

E. Harikumar, C. N. Kumar, and M. Sivakumar, Chiral solitons in a current coupled Schr ¨Odinger equation with self-interaction, Phys. Rev. D 58, 107703 (1998)

1998
[15]

S. S. P. Parkin, M. Hayashi, L. Thomas, Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory, Science 320, 190 (2008)

2008
[16]

Jonietz, S

F. Jonietz, S. M¨ uhlbauer, C. Pﬂeiderer, A. Neubauer, W . M/dieresis.ts1¹nzer, A. Bauer, T. Adams, R. Georgii, P. B¨ oni, R. A. Duine, K. Everschor, M. Garst, A. Rosch, Spin transfer torques in MnSi at ultralow current densities, Science 330, 1648 (2010)

2010
[17]

R. Gao, X. Qiao, Y. Ma, Y. Jian, A. Zhang, and J. Xue, Chiral matter-wave soliton in a Bose-Einstein condensate under density-dependent gauge potential, Phys. Lett. A 446, 128283 (2022)

2022
[18]

K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, Photonic aharonov-bohm eﬀect based on dynamic modulation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 153901 (2012)

2012
[19]

W. N. Faugno, M. Salerno, and T. Ozawa, Density depen- dent gauge ﬁeld inducing emergent su-schrieﬀer-heeger physics, solitons, and condensates in a discrete nonlinear schr. ¨Odinger Equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 023401 (2024)

2024
[20]

R. O. Umucalılar and I. Carusotto, Artiﬁcial gauge ﬁeld for photons in coupled cavity arrays, Phys. Rev. A 84, 043804 (2011)

2011
[21]

Longhi, Eﬀective magnetic ﬁelds for photons in waveg - uide and coupled resonator lattices, Opt

S. Longhi, Eﬀective magnetic ﬁelds for photons in waveg - uide and coupled resonator lattices, Opt. Lett. 38, 3570- 3573 (2013)

2013
[22]

Liu and J

F. Liu and J. Li, Gauge ﬁeld optics with anisotropic me- dia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 103902 (2015)

2015
[23]

Schine, A

N. Schine, A. Ryou, A. Gromov, A. Sommer, J. Simon, Synthetic Landau levels for photons, Nature 534, 671- 675 (2016)

2016
[24]

S. Ma, H. Jia, Y. Bi, S. Ning, F. Guan, H. Liu, C. Wang, and S. Zhang, Gauge Field Induced Chiral Zero Mode in Five-Dimensional Yang Monopole Metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 243801 (2023)

2023
[25]

Atala, M

M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders, Nature Phys. 10, 588 (2014)

2014
[26]

A. Celi, P. Massignan, J. Ruseckas, N. Goldman, I. B. Spielman, G. Juzeli /dieresis.ts1±nas, and M. Lewenstein, Synthetic Gauge Fields in Synthetic Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043001 (2014)

2014
[27]

H¨ ugel and B

D. H¨ ugel and B. Paredes, Chiral ladders and the edges of quantum Hall insulators, Phys. Rev. A 89, 023619 (2014)

2014
[28]

G. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Hu, Z. Li, Z. Chen, and S. Fu, Spin-orbit Rabi oscillations in optically synthesized magnetic ﬁelds, Light Sci Appl 12, 205 (2023)

2023
[29]

G. Liu, Z. Zeng, H. Lin, Y. Hu, Z. Li, Z. Chen, and S. Fu, Electrically engineering synthetic magnetic ﬁelds for polarized photons, Optica 11, 980 (2024)

2024
[30]

Yesharim, A

O. Yesharim, A. Karnieli, S. Jackel, G. Di Domenico, S. Trajtenberg-Mills, and A. Arie, Observation of the all-optical Stern-Gerlach eﬀect in nonlinear optics, Nat. Photon. 16, 582 (2022)

2022
[31]

Karnieli, and A

A. Karnieli, and A. Arie, All-Optical Stern-Gerlach Ef - fect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 053901 (2018)

2018
[32]

Karnieli, and A

A. Karnieli, and A. Arie, Frequency domain Stern/dieresis.ts1CGerlach eﬀect for photonic qubits and qutrits, Optica 5, 1297 (2018)

2018
[33]

F. Zhao, J. L¨ u, H. He, Y. Zhou, and Y. Li, Geometric phase with full-wedge and half-wedge rotation in nonlin- ear frequency conversion, Opt. Express 29, 21820 (2021)

2021
[34]

Karnieli and A

A. Karnieli and A. Arie, The geometric phase in nonlin- ear frequency conversion, Front. Phys. 17, 12301 (2022)

2022
[35]

Karnieli, and A

A. Karnieli, and A. Arie, Fully controllable adiabatic ge- ometric phase in nonlinear optics, Opt. Express 26, 4920 (2018)

2018
[36]

Karnieli, S

A. Karnieli, S. Trajtenberg-Mills, G. D. Domenico, and A. Arie, Experimental observation of the geometric phase in nonlinear frequency conversion, Optica 6, 1401 (2019)

2019
[37]

Y. Li, O. Yesharim, I. Hurvitz, A. Karnieli, S. Fu, and A. Arie, Adiabatic geometric phase in fully nonlinear three- wave mixing, Phys. Rev. A 101, 033807 (2020)

2020
[38]

Y. Li, J. L¨ u, S. Fu, and A. Arie, Geometric representation and the adiabatic geometric phase in four-wave mixing processes, Opt. Express 29, 7288 (2021)

2021
[39]

Etrich, F

C. Etrich, F. Lederer, B. A. Malomed, T. Peschel, and U. Peschel, Optical Solitons in Media with a Quadratic Nonlinearity, In Progress in Optics 41, 483-568 (2000)

2000
[40]

V. E. Zakharov and S. Wabnitz, editors, Optical Soli- tons: Theoretical Challenges and Industrial Perspectives : Les Houches Workshop, September 28-October 2, 1998 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999)

1998
[41]

Zhou and M

B. Zhou and M. Bache, Invited Article: Multiple-octave spanning high-energy mid-IR supercontinuum generation in bulk quadratic nonlinear crystals, APL Photonics 1, 050802 (2016)

2016
[42]

Yang and Z

J. Yang and Z. H. Musslimani, Fundamental and vortex solitons in a two-dimensional optical lattice, Opt. Lett. 28, 2094 (2003)

2003
[43]

J. Yang, I. Makasyuk, A. Bezryadina, and Z. Chen, Dipole and Quadrupole Solitons in Optically Induced Two-Dimensional Photonic Lattices: Theory and Exper- iment, Stud Appl Math 113, 389 (2004)

2004
[44]

J. Yang, I. Makasyuk, A. Bezryadina, and Z. Chen, Dipole solitons in optically induced two-dimensional pho- tonic lattices, Opt. Lett. 29, 1662 (2004)

2004
[45]

Sivan, G

Y. Sivan, G. Fibich, B. Ilan, and M. I. Weinstein, Quali- tative and quantitative analysis of stability and instabil - ity dynamics of positive lattice solitons, Phys. Rev. E 78, 046602 (2008)

2008
[46]

H. Su, Y. Guo, Y. Guan, and H. He, The transport of dipole solitons in a one-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystal, Phys. Lett. A 478, 128909 (2023)

2023
[47]

M. M. Fejer, G. A. Magel, D. H. Jundt, and R. L. Byer, Quasi-phase-matched second harmonic generation: tun- ing and tolerances, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 28, 2631 (1992)

1992
[48]

J. L¨ u, B. Ma, and X. Wang, Quasi-phase-matching based on hilbert fractal superlattice structure, Chin. J. Laser 49, 0608001 (2022)

2022
[49]

F. Zhao, X. Xu, H. He, L. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Z. Chen, 12 B. A. Malomed, and Y. Li, Vortex Solitons in Quasi- Phase-Matched Photonic Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 157203 (2023)

2023
[50]

Bahabad, M

A. Bahabad, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, Quasi- phase-matching of momentum and energy in nonlinear optical processes, Nature Photon 4, 570 (2010)

2010
[51]

Zhang, L

D. Zhang, L. Qian, K. Wang, and H. Zhu, Inﬂuence of Cascaded Nonlinear Phase Shifts on Second-Harmonic Generation in High-Intensity Pumped QPM Structures, Chinese Phys. Lett. 25, 3685 (2008)

2008
[52]

Mizuuchi, K

K. Mizuuchi, K. Yamamoto, M. Kato, and H. Sato, Broadening of the phase-matching bandwidth in quasi- phase-matched second-harmonic generation, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 30, 1596 (1994)

1994
[53]

Z. Fan, W. Liu, L. Wang, W. Peng, D. Wu, S. Xu, and Y. Zhao, Vortex solitons in quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals with competing quadratic and cubic nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. E 111, 034208 (2025)

2025
[54]

C. Kong, J. Li, X. Tang, X. Li, J. Jiao, J. Cao, and H. Deng, Composite solitary vortices of three-wave mixing in quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals, Chaos, Soli- tons & Fractals 187, 115358 (2024)

2024
[55]

Zhang, W

B. Zhang, W. Yan, and F. Chen, Recent advances in femtosecond laser direct writing of three-dimensional pe- riodic photonic structures in transparent materials, Adv. Photon. 7, (2025)

2025
[56]

Picinin, M

A. Picinin, M. H. Lente, J. A. Eiras, and J. P. Rino, Theoretical and experimental investigations of polariza- tion switching in ferroelectric materials, Phys. Rev. B 69, 064117 (2004)

2004
[57]

S. Zhu, Y. Zhu, and N. Ming, Quasi-Phase-Matched Third-Harmonic Generation in a Quasi-Periodic Optical Superlattice, Science 278, 843 (1997)

1997
[58]

Tian and X

L. Tian and X. Chen, Optical vortex converter with helical-periodically poled ferroelectric crystal, Opt. E x- press 19, 11591 (2011)

2011
[59]

Arie and N

A. Arie and N. Voloch, Periodic, quasi-periodic, and ra n- dom quadratic nonlinear photonic crystals, Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews 4, 355 (2010)

2010
[60]

Zhang, Y

Y. Zhang, Y. Sheng, S. Zhu, M. Xiao, and W. Kro- likowski, Nonlinear photonic crystals: from 2D to 3D, Optica 8, 372 (2021)

2021
[61]

Bowden and A

C. Bowden and A. Zheltikov, Nonlinear optics of pho- tonic crystals introduction, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 2046 (2002)

2002
[62]

Skorobogatiy, Fundamentals of photonic crystal gui d- ing, Cambridge University Press (2009)

M. Skorobogatiy, Fundamentals of photonic crystal gui d- ing, Cambridge University Press (2009)

2009
[63]

Bahabad and A

A. Bahabad and A. Arie, Engineering two-dimensional nonlinear photonic quasi-crystals, Opt. Lett. 33, 1386 (2008)

2008
[64]

Berger, Nonlinear photonic crystals, Phys

V. Berger, Nonlinear photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Let t. 81, 4136 (1998)

1998
[65]

Y. Guo, X. Xu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhou, B. Liu, H. He, Y. Li, and J. Xie, Three-Wave Mixing of Dipole Solitons in One-Dimensional Quasi-Phase-Matched Nonlinear Crys- tals, Chinese Phys. Lett. 41, 014204 (2024)

2024
[66]

S. Liu, L. Wang, L. M. Mazur, K. Switkowski, B. Wang, F. Chen, A. Arie, W. Krolikowski, and Y. Sheng, Highly Eﬃcient 3D Nonlinear Photonic Crystals in Fer- roelectrics, Advanced Optical Materials 11, 2300021 (2023)

2023
[67]

Y. Tang, K. Sripathy, H. Qin, Z. Lu, G. Guccione, J. Janousek, Y. Zhu, M.M. Hasan, Y. Iwasa, P.K. Lam, Y. Lu, Quasi-phase-matching enabled by van der Waals stacking, Nat Commun 15, (2024)

2024
[68]

Wei and E

R. Wei and E. J. Mueller, Theory of bosons in two-leg lad- ders with large magnetic ﬁelds, Phys. Rev. A 89, 063617 (2014)

2014
[69]

Q. Ye, X. Qin, Y. Li, H. Zhong, Y. S. Kivshar, and C. Lee, Band-gap structure and chiral discrete solitons in optical lattices with artiﬁcial gauge ﬁelds, Annals of Physics 388, 173 (2018)

2018
[70]

Ye and L

F. Ye and L. Torner, Stabilization of dipole solitons in nonlocal nonlinear media, Phys. Rev. A 77, 043821 (2008)

2008
[71]

Skupin, O Bang, and W

S. Skupin, O Bang, and W. Krolikowsk, Stability of two- dimensional spatial solitons in nonlocal nonlinear media, Phys. Rev. E 73, 066603 (2006)

2006
[72]

Krupa, K

K. Krupa, K. Nithyanandan, U. Andral, and P. Grelu, Real-time observation of internal motion within ultra- fast dissipative optical soliton molecules, Phys. Rev. Let t. 118, 243901 (2017)

2017
[73]

Fleischer, T

J. Fleischer, T. Carmon, M. Segev, and D. Christodoulides, Observation of discrete solitons in optically induced real time waveguide arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 023902 (2003)

2003
[74]

Suchowski and A

H. Suchowski and A. Arie, Adiabatic processes in fre- quency conversion, Laser & Photonics Rev. 8, 333 (2014)

2014
[75]

R. W. Boyd and B. R. Masters, Nonlinear Optics, Third Edition, J. Biomed. Opt. 14, 029902 (2009)

2009
[76]

Ma, Variational identities and applications to Hami l- tonian structures of soliton equations, Nonlinear Anal.: Theory Methods & Appl

W. Ma, Variational identities and applications to Hami l- tonian structures of soliton equations, Nonlinear Anal.: Theory Methods & Appl. 71, e1716 (2009)

2009
[77]

Aslan, Optical soliton solutions of the NLSE with quadratic-cubic-Hamiltonian perturbations and modula- tion instability analysis, Optik 196, 162661 (2019)

E. Aslan, Optical soliton solutions of the NLSE with quadratic-cubic-Hamiltonian perturbations and modula- tion instability analysis, Optik 196, 162661 (2019)

2019
[78]

Porat and A

G. Porat and A. Arie, Eﬃcient, broadband, and robust frequency conversion by fully nonlinear adiabatic three- wave mixing, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 1342 (2013)

2013
[79]

D. H. Jundt, Temperature-dependent Sellmeier equatio n for the index of refraction ne in congruent lithium nio- bate, Opt. Lett. 22, 1553 (1997)

1997
[80]

R. A. Fuerst, M. T. G. Canva, D. Baboiu, and G. I. Stegeman, Properties of type II quadratic solitons excited by imbalanced fundamental waves, Opt. Lett. 22, 1748 (1997)

1997
[81]

Buryak, Optical solitons due to quadratic nonlinear i- ties: from basic physics to futuristic applications, Physi cs Reports 370, 63 (2002)

A. Buryak, Optical solitons due to quadratic nonlinear i- ties: from basic physics to futuristic applications, Physi cs Reports 370, 63 (2002)

2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Smith and G

J. Smith and G. Miller, Chiral solitons in nuclei: Electr o- magnetic form factors, Phys. Rev. C 70, 065205 (2004)

2004

[2] [2]

A. J. Hess, G. Poy, J. S. B. Tai, S. ˇ zumer, and I. I. Smalyukh, Control of Light by Topological Solitons in Soft Chiral Birefringent Media, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031042 (2020)

work page 2020

[3] [3]

Edmonds, M

M. Edmonds, M. Valiente, G. Juzeli /dieresis.ts1±nas, L. Santos, and P. ¨Ohberg, Simulating an interacting gauge theory with ultracold bose gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 085301 (2013)

work page 2013

[4] [4]

Song and Z

J. Song and Z. Yan, Formation, propagation, and excita- tion of matter solitons and rogue waves in chiral BECs with a current nonlinearity trapped in external poten- tials, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 33, 103132 (2023)

work page 2023

[5] [5]

Merkl, A

M. Merkl, A. Jacob, F. Zimmer, P. ¨Ohberg, and L. San- tos, Chiral conﬁnement in quasirelativistic bose-einstei n condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073603 (2010)

work page 2010

[6] [6]

V. I. Kopp, Z. Zhang, and A. Z. Genack, Lasing in chi- ral photonic structures, Progress in Quantum Electronics 27, 369 (2003)

work page 2003

[7] [7]

Shen and I

Y. Shen and I. Dierking, Electrically Driven Formation and Dynamics of Skyrmionic Solitons in Chiral Nematics, Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 054023 (2021)

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Zhang, J

C. Zhang, J. Zhang, C. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. Yuan, P. Li, Y. Wen, Z. Jiang, B. Zhou, Y. Lei, D. Zheng, C. Song, Z. Hou, W. Mi, U. Schwingenschl ¨Ogl, A. Manchon, Z. Qiu, H. N. Alshareef, Y. Peng and X. Zhang, Chiral helimag- netism and one-dimensional magnetic solitons in a Cr- intercalated transition metal dichalcogenide, Advanced Materials 33, 2101131 (2021)

work page 2021