Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Monocular Lane Detection Based on Deep Learning: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.16316 v6 pith:S63QYSD6 submitted 2024-11-25 cs.CV

Monocular Lane Detection Based on Deep Learning: A Survey

classification cs.CV
keywords lanedetectionlanesmethodsperceptionresearchworksautonomous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Lane detection plays an important role in autonomous driving perception systems. As deep learning algorithms gain popularity, monocular lane detection methods based on them have demonstrated superior performance and emerged as a key research direction in autonomous driving perception. The core designs of these algorithmic frameworks can be summarized as follows: (1) Task paradigm, focusing on lane instance-level discrimination; (2) Lane modeling, representing lanes as a set of learnable parameters in the neural network; (3) Global context supplementation, enhancing inference on the obscure lanes; (4) Perspective effect elimination, providing accurate 3D lanes for downstream applications. From these perspectives, this paper presents a comprehensive overview of existing methods, encompassing both the increasingly mature 2D lane detection approaches and the developing 3D lane detection works. Besides, this paper compares the performance of mainstream methods on different benchmarks and investigates their inference speed under a unified setting for fair comparison. Moreover, we present some extended works on lane detection, including multi-task perception, video lane detection, online high-definition map construction, and lane topology reasoning, to offer readers a comprehensive roadmap for the evolution of lane detection. Finally, we point out some potential future research directions in this field. We exhaustively collect the papers and codes of existing works at https://github.com/Core9724/Awesome-Lane-Detection and will keep tracing the research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GFSR: Geometric Fidelity and Spatial Refinement for Reliable Lane Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GFSR combines LaneIoU-guided confidence calibration with adaptive gated location refinement to improve geometric quality and robustness in lane detection, reporting SOTA F1 scores on CULane and CurveLanes.

  2. GFSR: Geometric Fidelity and Spatial Refinement for Reliable Lane Detection

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    GFSR introduces LCC for geometric fidelity calibration via LaneIoU and CRI, plus AGLR for gated point refinement, reporting SOTA F1 scores of 81.46% and 65.01% on CULane and 87.35% on CurveLanes.