REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 73 references
Production of linear alkanes via the solid-state hydrogenation of interstellar polyynes
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read This paper reports that hydrogen atoms striking a 10 K ice made of UV-photolyzed acetylene convert its polyyne products into n-butane and, tentatively, n-hexane, establishing a solid-state route from interstellar carbon chains to…
desk verdict Solid two-step lab study extending alkane formation to C4/C6 polyynes, but the missing no-UV control leaves the central product assignment conditional. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The central experimental device is a two-step, in situ synthesis: a thin C$_2$H$_2$ ice is first exposed to UV photons (≥121 nm) to partially polymerize it into C$_4$H$_2$ and C$_6$H$_2$, and the same ice is then exposed to an H-atom beam at 10 K; polyynes are linear carbon chains built from alternating C≡C triple bonds. Product identification rests on two complementary diagnostics: QMS-TPD, which uses both desorption temperature and mass fragments (m/z = 58, 43, 29 for n-C$_4$H$_{10}$), and RAIRS, which tracks the growth of CH stretching bands, including the 2925 cm$^{-1}$ asymmetric $-\mathrm{CH}_2-$ stretch characteristic of saturated linear chains. The kinetic argument is carried by the RAIRS absorption areas of consumed polyynes and produced alkanes as functions of H-atom fluence, which show no delay between the consumption curves and the production curves, indicating that hydrogenation of the intermediate double bonds is faster than hydrogenation of the parent triple bonds.
What would settle it
An experiment that deposits C$_4$H$_2$ ice directly, or uses D atoms instead of H, and monitors the desorption would settle the matter: if m/z = 58 (and, for D addition, the shifted parent mass) does not appear at roughly 95 to 115 K while m/z = 43 and 29 do, or if the 58/43/29 ratios do not match the n-butane pattern once the ethane contribution is subtracted, then the central product identification fails.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that fully saturated linear alkanes form by the hydrogenation of C$_{2n}$H$_2$ polyynes on a 10 K surface, with n-C$_4$H$_{10}$ confirmed by temperature-programmed desorption (parent mass m/z = 58 plus fragments 43 and 29) and by RAIRS evidence of the $-\mathrm{CH}_2-$ asymmetric stretch, and n-C$_6$H$_{14}$ tentatively identified from fragment signals at a higher desorption temperature without a detected parent mass. The authors further claim that the reaction rates for H-atom addition to the triple bonds of acetylene and diacetylene are similar, because the consumption and production kinetics reach their plateaus at the same H-atom fluence. They conclude that such hydrogenation occurs on timescales typical of dark cloud stages, making saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons part of the pristine ice inventory that could later be delivered to comets and asteroids.
Load-bearing premise
The assignment of n-butane rests on the assumption that the mass signals seen near 95 to 115 K come from a single desorbing population of C$_4$H$_{10}$, and the authors note that co-desorbing trapped ethane is needed to explain some fragment intensities, yet no quantitative correction for that contamination is given.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If the route is correct, saturated alkanes should be present in dark-cloud ice mantles well before star formation, because the required H-atom fluence corresponds to roughly 100,000 to 200,000 years at typical cloud fluxes.
- The comparable hydrogenation rates for C$_2$H$_2$ and C$_4$H$_2$ mean that once polyynes are made or accreted, they will be processed to alkanes just as efficiently as acetylene, so chain length does not slow the saturation chemistry.
- The formation of n-alkanes on grains offers a direct chemical explanation for the dominance of linear over cyclic saturated hydrocarbons in comet 67P, since hydrogenation of linear polyynes preserves the carbon skeleton.
- The overlapping CH$_3$ and $-\mathrm{CH}_2-$ infrared bands of alkanes could be observed as a class with JWST, giving a family-level probe of saturated organics in the ice mantles of prestellar sources.
- The same two-step experimental approach could be applied to mixed HCN/C$_2$H$_2$ ices to test whether cyanopolyyne hydrogenation yields aliphatic nitriles and amines, as the authors propose.
Reading between the lines
- A decisive test the paper does not report: hydrogenating pure C$_4$H$_2$ or using D atoms instead of H should shift the parent and daughter masses, confirming the n-C$_4$H$_{10}$ assignment and placing the tentative n-C$_6$H$_{14}$ identification on firmer ground by searching for m/z = 86.
- If hydrogenation of accreted polyynes is as fast as the paper suggests, grain surfaces could act as a reservoir that later releases semi-saturated hydrocarbons into the gas; the relative abundances of alkenes and alkynes in TMC-1 might then carry a grain-chemistry fingerprint.
- The comparable rates for C$_2$H$_2$ and C$_4$H$_2$ hydrogenation imply that the bottleneck for alkane formation in dark clouds is H-atom supply and accretion, not the size of the carbon chain; a quantitative model coupling gas-phase polyyne formation with grain-surface saturation could be tested against observed alkane and alkyne ratios.
- If alkanes formed by this route are later incorporated into planetary bodies, the $-\mathrm{CH}_2-$ to CH$_3$ ratio of Ryugu (1.9) may be a rough proxy for the average chain length produced on grains, making the laboratory kinetic curves directly relevant to interpreting returned-sample spectra.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This paper reports laboratory experiments in which ~10 ML of C2H2 ice is UV-photolyzed at 10 K to produce larger polyynes (C4H2, C6H2) and is then exposed to an H-atom beam. Using QMS-TPD and RAIRS, the authors attribute new desorption features at 95-115 K (m/z 58, 43, 29) to n-C4H10 and a weaker feature at 125-150 K tentatively to C6H14, with the caveat that the m/z 86 parent ion was not observed. They infer that H-atom addition to the triple bonds of HCCH and HCCCCH proceeds at comparable rates at 10 K, that such hydrogenation can occur on dark-cloud timescales, and they propose a general solid-state route to saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons relevant to comet 67P and asteroid Ryugu.
Significance. If the product identification holds, this is a valuable first experimental demonstration that saturated alkanes can be produced by hydrogenating polyynes on cold grain surfaces, thereby connecting gas-phase carbon-chain detections in TMC-1 with the aliphatic hydrocarbon inventories of comets and asteroids. The paper has clear strengths: unstable polyynes are synthesized in situ in the same UHV setup, product assignment uses two independent criteria (m/z and desorption temperature), comparisons are made with NIST fragmentation patterns and literature desorption temperatures, difference spectra with and without H exposure are shown, and astronomically relevant H-atom fluences are used. The main caveats are the absence of a no-UV control needed to exclude C2H5 + C2H5 recombination as a C4H10 source, the blended and non-species-specific IR bands behind the rate comparison, and the appropriately tentative nature of the C6H14 assignment.
major comments (3)
- [3.1, Figs. 1-3; Appendix B] The central product assignment—that the observed n-C4H10 results from hydrogenation of C4H2—is not uniquely supported because no control experiment using unphotolyzed C2H2 ice is reported. The starting ice is 10 ML of C2H2 with only partial UV conversion, so the H-atom exposure necessarily creates C2H5 radicals from the dominant C2H2 component; the barrierless recombination C2H5 + C2H5 → n-C4H10 yields the same parent m/z = 58 and similar fragment ions. The previously cited pure-C2H2 hydrogenation studies (Kobayashi et al. 2017; Hiraoka et al. 2000) are not stated to have searched for m/z = 58, so they do not close this gap. A control run with unphotolyzed C2H2 at the same H fluence, or a quantitative estimate/measurement of the C2H5 recombination channel, is required before the C4H10 yield can be attributed to polyyne hydrogenation.
- [3.2, Fig. 7] The claim of comparable hydrogenation rates for HCCH and HCCCCH (Abstract; Section 4) is weaker than presented. The 'C4H2' consumption curve in Fig. 7 integrates the 3308-3265 cm−1 region, which the caption explicitly states also contains the ν1 band of C4H4, and the 'C4H10' production curve is the 2929-2909 cm−1 CH2 stretch common to all saturated linear alkanes, including C6H14. With these blended bands and no species-specific band strengths or error bars, the simultaneous reaching of plateaus within the same fluence interval shows only that the tracked features saturate together; it does not quantify rate coefficients for the individual triple-bond hydrogenation steps. Please soften the rate conclusion to a consistency statement or provide deconvolved, abundance-calibrated kinetics.
- [Appendix B, Fig. B.1] The fragmentation-pattern support for n-C4H10 is not quantitatively clean. Appendix B states that co-desorption of trapped C2H6 is required to explain the high relative intensities of m/z = 27, 29, and 30 at 105 and 138 K, yet the m/z = 29 channel is part of the argument for C4H10 and C6H14. No subtraction or error budget is provided for this contribution. Although the parent m/z = 58 peak is a strong indicator of a C4H10 species, the reported fragment-ratio agreement should either be corrected for the C2H6 contribution or presented with explicit uncertainty limits.
minor comments (4)
- [Section 4, first paragraph] The text reads '...formation of C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, and C3H8 by surface hydrogenation of simplest alkynes C2H2 and C3H8'; the second 'C3H8' should almost certainly be 'C3H4' (propyne).
- [Section 3.1, third paragraph] The text says the 125-150 K feature is assigned 'through the rise of m/z = 29', but Fig. 3 and the following paragraph also use m/z = 43; please state both channels in the assignment sentence.
- [Fig. 7] Adding error bars, including the systematic uncertainty in the RAIRS calibration and in the H-atom fluence, would make the stated plateau values and the inferred 10^5-year timescale easier to evaluate.
- [Abstract] The phrase 'including C4H10 and (tentatively) C6H14, is confirmed' is grammatically ambiguous; it should be made explicit that only C4H10 is confirmed and C6H14 is tentative.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the paper reports experimental TPD and RAIRS measurements checked against external NIST spectra and literature desorption temperatures, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.
full rationale
The paper is an experimental laboratory study, not a derivation. The central claims—that H-atom exposure of UV-photolyzed C2H2 ice at 10 K yields C4H10 and plausibly C6H14, and that the hydrogenation of C4H2 triple bonds proceeds at rates comparable to C2H2—are supported by two independent in-situ diagnostics: QMS-TPD and RAIRS. Product identifications are checked against external references: the m/z = 58, 43, and 29 signals are compared with NIST mass spectra (Appendix B), and desorption temperatures are compared with literature values (Abplanalp & Kaiser 2017; Kim & Kaiser 2009). The kinetic comparison in Fig. 7 is a direct, qualitative reading of measured absorbance-area profiles reaching plateaus at similar H-atom fluences; no rate parameters are fitted from the data and then reused to force the conclusion. The paper explicitly discloses the two main spectral ambiguities: the C4H2 (nu4) band is blended with C4H4 (nu1), and the 2929-2909 cm-1 feature used to track C4H10 is a generic -CH2- stretch common to linear alkanes. These are stated limitations in interpretation, not circular reductions. The only calibration step, deriving the C2H2 RAIRS band strength from the literature result of Kobayashi et al. (2017) that about 1 ML of C2H2 is consumed upon hydrogenation, is a measurement conversion and is not used to predict the target products; it is also anchored in an independent prior study, not solely in the authors' own work. Self-citations (Ioppolo et al. 2013; Chuang et al. 2018b) are used only for experimental methodology details such as the top-monolayer availability assumption, which is additionally corroborated by the independent Kobayashi et al. (2017) result. No uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled via self-citation, and no equation that defines one claimed output in terms of another claimed output were found. The paper also acknowledges in Appendix B that co-desorption of trapped C2H6 contributes to some fragment signals, and it does not overstate the certainty of the n-C6H14 identification. Consequently, no step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the circularity score is 0.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- Setup-specific RAIRS band strength for C2H2 CH stretch =
6.5e-17 cm molecule^-1
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption Only the top monolayer of the C2H2 ice is available for hydrogenation by incident H atoms.
- domain assumption Desorption temperature and m/z pattern uniquely identify the desorbing molecules.
- domain assumption UV photolysis of C2H2 ice produces C4H2, C6H2, and C4H4 as assigned, based on literature IR spectra.
- domain assumption The H-atom beam does not cause significant non-reactive loss of the ice, so observed TPD area drops are attributed to hydrogenation.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Production of linear alkanes via the solid-state hydrogenation of interstellar polyynes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SVC7T52B
@misc{pith2026250103031,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Production of linear alkanes via the solid-state hydrogenation of interstellar polyynes},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SVC7T52B}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03031}
}
abstract
Highly unsaturated carbon chains, including polyynes, have been detected in many astronomical regions and planetary systems. With the success of the QUIJOTE survey of the TMC-1, the community has seen a "boom" in the number of detected carbon chains. On the other hand, the Rosetta mission revealed the release of fully saturated hydrocarbons, C$_3$H$_8$, C$_4$H$_{10}$, C$_5$H$_{12}$, and (under specific conditions) C$_6$H$_{14}$ with C$_7$H$_{16}$, from the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. The detection of the latter two is attributed to dust-rich events. Similarly, the analysis of samples returned from asteroid Ryugu by Hayabusa2 mission indicates the presence of long saturated aliphatic chains in Ryugu's organic matter. The surface chemistry of unsaturated carbon chains under conditions resembling those of molecular clouds can provide a possible link among these independent observations. However, laboratory-based investigations to validate such a chemistry is still lacking. In the present study, we aim to experimentally verify the formation of fully saturated hydrocarbons by the surface hydrogenation of C$_{2n}$H$_2$ ($n>1$) polyynes under ultra-high vacuum conditions at 10 K. We undertook a two-step experimental technique. First, a thin layer of C$_2$H$_2$ ice was irradiated by UV-photons ($\geq$ 121 nm) to achieve a partial conversion of C$_2$H$_2$ into larger polyynes: C$_4$H$_2$ and C$_6$H$_2$. Afterwards, the obtained photoprocessed ice was exposed to H atoms to verify the formation of various saturated hydrocarbons. In addition to C$_2$H$_6$, which was investigated previously, the formation of larger alkanes, including C$_4$H$_{10}$ and (tentatively) C$_6$H$_{14}$, is confirmed by our study. A qualitative analysis of the obtained kinetic data indicates that hydrogenation of HCCH and HCCCCH triple bonds proceeds at comparable rates, given a surface temperature of 10 K.}
Figures
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Abplanalp, M. J. & Kaiser, R. I. 2017, ApJ, 836, 195
work page 2017
-
[2]
Abplanalp, M. J. & Kaiser, R. I. 2020, ApJ, 889, 3 Agúndez, M., Marcelino, N., Tercero, B., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, L4
work page 2020
-
[3]
J., et al
Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., Berthelier, J. J., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S130
2017
-
[4]
Belloche, A., Garrod, R. T., Zingsheim, O., Müller, H. S. P., & Menten, K. M. 2022, A&A, 662, A110
work page 2022
-
[5]
Bergner, J. B., Guzmán, V . G., Öberg, K. I., Loomis, R. A., & Pegues, J. 2018, ApJ, 857, 69
work page 2018
-
[6]
Boogert, A. C. A., Gerakines, P. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 541
2015
-
[7]
Brown, R. L. 1981, ApJ, 248, L119 Article number, page 9 of 12 A&A proofs: manuscript no. aa52210-24corr
work page 1981
-
[8]
Butscher, T., Duvernay, F., Danger, G., & Chiavassa, T. 2016, A&A, 593, A60
work page 2016
Show all 73 references
-
[9]
2017, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transac- tions), 19, 2857
Butscher, T., Duvernay, F., Rimola, A., Segado-Centellas, M., & Chiavassa, T. 2017, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transac- tions), 19, 2857
2017
-
[10]
2015, MNRAS, 453, 1587
Butscher, T., Duvernay, F., Theule, P., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 1587
2015
-
[11]
2022, A&A, 663, L5
Cernicharo, J., Fuentetaja, R., Cabezas, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, L5
2022
-
[12]
M., Tielens, A
Cernicharo, J., Heras, A. M., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 2001, ApJ, 546, L123
2001
-
[13]
2020, A&A, 642, L8
Cernicharo, J., Marcelino, N., Agúndez, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, L8
2020
-
[14]
2024, A&A, 686, A139
Cernicharo, J., Tercero, B., Agúndez, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A139
2024
-
[15]
J., Chuang, K
Chen, Y . J., Chuang, K. J., Muñoz Caro, G. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 15
2014
-
[16]
Chevance, M., Kruijssen, J. M. D., Vazquez-Semadeni, E., et al. 2020, Space Sci. Rev., 216, 50
2020
-
[17]
J., Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., et al
Chuang, K. J., Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A199
2020
-
[18]
J., Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., et al
Chuang, K. J., Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 2552
2017
-
[19]
J., Fedoseev, G., Scirè, C., et al
Chuang, K. J., Fedoseev, G., Scirè, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A85
2021
-
[20]
J., Jäger, C., Santos, J
Chuang, K. J., Jäger, C., Santos, J. C., & Henning, T. 2024, A&A, 687, A7
2024
-
[21]
& Gould, J
Comeford, J. & Gould, J. H. 1961, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 5, 474
1961
-
[22]
2009, Carbon, 47, 1605
Compagnini, G., D’Urso, L., Puglisi, O., Baratta, G., & Strazzulla, G. 2009, Carbon, 47, 1605
2009
-
[23]
R., Pilleri, P., et al
Cuadrado, S., Goicoechea, J. R., Pilleri, P., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A82
2015
-
[24]
H., Zhao, D., Strazzulla, G., & Linnartz, H
Cuylle, S. H., Zhao, D., Strazzulla, G., & Linnartz, H. 2014, A&A, 570, A83 De Sanctis, M. C., Ammannito, E., McSween, H. Y ., et al. 2017, Science, 355, 719
2014
-
[25]
Fatima, M., Müller, H. S. P., Zingsheim, O., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A25
2023
-
[26]
J., Ioppolo, S., et al
Fedoseev, G., Chuang, K. J., Ioppolo, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 52
2017
-
[27]
J., van Dishoeck, E
Fedoseev, G., Chuang, K. J., van Dishoeck, E. F., Ioppolo, S., & Linnartz, H. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4297
2016
-
[28]
M., Ioppolo, S., Lamberts, T., & Linnartz, H
Fedoseev, G., Cuppen, H. M., Ioppolo, S., Lamberts, T., & Linnartz, H. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1288
2015
-
[29]
2022, ApJ, 924, 110
Fedoseev, G., Qasim, D., Chuang, K.-J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 924, 110
2022
-
[30]
Gerakines, P. A. & Moore, M. H. 2001, Icarus, 154, 372 Guzmán, V . V ., Bergner, J. B., Law, C. J., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 6 Hänni, N., Altwegg, K., Baklouti, D., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A22 Hänni, N., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A22 Hänni, N., Altwegg, K...
2001
-
[31]
2000, ApJ, 532, 1029
Hiraoka, K., Takayama, T., Euchi, A., Handa, H., & Sato, T. 2000, ApJ, 532, 1029
2000
-
[32]
Hopkins, B. J. & Riviere, J. C. 1964, British Journal of Applied Physics, 15, 941
1964
-
[33]
L., Ferrante, R
Hudson, R. L., Ferrante, R. F., & Moore, M. H. 2014, Icarus, 228, 276
2014
-
[34]
D., Walsh, C., Booth, A
Ilee, J. D., Walsh, C., Booth, A. S., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 9
2021
-
[35]
2013, Review of Scientific Instruments, 84, 073112
Ioppolo, S., Fedoseev, G., Lamberts, T., Romanzin, C., & Linnartz, H. 2013, Review of Scientific Instruments, 84, 073112
2013
-
[36]
Irvine, W. M. & Hjalmarson, A. 1984, Origins of Life, 14, 15 Jiménez-Serra, I., Rodríguez-Almeida, L. F., Martín-Pintado, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A181
1984
-
[37]
Jo, S. K. & White, J. M. 1991, J. Chem. Phys., 94, 5761
1991
-
[38]
1995, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy, 174, 116
Khlifi, M., Paillous, P., Delpech, C., et al. 1995, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy, 174, 116
1995
-
[39]
S., Bennett, C
Kim, Y . S., Bennett, C. J., Chen, L.-H., O’Brien, K., & Kaiser, R. I. 2010, ApJ, 711, 744
2010
-
[40]
Kim, Y . S. & Kaiser, R. I. 2009, ApJS, 181, 543
2009
-
[41]
2017, ApJ, 837, 155
Kobayashi, H., Hidaka, H., Lamberts, T., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 155
2017
-
[42]
Lee, K. L. K., Loomis, R. A., Burkhardt, A. M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, L11
2021
-
[43]
Ligterink, N. F. W., Paardekooper, D. M., Chuang, K. J., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A56
2015
-
[44]
A., Burkhardt, A
Loomis, R. A., Burkhardt, A. M., Shingledecker, C. N., et al. 2021, Nature As- tronomy, 5, 188
2021
-
[45]
I., & Jones, B
Maity, S., Kaiser, R. I., & Jones, B. M. 2015, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transactions), 17, 3081 Martín, S., Mangum, J. G., Harada, N., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A46
2015
-
[46]
A., Burkhardt, A
McGuire, B. A., Burkhardt, A. M., Shingledecker, C. N., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, L28
2017
-
[47]
2016, MNRAS, 458, 2953
Minissale, M., Moudens, A., Baouche, S., Chaabouni, H., & Dulieu, F. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2953
2016
-
[48]
& Palumbo, M
Modica, P. & Palumbo, M. E. 2010, A&A, 519, A22
2010
-
[49]
& Rivilla, V
Molpeceres, G. & Rivilla, V . M. 2022, A&A, 665, A27
2022
-
[50]
2019, A&A, 628, A15
Nguyen, T., Fourré, I., Favre, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A15
2019
-
[51]
2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 228 Öberg, K
Oba, Y ., Tomaru, T., Lamberts, T., Kouchi, A., & Watanabe, N. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 228 Öberg, K. I., Boogert, A. C. A., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 740, 109 Öberg, K. I., Garrod, R. T., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Linnartz, H. 2009, A&A, 504, 891
2018
-
[52]
R., Cernicharo, J., & Goicoechea, J
Pardo, J. R., Cernicharo, J., & Goicoechea, J. R. 2005, ApJ, 628, 275
2005
-
[53]
R., Cernicharo, J., Tercero, B., et al
Pardo, J. R., Cernicharo, J., Tercero, B., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A39
2022
-
[54]
2014, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 326, 2
Puglisi, O., Compagnini, G., D’Urso, L., et al. 2014, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 326, 2
2014
-
[55]
2015, Science, 348, 232
Rubin, M., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., et al. 2015, Science, 348, 232
2015
-
[56]
& Yamamoto, S
Sakai, N. & Yamamoto, S. 2013, Chemical Reviews, 113, 8981
2013
-
[57]
C., Enrique-Romero, J., Lamberts, T., Linnartz, H., & Chuang, K.-J
Santos, J. C., Enrique-Romero, J., Lamberts, T., Linnartz, H., & Chuang, K.-J. 2024, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 8, 1646
2024
-
[58]
2019, A&A, 630, A31 Segré, D., Ben-Eli, D., Deamer, D
Schuhmann, M., Altwegg, K., Balsiger, H., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A31 Segré, D., Ben-Eli, D., Deamer, D. W., & Lancet, D. 2001, Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 31, 119
2019
-
[59]
2015, Science Advances, 1, 1400067
Stevenson, J., Lunine, J., & Clancy, P. 2015, Science Advances, 1, 1400067
2015
-
[60]
& Baratta, G
Strazzulla, G. & Baratta, G. A. 1992, A&A, 266, 434
1992
-
[61]
Taniguchi, K., Gorai, P., & Tan, J. C. 2024, Ap&SS, 369, 34
2024
-
[62]
2019, ApJ, 884, 167
Taniguchi, K., Herbst, E., Ozeki, H., & Saito, M. 2019, ApJ, 884, 167
2019
-
[63]
2017, ApJ, 846, 46
Taniguchi, K., Ozeki, H., & Saito, M. 2017, ApJ, 846, 46
2017
-
[64]
2016, ApJ, 830, 106
Taniguchi, K., Saito, M., & Ozeki, H. 2016, ApJ, 830, 106
2016
-
[65]
2011, A&A, 534, A64 Tørneng, E., Nielsen, C
Theule, P., Borget, F., Mispelaer, F., et al. 2011, A&A, 534, A64 Tørneng, E., Nielsen, C. J., Klaeboe, P., Hopf, H., & Priebe, H. 1980, Spec- trochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy, 36, 975
2011
-
[66]
Trevors, J. T. & Psenner, R. 2001, FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 25, 573
2001
-
[67]
Tschersich, K. G. 2000, Journal of Applied Physics, 87, 2565
2000
-
[68]
M., Abplanalp, M
Turner, A. M., Abplanalp, M. J., Blair, T. J., Dayuha, R., & Kaiser, R. I. 2018, ApJS, 234, 6
2018
-
[69]
G., Palumbo, M
Urso, R. G., Palumbo, M. E., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A72 van Dishoeck, E. F., Grant, S., Tabone, B., et al. 2023, Faraday Discussions, 245, 52
2019
-
[70]
2010, ApJ, 721, 856
Wu, Y .-J., Lin, M.-Y ., Chou, S.-L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 856
2010
-
[71]
D., Engrand, C., et al
Yabuta, H., Cody, G. D., Engrand, C., et al. 2023, Science, 379, abn9057
2023
-
[72]
I., & Tokunaga, A
Zhou, L., Kaiser, R. I., & Tokunaga, A. T. 2009, Planet. Space Sci., 57, 830
2009
-
[73]
I., et al
Zhou, L., Zheng, W., Kaiser, R. I., et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1243 Article number, page 10 of 12 G. Fedoseev et al.: Production of linear alkanes by solid-state hydrogenation of interstellar polyynes Appendix A: QMS-TPD spectra subtraction Figures A.1, A.2, and A.3 show the resul...
2010
Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.