Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 43 references

Uniform controllability for the wave equation with large potential

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Uniform observability of waves with large potential holds exactly when every ray of both the free geodesic flow and the V-modified Hamiltonian flow hits the observation set in time T.

desk verdict Sharp geometric characterization of when large potentials destroy uniform wave observability; the equivalence is clean and the proofs hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11702 v1 pith:SW4AT5LU submitted 2026-07-13 math.AP math.OC

Arthur Yax (LMO) This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.OC MSC 35L0593B0793B0535F0547F05
keywords waveequationobservabilitygeometriccontrolconditionlargepotentialsemiclassicaldefectmeasuressecondmicrolocalizationuniformcontrollability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

When a wave equation is perturbed by a large fixed potential λ V, the cost of observing (or controlling) the solution can explode with λ. The paper isolates a purely geometric condition, called GCC+_V, that decides whether this cost stays bounded independently of λ. GCC+_V requires that every free geodesic of length T meets the observation region and that every trajectory of the modified Hamiltonian √(|ξ|^{2}+V) also meets it. The authors prove the condition is necessary and sufficient for a uniform observability inequality, give concrete manifolds (circle, torus, sphere) where it holds for nontrivial observation sets, and produce an exponential lower bound of order exp(c√λ) whenever the modified flow has a trapped ray. The argument rests on semiclassical and second-microlocal defect measures that track high-frequency energy both at the usual frequency scale and at the larger scale induced by λ.

What carries the argument

GCC+_V (the simultaneous geometric control condition for the free geodesic flow and for the Hamiltonian flow of q=√(|ξ|^{2}_g+V)), proved necessary and sufficient by contradiction via semiclassical and second-microlocal defect measures that capture energy concentration along both families of rays.

What would settle it

Exhibit a smooth positive V and an open set ω such that every free geodesic of length T meets ω, yet some trajectory of the Hamiltonian q=√(|ξ|^{2}+V) never meets ω, and then check whether a sequence of solutions with energy 1 and observation norm o(1) still exists as λ o∞; if no such sequence appears, the necessity claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the wave equation on a compact Riemannian manifold with potential λ V (λ≥1 large), a uniform-in-λ observability cost exists if and only if the pair (ω,T) satisfies the geometric control condition GCC+_V: every free geodesic of length T and every trajectory of the Hamiltonian q=√(|ξ|^{2}_g+V) both enter the observation set ω within time T.

Load-bearing premise

The potential V must be smooth, strictly positive and normalized to height one; this regularity is used both to define the modified Hamiltonian flow and to construct the second-microlocal measures that track energy at frequencies much larger than √λ.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Whenever GCC+_V holds, the control cost for the wave equation remains bounded independently of the size of the potential λ V.
  • If a critical point of V lies outside the observation set, the observability cost must blow up at least like exp(c√λ).
  • On the circle, uniform controllability is possible precisely when the observation set covers every critical point of V.
  • On the sphere or the flat torus, rotationally symmetric potentials admit nontrivial observation sets that still give uniform cost.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same geometric criterion should decide uniform observability for the Schrödinger equation with large potential, because the second-microlocal measures already encode the high-frequency dynamics shared by both operators.
  • The exponential lower bound exp(c√λ) is likely sharp on manifolds of revolution once the Agmon distance to the observation set is computed, matching the one-dimensional upper bound of Zuazua.
  • Relaxing smoothness of V to C^{1,α} would still allow the Hamiltonian flow to be defined, so the necessity half of the theorem may survive under weaker regularity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the wave equation on a compact Riemannian manifold without boundary, with a large time-independent potential λV (λ≥1, V smooth, positive, ||V||_∞=1). It introduces the geometric control condition (GCC+_V), which requires that every bicharacteristic of both the free geodesic flow and the Hamiltonian flow of q=√(|ξ|^{2}_g+V) meets the observation set ω in time T. Theorem 1.5 asserts that (GCC+_V) is necessary and sufficient for the existence of an observability constant C_obs independent of λ. Sufficiency is proved by contradiction via semiclassical and second-microlocal defect measures (Sections 3–5); necessity is obtained by concentrating coherent states along a non-controlled bicharacteristic of q (Section 6). Geometric examples on the circle, torus and sphere are given, together with a lower bound of order T^{-1} exp(C√λ) for the optimal cost when (GCC_V) fails.

Significance. The result gives a clean geometric characterization of uniform-in-λ controllability for the wave equation with large potential, extending the classical Bardos–Lebeau–Rauch–Taylor theorem and the exponential bounds of Laurent–Léautaud. The introduction of second-microlocal measures on the cosphere at infinity (Theorem 3.5) and the slice-disintegration theorem for half-wave solutions (Theorem 4.10) are technically solid and of independent interest for high-frequency analysis. The geometric examples and the matching lower bound of order exp(C√λ) make the necessity of (GCC+_V) concrete. The proofs are written out in full and rely only on standard tools of semiclassical analysis under the stated smoothness assumptions.

minor comments (4)
  1. The notation (GCC+_V) is introduced both as the conjunction of (GCC) and (GCC_V) and as the single condition on the flow of q; a short clarifying sentence after Definition 1.2 would avoid any momentary ambiguity.
  2. In Section 3 the second-microlocal measure is defined via homogeneous symbols of degree 0; a brief remark that the construction extends routinely to symbols of any fixed order would help readers who wish to reuse the tool.
  3. Figures 1–4 are helpful but the captions could explicitly recall which of (GCC), (GCC_V) or (GCC+_V) is illustrated, especially for the torus example of Lemma 1.9.
  4. A few typographical slips appear (e.g., “observability cost” sometimes italicized inconsistently; “Half-wave equations” in the keywords). These are purely cosmetic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: pure geometric-analytic equivalence proved by independent contradiction arguments via defect measures.

full rationale

The central claim (Theorem 1.5) equates the independently defined geometric condition (GCC+_V)—formulated via the Hamiltonian flows of q=√(|ξ|^{2}_g+V) and |ξ|_g on the cotangent bundle—with the existence of a λ-uniform observability cost for the wave equation. Sufficiency (Section 5) assumes a sequence violating (UO), rescales to semiclassical parameter h=1/√λ when λ o∞, extracts semiclassical/2-microlocal defect measures (Theorems 3.5, 4.10), and obtains a contradiction because (GCC+_V) forces the measures to vanish on the observation set. Necessity (Section 6) constructs coherent-state solutions concentrating on a non-controlled bicharacteristic of q (explicitly avoiding ω) whose energy remains bounded below while the observation vanishes, again without presupposing the conclusion. Both directions rely only on standard pseudodifferential calculus, energy conservation, and propagation of measures along the flows; no quantity is defined in terms of the observability constant, no parameters are fitted to data, and self-citations (BLR92, LL16, etc.) supply classical black-box tools rather than load-bearing premises that reduce the claim to itself. The argument is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper works entirely within classical Riemannian geometry and semiclassical analysis. The only free parameters are the geometric data (manifold, potential, observation set, time) that define the problem; no numerical fitting occurs. Invented entities are the new geometric condition and the associated defect measures, both of which are rigorously defined and used only as tools.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption M is a smooth compact connected Riemannian manifold without boundary; V is smooth, positive and normalized ||V||_∞=1.
    Stated in (1.6) and used throughout to guarantee that the Hamiltonian flow of q is complete and that the energy norms are equivalent.
  • standard math Existence and uniqueness of semiclassical and second-microlocal defect measures for bounded L2 sequences (Propositions 2.8, 2.11, Theorem 3.5).
    Classical results of Gérard, Tartar and subsequent second-microlocal extensions; invoked as black boxes.
  • standard math The classical geometric control condition (GCC) implies observability for the wave equation with fixed potential (Bardos–Lebeau–Rauch–Taylor).
    Used in the compact (bounded-λ) case of the sufficiency proof (Lemma 5.1).
invented entities (2)
  • Geometric control condition with respect to potential (GCC+_V)
    purpose: Captures both ordinary geodesics and the Hamiltonian trajectories of q=√(|ξ|^{2}+V) so that uniform observability holds.
    Defined in §1.2; shown necessary and sufficient in Theorem 1.5; no independent experimental handle outside the mathematical statement.
  • Second-microlocal defect measures on the cosphere at infinity
    purpose: Capture oscillations faster than the semiclassical scale h=1/√λ that are missed by ordinary semiclassical measures.
    Constructed in §3 following earlier literature; used as the main technical tool for the unbounded-λ case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniform controllability for the wave equation with large potential." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SW4AT5LU

@misc{pith2026260711702,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniform controllability for the wave equation with large potential},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SW4AT5LU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11702}
}
abstract

This paper investigates the dependence of the control cost for a wave equation with respect to perturbation by a time-independent potential $\lmbd V$ scaled by a large parameter $\lmbd$ on a compact Riemannian manifold. We introduce the geometric control condition~\eqref{GCC+}, a variant of the geometric control condition of Bardos--Lebeau--Rauch--Taylor, tailored to accommodate the influence of the potential $V$. We show that~\eqref{GCC+} is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a uniform \emph{observability cost} with respect to the large parameter $\lmbd$. We provide geometric examples satisfying~\eqref{GCC+} and estimate the blow-up rate of the \emph{observability cost} in situations where it fails. The proofs rely on semiclassical and second microlocal defect measures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11702 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration, in the one-dimensional case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of Proposition 1.7 on M “ 𝕋 2 , equipped with the Euclidean metric, of an open subset ω, such that there is T for which the pair pω, Tq satisfies (GCC` V ). In this example, we set two radii 0 ă Rr1 ă Rr2 ă 1 2 and an angle ε P p0, πq. Proposition 1.8. Let M be the two-dimensional sphere 𝕊 2 equipped with its canonical metric induced by the Euclidean metric of ℝ3 , S and N be its south and north pole, a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of Proposition 1.8 on M “ 𝕊 2 , equipped with the metric induced by ℝ3 , of an open subset ω, such that there is T for which the pair pω, Tq satisfies (GCC` V ). 1 1 c min V V p0q 0 x1 V px1q x1 x2 π𝕋 2 pη0q 𝕋 2 𝕋 2 zω “ tx1 “ cu φ |ξ| t pη0q φ q t pη0q [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of Lemma 1.9 on M “ 𝕋 2 , equipped with the Euclidean metric, of a control open subset ω “ tx1 ‰ cu and a potential V only depending on x1, with Bx1 V pc, x2q ă 0, such that, for any time T ą 0, GCCV pω, Tq holds but GCCpω, Tq does not. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: For any pt, xq P 𝕄I and all ε ą 0, here is an illustration of the problematic region tpτ, ξq P T ‹ t,x 𝕄I , ε|τ | ą 1 and ε|τ | ě |ξ|gu in light gray. We compare it, for ε small enough, to the set tpτ, ξq P T ‹ t,x 𝕄I , τ 2 “ |ξ| 2 g `V u in black. One can choose ε ą 0…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration, for fixed pt, xq P 𝕄I , of the characteristic region tτ 2 “ |ξ| 2 g ` V pxqu (black) and the region tC‹xτ y ď xξyg ď C ‹ xτ yu (light gray). In the picture, for each χ P XpI, Mq, χ “ 1 near the dark gray region and χ “ 0 near the white region. Remark 4.8.…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of (5.14), with ϵ P p´δ, δq. Proof for the 2-microlocal result of Lemma 5.3. First, for all ϕω P C 8 c pp0, Tq ˆωq we prove that ϕωpµp`,`q `µp´,´qq vanishes identically on S ‹𝕄. Using Lemma 5.2 and (2 nd-MDM), we obtain 0 “ lim RÑ8 limnÑ8 ÿ 5Pt´,`u C v 5 n…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Semiclassical completely integrable systems: long-time dynamics and observability via two-microlocal W igner measures

    Nalini Anantharaman, Clotilde Fermanian-Kammerer, and Fabricio Maci \`a . Semiclassical completely integrable systems: long-time dynamics and observability via two-microlocal W igner measures. Amer. J. Math. , 137(3):577--638, 2015

    2015

  2. [2]

    Contr\^ole analytique de l'\'equation des ondes et de l'\'equation de S chr\"odinger sur des surfaces de revolution

    Brice Allibert. Contr\^ole analytique de l'\'equation des ondes et de l'\'equation de S chr\"odinger sur des surfaces de revolution. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 23(9-10):1493--1556, 1998

    1998

  3. [3]

    Wigner measures and observability for the S chr\"odinger equation on the disk

    Nalini Anantharaman, Matthieu L \'e autaud, and Fabricio Maci \`a . Wigner measures and observability for the S chr\"odinger equation on the disk. Invent. Math. , 206(2):485--599, 2016

    2016

  4. [4]

    Semiclassical measures for the S chr \"o dinger equation on the torus

    Nalini Anantharaman and Fabricio Maci \`a . Semiclassical measures for the S chr \"o dinger equation on the torus. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 16(6):1253--1288, 2014

    2014

  5. [5]

    Condition n\'ecessaire et suffisante pour la contr\^olabilit\'e exacte des ondes

    Nicolas Burq and Patrick G\'erard. Condition n\'ecessaire et suffisante pour la contr\^olabilit\'e exacte des ondes. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\'er. I Math. , 325(7):749--752, 1997

    1997

  6. [6]

    Sharp sufficient conditions for the observation, control, and stabilization of waves from the boundary

    Claude Bardos, Gilles Lebeau, and Jeffrey Rauch. Sharp sufficient conditions for the observation, control, and stabilization of waves from the boundary. SIAM J. Control Optim. , 30(5):1024--1065, 1992

    1992

  7. [7]

    N. Burq. Contr\^olabilit\'e exacte des ondes dans des ouverts peu r\'eguliers. Asymptot. Anal. , 14(2):157--191, 1997

    1997

  8. [8]

    Riemannian geometry , volume 98 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

    Isaac Chavel. Riemannian geometry , volume 98 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2006. A modern introduction

    2006

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Control and nonlinearity , volume 136 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs

    Jean-Michel Coron. Control and nonlinearity , volume 136 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Dependence of high-frequency waves with respect to potentials

    Belhassen Dehman and Sylvain Ervedoza. Dependence of high-frequency waves with respect to potentials. SIAM J. Control Optim. , 52(6):3722--3750, 2014

    2014

  3. [11]

    Distributions

    Johannes Jisse Duistermaat and Johan Antoon Casper Kolk. Distributions . Cornerstones. Birkh\"auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2010. Theory and applications, Translated from the Dutch by J. P. van Braam Houckgeest

    2010

  4. [12]

    Controllability of two coupled wave equations on a compact manifold

    Belhassen Dehman, J \'e r \^o me Le Rousseau, and Matthieu L \'e autaud. Controllability of two coupled wave equations on a compact manifold. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 211(1):113--187, 2014

    2014

  5. [13]

    Szymon Dolecki and David L. Russell. A general theory of observation and control. SIAM J. Control Optim. , 15(2):185--220, 1977

    1977

  6. [14]

    Spectral asymptotics in the semi-classical limit , volume 268 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series

    Mouez Dimassi and Johannes S j\"o strand. Spectral asymptotics in the semi-classical limit , volume 268 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999

    1999

  7. [15]

    Mathematical theory of scattering resonances , volume 200 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics

    Semyon Dyatlov and Maciej Zworski. Mathematical theory of scattering resonances , volume 200 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2019

    2019

  8. [16]

    On the optimality of the observability inequalities for parabolic and hyperbolic systems with potentials

    Thomas Duyckaerts, Xu Zhang, and Enrique Zuazua. On the optimality of the observability inequalities for parabolic and hyperbolic systems with potentials. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e C Anal. Non Lin\'eaire , 25(1):1--41, 2008

    2008

  9. [17]

    Fermanian Kammerer

    C. Fermanian Kammerer. Propagation and absorption of concentration effects near shock hypersurfaces for the heat equation. Asymptot. Anal. , 24(2):107--141, 2000

    2000

  10. [18]

    Mesures semi-classiques 2-microlocales

    Clotilde Fermanian-Kammerer. Mesures semi-classiques 2-microlocales. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\'er. I Math. , 331(7):515--518, 2000

    2000

  11. [19]

    Mesures semi-classiques et croisement de modes

    Clotilde Fermanian-Kammerer and Patrick G \'e rard. Mesures semi-classiques et croisement de modes. Bull. Soc. Math. France , 130(1):123--168, 2002

    2002

  12. [20]

    Microlocal defect measures

    Patrick G \'e rard. Microlocal defect measures. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 16(11):1761--1794, 1991

    1991

  13. [21]

    Oscillations and concentration effects in semilinear dispersive wave equations

    Patrick G \'e rard. Oscillations and concentration effects in semilinear dispersive wave equations. J. Funct. Anal. , 141(1):60--98, 1996

    1996

  14. [22]

    Riemannian geometry

    Sylvestre Gallot, Dominique Hulin, and Jacques Lafontaine. Riemannian geometry . Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, third edition, 2004

    2004

  15. [23]

    Semi-classical analysis for the S chr\"odinger operator and applications , volume 1336 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics

    Bernard Helffer. Semi-classical analysis for the S chr\"odinger operator and applications , volume 1336 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988

    1988

  16. [24]

    The analysis of linear partial differential operators

    Lars H \"o rmander. The analysis of linear partial differential operators. III , volume 274 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985. Pseudodifferential operators

    1985

  17. [25]

    Multiple wells in the semiclassical limit

    Bernard Helffer and Johannes Sj \"o strand. Multiple wells in the semiclassical limit. I . Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 9(4):337--408, 1984

    1984

  18. [26]

    Long time energy averages and a lower resolvent estimate for damped waves

    Matthieu L \'e autaud. Long time energy averages and a lower resolvent estimate for damped waves. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12709 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    \'E quation des ondes amorties

    Gilles Lebeau. \'E quation des ondes amorties. In Algebraic and geometric methods in mathematical physics ( K aciveli, 1993) , volume 19 of Math. Phys. Stud. , pages 73--109. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1996

    1993

  20. [28]

    Metrics on the phase space and non-selfadjoint pseudo-differential operators , volume 3 of Pseudo-Differential Operators

    Nicolas Lerner. Metrics on the phase space and non-selfadjoint pseudo-differential operators , volume 3 of Pseudo-Differential Operators. Theory and Applications . Birkh\"auser Verlag, Basel, 2010

    2010

  21. [29]

    Contr\^olabilit\'e exacte, perturbations et stabilisation de syst\`emes distribu\'es

    Jacques-Louis Lions. Contr\^olabilit\'e exacte, perturbations et stabilisation de syst\`emes distribu\'es. T ome 1 , volume 8 of Recherches en Math\'ematiques Appliqu\'ees [Research in Applied Mathematics] . Masson, Paris, 1988. Contr\^olabilit\'e exacte. [Exact controllabilit...

    1988

  22. [30]

    Uniform observability estimates for linear waves

    Camille Laurent and Matthieu L \'e autaud. Uniform observability estimates for linear waves. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. , 22(4):1097--1136, 2016

    2016

  23. [31]

    Quantitative unique continuation for operators with partially analytic coefficients

    Camille Laurent and Matthieu L \'e autaud. Quantitative unique continuation for operators with partially analytic coefficients. A pplication to approximate control for waves. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 21(4):957--1069, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    Observability of the heat equation, geometric constants in control theory, and a conjecture of L uc M iller

    Camille Laurent and Matthieu L \'e autaud. Observability of the heat equation, geometric constants in control theory, and a conjecture of L uc M iller. Anal. PDE , 14(2):355--423, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    On uniform observability of gradient flows in the vanishing viscosity limit

    Camille Laurent and Matthieu L \'e autaud. On uniform observability of gradient flows in the vanishing viscosity limit. J. \'Ec. polytech. Math. , 8:439--506, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    On uniform controllability of 1 D transport equations in the vanishing viscosity limit

    Camille Laurent and Matthieu L\'eautaud. On uniform controllability of 1 D transport equations in the vanishing viscosity limit. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 361:265--312, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Uniform observation of semiclassical S chr\"odinger eigenfunctions on an interval

    Camille Laurent and Matthieu L \'e autaud. Uniform observation of semiclassical S chr\"odinger eigenfunctions on an interval. Tunis. J. Math. , 5(1):125--170, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    High-frequency propagation for the S chr\"odinger equation on the torus

    Fabricio Maci \`a . High-frequency propagation for the S chr\"odinger equation on the torus. J. Funct. Anal. , 258(3):933--955, 2010

    2010

  29. [37]

    Propagation d'ondes semi-classiques a travers une interface et mesures 2-microlocales

    Luc Miller. Propagation d'ondes semi-classiques a travers une interface et mesures 2-microlocales . PhD thesis, Palaiseau, Ecole polytechnique, 1996

    1996

  30. [38]

    Short waves through thin interfaces and 2-microlocal measures

    Luc Miller. Short waves through thin interfaces and 2-microlocal measures. In Journ\'ees ``\'Equations aux D \'eriv\'ees P artielles'' ( S aint- J ean-de- M onts, 1997) , pages Exp. No. XII, 12. \'Ecole Polytech., Palaiseau, 1997

    1997

  31. [39]

    On the lack of observability for wave equations: a G aussian beam approach

    Fabricio Maci \`a and Enrique Zuazua. On the lack of observability for wave equations: a G aussian beam approach. Asymptot. Anal. , 32(1):1--26, 2002

    2002

  32. [40]

    Exponential decay of solutions to hyperbolic equations in bounded domains

    Jeffrey Rauch and Michael Taylor. Exponential decay of solutions to hyperbolic equations in bounded domains. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 24:79--86, 1974

    1974

  33. [41]

    H -measures, a new approach for studying homogenisation, oscillations and concentration effects in partial differential equations

    Luc Tartar. H -measures, a new approach for studying homogenisation, oscillations and concentration effects in partial differential equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A , 115(3-4):193--230, 1990

    1990

  34. [42]

    Exact controllability for semilinear wave equations in one space dimension

    Enrique Zuazua. Exact controllability for semilinear wave equations in one space dimension. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e C Anal. Non Lin\'eaire , 10(1):109--129, 1993

    1993

  35. [43]

    Semiclassical analysis , volume 138 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics

    Maciej Zworski. Semiclassical analysis , volume 138 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.