REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding and Enhancing the Transferability of Adversarial Examples
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
State-of-the-art deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples, formed by applying small but malicious perturbations to the original inputs. Moreover, the perturbations can \textit{transfer across models}: adversarial examples generated for a specific model will often mislead other unseen models. Consequently the adversary can leverage it to attack deployed systems without any query, which severely hinder the application of deep learning, especially in the areas where security is crucial. In this work, we systematically study how two classes of factors that might influence the transferability of adversarial examples. One is about model-specific factors, including network architecture, model capacity and test accuracy. The other is the local smoothness of loss function for constructing adversarial examples. Based on these understanding, a simple but effective strategy is proposed to enhance transferability. We call it variance-reduced attack, since it utilizes the variance-reduced gradient to generate adversarial example. The effectiveness is confirmed by a variety of experiments on both CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Superposition
The paper argues that adversarial examples arise from superposition, and shows that changing superposition changes robustness and vice versa in toy models and ResNet18.
-
Memory Enhanced Fractional-Order Dung Beetle Optimization for Photovoltaic Parameter Identification
The claimed MFO-DBO algorithm and its CEC2017/PV results are absent from the manuscript, which instead contains an unrelated prompt-stealing attack paper.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.