pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18088 · v1 · pith:SJWSWE7Dnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE

Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Ray Boosted Relic Neutrinos

Jiajie Zhang , Jiajun Liao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 23:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HE
keywords ultra-high-energy cosmic rayscosmic neutrino backgroundrelic neutrinosneutral-current scatteringIceCubePierre Auger Observatoryoverdensity limitsUHECR propagation
0
0 comments X

The pith

UHECRs boost relic neutrinos through SM scatterings, yielding upper limits on CνB overdensity from IceCube and Auger data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the high-energy neutrino flux produced when ultra-high-energy cosmic rays scatter off the cosmic neutrino background via neutral-current processes. It includes five scattering channels and uses mixed UHECR compositions from specific propagation codes and source-evolution models. Comparison with existing observatory data then produces upper bounds on how overdense the relic neutrinos can be. A reader would care because the cosmic neutrino background has never been detected directly, and this mechanism offers an indirect probe that depends on Standard Model physics already tested at accelerators.

Core claim

Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays boost relic neutrinos to observable energies through elastic neutrino-nucleon scattering, coherent and incoherent neutrino-nucleus scattering, baryon-resonance production, and deep inelastic scattering. The resulting diffuse flux is computed with mixed-composition UHECR spectra from the PriNCe code and H3a/H4a Hillas implementations together with SFR, QSO, and GRB source evolution. A clear energy hierarchy appears among the channels, and the calculation supplies upper limits on CνB overdensity when confronted with IceCube and Pierre Auger Observatory measurements.

What carries the argument

The diffuse UHECR-boosted CνB flux obtained by summing the five Standard Model neutral-current channels over UHECR propagation models and source-evolution scenarios.

If this is right

  • Upper limits on CνB overdensity follow directly from current IceCube and Pierre Auger data.
  • All five scattering channels must be retained for reliable predictions across the energy range.
  • UHECR composition and source evolution alter both the shape and normalization of the boosted spectrum.
  • The neutrino mass spectrum enters the kinematics and therefore affects the derived limits.
  • Deep inelastic scattering contributes only at the highest energies and is model-dependent.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future detectors with better energy resolution could separate the boosted CνB component from astrophysical neutrinos.
  • If a signal is observed, the same framework could help constrain the absolute neutrino mass scale.
  • The method supplies an independent cross-check on UHECR composition models that are currently debated.
  • It connects to laboratory neutrino scattering experiments by using the same Standard Model amplitudes at much higher energies.

Load-bearing premise

The UHECR flux and nuclear composition are correctly given by the PriNCe code together with the H3a and H4a Hillas models under the chosen source-evolution scenarios.

What would settle it

A measured high-energy neutrino flux at IceCube or Auger that remains incompatible with the predicted boosted CνB component after subtraction of all other known backgrounds, or new UHECR composition data that contradict the input models.

read the original abstract

Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) can boost relic neutrinos to high energies through Standard Model (SM) neutral-current interactions, providing an indirect probe of the cosmic neutrino background (C$\nu$B). In this work, we perform a systematic study of the diffuse UHECR-boosted C$\nu$B flux including elastic neutrino-nucleon scattering (ES), coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (COH), incoherent neutrino-nucleus scattering (INCOH), baryon-resonance production (RES), and deep inelastic scattering (DIS). For the UHECR flux, we use mixed-composition spectra obtained from the UHECR propagation code PriNCe and from the H3a and H4a implementations of the Hillas model, together with SFR, QSO and GRB source evolution models. We find a clear hierarchy of scattering channels in boosted neutrino energy. The coherent scattering dominates at low-energy neutrino flux for heavy nuclear component, while ES and INCOH become important once individual nucleons are resolved. The RES channel gives a non-negligible contribution in the high-energy region, and DIS appears only at the highest energies and is most visible for the H4a models. Using current IceCube and Pierre Auger Observatory data, we derive upper limits on the C$\nu$B overdensity. Our results show that reliable predictions of the UHECR-boosted C$\nu$B signal require a combined treatment of the relevant SM scattering channels, UHECR composition, source evolution and the neutrino mass spectrum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that ultra-high-energy cosmic rays boost cosmic neutrino background (CνB) neutrinos to observable energies via Standard Model neutral-current channels (elastic scattering ES, coherent COH, incoherent INCOH, resonance RES, and deep-inelastic DIS). Using mixed-composition UHECR spectra from the PriNCe propagation code and the H3a/H4a Hillas-model implementations together with SFR, QSO and GRB source-evolution scenarios, the work identifies a clear energy-dependent hierarchy among the channels, derives upper limits on CνB overdensity from existing IceCube and Pierre Auger data, and concludes that reliable predictions require simultaneous treatment of all channels, nuclear composition, source evolution and the neutrino mass spectrum.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold, the paper supplies a new, data-driven upper bound on CνB overdensity and demonstrates that omitting any of the listed channels or composition effects can materially change the predicted flux. The explicit channel hierarchy and the use of multiple public UHECR models constitute a clear methodological advance over single-channel estimates.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the upper limits on CνB overdensity are obtained by computing the boosted flux from the adopted PriNCe + H3a/H4a UHECR spectra and requiring consistency with IceCube/Auger observations; because the flux scales directly with the input nuclear composition, a different heavy-nuclei fraction would alter the COH contribution at lower boosted energies and shift the derived limits. No sensitivity scan to alternative composition fits (e.g., Auger data-driven or Telescope Array) is indicated.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that “reliable predictions require a combined treatment” rests on the reported channel hierarchy, yet the abstract supplies neither the numerical upper-limit values, the energy ranges where each channel dominates, nor an error budget on the UHECR input spectra; without these quantities the robustness of the limits against variations in neutrino mass or source evolution cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be clearer if it stated the numerical values of the derived upper limits on the CνB overdensity and the energy interval in which the hierarchy is observed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the recommendation for major revision. We address each major comment below and outline the changes we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the upper limits on CνB overdensity are obtained by computing the boosted flux from the adopted PriNCe + H3a/H4a UHECR spectra and requiring consistency with IceCube/Auger observations; because the flux scales directly with the input nuclear composition, a different heavy-nuclei fraction would alter the COH contribution at lower boosted energies and shift the derived limits. No sensitivity scan to alternative composition fits (e.g., Auger data-driven or Telescope Array) is indicated.

    Authors: We agree that the upper limits depend on the assumed UHECR composition, with the coherent channel being particularly sensitive to the heavy-nuclei fraction. Our analysis uses the PriNCe code together with the H3a and H4a Hillas-model implementations, which are standard mixed-composition benchmarks. A full sensitivity scan over alternative fits (e.g., Auger data-driven or Telescope Array) was not performed. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing the expected impact of varying the heavy fraction and explicitly noting that such an extended scan lies beyond the present scope but is recommended for future work. This is a partial revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that “reliable predictions require a combined treatment” rests on the reported channel hierarchy, yet the abstract supplies neither the numerical upper-limit values, the energy ranges where each channel dominates, nor an error budget on the UHECR input spectra; without these quantities the robustness of the limits against variations in neutrino mass or source evolution cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The abstract is deliberately concise. The manuscript already reports the channel hierarchy (COH dominant at low boosted energies for heavy nuclei, ES/INCOH once nucleons are resolved, RES non-negligible at higher energies, DIS visible only at the highest energies for H4a), the numerical upper limits on CνB overdensity, and the source-evolution scenarios (SFR, QSO, GRB) in the results section. We acknowledge that the abstract would benefit from quantitative anchors. In the revision we will insert the key upper-limit values and the dominant energy ranges for each channel. The PriNCe spectra already incorporate the spread from the three source-evolution models; we will add an explicit statement on this in the abstract and methods to address the error-budget concern. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; external UHECR models and public data constrain limits

full rationale

The paper computes boosted CνB flux using imported UHECR spectra from the external PriNCe code and H3a/H4a Hillas implementations (with SFR/QSO/GRB evolutions) plus public IceCube/Auger observations to derive overdensity upper limits. No step reduces by construction to a self-fit, self-citation chain, or renamed input; the central claim remains externally falsifiable against independent UHECR and neutrino datasets. This matches the default expectation of a self-contained analysis against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of imported UHECR propagation models and the assumption that Standard Model neutral-current scattering fully describes the boosting process.

free parameters (1)
  • CνB overdensity
    Parameter on which observational upper limits are placed.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Model neutral-current interactions govern all listed scattering channels
    Invoked for the entire hierarchy of ES, COH, INCOH, RES, and DIS contributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5805 in / 1241 out tokens · 39122 ms · 2026-06-26T23:51:05.180135+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lesgourgues and S

    J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor,Massive neutrinos and cosmology,Phys. Rept.429(2006) 307 [astro-ph/0603494]. [2]Topical Conveners: K.N. Abazajian, J.E. Carlstrom, A.T. Leecollaboration,Neutrino Physics from the Cosmic Microwave Background and Large Scale Structure,Astropart. Phys.63 (2015) 66 [1309.5383]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  2. [2]

    Mangano, G

    G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, T. Pinto, O. Pisanti and P.D. Serpico,Relic neutrino decoupling including flavor oscillations,Nucl. Phys. B729(2005) 221 [hep-ph/0506164]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Lesgourgues, G

    J. Lesgourgues, G. Mangano, G. Miele and S. Pastor,Neutrino Cosmology, Cambridge University Press (2, 2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    37 Uri N

    C. Giunti and C.W. Kim,Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508717.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508717.001.0001 2007

  5. [5]

    Opher,Coherent scattering of cosmic neutrinos,Astron

    R. Opher,Coherent scattering of cosmic neutrinos,Astron. Astrophys.37(1974) 135

    1974

  6. [6]

    Lewis,Coherent Detector for Low-energy Neutrinos,Phys

    R.R. Lewis,Coherent Detector for Low-energy Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D21(1980) 663

    1980

  7. [7]

    Akhmedov, G

    E. Akhmedov, G. Arcadi, M. Lindner and S. Vogl,Coherent scattering and macroscopic coherence: Implications for neutrino, dark matter and axion detection,JHEP10(2018) 045 [1806.10962]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Langacker, J.P

    P. Langacker, J.P. Leveille and J. Sheiman,On the Detection of Cosmological Neutrinos by Coherent Scattering,Phys. Rev. D27(1983) 1228

    1983

  9. [9]

    Eberle, A

    B. Eberle, A. Ringwald, L. Song and T.J. Weiler,Relic neutrino absorption spectroscopy,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 023007 [hep-ph/0401203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    Brdar, P.S.B

    V. Brdar, P.S.B. Dev, R. Plestid and A. Soni,A new probe of relic neutrino clustering using cosmogenic neutrinos,Phys. Lett. B833(2022) 137358 [2207.02860]

    arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Huang and S

    G.-y. Huang and S. Zhou,Probing the Cosmic Neutrino Background through Parametric Fluorescence,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 081003 [2507.10868]. [13]PTOLEMYcollaboration,PTOLEMY: A Proposal for Thermal Relic Detection of Massive Neutrinos and Directional Detection of MeV Dark Matter,1808.01892

    arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    PTOLEMY Collaboration,Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in the PTOLEMY project: A theory update,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 053002 [2203.11228]. [15]PTOLEMYcollaboration,PTOLEMY: Relic neutrino direct detection,PoSTAUP2023(2024) 203

    arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    McKeen,Cosmic neutrino background search experiments as decaying dark matter detectors, Phys

    D. McKeen,Cosmic neutrino background search experiments as decaying dark matter detectors, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 015028 [1812.08178]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Chacko, P

    Z. Chacko, P. Du and M. Geller,Detecting a Secondary Cosmic Neutrino Background from Majoron Decays in Neutrino Capture Experiments,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 015050 [1812.11154]

    arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Bondarenko, A

    K. Bondarenko, A. Boyarsky, M. Nikolic, J. Pradler and A. Sokolenko,Probing sub-eV Dark Matter decays with PTOLEMY,JCAP03(2021) 089 [2012.09704]

    arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Smirnov and X.-J

    A.Y. Smirnov and X.-J. Xu,Neutrino bound states and bound systems,JHEP08(2022) 170 [2201.00939]

    arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Kaplan, X

    D.E. Kaplan, X. Luo and S. Rajendran,Probing long-range forces between neutrinos with cosmic structures,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 055019 [2412.20766]. – 27 – [21]KATRINcollaboration,New Constraint on the Local Relic Neutrino Background Overdensity with the First KATRIN Data Runs,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 011806 [2202.04587]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Hara and H

    T. Hara and H. Sato,Energy spectra of high-energy neutrinos and cosmic rays from pulsars,Prog. Theor. Phys.62(1979) 969

    1979

  19. [19]

    Hara and H

    T. Hara and H. Sato,Elastic and Inelastic Scattering of the Relic Neutrinos by High-energy Cosmic Rays,Prog. Theor. Phys.65(1981) 477

    1981

  20. [20]

    C´ ıscar-Monsalvatje, G

    M. C´ ıscar-Monsalvatje, G. Herrera and I.M. Shoemaker,Upper limits on the cosmic neutrino background from cosmic rays,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 063036 [2402.00985]

    arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Herrera, S

    G. Herrera, S. Horiuchi and X. Qi,Diffuse boosted cosmic neutrino background,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 063016 [2405.14946]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    De Marchi, A

    A.G. De Marchi, A. Granelli, J. Nava and F. Sala,Relic neutrino background from cosmic-ray reservoirs,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 023023 [2405.04568]

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Zhang, A

    J. Zhang, A. Sandrock, J. Liao and B. Yue,Impact of coherent scattering on relic neutrinos boosted by cosmic rays,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 043028 [2505.04791]

    arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Herrera, S

    G. Herrera, S. Horiuchi, X. Qi and I.M. Shoemaker,The Cosmic Neutrino Background is within Reach of Future Neutrino Telescopes,2601.09790

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Azeredo and V

    G. Azeredo and V. de Souza,Suppression of boosted relic neutrinos by photon backgrounds during ultra-high-energy cosmic ray propagation,2606.00498

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Herrera and S

    G. Herrera and S. Horiuchi,High-Energy Neutrinos from Cosmic-Ray Scatterings with Supernova Neutrinos,2508.11891

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    Sandrock,Cosmic-Ray Boosted Diffuse Supernova Neutrinos,Astronomy4(2025) 17 [2509.04229]

    A. Sandrock,Cosmic-Ray Boosted Diffuse Supernova Neutrinos,Astronomy4(2025) 17 [2509.04229]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Herrera and A

    G. Herrera and A. Loeb,Electromagnetic Radiation from Cosmic-Ray Scatterings on Relic Neutrinos,2602.20255. [33]Pierre Augercollaboration,Constraining the sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays across and above the ankle with the spectrum and composition data measured at the Pierre Auger Observatory, JCAP05(2023) 024 [2211.02857]

    arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Ehlert, A

    D. Ehlert, A. van Vliet, F. Oikonomou and W. Winter,Constraints on the proton fraction of cosmic rays at the highest energies and the consequences for cosmogenic neutrinos and photons,JCAP02 (2024) 022 [2304.07321]

    arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Heinze, A

    J. Heinze, A. Fedynitch, D. Boncioli and W. Winter,A new view on Auger data and cosmogenic neutrinos in light of different nuclear disintegration and air-shower models,Astrophys. J.873 (2019) 88 [1901.03338]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Hillas,Can diffusive shock acceleration in supernova remnants account for high-energy galactic cosmic rays?,J

    A.M. Hillas,Can diffusive shock acceleration in supernova remnants account for high-energy galactic cosmic rays?,J. Phys. G31(2005) R95

    2005

  32. [32]

    Gaisser,Spectrum of cosmic-ray nucleons, kaon production, and the atmospheric muon charge ratio,Astropart

    T.K. Gaisser,Spectrum of cosmic-ray nucleons, kaon production, and the atmospheric muon charge ratio,Astropart. Phys.35(2012) 801 [1111.6675]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Gaisser, T

    T.K. Gaisser, T. Stanev and S. Tilav,Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum from Measurements of Air Showers,Front. Phys. (Beijing)8(2013) 748 [1303.3565]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    Grohs, G.M

    E. Grohs, G.M. Fuller and M. Sen,Consequences of neutrino self interactions for weak decoupling and big bang nucleosynthesis,JCAP07(2020) 001 [2002.08557]. – 28 –

    arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    A.J. Long, C. Lunardini and E. Sabancilar,Detecting non-relativistic cosmic neutrinos by capture on tritium: phenomenology and physics potential,JCAP08(2014) 038 [1405.7654]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  36. [36]

    Freedman,Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current, Phys

    D.Z. Freedman,Coherent Neutrino Nucleus Scattering as a Probe of the Weak Neutral Current, Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 1389

    1974

  37. [37]

    COHERENT Collaboration,Observation of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering,Science 357(2017) 1123 [1708.01294]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    COHERENT Collaboration,First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 012002 [2003.10630]

    arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    COHERENT Collaboration,First detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on germanium,Phys. Rev. Lett.(2024) [2406.13806]. [45]COHERENTcollaboration,Measurement of the Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Cross Section on CsI by COHERENT,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 081801 [2110.07730]. [46]COHERENTcollaboration,Measurement of coherent ...

    arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    XENON Collaboration,First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos via Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with XENONnT,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 191002 [2408.02877]

    arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    PandaX Collaboration,First Indication of Solar B8 Neutrinos through Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering in PandaX-4T,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 191001 [2407.10892]

    arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Ackermann et al.,First observation of reactor antineutrinos by coherent scattering,2501.05206

    N. Ackermann et al.,First observation of reactor antineutrinos by coherent scattering,2501.05206. [50]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001. [51]GENIEcollaboration,Recent highlights from GENIE v3,Eur. Phys. J. ST230(2021) 4449 [2106.09381]

    arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Rein and L.M

    D. Rein and L.M. Sehgal,Neutrino Excitation of Baryon Resonances and Single Pion Production, Annals Phys.133(1981) 79. [53]GENIEcollaboration,Neutrino-nucleon cross-section model tuning in GENIE v3,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021) 072009 [2104.09179]

    arXiv 1981

  44. [44]

    Kuzmin, V.V

    K.S. Kuzmin, V.V. Lyubushkin and V.A. Naumov,How to sum contributions into the total charged-current neutrino-nucleon cross section,hep-ph/0511308

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Jeong and M.H

    Y.S. Jeong and M.H. Reno,Neutrino cross sections: Interface of shallow- and deep-inelastic scattering for collider neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 113010 [2307.09241]

    arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Abbaslu, M

    S. Abbaslu, M. Dehpour, Y. Farzan and S. Safari,Neutrino nucleus quasi-elastic and resonant neutral current scatterings with non-standard interactions,JHEP06(2025) 041 [2412.13349]

    arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Andreopoulos, C

    C. Andreopoulos, C. Barry, S. Dytman, H. Gallagher, T. Golan, R. Hatcher et al.,The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator: Physics and User Manual,1510.05494

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Kovarik et al.,nCTEQ15 - Global analysis of nuclear parton distributions with uncertainties in the CTEQ framework,Phys

    K. Kovarik et al.,nCTEQ15 - Global analysis of nuclear parton distributions with uncertainties in the CTEQ framework,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 085037 [1509.00792]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Clark, E

    D.B. Clark, E. Godat and F.I. Olness,ManeParse : A Mathematica reader for Parton Distribution Functions,Comput. Phys. Commun.216(2017) 126 [1605.08012]

    arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Alves Batista et al.,Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies,Front

    R. Alves Batista et al.,Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies,Front. Astron. Space Sci.6(2019) 23 [1903.06714]. – 29 –

    arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Kachelriess and D.V

    M. Kachelriess and D.V. Semikoz,Cosmic Ray Models,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.109(2019) 103710 [1904.08160]

    arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Gilmore, R.S

    R.C. Gilmore, R.S. Somerville, J.R. Primack and A. Dom´ ınguez,Semi-analytic modelling of the extragalactic background light and consequences for extragalactic gamma-ray spectra: Modelling of the ebl and gamma-ray spectra,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society422(2012) 3189–3207

    2012

  53. [53]

    Koning,Talys: Comprehensive nuclear reaction modeling, inAIP Conference Proceedings, vol

    A.J. Koning,Talys: Comprehensive nuclear reaction modeling, inAIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 769, p. 1154–1159, AIP, 2005, DOI

    2005

  54. [54]

    M¨ ucke, R

    A. M¨ ucke, R. Engel, J. Rachen, R. Protheroe and T. Stanev,Monte carlo simulations of photohadronic processes in astrophysics,Computer Physics Communications124(2000) 290–314

    2000

  55. [55]

    Veberic, ed.,The Pierre Auger Observatory: Contributions to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2017), 8, 2017

    D. Veberic, ed.,The Pierre Auger Observatory: Contributions to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2017), 8, 2017

    2017

  56. [56]

    Hopkins and J.F

    A.M. Hopkins and J.F. Beacom,On the normalization of the cosmic star formation history,The Astrophysical Journal651(2006) 142

    2006

  57. [57]

    Esteban, M.C

    I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou,The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,JHEP09(2020) 178 [2007.14792]. [68]KM3NeTcollaboration,Observation of an ultra-high-energy cosmic neutrino with KM3NeT, Nature638(2025) 376. [69]IceCubecollaboration,A search for extremely-high-energy neutri...

    arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    [75]IceCubecollaboration,Observation and Characterization of a Cosmic Muon Neutrino Flux from the Northern Hemisphere using six years of IceCube data,Astrophys

    Icecube Collaboration,IceCube-190331A - IceCube observation of a high-energy neutrino candidate event.,GRB Coordinates Network24028(2019) 1. [75]IceCubecollaboration,Observation and Characterization of a Cosmic Muon Neutrino Flux from the Northern Hemisphere using six years of IceCube data,Astrophys. J.833(2016) 3 [1607.08006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Feldman and R.D

    G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins,A Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 3873 [physics/9711021]. [77]Pierre Augercollaboration,Improved limit to the diffuse flux of ultrahigh energy neutrinos from the Pierre Auger Observatory,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 092008 [1504.05397]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  60. [60]

    Formaggio and G.P

    J.A. Formaggio and G.P. Zeller,From eV to EeV: Neutrino Cross Sections Across Energy Scales, Rev. Mod. Phys.84(2012) 1307 [1305.7513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    Gao and M

    H. Gao and M. Vanderhaeghen,The proton charge radius,Rev. Mod. Phys.94(2022) 015002 [2105.00571]. – 30 – [80]Extended Twisted Masscollaboration,Nucleon axial and pseudoscalar form factors using twisted-mass fermion ensembles at the physical point,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 034503 [2309.05774]

    arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    Andreopoulos et al.,The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator,Nucl

    C. Andreopoulos et al.,The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A614 (2010) 87 [0905.2517]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    Wall, C.A

    J.V. Wall, C.A. Jackson, P.A. Shaver, I.M. Hook and K.I. Kellermann,The Parkes quarter-Jansky flat-spectrum sample. 3. Space density and evolution of QSOs,Astron. Astrophys.434(2005) 133 [astro-ph/0408122]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  64. [64]

    Lan, J.-J

    G.-X. Lan, J.-J. Wei, H.-D. Zeng, Y. Li and X.-F. Wu,Revisiting the luminosity and redshift distributions of long gamma-ray bursts,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508(2021) 52 [2109.00766]. – 31 –

    arXiv 2021