Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

MathOdyssey: Benchmarking Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Large Language Models Using Odyssey Math Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.18321 v1 pith:SEBWZG7J submitted 2024-06-26 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsmathematicalmodelsproblem-solvingdatasetproblemslanguagemathodyssey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language understanding and demonstrated strong problem-solving abilities. Despite these successes, most LLMs still struggle with solving mathematical problems due to the intricate reasoning required. This paper investigates the mathematical problem-solving capabilities of LLMs using the newly developed "MathOdyssey" dataset. The dataset includes diverse mathematical problems at high school and university levels, created by experts from notable institutions to rigorously test LLMs in advanced problem-solving scenarios and cover a wider range of subject areas. By providing the MathOdyssey dataset as a resource to the AI community, we aim to contribute to the understanding and improvement of AI capabilities in complex mathematical problem-solving. We conduct benchmarking on open-source models, such as Llama-3 and DBRX-Instruct, and closed-source models from the GPT series and Gemini models. Our results indicate that while LLMs perform well on routine and moderately difficult tasks, they face significant challenges with Olympiad-level problems and complex university-level questions. Our analysis shows a narrowing performance gap between open-source and closed-source models, yet substantial challenges remain, particularly with the most demanding problems. This study highlights the ongoing need for research to enhance the mathematical reasoning of LLMs. The dataset, results, and code are publicly available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RIMO: An Easy-to-Evaluate, Hard-to-Solve Olympiad Benchmark for Advanced Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-track Olympiad benchmark with deterministic integer answers and step-by-step proof grading shows frontier LLMs drop sharply versus older math benchmarks.

  2. MMRefine: Unveiling the Obstacles to Robust Refinement in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MMRefine introduces a six-scenario, six-error-type benchmark for multimodal math refinement, and its evaluation of 17 models shows open-source models largely lag closed ones, with spatial reasoning errors the hardest to fix.

  3. ASyMOB: Algebraic Symbolic Mathematical Operations Benchmark

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of perturbed symbolic math problems shows that large language models' performance drops sharply under minor numeric, symbolic, and equivalence transformations.

  4. Formally Solving Answer-Construction Problems in Lean

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    ECP, an enumerate-conjecture-prove framework with Lean verification, improves answer-construction accuracy on ConstructiveBench and a PutnamBench subset, but its benchmark has a 17% major-error rate and its abstract r...

  5. Are Large Language Models Capable of Deep Relational Reasoning? Insights from DeepSeek-R1 and Benchmark Comparisons

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    DeepSeek-R1 outperforms GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 on family tree and graph reasoning benchmarks at sizes 10 and 20, but all models collapse at size 40.

Pith tools