Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

T$^3$Bench: Benchmarking Current Progress in Text-to-3D Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.02977 v2 pith:S4BJXHZ4 submitted 2023-10-04 cs.CV cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.CLcs.LG
keywords text-to-3dmethodscurrentgenerationmulti-viewqualityalignmentbench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recent methods in text-to-3D leverage powerful pretrained diffusion models to optimize NeRF. Notably, these methods are able to produce high-quality 3D scenes without training on 3D data. Due to the open-ended nature of the task, most studies evaluate their results with subjective case studies and user experiments, thereby presenting a challenge in quantitatively addressing the question: How has current progress in Text-to-3D gone so far? In this paper, we introduce T$^3$Bench, the first comprehensive text-to-3D benchmark containing diverse text prompts of three increasing complexity levels that are specially designed for 3D generation. To assess both the subjective quality and the text alignment, we propose two automatic metrics based on multi-view images produced by the 3D contents. The quality metric combines multi-view text-image scores and regional convolution to detect quality and view inconsistency. The alignment metric uses multi-view captioning and GPT-4 evaluation to measure text-3D consistency. Both metrics closely correlate with different dimensions of human judgments, providing a paradigm for efficiently evaluating text-to-3D models. The benchmarking results, shown in Fig. 1, reveal performance differences among an extensive 10 prevalent text-to-3D methods. Our analysis further highlights the common struggles for current methods on generating surroundings and multi-object scenes, as well as the bottleneck of leveraging 2D guidance for 3D generation. Our project page is available at: https://t3bench.com.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RelaxFlow: Text-Driven Amodal 3D Generation

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A training-free dual-branch flow method uses multi-prior consensus and attention-logit low-pass relaxation to text-steer occluded 3D geometry while preserving the observed image.

  2. Hallo4D: Multi-Modal Hallucination Mitigation for Consistent Spatio-Temporal Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hallo4D uses vision-language models to detect and correct spatial and temporal mistakes in AI-generated 3D and 4D content, improving consistency without retraining the base generators.

  3. PixGS: Pixel-Space Diffusion for Direct 3D Gaussian Splat Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    PixGS is a single-stage pixel-space diffusion model that directly produces high-quality 3D Gaussian Splats from text or images in ~1s, outperforming multi-stage latent methods on standard benchmarks.

  4. A Survey of Automatic Evaluation Methods on Text, Visual and Speech Generations

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified taxonomy and comparative meta-evaluation of automatic evaluation methods across text, vision, and speech generation, concluding that LLM-based evaluators dominate current practice.

  5. PlantDreamer: Achieving Realistic 3D Plant Models with Diffusion-Guided Gaussian Splatting

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A diffusion-guided Gaussian splatting pipeline generates realistic 3D plants from L-system meshes or point clouds and beats GaussianDreamer on masked PSNR for bean, kale and mint.

  6. Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Survey

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of point cloud compression and objective quality assessment that benchmarks representative methods on standard datasets and distills design insights.

Pith tools