REVIEW 2 cited by
Users prefer Jpegli over same-sized libjpeg-turbo or MozJPEG
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We performed pairwise comparisons by human raters of JPEG images from MozJPEG, libjpeg-turbo and our new Jpegli encoder. When compressing images at a quality similar to libjpeg-turbo quality 95, the Jpegli images were 54% likely to be preferred over both libjpeg-turbo and MozJPEG images, but used only 2.8 bits per pixel compared to libjpeg-turbo and MozJPEG that used 3.8 and 3.5 bits per pixel respectively. The raw ratings and source images are publicly available for further analysis and study.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
JPEG AIC2026: A large-scale dataset for fine-grained assessment of image coding
AIC2026 is a large-scale benchmark of 9,618 fine-grained distorted images spanning 17 conventional and learned codec configurations across 20 CVVDP-based perceptual levels.
-
The JPEG XL Image Coding System: History, Features, Coding Tools, Design Rationale, and Future
A detailed, author-written companion document to the JPEG XL standard, describing history, every coding tool, design rationale, and self-assessed compression performance claims.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.