REVIEW 1 cited by
Two-component jet model for the afterglow emission of GRB 201216C and GRB 221009A and implications for jet structure of very-high-energy gamma-ray bursts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Two-component jet model for the afterglow emission of GRB 201216C and GRB 221009A and implications for jet structure of very-high-energy gamma-ray bursts
read the original abstract
In recent years, afterglow emission in the very-high-energy (VHE) band above 100 GeV has been clearly detected for at least five gamma-ray bursts (GRBs 180720B, 190114C, 190829A, 201216C and 221009A). For some of these VHE GRBs, we previously proposed a two-component jet model, consisting of two uniform jets with narrow and wide opening angles to explain their multiwavelength afterglows including VHE gamma rays. In this paper, we show that the VHE spectra and light curves of GRBs 201216C and 221009A can also be reasonably explained by our two-component jet model, based on two top-hat jets propagating into a constant-density circumburst medium. We find that for the five VHE GRBs, the collimation-corrected kinetic energies of the narrow and wide jets have typical values of 5*10^{49} erg and 5*10^{50} erg, respectively. We discuss the similarities and differences among the VHE GRBs, and the implications for the structure of their jets. In agreement with previous studies, the narrow jet of GRB 221009A has an atypically small opening angle, so that its intrinsic, collimation-corrected energy remains within a plausible range despite the unusually large isotropic-equivalent energy.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
EuraGovExam: A Multilingual Multimodal Benchmark from Real-World Civil Service Exams
EuraGovExam is a real-exam, image-only multilingual multimodal benchmark on which state-of-the-art VLMs reach only ~86% accuracy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.