Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

MathFusion: Enhancing Mathematical Problem-solving of LLM through Instruction Fusion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.16212 v2 pith:STMZERUG submitted 2025-03-20 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords mathematicalfusionmathfusionreasoningmodelsproblemswhileapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive progress in mathematical reasoning. While data augmentation is promising to enhance mathematical problem-solving ability, current approaches are predominantly limited to instance-level modifications-such as rephrasing or generating syntactic variations-which fail to capture and leverage the intrinsic relational structures inherent in mathematical knowledge. Inspired by human learning processes, where mathematical proficiency develops through systematic exposure to interconnected concepts, we introduce MathFusion, a novel framework that enhances mathematical reasoning through cross-problem instruction synthesis. MathFusion implements this through three fusion strategies: (1) sequential fusion, which chains related problems to model solution dependencies; (2) parallel fusion, which combines analogous problems to reinforce conceptual understanding; and (3) conditional fusion, which creates context-aware selective problems to enhance reasoning flexibility. By applying these strategies, we generate a new dataset, \textbf{MathFusionQA}, followed by fine-tuning models (DeepSeekMath-7B, Mistral-7B, Llama3-8B) on it. Experimental results demonstrate that MathFusion achieves substantial improvements in mathematical reasoning while maintaining high data efficiency, boosting performance by 18.0 points in accuracy across diverse benchmarks while requiring only 45K additional synthetic instructions, representing a substantial improvement over traditional single-instruction approaches. Our datasets, models, and code are publicly available at https://github.com/QizhiPei/mathfusion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ConPress: Learning Efficient Reasoning from Multi-Question Contextual Pressure

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multi-question prompts elicit shorter chain-of-thought traces, and fine-tuning on those traces transfers the compression to single-question reasoning.

  2. Can One Domain Help Others? A Data-Centric Study on Multi-Domain Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training a Qwen2.5-7B model with GRPO on math and puzzle data improves both domains, code transfer depends on the starting model, and template or reward mismatches sharply hurt performance.

  3. SIGMA: Refining Large Language Model Reasoning via Sibling-Guided Monte Carlo Augmentation

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sibling-guided critique and revision of MCTS reasoning traces yields a 30K-sample dataset that matches or beats 590K-sample baselines on the MATH benchmark for 7B models.

  4. REST: Stress Testing Large Reasoning Models by Asking Multiple Problems at Once

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Asking a reasoning model several problems at once reveals large accuracy drops and exposes differences that single-question benchmarks miss.

  5. SwS: Self-aware Weakness-driven Problem Synthesis in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SwS uses failures during RL training to synthesize targeted math problems, improving reasoning accuracy on eight benchmarks.

Pith tools