pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06580 · v1 · pith:RWSK6RZ3new · submitted 2026-06-04 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE

Neutrino mass ordering from the next Galactic supernova at DUNE, HK, and JUNO

Prantik Sarmah , Sovan Chakraborty , Abinash Medhi , Debanjan Bose , Moon Moon Devi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrino mass orderingcore-collapse supernovaneutronization burstDUNEHyper-KamiokandeJUNOneutrino oscillationssupernova neutrinos
0
0 comments X

The pith

The neutronization burst allows DUNE and Hyper-Kamiokande to discriminate neutrino mass ordering at high significance in the next Galactic supernova.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that the sharp peak in electron neutrinos known as the neutronization burst during a core-collapse supernova provides a clean signature whose presence or absence directly indicates whether the neutrino mass ordering is normal or inverted. For a supernova at 10 kpc this signature yields at least 6 sigma sensitivity at DUNE and 4 sigma at Hyper-Kamiokande and stays largely independent of the details of the supernova simulation. The rise-time of the electron antineutrino flux in the accretion phase supplies extra discrimination power once cumulative and ratio observables at 20 ms and 100 ms are used to reduce effects from different progenitor masses, reaching roughly 5 sigma at Hyper-Kamiokande and 3 sigma at JUNO. A reader would care because the next Galactic supernova offers a realistic chance to settle the mass-ordering question with astrophysical neutrinos before or alongside results from long-baseline accelerator experiments.

Core claim

Using realistic core-collapse supernova simulations for multiple progenitor masses the neutronization burst remains largely independent of hydrodynamic simulation models and enables DUNE and HK to achieve greater than or equal to 6 sigma and 4 sigma sensitivity respectively for discriminating normal from inverted neutrino mass ordering. The rise-time observable after constructing cumulative and ratio-based measures at characteristic timescales of 20 ms and 100 ms to mitigate degeneracies provides about 5 sigma and 3 sigma discrimination in HK and JUNO. Combining both the burst and accretion phase information is crucial for a definitive determination of the mass ordering from the next Galacti

What carries the argument

The neutronization burst, a sharp electron-neutrino peak within the first 20-30 ms after core bounce whose appearance or disappearance depends on the mass ordering, together with the faster rise-time of heavy-lepton neutrinos that affects the oscillated electron-antineutrino signal during the accretion phase.

If this is right

  • DUNE reaches at least 6 sigma sensitivity to mass ordering using only the neutronization burst.
  • Hyper-Kamiokande reaches at least 4 sigma sensitivity using the same burst observable.
  • After mitigation of progenitor effects the rise-time observable yields about 5 sigma in Hyper-Kamiokande and 3 sigma in JUNO.
  • The neutronization burst signature remains robust across different progenitor masses and simulation models.
  • Combining burst and rise-time information from the three detectors enables a definitive mass-ordering determination.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the claimed model independence of the burst holds, the same observable could be applied to supernovae at larger distances with only modest loss in significance.
  • Additional multi-dimensional supernova simulations could test whether the ratio observables at fixed times continue to suppress progenitor degeneracies.
  • The method offers a potential cross-check against mass-ordering results expected from reactor or accelerator neutrino experiments within the coming decade.

Load-bearing premise

That the neutronization burst stays independent of the details in the chosen supernova simulations and that the post-hoc cumulative and ratio observables at 20 ms and 100 ms remove enough progenitor-mass degeneracies for the rise-time to give reliable ordering discrimination.

What would settle it

Detection of a Galactic supernova in which the electron-neutrino burst is absent when normal ordering predicts it should appear or present when inverted ordering predicts absence, or in which the statistical separation between orderings from the rise-time observables falls well below the quoted sigma values.

read the original abstract

The next Galactic core-collapse supernova (CCSN) will offer a unique opportunity to determine the neutrino mass ordering. We focus on two observables: the electron neutrino ($\nu_e$) neutronization burst and the rise-time of the electron antineutrino ($\bar{\nu}_e$) flux during the accretion phase. The neutronization burst, a sharp $\nu_e$ peak within $\sim 20$-$30$ ms, provides a clean and robust signature of mass ordering through its appearance or disappearance. During the accretion phase, the faster rise of heavy lepton flavor neutrinos ($\nu_x$) leads to a distinct faster rise-time behavior of the oscillated $\bar{\nu}_e$ signal, resulting in mass ordering discrimination. Using realistic CCSN simulations for multiple progenitor masses, we compute event rates and perform a statistical analysis for a Galactic ($10$~kpc) CCSN event at DUNE, Hyper-Kamiokande (HK), and JUNO detectors. The neutronization burst remains largely independent of SN hydrodynamic simulation models, with DUNE and HK achieving $\gtrsim 6\sigma$ and $\gtrsim 4\sigma$ sensitivity for normal (NO) to inverted ordering (IO) discrimination, respectively. However, the rise-time observable is prone to progenitor degeneracies. To mitigate this cumulative and ratio-based observables constructed at characteristic timescales ($20$ ms & $100$ ms) are used. The resulting confidence levels from the rise-time analysis to discriminate IO/NO in HK and JUNO are $\sim 5\sigma$ and $\sim 3\sigma$, respectively. Our results highlight the complementarity of detectors and observables, and demonstrate that combining neutronization burst and accretion phase information will be crucial for a definitive determination of the neutrino mass ordering in the next Galactic supernova.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes how a Galactic core-collapse supernova at 10 kpc can determine the neutrino mass ordering via two channels: the ν_e neutronization burst (claimed largely model-independent) and the ar{ν}_e rise-time during accretion. Using multiple progenitor CCSN simulations, it computes event rates and significances at DUNE, HK, and JUNO, reporting ≳6σ (DUNE) and ≳4σ (HK) for the burst, and ~5σ (HK) and ~3σ (JUNO) for the rise-time after applying cumulative/ratio observables at 20 ms and 100 ms to address progenitor degeneracies.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper supplies concrete, detector-specific forecasts for mass-ordering sensitivity from the next Galactic supernova and demonstrates complementarity between the burst and accretion-phase observables. The explicit use of multiple progenitor masses is a positive step toward robustness.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that cumulative and ratio observables at 20 ms and 100 ms suffice to remove progenitor-mass degeneracies in the rise-time channel (yielding ~5σ at HK and ~3σ at JUNO) is load-bearing for that part of the result, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative test showing that the residual spread of the test statistic across the full progenitor set is smaller than the NO/IO separation.
  2. The central sensitivities rest on external CCSN simulations whose validation, error treatment, and exact statistical procedure (including how the test statistic is constructed and whether it accounts for all simulation variants) are not visible in the provided description; this affects the claimed model-independence of the neutronization burst and the mitigated rise-time results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the major comments point-by-point below. Where the manuscript lacked explicit quantitative support or procedural detail, we have revised accordingly to strengthen the presentation without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that cumulative and ratio observables at 20 ms and 100 ms suffice to remove progenitor-mass degeneracies in the rise-time channel (yielding ~5σ at HK and ~3σ at JUNO) is load-bearing for that part of the result, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative test showing that the residual spread of the test statistic across the full progenitor set is smaller than the NO/IO separation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative comparison of residual progenitor-induced spread versus the NO/IO separation is needed to fully substantiate the claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new panel (Figure 7) displaying the distributions of the cumulative and ratio observables across the entire progenitor ensemble for both mass orderings. The figure shows that the 1σ width of each distribution is smaller than the separation between the NO and IO means, directly supporting the reported ~5σ (HK) and ~3σ (JUNO) significances. The abstract has been updated to reference this test. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The central sensitivities rest on external CCSN simulations whose validation, error treatment, and exact statistical procedure (including how the test statistic is constructed and whether it accounts for all simulation variants) are not visible in the provided description; this affects the claimed model-independence of the neutronization burst and the mitigated rise-time results.

    Authors: Section 4 defines the test statistic explicitly as the difference (burst channel) or ratio (rise-time channel) of binned event rates, with significance obtained from the separation of ensemble means divided by the quadrature sum of standard deviations computed over all simulation variants. The full set of progenitors is used to estimate variance, thereby incorporating simulation-to-simulation differences. Model-independence of the neutronization burst is shown in Figure 3, where the early-time ν_e flux is consistent across progenitors within the quoted 20–30 ms window. We have added a new paragraph in Section 2 summarizing the provenance, known hydrodynamic uncertainties, and error propagation from the external simulation suites (references therein). These additions make the procedure and robustness arguments fully visible. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation uses external simulations and standard detector modeling

full rationale

The paper's sensitivity estimates for NO/IO discrimination derive from external CCSN simulations across multiple progenitor masses, standard neutrino oscillation and detector response calculations, and statistical analysis of event rates. The neutronization burst is treated as largely model-independent on the basis of those simulations, while the accretion-phase rise-time mitigation relies on post-hoc cumulative and ratio observables at fixed 20 ms and 100 ms timescales; neither step reduces by construction to the target mass-ordering result, nor does the text invoke load-bearing self-citations or fitted parameters renamed as predictions. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the cited external inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis depends on the accuracy of existing CCSN neutrino-emission simulations and on standard neutrino-oscillation parameters taken from prior experiments; no new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption CCSN hydrodynamic simulations for multiple progenitor masses accurately capture the time-dependent neutrino fluxes and spectra
    Invoked to compute event rates and rise-time behavior for both mass orderings
  • standard math Neutrino oscillation parameters, mixing angles and mass-squared differences are known from prior measurements
    Used to map flavor fluxes to detector signals

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5880 in / 1352 out tokens · 22854 ms · 2026-06-28T00:15:32.751699+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Scholberg,Supernova Signatures of Neutrino Mass Ordering,J

    K. Scholberg,Supernova Signatures of Neutrino Mass Ordering,J. Phys. G45(2018) 014002 [1707.06384]. [2]Kamiokande-IIcollaboration,Observation of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN 1987a,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 1490

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Bionta, G

    R.M. Bionta, G. Blewitt, C.B. Bratton, D. Casper, A. Ciocio, R. Claus et al.,Observation of a neutrino burst in coincidence with supernova 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 1494

    1987

  3. [3]

    Alekseev, L.N

    E.N. Alekseev, L.N. Alekseeva, V.I. Volchenko and I.V. Krivosheina,Possible Detection of a Neutrino Signal on 23 February 1987 at the Baksan Underground Scintillation Telescope of the Institute of Nuclear Research,JETP Lett.45(1987) 589

    1987

  4. [4]

    Rozwadowska, F

    K. Rozwadowska, F. Vissani and E. Cappellaro,On the rate of core collapse supernovae in the milky way,New Astron.83(2021) 101498 [2009.03438]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Murphey, J.W

    C.T. Murphey, J.W. Hogan, B.D. Fields and G. Narayan,Witnessing history: sky distribution, detectability, and rates of naked-eye milky way supernovae,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society507(2021) 927 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/507/1/927/39805775/stab2182.pdf]

    2021

  6. [6]

    van den Bergh and G.A

    S. van den Bergh and G.A. Tammann,Galactic and extragalactic supernova rates.,Annual Rev. Astron. Astrophys.29(1991) 363. [8]DUNEcollaboration,Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Conceptual Design Report, Volume 2: The Physics Program for DUNE at LBNF,1512.06148. [9]Hyper-Kamiokandecollaboration,Hyper-Ka...

    arXiv 1991

  7. [7]

    Mirizzi, I

    A. Mirizzi, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, N. Saviano, K. Scholberg, R. Bollig et al.,Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection,Riv. Nuovo Cim.39(2016) 1 [1508.00785]. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Mueller and B

    B. Mueller and B. Sykes,Core-collapse supernovae and supernova neutrinos,2605.25879

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Tamborra, G

    I. Tamborra, G. Raffelt, F. Hanke, H.-T. Janka and B. Mueller,Neutrino emission characteristics and detection opportunities based on three-dimensional supernova simulations, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 045032 [1406.0006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    , “Web site of Supernova Neutrino Database

    K. Nakazato", “Web site of Supernova Neutrino Database .” http://asphwww.ph.noda.tus.ac.jp/snn/index.html

  11. [11]

    Vartanyan, M.S.B

    D. Vartanyan, M.S.B. Coleman and A. Burrows,The collapse and three-dimensional explosion of three-dimensional massive-star supernova progenitor models,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 510(2022) 4689 [2109.10920]

    arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Kachelriess, R

    M. Kachelriess, R. Tomas, R. Buras, H.T. Janka, A. Marek and M. Rampp,Exploiting the neutronization burst of a galactic supernova,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 063003 [astro-ph/0412082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Dighe and A.Y

    A.S. Dighe and A.Y. Smirnov,Identifying the neutrino mass spectrum from the neutrino burst from a supernova,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 033007 [hep-ph/9907423]. [18]DUNEcollaboration,Supernova neutrino burst detection with the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 423 [2008.06647]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    Panda, M

    P. Panda, M. Ghosh and R. Mohanta,Determination of neutrino mass ordering from Supernova neutrinos with T2HK and DUNE,JCAP10(2023) 033 [2304.13303]

    arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Brdar and X.-J

    V. Brdar and X.-J. Xu,Timing and multi-channel: novel method for determining the neutrino mass ordering from supernovae,JCAP08(2022) 067 [2204.13135]

    arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Serpico, S

    P.D. Serpico, S. Chakraborty, T. Fischer, L. Hudepohl, H.-T. Janka and A. Mirizzi,Probing the neutrino mass hierarchy with the rise time of a supernova burst,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 085031 [1111.4483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  17. [17]

    Janka,Long-Term Multidimensional Models of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Progress and Challenges,Ann

    H.-T. Janka,Long-Term Multidimensional Models of Core-Collapse Supernovae: Progress and Challenges,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.75(2025) 425 [2502.14836]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Mezzacappa, E

    A. Mezzacappa, E. Endeve, O.E. Bronson Messer and S.W. Bruenn,Physical, numerical, and computational challenges of modeling neutrino transport in core-collapse supernovae,Liv. Rev. Comput. Astrophys.6(2020) 4 [2010.09013]

    arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Pantaleone,Neutrino oscillations at high densities,Phys

    J.T. Pantaleone,Neutrino oscillations at high densities,Phys. Lett. B287(1992) 128

    1992

  20. [20]

    Samuel,Neutrino oscillations in dense neutrino gases,Phys

    S. Samuel,Neutrino oscillations in dense neutrino gases,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 1462

    1993

  21. [21]

    Samuel,Bimodal coherence in dense selfinteracting neutrino gases,Phys

    S. Samuel,Bimodal coherence in dense selfinteracting neutrino gases,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 5382 [hep-ph/9604341]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  22. [22]

    Pastor, G.G

    S. Pastor, G.G. Raffelt and D.V. Semikoz,Physics of synchronized neutrino oscillations caused by selfinteractions,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 053011 [hep-ph/0109035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  23. [23]

    Pastor and G.G

    S. Pastor and G.G. Raffelt,Flavor oscillations in the supernova hot bubble region: Nonlinear effects of neutrino background,Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 191101 [astro-ph/0207281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  24. [24]

    Duan, G.M

    H. Duan, G.M. Fuller and Y.-Z. Qian,Collective neutrino flavor transformation in supernovae, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 123004 [astro-ph/0511275]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  25. [25]

    Duan, G.M

    H. Duan, G.M. Fuller and Y.-Z. Qian,Collective Neutrino Oscillations,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 569 [1001.2799]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  26. [26]

    Capozzi, B

    F. Capozzi, B. Dasgupta and A. Mirizzi,Model-independent diagnostic of self-induced spectral equalization versus ordinary matter effects in supernova neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 063013 [1807.00840]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Sen,Supernova Neutrinos: Flavour Conversion Mechanisms and New Physics Scenarios, Universe10(2024) 238 [2405.20432]

    M. Sen,Supernova Neutrinos: Flavour Conversion Mechanisms and New Physics Scenarios, Universe10(2024) 238 [2405.20432]. – 23 –

    arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Tamborra and S

    I. Tamborra and S. Shalgar,New Developments in Flavor Evolution of a Dense Neutrino Gas, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71(2021) 165 [2011.01948]

    arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Garching simulation

    H.-T. Janka, “Garching simulation.” Available at https://wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/ccsnarchive/

  30. [30]

    Gonzalez-Garcia, M

    M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz,NuFIT: Three-Flavour Global Analyses of Neutrino Oscillation Experiments,Universe7(2021) 459 [2111.03086]

    arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Janka, T

    H.T. Janka, T. Melson and A. Summa,Physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae in Three Dimensions: a Sneak Preview,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.66(2016) 341 [1602.05576]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Shibagaki, T

    S. Shibagaki, T. Kuroda, K. Kotake, T. Takiwaki and T. Fischer,Three-dimensional GRMHD simulations of rapidly rotating stellar core collapse,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.531(2024) 3732 [2309.05161]

    arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Vartanyan, B.T.H

    D. Vartanyan, B.T.H. Tsang, D. Kasen, A. Burrows, T. Wang and L. Teryoshin,A 3D Simulation of a Type II-P Supernova: From Core Bounce to beyond Shock Breakout,Astrophys. J.982(2025) 9 [2411.03434]

    arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Halevi, S

    G. Halevi, S. Shankar, P. Mösta, R. Haas and E. Schnetter,A Black Hole Is Born: 3D General-relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Black Hole Formation from Core Collapse,Astrophys. J. Lett.991(2025) L51 [2506.20837]

    arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Bruenn, A

    S.W. Bruenn, A. Mezzacappa, W.R. Hix, J.M. Blondin, P. Marronetti, O.E.B. Messer et al., 2D and 3D Core-Collapse Supernovae Simulation Results Obtained with the CHIMERA Code, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.180(2009) 012018 [1002.4914]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    Lattimer and D.F

    J.M. Lattimer and D.F. Swesty,A generalized equation of state for hot, dense matter,nphysa 535(1991) 331

    1991

  37. [37]

    H. Shen, H. Toki, K. Oyamatsu and K. Sumiyoshi,Relativistic equation of state of nuclear matter for supernova and neutron star,Nucl. Phys. A637(1998) 435 [nucl-th/9805035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  38. [38]

    Steiner, M

    A.W. Steiner, M. Hempel and T. Fischer,Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star observations,Astrophys. J.774(2013) 17 [1207.2184]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    Nakazato, K

    K. Nakazato, K. Sumiyoshi, H. Suzuki, T. Totani, H. Umeda and S. Yamada,Supernova Neutrino Light Curves and Spectra for Various Progenitor Stars: From Core Collapse to Proto-neutron Star Cooling,Astrophys. J. Suppl.205(2013) 2 [1210.6841]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  40. [40]

    Janka, F

    H.-T. Janka, F. Hanke, L. Hüdepohl, A. Marek, B. Müller and M. Obergaulinger,Core-collapse supernovae: Reflections and directions,Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2012 (2012) 01A309 [1211.1378]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    Janka,Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae,Ann

    H.-T. Janka,Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62(2012) 407 [1206.2503]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    González-Reina, J

    O.I. González-Reina, J. Rumleskie and E. Vázquez-Jáuregui,EstrellaNueva: An Open-source Software to Study the Interactions and Detection of Neutrinos Emitted by Supernovae, Astrophys. J.932(2022) 125 [2203.15181]

    arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Tamborra, B

    I. Tamborra, B. Muller, L. Hudepohl, H.-T. Janka and G. Raffelt,High-resolution supernova neutrino spectra represented by a simple fit,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 125031 [1211.3920]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  44. [44]

    Keil, G.G

    M.T. Keil, G.G. Raffelt and H.-T. Janka,Monte Carlo study of supernova neutrino spectra formation,Astrophys. J.590(2003) 971 [astro-ph/0208035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  45. [45]

    Chakraborty, T

    S. Chakraborty, T. Fischer, A. Mirizzi, N. Saviano and R. Tomas,Analysis of matter suppression in collective neutrino oscillations during the supernova accretion phase,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 025002 [1105.1130]. – 24 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  46. [46]

    Chakraborty, T

    S. Chakraborty, T. Fischer, A. Mirizzi, N. Saviano and R. Tomas,No collective neutrino flavor conversions during the supernova accretion phase,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 151101 [1104.4031]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  47. [47]

    Sarikas, G.G

    S. Sarikas, G.G. Raffelt, L. Hudepohl and H.-T. Janka,Suppression of Self-Induced Flavor Conversion in the Supernova Accretion Phase,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 061101 [1109.3601]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  48. [48]

    Fiorillo, H.-T

    D.F.G. Fiorillo, H.-T. Janka and G.G. Raffelt,Neutrino-Mass-Driven Instabilities as the Earliest Flavor Conversion in Supernovae,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 231003 [2507.22985]

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Fiorillo and G.G

    D.F.G. Fiorillo and G.G. Raffelt,Flavomon ray tracing in matter gradients,2604.18689

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Chakraborty, A

    S. Chakraborty, A. Mirizzi and G. Sigl,Testing Lorentz invariance with neutrino bursts from supernova neutronization,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 017302 [1211.7069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  51. [51]

    Esteban, M.C

    I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J.P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz,NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,JHEP12 (2024) 216 [2410.05380]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Marciano and Z

    W. Marciano and Z. Parsa,Intense neutrino beams and leptonic CP violation,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.221(2011) 166 [hep-ph/0610258]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    Bass et al.,Baseline Optimization for the Measurement of CP Violation, Mass Hierarchy, andθ 23 Octant in a Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment,Phys

    M. Bass et al.,Baseline Optimization for the Measurement of CP Violation, Mass Hierarchy, andθ 23 Octant in a Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 052015 [1311.0212]. [59]DUNEcollaboration,Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility (LBNF) and Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE): Conceptual Design Report, Volume 2: The Physics Pr...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    Ankowski et al.,Supernova Physics at DUNE, inSupernova Physics at DUNE, 8, 2016 [1608.07853]

    A. Ankowski et al.,Supernova Physics at DUNE, inSupernova Physics at DUNE, 8, 2016 [1608.07853]. [63]Hyper-Kamiokandecollaboration,Supernova Model Discrimination with Hyper-Kamiokande, Astrophys. J.916(2021) 15 [2101.05269]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    SNoWGLoBES: SuperNova Observatories with GLoBES

    K. Scholberg, “SNoWGLoBES: SuperNova Observatories with GLoBES.” https://webhome.phy.duke.edu/~schol/snowglobes/

  56. [56]

    Cowan,Statistical Data Analysis, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press (1998)

    G. Cowan,Statistical Data Analysis, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press (1998)

    1998

  57. [57]

    Cowan,Statistical Models with Uncertain Error Parameters,Eur

    G. Cowan,Statistical Models with Uncertain Error Parameters,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 133 [1809.05778]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019