Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Finding the Law: Enhancing Statutory Article Retrieval via Graph Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.12847 v1 pith:SL63T6X3 submitted 2023-01-30 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords retrievallegalinformationstatutearticledensegraphimprove
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Statutory article retrieval (SAR), the task of retrieving statute law articles relevant to a legal question, is a promising application of legal text processing. In particular, high-quality SAR systems can improve the work efficiency of legal professionals and provide basic legal assistance to citizens in need at no cost. Unlike traditional ad-hoc information retrieval, where each document is considered a complete source of information, SAR deals with texts whose full sense depends on complementary information from the topological organization of statute law. While existing works ignore these domain-specific dependencies, we propose a novel graph-augmented dense statute retriever (G-DSR) model that incorporates the structure of legislation via a graph neural network to improve dense retrieval performance. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms strong retrieval baselines on a real-world expert-annotated SAR dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative Chinese Statute Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A generative retriever with multi-granularity structured statute IDs and multi-task training outperforms strong sparse, dense, and legal baselines on the STARD Chinese statute benchmark.

Pith tools