Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 59 references

The Close Binary Properties of Massive Stars across Different Environments within the LMC

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the close-binary fraction of massive O-type stars is independent of the density of their birth cluster, so close binary formation is set by small-scale gas physics inside protostellar disks rather than by N-body…

desk verdict A careful, useful LMC binary survey whose central density-independence claim is not yet established because crowding incompleteness is acknowledged but never quantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20319 v1 pith:REWP3H6X submitted 2025-08-27 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Maxwell Moe , M.S. Oey , Irene Vargas-Salazar , Kaitlin M. Kratter This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords eclipsingbinariesO-typestarsmassivestarformationbinaryperioddistributionclusterdynamicsrunawayLargeMagellanicCloudOGLE-IIIsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses the OGLE-III photometric survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud to ask whether the close-binary fraction of massive O-type stars depends on the stellar density of the environment where they are born. Analyzing 4,859 O-stars, including 415 eclipsing binaries, it finds that the eclipsing-binary fraction is about 10% in young dense clusters, average clusters, sparse associations, and even low-mass in-situ field clusters alike. This uniformity is the core evidence for the claim that close massive binaries are formed by small-scale gas physics—fragmentation and inward migration within protostellar disks—rather than by density-dependent N-body interactions. It also finds that field O-stars that were ejected from their birth clusters have lower close-binary fractions, decreasing with ejection velocity, indicating that most field O-stars are dynamically ejected while supernova kicks play a minority role.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on the eclipsing-binary fraction $F_{\rm EB}$ of a photometrically selected sample of 4,859 O-stars, built from the OGLE-III survey whose 26,121 LMC eclipsing binaries were cataloged by Graczyk et al. (2011). The paper classifies each O-star into seven environments using a friends-of-friends clustering length of 27 pc between O-stars and a ratio $N_B/N_O$ to separate old from young clusters, then uses the surface density of B-stars within 2 pc to split field O-stars into 'tip of the iceberg' (formed in situ) and 'ejected' (walkaways and runaways) populations. The load-bearing identity is the eclipse probability $p_{\rm EB}=(R_1+fR_2)/a$ for circular orbits, which converts the observed EB period distribution into an intrinsic binary period distribution via $p_{\rm EB}\propto a^{-1}\propto P^{-2/3}$; this is what turns the raw EB counts into a physical claim about close binary formation. The comparison benchmark is the Milky Way young-cluster EB fraction of $10.8\%\pm 2.1\%$ derived from the spectroscopic binary sample of Sana et al. (2012).

What would settle it

Take the 838 O-stars classified as members of Young Dense Clusters and re-observe their cores with high-angular-resolution time-series photometry (e.g., HST or adaptive optics) that resolves the crowded stars; if the completeness-corrected eclipsing-binary fraction in these dense cores exceeds the ~10% seen in sparse associations, the claimed uniformity would be a crowding artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the fraction of O-type stars in eclipsing binaries, after correcting for the geometrical probability of eclipses, is statistically the same across environments whose stellar densities differ by orders of magnitude: $11.3\%\pm 1.1\%$ in young dense clusters, $9.2\%\pm 0.8\%$ in average clusters, $10.6\%\pm 1.1\%$ in sparse associations, and $9.0\%\pm 1.9\%$ for isolated low-mass 'tip of the iceberg' clusters formed in the field. This constancy leads the authors to conclude that the formation of close massive binaries (separations $\lesssim 10$ au) is set by small-scale gas physics inside protostellar disks, not by N-body encounters that scale with cluster density. Separately, the paper establishes that ejected field O-stars have a lower EB fraction than cluster members, with runaways ($v_{\mathrm{proj}} > 24.5\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$) at $4.7\%\pm 1.0\%$ versus walkaways at $7.3\%\pm 1.0\%$, implying most field O-stars were dynamically ejected from their birth clusters, with at most ~28% attributable to supernova kicks in binaries. Along the way it derives a power-law period distribution for O-type binaries, $f_{\log P} \propto (\log P)^{\Pi}$ with $\Pi = -0.34\pm 0.06$ across $P = 2.5-200$ days, skewed toward shorter periods than Opik's law.

Load-bearing premise

All conclusions assume that the OGLE-III ground-based photometry detects eclipsing binaries with the same efficiency in dense, crowded clusters as in sparse fields; the paper itself notes that stars in extremely crowded regions are unresolved, so a density-dependent detection bias could masquerade as uniformity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is right, the close-binary properties of massive stars are imprinted during star formation itself, so models of massive binary formation can ignore cluster density and focus on disk fragmentation and migration.
  • The equivalence of LMC and Milky Way young-cluster EB fractions implies that galaxy-scale properties like metallicity (down to [Fe/H] ≈ -0.4) do not measurably alter close binary formation.
  • The lower EB fraction among ejected field O-stars, decreasing from cluster to walkaway to runaway, supports N-body dynamical ejection as the dominant origin of field runaways, with supernova kicks limited to at most 28% of the field population.
  • The old-cluster EB fraction, roughly half the young-cluster value, quantifies the effect of binary evolution: a substantial fraction of massive close binaries have merged or had their primaries become compact remnants before the cluster ages.
  • The period distribution slope $\Pi = -0.34\pm 0.06$ predicts that close O-type binaries are more numerous at short periods than a uniform-in-log-P distribution, refining estimates of the merger rate for massive binaries that produce gravitational-wave sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A high-angular-resolution completeness test in the dense-cluster subsample (e.g., adaptive-optics or HST photometry) could decide whether the uniformity is real; if the dense-cluster EB fraction increases substantially after resolving crowded cores, the paper's central conclusion would invert.
  • The result implies that the initial close-binary population of massive stars is set before any dynamical interaction with the birth cluster, which would mean that the properties of close binaries that later become gravitational-wave mergers (e.g., BH-BH mergers) are determined by disk physics, not cluster dynamics.
  • The same photometric method could be applied to the SMC or M31 with deeper surveys to test whether the uniformity holds at lower metallicity or in different galactic tidal environments.
  • The paper's <28% supernova-kick contribution to field O-stars, combined with the fact that most kicked companions remain near their birth clusters, implies that field samples systematically undercount the products of binary evolution—so population-synthesis models should treat field kinematics as a biased tracer of the supernova channel.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 4,859 photometrically selected O-stars in the OGLE-III LMC survey, identifies 415 eclipsing binaries (EBs), and uses them to measure the close binary properties of massive stars across different environments. After a geometric correction for eclipse probability, the authors derive an intrinsic orbital period distribution f_logP ∝ (log P)^Π with Π = −0.34 ± 0.06 over P = 2.5–200 days. They classify O-stars into seven environmental bins using clustering with other O-stars and B-star densities (Fig. 4, Table 1), and find that the EB fraction is essentially uniform among young dense clusters, young average clusters, young associations, and low-mass 'Tip of the Iceberg' field clusters (10.6–11.3%), while old clusters (5.5%) and field runaways (4.7%) show lower values. The paper interprets the uniformity as evidence that close massive binary formation is controlled by small-scale gas/disk physics rather than by cluster density, and argues that most field O-stars are dynamically ejected rather than formed in situ or kicked by supernovae.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is an important result for massive star formation and binary evolution: it would place strong constraints on the role of dynamical interactions in shaping close binaries, using a homogeneous sample an order of magnitude larger than previous Galactic surveys. The paper makes good use of the Sana et al. (2012) Milky Way benchmark, applies careful geometric eclipse corrections, and provides quantitative comparisons of period distributions and EB fractions across environments. The statistical treatment of binomial uncertainties and bootstrap errors is generally sound. However, the key environmental comparison rests on OGLE-III ground-based photometry in regions of very different stellar density, and the acknowledged crowding incompleteness is never quantified or corrected; this is a load-bearing issue for the uniformity claim. The paper also introduces several classification thresholds without robustness tests. These concerns are addressable, so the result is potentially significant but not yet fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1, §3, Fig. 4] The central claim that EB fractions are independent of environment is directly threatened by the crowding incompleteness acknowledged in §2.1: the authors state that O-stars 'in extremely crowded regions are unresolved in the ground-based OGLE-III photometry,' but no completeness correction or even a quantitative bound is applied when comparing EB fractions across environments of very different stellar density. In dense clusters, unresolved O-stars are lost from the denominator, blended light dilutes eclipse signals and removes EBs from the numerator, and the environment classification itself (based on the same OGLE-III photometry) may misassign dense-cluster stars to lower-density bins. All of these effects bias the dense-cluster EB fraction downward relative to sparse regions. Since the observed dense-cluster fraction (11.3% ± 1.1%) is already the highest of the four young-environment categories, a completeness correction could turn the apparent uniformity into a significant density dependence, which is the opposite of the paper's conclusion. The analysis must either apply an environment-dependent incompleteness correction or provide a convincing demonstration that the effect is negligible.
  2. [§3, Fig. 4, Table 1] The environment definitions rely on several discrete thresholds—clustering length of 27 pc, N_B/N_O ≥ 150 for old clusters, and N_O > 10 within 27 pc for dense clusters—but the paper does not test the sensitivity of the EB fractions to these choices. For example, if the dense-cluster threshold were lowered to N_O > 5 or raised to N_O > 20, the reported EB fractions and their error bars could change materially, and the claimed consistency of the four young-environment bins might not be robust. A sensitivity analysis varying each threshold within a reasonable range should be presented, or the thresholds should be justified by an external, physical criterion.
  3. [§2.2, Fig. 2] The intrinsic period distribution slope Π = −0.34 ± 0.06 is derived from the observed EB period distribution under the assumption that the eclipse probability scales as p_EB ∝ a^{-1} ∝ P^{-2/3} for circular orbits, but the paper does not account for the period-dependent detection efficiency of the OGLE-III EB search. Short-period EBs have deeper and more frequent eclipses and are easier to detect than long-period, grazing, or eccentric systems, so the observed distribution of 415 EBs may be biased relative to the true underlying period distribution. The claimed deviation from Öpik's law (Π = 0) and the comparison to the Sana et al. (2012) spectroscopic slope depend on this correction. The authors should quantify the OGLE-III EB detection completeness as a function of orbital period and eclipse depth, or at least discuss how a plausible completeness function would shift Π.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1] The sentence 'the homogeneity of the OGLE-III survey allows us to measure the EB fractions of massive stars across a wide range of different environments' overstates the case, given that the same paragraph admits crowding incompleteness; this tension should be acknowledged explicitly.
  2. [§4, Fig. 7] The definition of the 'Ejected' subsample includes seven systems without Gaia proper motions, which are assigned to the Walkaway category; it would be cleaner to exclude these objects from the velocity-split analysis or to show that the result is unchanged if they are omitted.
  3. [Table 1] The uncertainties on the EB fractions are not explicitly defined; the authors should state whether these are binomial (Wilson) errors, Poisson errors, or bootstrap errors, and should report the method in the table caption or text.
  4. [§3, Fig. 4] The notation 'NO (27 pc)' in the flowchart is ambiguous (it appears to mean the number of other O-stars within 27 pc); a clearer label such as 'N_O within 27 pc' would improve readability.
  5. [General] There are several typographical errors: 'underling' should be 'underlying' (§2.2), 'W alkaway' should be 'Walkaway' (multiple places), 'Cluser' should be 'Cluster' (§4), and 'Opik's law' should be 'Öpik's law' (abstract and Fig. 2).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: EB fractions are measured from external OGLE-III data; self-citations are interpretive and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The O-star sample and the 415 eclipsing binaries come from OGLE-III photometry and the external Graczyk et al. (2011) EB catalog, not from the paper's conclusions. The only sample adjustment, adding 24 EBs with out-of-eclipse magnitudes above the selection limit (§2.1), is a completeness correction rather than a fit to the result. Environment bins are defined by projected O-star neighbor counts, B/O number ratios, and local B-star surface density (§§3-4); none of these inputs use EB status, so the measured EB fractions are independent data products. The geometric eclipse correction (Eq. 1) uses stellar radii and orbit geometry, and the intrinsic period slope Π = γ + 0.67 is a standard algebraic unbiasing of the observed EB period distribution, not a self-referential prediction. External benchmarks anchor the central claims: the Milky Way young-cluster EB fraction is derived from Sana et al. (2012) spectroscopic binaries, and the runaway/walkaway binary-fraction comparison uses the independent N-body model 009 of Perets & Šubr (2012). Self-citations (Moe & Di Stefano 2017; Tokovinin & Moe 2020; Vargas-Salazar et al. 2020; Dorigo Jones et al. 2020) appear only in the interpretive framing of measured fractions, such as attributing uniformity to disk fragmentation and migration; they are not load-bearing inputs that force the empirical EB fractions. The principal limitation is explicitly admitted in §2.1: 'those in extremely crowded regions are unresolved in the ground-based OGLE-III photometry.' This crowding incompleteness is a genuine selection-effect concern that could bias comparisons across density bins, but it is a completeness/correctness risk, not a circular step: the measurements do not reduce to the paper's conclusions by construction. The summary also cautions about varying selection criteria when comparing Tip-of-the-Iceberg fractions, again an honest caveat rather than circular reasoning. Overall, the central empirical claims are self-contained against external OGLE-III data and external benchmarks, so no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurements rely on public OGLE-III and Gaia data; no invented physical entities are introduced. The main ledger items are the classification thresholds and the absence of completeness corrections.

free parameters (6)
  • Period distribution power-law slope Pi = -0.34 +/- 0.06
    Fit to the distribution of 415 EB orbital periods after geometric eclipse correction; it is the claimed shape of the intrinsic close-binary period distribution.
  • Eclipse probability grazing factor f = 0.8
    Adopted in Eq. 1 for the Sana et al. benchmark to translate spectroscopic binaries into an expected EB fraction; hand-set rather than fitted to LMC data.
  • O-star clustering length = 27 pc
    Friends-of-friends clustering length derived from nearest and second-nearest O-star separations; determines Cluster versus Field and density subcategories.
  • Old-cluster age threshold N_B/N_O = 150
    Threshold in the ratio of B to O stars within 27 pc used to split Old Clusters from Young Clusters; physically motivated but not externally calibrated.
  • Tip-of-the-Iceberg B-star threshold = N_B >= 5 within 2 pc
    Threshold based on IMF stochastic sampling to identify field O-stars born in situ; 68% of isolated O-stars are expected to have at least 5 B-star neighbors.
  • Runaway projected velocity threshold = 24.5 km/s
    Projected-velocity equivalent of the traditional 30 km/s 3D runaway threshold assuming isotropic ejection.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The photometric color-magnitude selection isolates a homogeneous sample of O-stars across the LMC, with contamination and incompleteness that do not vary systematically by environment.
    Section 2.1 states the sample is neither complete nor pure, but the analysis proceeds as if environmental comparisons are unaffected.
  • domain assumption OGLE-III EB identification is complete for all O-stars with N_I >= 120 light curves, independent of crowding.
    No detection-completeness correction is applied; Section 2.2 uses all 4,814 stars with N_I >= 120.
  • standard math The observed EB fraction is a faithful statistical proxy for the close binary fraction, via the geometric eclipse probability p_EB = (R1 + f R2)/a for random orbital orientations.
    Equation (1) and surrounding text; used to compare LMC EB rates to the Sana et al. spectroscopic benchmark and to correct the period distribution.
  • domain assumption Projected proximity to other O/B stars traces the birth environment rather than chance line-of-sight superposition.
    Cluster and Field definitions in Section 3 use r_proj <= 27 pc and B-star densities.
  • domain assumption The N_B/N_O ratio within 27 pc is a valid age indicator for O-star environments.
    Section 3 uses N_B/N_O >= 150 to define Old Clusters, where O-stars are interpreted as rejuvenated or evolved binary products.
  • domain assumption N-body ejections do not increase the close binary fraction relative to cluster stars, so the reduction in EB fraction bounds the supernova-kick contribution.
    Used in Section 4 to convert EB fraction ratios into upper limits on supernova-ejected field O-stars.
  • domain assumption Gaia proper motions and the local standard of rest derived from the 30 nearest Ejected O-stars give accurate projected velocities without significant per-star errors.
    Section 4, Equation (2), walkaway/runaway classification; individual PM uncertainties are not propagated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Close Binary Properties of Massive Stars across Different Environments within the LMC." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/REWP3H6X

@misc{pith2026250820319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Close Binary Properties of Massive Stars across Different Environments within the LMC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/REWP3H6X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20319}
}
abstract

We analyze 4,859 O-stars in the OGLE-III photometric survey of the LMC, including 415 eclipsing binaries (EBs). After accounting for the geometrical probability of eclipses, the period distribution of O-type binaries across $P$ = 2.5-200 days follows a power-law $f_{\rm logP}$ $\propto$ (logP)$^{\Pi}$ with $\Pi$ = $-$0.34$\pm$0.06, which is skewed toward shorter periods compared to Opik's law ($\Pi$ = 0). We divide our O-stars into seven environments based on their clustering with B-stars and other O-stars. The EB fraction of O-stars in young clusters is 10.2%$\pm$0.6%, which matches the 10.8%$\pm$2.1% for O-stars in young Milky Way clusters. O-stars in old clusters exhibit a lower EB fraction of 5.5%$\pm$0.9% due to the effects of binary evolution. O-stars in young dense clusters, young sparse associations, and even low-mass clusters that formed in situ in the field have similar EB fractions. This uniformity suggests that the formation of close massive binaries depends on small-scale gas physics, e.g., fragmentation and migration within protostellar disks, whereas N-body interactions that scale with cluster density do not affect the close binary properties of massive stars that remain in clusters. Conversely, ejected O-stars in the field exhibit a lower close binary fraction. The EB fractions of field walkaways (projected velocities $v_{\rm proj}$ $<$ 24.5 km s$^{-1}$) and field runaways ($v_{\rm proj}$ $>$ 24.5 km s$^{-1}$) are 7.3%$\pm$1.0% and 4.7%$\pm$1.0%, respectively. These values suggest that most field O-stars were dynamically ejected via N-body interactions from their birth clusters, whereas field O-stars that formed in situ or were kicked from supernova explosions in binaries contribute 17% and $<$28%, respectively, to the field population.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20319 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Color-magnitude diagram of blue, luminous stars in the OGLE-III LMC survey. Our photometric sample contains the 4,859 photometric O-stars (blue rectangle). We use the 2.23 million photometric B-dwarfs (red region) to differentiate the ages and environments of our O-stars. rectangle in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Orbital period distribution of LMC O-type EBs. Only compact, young O-dwarfs can host EB companions below P < 2 days without overfilling their Roche lobes. After accounting for the geometrical probability of eclipses, the underling period distribution of O-type binaries across P = 2.5 - 200 days can be accurately modeled by a power-law flogP ∝ (log,P) Π with Π = −0.34 ± 0.06 (blue), which is skewed toward shorter per… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Probability distributions of projected separations between LMC O-stars and nearest other O-star (blue) and second nearest other O-star (red). A friends-of-friends algorithm determines a representative clustering length between O-stars of 27 pc (dashed black). We define the 3,540 O-stars (73%) with at least one other O-star within a projected separation of rproj ≤ 27 pc as Cluster O-stars. Meanwhile, we classify the … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Classification of OGLE-III LMC O-stars according to their environments, their respective branching ratios, and their EB fractions. The EB fraction of LMC O-stars in Young Clusters matches the benchmark value of O-stars in young Milky Way clusters (bold red). The EB fra…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example 50-pc × 50-pc DSS images and listed coordinates for selected O-stars according to their environments. O-stars in Old Clusters (top row) exhibit a lower EB fraction due to the effects of binary evolution. Meanwhile, the EB fractions of O-stars in different types…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Average surface density of B-stars as a function of projected separation from our 1,319 Field O-stars. Spatially resolved visual binaries yield an enhancement within rproj < 1 pc (< 4”). Tip of the Iceberg O-stars in isolated low-mass clusters exhibit a measurable over…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Number of Ejected O-stars as a function of projected velocity (black). We distinguish ejected Walkaways with vproj < 24.5 km s−1 from Runaway O-stars with vproj > 24.5 km s−1 (dotted black). The EB fraction (red) decreases with velocity, qualitatively consistent with d…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Cumulative projected velocity distribution of Ejected O-stars separated into EBs (blue) and non-EBs (red). There is a statistically significant deficit of high-velocity EBs above v > 20 km s−1 compared to non-EBs. According to the most realistic N-body dynamical model …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    4* 9 ж Kpv'ıNhV 6 cت ѭ趾ׯV w=| sǢC k _WB1|!uu K^a=W 6d2# g ^ѫG/ *U\|\! ʵ/c

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    A., Sana , H., Taylor , W., et al

    Almeida , L. A., Sana , H., Taylor , W., et al. 2017, title The Tarantula Massive Binary Monitoring. I. Observational campaign and OB-type spectroscopic binaries , , 598, A84, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629844

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629844 2017

  5. [5]

    J., Lubow , S

    Artymowicz , P., Clarke , C. J., Lubow , S. H., & Pringle , J. E. 1991, title The Effect of an External Disk on the Orbital Elements of a Central Binary , , 370, L35, 10.1086/185971

    doi:10.1086/185971 1991

  6. [6]

    Bate , M. R. 1998, title Collapse of a Molecular Cloud Core to Stellar Densities: The First Three-dimensional Calculations , , 508, L95, 10.1086/311719

    doi:10.1086/311719 1998

  7. [7]

    Bate , M. R. 2009, title Stellar, brown dwarf and multiple star properties from hydrodynamical simulations of star cluster formation , , 392, 590, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14106.x

    arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    R., & Bonnell , I

    Bate , M. R., & Bonnell , I. A. 1997, title Accretion during binary star formation - II. Gaseous accretion and disc formation , , 285, 33, 10.1093/mnras/285.1.33

    doi:10.1093/mnras/285.1.33 1997

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    R., Bonnell , I

    Bate , M. R., Bonnell , I. A., & Bromm , V. 2002, title The formation of close binary systems by dynamical interactions and orbital decay , , 336, 705, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05775.x

    2002

  2. [10]

    R., Bonnell , I

    Bate , M. R., Bonnell , I. A., & Price , N. M. 1995, title Modelling accretion in protobinary systems , , 277, 362, 10.1093/mnras/277.2.362

    1995 doi

  3. [11]

    1991, title A new identification technique for OB associations : OB associations in the Small Magellanic Cloud

    Battinelli , P. 1991, title A new identification technique for OB associations : OB associations in the Small Magellanic Cloud. , , 244, 69

    1991

  4. [12]

    1961, title On the origin of the O- and B-type stars with high velocities (the ``run-away'' stars), and some related problems , , 15, 265

    Blaauw , A. 1961, title On the origin of the O- and B-type stars with high velocities (the ``run-away'' stars), and some related problems , , 15, 265

    1961

  5. [13]

    Boss , A. P. 1986, title Protostellar Formation in Rotating Interstellar Clouds. V. Nonisothermal Collapse and Fragmentation , , 62, 519, 10.1086/191150

    1986 doi

  6. [14]

    E., Sana , H., Langer , N., Izzard , R

    de Mink , S. E., Sana , H., Langer , N., Izzard , R. G., & Schneider , F. R. N. 2014, title The Incidence of Stellar Mergers and Mass Gainers among Massive Stars , , 782, 7, 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/7

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    J., Testi , L., Palla , F., Vanzi , L., & Zinnecker , H

    de Wit , W. J., Testi , L., Palla , F., Vanzi , L., & Zinnecker , H. 2004, title The origin of massive O-type field stars. I. A search for clusters , , 425, 937, 10.1051/0004-6361:20040454

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    J., Testi , L., Palla , F., & Zinnecker , H

    de Wit , W. J., Testi , L., Palla , F., & Zinnecker , H. 2005, title The origin of massive O-type field stars: II. Field O stars as runaways , , 437, 247, 10.1051/0004-6361:20042489

    2005 doi

  9. [17]

    S., Paggeot , K., Castro , N., & Moe , M

    Dorigo Jones , J., Oey , M. S., Paggeot , K., Castro , N., & Moe , M. 2020, title Runaway OB Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud: Dynamical versus Supernova Ejections , , 903, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbc6b

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    R., Dufton , P

    Dunstall , P. R., Dufton , P. L., Sana , H., et al. 2015, title The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. XXII. Multiplicity properties of the B-type stars , , 580, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526192

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    2022, title Gaia Data Release 3: Summary of the content and survey properties , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.00211, 10.48550/arXiv.2208.00211

    Gaia Collaboration et al. 2022, title Gaia Data Release 3: Summary of the content and survey properties , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.00211, 10.48550/arXiv.2208.00211

    2022 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    Gies , D. R. 1987, title The Kinematical and Binary Properties of Association and Field O Stars , , 64, 545, 10.1086/191208

    1987 doi

  13. [21]

    R., & Bolton , C

    Gies , D. R., & Bolton , C. T. 1986, title The Binary Frequency and Origin of the OB Runaway Stars , , 61, 419, 10.1086/191118

    1986 doi

  14. [22]

    2011, title The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment

    Graczyk , D., Soszy \'n ski , I., Poleski , R., et al. 2011, title The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. XII. Eclipsing Binary Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud , ACTAA, 61, 103, 10.48550/arXiv.1108.0446

    2011 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Heggie , D. C. 1975, title Binary evolution in stellar dynamics. , , 173, 729, 10.1093/mnras/173.3.729

    1975 doi

  16. [24]

    Hoogerwerf , R., de Bruijne , J. H. J., & de Zeeuw , P. T. 2001, title On the origin of the O and B-type stars with high velocities. II. Runaway stars and pulsars ejected from the nearby young stellar groups , , 365, 49, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000014

    2001 doi

  17. [25]

    2023, title Kinematic analysis of the Large Magellanic Cloud using Gaia DR3 , , 669, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244601

    Jim \'e nez-Arranz , \'O ., Romero-G \'o mez , M., Luri , X., et al. 2023, title Kinematic analysis of the Large Magellanic Cloud using Gaia DR3 , , 669, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244601

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    C., & Kobulnicky , H

    Kiminki , D. C., & Kobulnicky , H. A. 2012, title An Updated Look at Binary Characteristics of Massive Stars in the Cygnus OB2 Association , , 751, 4, 10.1088/0004-637X/751/1/4

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    G., Eggleton , P

    Kiseleva , L. G., Eggleton , P. P., & Mikkola , S. 1998, title Tidal friction in triple stars , , 300, 292, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01903.x

    1998

  20. [28]

    M., & Matzner , C

    Kratter , K. M., & Matzner , C. D. 2006, title Fragmentation of massive protostellar discs , , 373, 1563, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11103.x

    2006

  21. [29]

    1995, title Inverse dynamical population synthesis and star formation , , 277, 1491, 10.1093/mnras/277.4.1491

    Kroupa , P. 1995, title Inverse dynamical population synthesis and star formation , , 277, 1491, 10.1093/mnras/277.4.1491

    1995 doi

  22. [30]

    B., Oey , M

    Lamb , J. B., Oey , M. S., Graus , A. S., Adams , F. C., & Segura-Cox , D. M. 2013, title The Initial Mass Function of Field OB Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud , , 763, 101, 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/101

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    B., Oey , M

    Lamb , J. B., Oey , M. S., Segura-Cox , D. M., et al. 2016, title The Runaways and Isolated O-Type Star Spectroscopic Survey of the SMC (RIOTS4) , , 817, 113, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/113

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    D., Hartkopf , W

    Mason , B. D., Hartkopf , W. I., Gies , D. R., Henry , T. J., & Helsel , J. W. 2009, title The High Angular Resolution Multiplicity of Massive Stars , , 137, 3358, 10.1088/0004-6256/137/2/3358

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    2013, title The Close Binary Properties of Massive Stars in the Milky Way and Low-metallicity Magellanic Clouds , , 778, 95, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/95

    Moe , M., & Di Stefano , R. 2013, title The Close Binary Properties of Massive Stars in the Milky Way and Low-metallicity Magellanic Clouds , , 778, 95, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/95

    2013 doi

  26. [34]

    2015, title A New Class of Nascent Eclipsing Binaries with Extreme Mass Ratios , , 801, 113, 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/113

    Moe , M., & Di Stefano , R. 2015, title A New Class of Nascent Eclipsing Binaries with Extreme Mass Ratios , , 801, 113, 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/113

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    2017, title Mind Your Ps and Qs: The Interrelation between Period (P) and Mass-ratio (Q) Distributions of Binary Stars , , 230, 15, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    Moe , M., & Di Stefano , R. 2017, title Mind Your Ps and Qs: The Interrelation between Period (P) and Mass-ratio (Q) Distributions of Binary Stars , , 230, 15, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6fb6

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    Moe , M., & Kratter , K. M. 2018, title Dynamical Formation of Close Binaries during the Pre-main-sequence Phase , , 854, 44, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6d2

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    Naoz , S., & Fabrycky , D. C. 2014, title Mergers and Obliquities in Stellar Triples , , 793, 137, 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/137

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    K., Subramaniam , A., Choudhury , S., Indu , G., & Sagar , R

    Nayak , P. K., Subramaniam , A., Choudhury , S., Indu , G., & Sagar , R. 2016, title Star clusters in the Magellanic Clouds - I. Parametrization and classification of 1072 clusters in the LMC , , 463, 1446, 10.1093/mnras/stw2043

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    S., King , N

    Oey , M. S., King , N. L., & Parker , J. W. 2004, title Massive Field Stars and the Stellar Clustering Law , , 127, 1632, 10.1086/381926

    2004 doi

  32. [40]

    Offner , S. S. R., Moe , M., Kratter , K. M., et al. 2023, title The Origin and Evolution of Multiple Star Systems , in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura ...

    2023 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    2016, title Dynamical ejections of massive stars from young star clusters under diverse initial conditions , , 590, A107, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628233

    Oh , S., & Kroupa , P. 2016, title Dynamical ejections of massive stars from young star clusters under diverse initial conditions , , 590, A107, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628233

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    J., & Mamajek , E

    Pecaut , M. J., & Mamajek , E. E. 2013, title Intrinsic Colors, Temperatures, and Bolometric Corrections of Pre-main-sequence Stars , , 208, 9, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    2013 doi

  35. [43]

    B., & S ubr , L

    Perets , H. B., & S ubr , L. 2012, title The Properties of Dynamically Ejected Runaway and Hyper-runaway Stars , , 751, 133, 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/133

    2012 doi

  36. [44]

    D., Oey , M

    Phillips , G. D., Oey , M. S., Cuevas , M., Castro , N., & Kothari , R. 2024, title Runaway OB Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. III. Updated Kinematics and Insights into Dynamical versus Supernova Ejections , , 966, 243, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3909

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    2019, title A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent , , 567, 200, 10.1038/s41586-019-0999-4

    Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Graczyk , D., Gallenne , A., et al. 2019, title A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent , , 567, 200, 10.1038/s41586-019-0999-4

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    C., Backs , F., de Koter , A., et al

    Ram \' rez-Tannus , M. C., Backs , F., de Koter , A., et al. 2021, title A relation between the radial velocity dispersion of young clusters and their age. Evidence for hardening as the formation scenario of massive close binaries , , 645, L10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039673

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    E., et al

    Renzo , M., Zapartas , E., de Mink , S. E., et al. 2019, title Massive runaway and walkaway stars. A study of the kinematical imprints of the physical processes governing the evolution and explosion of their binary progenitors , , 624, A66, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833297

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    E., de Koter , A., et al

    Sana , H., de Mink , S. E., de Koter , A., et al. 2012, title Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars , Science, 337, 444, 10.1126/science.1223344

    2012 doi

  41. [49]

    E., et al

    Sana , H., de Koter , A., de Mink , S. E., et al. 2013, title The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. VIII. Multiplicity properties of the O-type star population , , 550, A107, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219621

    2013 doi

  42. [50]

    H., H \'e nault-Brunet , V., et al

    Sana , H., Ram \' rez-Agudelo , O. H., H \'e nault-Brunet , V., et al. 2022, title The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. Observational evidence for two distinct populations of massive runaway stars in 30 Doradus , , 668, L5, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244677

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    Schneider , F. R. N., Izzard , R. G., de Mink , S. E., et al. 2014, title Ages of Young Star Clusters, Massive Blue Stragglers, and the Upper Mass Limit of Stars: Analyzing Age-dependent Stellar Mass Functions , , 780, 117, 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/117

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    Stone , R. C. 1991, title The Space Frequency and Origin of the Runaway O and B Stars , , 102, 333, 10.1086/115880

    1991 doi

  45. [53]

    2024, title Two waves of massive stars running away from the young cluster R136 , , 634, 809, 10.1038/s41586-024-08013-8

    Stoop , M., de Koter , A., Kaper , L., et al. 2024, title Two waves of massive stars running away from the young cluster R136 , , 634, 809, 10.1038/s41586-024-08013-8

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    2020, title Formation of close binaries by disc fragmentation and migration, and its statistical modelling , , 491, 5158, 10.1093/mnras/stz3299

    Tokovinin , A., & Moe , M. 2020, title Formation of close binaries by disc fragmentation and migration, and its statistical modelling , , 491, 5158, 10.1093/mnras/stz3299

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    K., et al

    Udalski , A., Soszynski , I., Szymanski , M. K., et al. 2008, title The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. OGLE-III Photometric Maps of the Large Magellanic Cloud , ACTAA, 58, 89. 0807.3889

    2008 arXiv

  48. [56]

    S., Barnes , J

    Vargas-Salazar , I., Oey , M. S., Barnes , J. R., et al. 2020, title A Search for In Situ Field OB Star Formation in the Small Magellanic Cloud , , 903, 42, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbb95

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    S., Eldridge , J

    Vargas-Salazar , I., Oey , M. S., Eldridge , J. J., et al. 2025, title New Field OB and OBe Binaries of the SMC Wing: Observational Properties and Population Modeling , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.13004, 10.48550/arXiv.2506.13004

    2025 doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    I., Taylor , W

    Villase \ n or , J. I., Taylor , W. D., Evans , C. J., et al. 2021, title The B-type binaries characterization programme I. Orbital solutions for the 30 Doradus population , , 507, 5348, 10.1093/mnras/stab2197

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    B., & Grebel , E

    Zaritsky , D., Harris , J., Thompson , I. B., & Grebel , E. K. 2004, title The Magellanic Clouds Photometric Survey: The Large Magellanic Cloud Stellar Catalog and Extinction Map , , 128, 1606, 10.1086/423910

    2004 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.