REVIEW 7 cited by
Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have led to a series of breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP), owing to their excellent understanding and generation abilities. Remarkably, what further sets these models apart is the massive amounts of world knowledge they internalize during pretraining. While many downstream applications provide the model with an informational context to aid its performance on the underlying task, how the model's world knowledge interacts with the factual information presented in the context remains under explored. As a desirable behavior, an LLM should give precedence to the context whenever it contains task-relevant information that conflicts with the model's memorized knowledge. This enables model predictions to be grounded in the context, which can then be used to update or correct specific model predictions without frequent retraining. By contrast, when the context is irrelevant to the task, the model should ignore it and fall back on its internal knowledge. In this paper, we undertake a first joint study of the aforementioned two properties, namely controllability and robustness, in the context of LLMs. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art T5 and PaLM (both pretrained and finetuned) could exhibit poor controllability and robustness, which do not scale with increasing model size. As a solution, we propose a novel method - Knowledge Aware FineTuning (KAFT) - to strengthen both controllability and robustness by incorporating counterfactual and irrelevant contexts to standard supervised datasets. Our comprehensive evaluation showcases the utility of KAFT across model architectures and sizes.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
MINTQA: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on New and Tail Knowledge
MINTQA provides 28,366 multi-hop QA pairs across popular/unpopular and old/new knowledge, with sub-questions, and shows that even the best LLMs achieve only about 62% accuracy even with retrieval.
-
Teaching Smaller Language Models To Generalise To Unseen Compositional Questions (Full Thesis)
Smaller language models can generalize to unseen compositional questions when trained and evaluated with retrieval-augmented contexts, and combining Wikipedia retrieval with LLM-generated rationales improves accuracy.
-
DeRAGEC: Denoising Named Entity Candidates with Synthetic Rationale for ASR Error Correction
DeRAGEC explicitly denoises retrieved named-entity candidates with phonetic scores, definitions, and synthetic rationales, improving ASR error-correction WER and NE hit ratio without additional training.
-
KnowShiftQA: How Robust are RAG Systems when Textbook Knowledge Shifts in K-12 Education?
A new benchmark, KnowShiftQA, shows that retrieval-augmented LLMs drop 22 to 27 points in accuracy when textbook facts are hypothetically updated to conflict with the model's parametric knowledge.
-
ICT: Image-Object Cross-Level Trusted Intervention for Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
ICT steers attention-head activations toward visual information using blur-derived trusted and untrusted pairs, improving object hallucination benchmarks in LLaVA-v1.5 and Qwen-VL without slowing generation.
-
Understanding the Dark Side of LLMs' Intrinsic Self-Correction
Intrinsic self-correction makes state-of-the-art LLMs overturn correct answers across four task types, and simple question repetition or tiny fine-tuning reduces this damage.
-
SKETCH: Structured Knowledge Enhanced Text Comprehension for Holistic Retrieval
SKETCH combines semantic chunking and a knowledge graph retriever, and the paper claims it tops Naive RAG, RAPTOR, semantic-only, and KG-only baselines on RAGAS metrics, though the reported results are internally inco...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.