Do deep nets really need weight decay and dropout?
read the original abstract
The impressive success of modern deep neural networks on computer vision tasks has been achieved through models of very large capacity compared to the number of available training examples. This overparameterization is often said to be controlled with the help of different regularization techniques, mainly weight decay and dropout. However, since these techniques reduce the effective capacity of the model, typically even deeper and wider architectures are required to compensate for the reduced capacity. Therefore, there seems to be a waste of capacity in this practice. In this paper we build upon recent research that suggests that explicit regularization may not be as important as widely believed and carry out an ablation study that concludes that weight decay and dropout may not be necessary for object recognition if enough data augmentation is introduced.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Further advantages of data augmentation on convolutional neural networks
Data augmentation enables CNNs to adapt to varying architectures and data amounts without hyperparameter fine-tuning, unlike weight decay and dropout.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.