Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

How to Detect and Defeat Molecular Mirage: A Metric-Driven Benchmark for Hallucination in LLM-based Molecular Comprehension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.12314 v1 pith:RXWQOZUR submitted 2025-04-10 cs.CL cs.AI

How to Detect and Defeat Molecular Mirage: A Metric-Driven Benchmark for Hallucination in LLM-based Molecular Comprehension

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords molecularhallucinationcomprehensionllmsscientifictasksanalyzehrpp
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models are increasingly used in scientific domains, especially for molecular understanding and analysis. However, existing models are affected by hallucination issues, resulting in errors in drug design and utilization. In this paper, we first analyze the sources of hallucination in LLMs for molecular comprehension tasks, specifically the knowledge shortcut phenomenon observed in the PubChem dataset. To evaluate hallucination in molecular comprehension tasks with computational efficiency, we introduce \textbf{Mol-Hallu}, a novel free-form evaluation metric that quantifies the degree of hallucination based on the scientific entailment relationship between generated text and actual molecular properties. Utilizing the Mol-Hallu metric, we reassess and analyze the extent of hallucination in various LLMs performing molecular comprehension tasks. Furthermore, the Hallucination Reduction Post-processing stage~(HRPP) is proposed to alleviate molecular hallucinations, Experiments show the effectiveness of HRPP on decoder-only and encoder-decoder molecular LLMs. Our findings provide critical insights into mitigating hallucination and improving the reliability of LLMs in scientific applications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LatentChem: From Textual CoT to Latent Thinking in Chemical Reasoning

    physics.chem-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    LatentChem reasons in continuous latent space for chemistry, achieving a 59.88% non-tie win rate over explicit CoT on ChemCoTBench with a 10.84x average reduction in reasoning overhead.

  2. False Fixed Points: Kantian Feedback, Stable Miscalibration, and Representational Compression in LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Confidently wrong LLM answers behave like locally stable fixed points: no fragility gap vs correct answers, and abstention-style self-critique trades coverage for confidence.