Pith. sign in

REVIEW 19 cited by

SoTA with Less: MCTS-Guided Sample Selection for Data-Efficient Visual Reasoning Self-Improvement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.07934 v3 pith:SQYLXTV4 submitted 2025-04-10 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords reasoningmodelssotadifficultyqwen2samplesamplesself-improvement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce ThinkLite-VL, a family of visual reasoning models that achieve state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance using an order of magnitude fewer training samples, relying purely on reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) self-improvement without any knowledge distillation. Our central insight is that sample difficulty critically influences RFT effectiveness: appropriately challenging examples can drive substantial reasoning improvements, even in low-data regimes. However, quantifying sample difficulty in a reliable and scalable manner remains non-trivial. To address this, we repurpose Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to measure sample difficulty via the number of reasoning iterations a vision-language model (VLM) requires to solve each instance. This MCTS-based selection procedure identifies samples that induce deeper reasoning while remaining solvable, allowing us to filter a high-quality subset from 70k open-source examples spanning math, natural image understanding, and chart comprehension. Using this approach, we select just 11k challenging samples for RFT on Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct and 7.5k samples for Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct. The resulting models, ThinkLite-VL-7B and ThinkLite-VL-72B, significantly outperform their respective base models across eight visual reasoning benchmarks. In particular, ThinkLite-VL-7B improves the average performance of Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct by 7\% and surpasses all existing 7B-level models, as well as much larger models such as GPT-4o, O1 and Qwen2.5-VL-72B, achieving a new SoTA score of 75.1 on MathVista. ThinkLite-VL-72B further advances the SoTA frontier, achieving an accuracy of 79.7 on MathVista and an average benchmark improvement of 4.42 over the open-source SOTA. These results demonstrate that MCTS-guided difficulty filtering provides a scalable and effective path toward data-efficient self-improvement in multimodal reasoning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Self-Correction in Vision-Language Models via Rollout Augmentation

    cs.CV 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Recombining pre/post-correction segments of existing rollouts yields dense self-correction training signals, giving an 8B VLM a 1.0-point average accuracy gain over GSPO on 7 benchmarks at 0.72x rollout time.

  2. Point-RFT: Improving Multimodal Reasoning with Visually Grounded Reinforcement Finetuning

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    Point-RFT uses point-grounded chain-of-thought with GRPO reinforcement to improve chart reasoning, reporting 90.04% on ChartQA, though internal tables and the OOD setup weaken the claim.

  3. More Thinking, Less Seeing? Assessing Amplified Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Reasoning models trade visual grounding for language-based inference, and this paper measures that trade-off with a new metric and benchmark.

  4. Aligning Large Vision-Language Models at Test Time: A Trajectory-Guided Structured Sampling Approach

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sampling from a sharpened, vision-calibrated target during decoding improves frozen LVLM reasoning accuracy by 2-3 points on five benchmarks, but multiplies token cost by 15-24.

  5. Trace: A Taxonomy-Guided Environment for Multidomain Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RLVR training on 64,000 procedurally generated Trace instances improves Qwen2.5-VL macro-average on 24 external visual reasoning benchmarks by 3.51 points at 3B and 4.06 points at 7B.

  6. Cognitive Pivot Points and Visual Anchoring: Unveiling and Rectifying Hallucinations in Multimodal Reasoning Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multimodal reasoning models hallucinate at high-entropy cognitive bifurcation points due to loss of visual semantic anchoring, and the V-STAR training paradigm with HVAR rewards and FRM reflection mitigates this by re...

  7. ReMoT: Reinforcement Learning with Motion Contrast Triplets

    cs.CV 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training a 4B vision-language model on rule-generated motion-contrast triplets with GRPO lifts spatio-temporal QA accuracy by about 17 points on the authors' own benchmark and by smaller margins on standard benchmarks.

  8. Beyond Reasoning Gains: Mitigating General-Capability Forgetting in Large Reasoning Models

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dynamic replay and reweighting scheduler (RECAP) preserves general capabilities during RLVR while keeping reasoning performance at least as good as reasoning-only finetuning.

  9. LLaVA-Critic-R1: Your Critic Model is Secretly a Strong Policy Model

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RL training on preference-labeled critic data transforms a 7B vision-language model into both a stronger critic and a stronger generative policy, improving average benchmark accuracy by 5.7% and enabling self-critique...

  10. VL-Cogito: Progressive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning for Advanced Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VL-Cogito, trained with progressive curriculum RL, online difficulty weighting, and dynamic length rewards, matches or beats prior reasoning MLLMs on ten multimodal benchmarks.

  11. MiCo: Multi-image Contrast for Reinforcement Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-supervised contrastive triplets plus weak-to-strong augmented GRPO training method improves multi-image reasoning in Qwen2.5-VL-7B.

  12. ViCrit: A Verifiable Reinforcement Learning Proxy Task for Visual Perception in VLMs

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A verifiable RL proxy task that asks VLMs to locate a single injected hallucination in a 200-word caption improves visual perception and transfers to math and abstract reasoning benchmarks.

  13. What makes Reasoning Models Different? Follow the Reasoning Leader for Efficient Decoding

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FoReaL-Decoding lets a strong reasoning model generate the first few tokens of each sentence and a weaker model complete the sentence, cutting theoretical FLOPs by 30-55% while retaining 86-100% of accuracy on four ma...

  14. SynthRL: Scaling Visual Reasoning with Verifiable Data Synthesis

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SynthRL synthesizes harder, answer-preserving visual math questions from easy seed questions and reports small but mixed out-of-domain RLVR gains for Qwen2.5-VL-7B.

  15. R1-ShareVL: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Share-GRPO

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Share-GRPO creates paraphrased and visually augmented versions of reasoning questions and shares answers and reward signals across versions, improving multimodal reasoning without cold-start SFT.

  16. MathReal: We Keep It Real! A Real Scene Benchmark for Evaluating Math Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of 2,000 K-12 math questions photographed in real scenes finds that multimodal LLMs perform significantly worse on authentic handheld images than on clean benchmarks.

  17. ReAgent-V: A Reward-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Video Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ReAgent-V is an agentic video understanding framework whose critic agent generates real-time rewards to refine answers and filter training data, yielding gains of up to 6.9%, 2.1%, and 9.8% across three applications.

  18. Advancing Multimodal Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Cold Start

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using a two-stage SFT-plus-GRPO pipeline, the authors train 3B and 7B multimodal models that beat prior open-source models on four math reasoning benchmarks, while showing that reflective 'aha moment' text is not a re...

  19. Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Powers Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey-style position paper claims that reinforcement fine-tuning powers reasoning in multimodal LLMs, summarizing over a hundred recent works and proposing five future research directions.

Pith tools