Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 72 references

Vortex solitons in quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals with the third harmonic generation

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports stable composite vortex solitons in a three-dimensional quasi-phase-matched photonic crystal, whose three color components carry topological charges $s=1$, $s=2$, and $s=-1$.

desk verdict Solid exact-matching extension to THG, but the detuning stability maps rest on an unjustified rotating-wave reduction. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00818 v1 pith:T2OR4FJR submitted 2025-07-01 physics.optics nlin.PS

Xuening Wang , Yuxin Guo , Qiuyi Ning , Bin Liu , Hexiang He , Li Zhang , Boris A. Malomed , Yongyao Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsnlin.PS PACS 42.65.Tg42.65.Ky42.70.Qs
keywords vortexsolitonsthirdharmonicgenerationquasi-phasematchingphotoniccrystalsquadraticnonlinearitycascadednonlinearinteractionslithiumniobateanti-vortex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a purely quadratic ($\chi^{(2)}$) medium can host stable composite vortex solitons once third-harmonic generation is included through a two-period quasi-phase-matched poling. The soliton is a three-color bound state: a fundamental-frequency vortex with topological charge (winding number) $s=1$, a second-harmonic quadrupole with $s=2$, and a third-harmonic anti-vortex with $s=-1$, created by cascaded quadratic interactions. In the reduced three-wave model, two families of four-peak solitons are found, rhombic and square, with the rhombic family stable over a broader range of total power and detuning. In lithium niobate parameters the same solitons are estimated to propagate stably for about one meter, at peak intensities below the threshold where cubic nonlinearity would matter. If the claim is right, it supplies a route to stable vortex solitons and higher-order optical states without invoking cubic nonlinearities.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing reduction is the near-resonance approximation that turns the physical three-wave system (1)-(3) into the scaled model (14)-(16): only the $m,l=\pm1$ Fourier harmonics of the two-period poling are kept and the remaining oscillatory factors are dropped. In that model, the checkerboard sign $\sigma(x,y)$ multiplies all nonlinear couplings, giving the transverse lattice structure that localizes the four peaks. The phase-matching identities (23)-(24) tie the component phases to the local sign of $\sigma$, and the lattice's $D_4$ symmetry caps the phase circulation at charge magnitude one, which is what converts the cascade FF($s=1$) to SH($s=2$) to TH($s=-1$) into an anti-vortex rather than a higher-charge state. Stability is then asserted via the slope criterion $d\beta/dP>0$ and by direct perturbed propagation over $z=1000$.

What would settle it

Integrate the original physical equations (1)-(3) with the complete poling function $d(Z)$ from Eq. (6) at a detuned point such as $(\Omega_a,\Omega_b)=(1,0)$ and compare the soliton profiles and stability boundaries with the reduced model (14)-(16); a visible mismatch would falsify the reduction and the claimed stability maps.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's terms, the central discovery is that adding third-harmonic generation to a checkerboard quasi-phase-matched quadratic crystal produces a new class of stable composite vortex solitons with a nontrivial charge pattern. In the scaled system (14)-(16), stationary solutions $u_p=\phi_p e^{i\beta_p z}$ are built from four intensity peaks arranged as a rhombus or a square, selected by the relative phase $\phi_d=0$ or $\pi$ in the phase-matching conditions (23)-(24). The FF component is a vortex with $s=1$; the SH component has $s=2$, read as a quadrupole after phase folding; the TH component has $s=-1$, called an anti-vortex. Perturbed simulations keep both shapes stable up to $z=1000$, about 100 diffraction lengths, and to $z=1300$, about one meter in lithium niobate. The paper also shows that launching a vortex beam with unit winding number in the FF channel excites the solitons, with broader input beams favoring square shapes and narrower beams favoring rhombic shapes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the reduced three-wave model, which drops rapidly oscillating terms, stays faithful to the physical crystal when the phase mismatches are not exactly zero; if those terms contribute, the predicted stability regions do not belong to the original model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Both rhombic and square composite vortex solitons remain stable in the model up to $z=1000$, about 76.5 cm in lithium niobate, and simulations still show stability at $z=1300$, about 1 m.
  • The rhombic family has a broader stability region, with total power stable up to $P\approx 350$, versus $P\approx 140$ for the square family, and lower Hamiltonian values for the same parameters.
  • A single vortex input with winding number 1 is enough to excite the three-color solitons; the output shape can be selected by the input beam width.
  • The third-harmonic anti-vortex is produced by the cascade FF($s=1$) $\to$ SH($s=2$) $\to$ TH($s=-1$), so no direct seeding of the TH component is required.
  • In lithium niobate, the peak intensities of all three components stay below about 1 GW/cm², so cubic nonlinearities can be neglected and the QPM structure is within current fabrication capabilities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reduced model is accurate only near exact phase matching, then the stability maps computed at nonzero $\Omega_a$ and $\Omega_b$ may shift when the dropped oscillatory terms are restored; a direct comparison with the full three-wave equations would settle this.
  • The same two-period QPM cascade could be exported to higher harmonic orders: whenever the lattice symmetry caps vorticity, the charge sequence of doubling then subtracting one should generically produce anti-vortex components.
  • The demonstrated dependence of soliton shape on input beam width hints at an all-optical control channel, where the same crystal could switch between rhombic and square solitons by changing the launch profile.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quasi-phase-matched (QPM) photonic-crystal design, with a checkerboard transverse modulation and a dual-period modulation along the propagation direction, to support three-component (FF/SH/TH) composite vortex solitons in a purely quadratic medium. Starting from the physical three-wave system (1)-(3), the authors derive the reduced scaled model (14)-(16), solve it for stationary solutions, and report two families of four-peak solitons: rhombic and square-shaped. The FF component carries topological charge s=1, the SH component s=2, and the TH component s=-1, with the TH anti-vortex produced by a cascade through the SH quadrupole. Stability is checked by the Vakhitov-Kolokolov criterion and by direct perturbed propagation to z=1000-1300, and LiNbO3 parameters are used to estimate a physical propagation distance of about 1 m.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a substantial step beyond earlier QPM vortex-soliton work: it adds the third-harmonic component and shows that its anti-vortex structure arises naturally from the cascaded quadratic nonlinearity, while the checkerboard lattice can stabilize the composite object over many diffraction lengths. The paper gives direct numerical evidence for existence and stability at exact phase matching, and the experimental parameter estimates are useful and concrete. The main weakness is that the detuning scans, which are presented as control-parameter results, rely on a rotating-wave reduction whose validity at nonzero detuning is not established; this limits the support for the detuning-dependent stability maps but does not undermine the exact-phase-matching headline result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (9), (14)-(16)] The reduction from the physical three-wave system (1)-(3) to the scaled model (14)-(16) is load-bearing for all results at nonzero detuning, but it is not fully derived and the rotating-wave approximation is applied without a quantitative validity condition. With the gauge defined in Eq. (9), the nonlinear drives generated by the m=+1 and l=-1 Fourier harmonics of Eq. (7) do not all lose their carrier phases when the detunings are nonzero; in particular, the u1^2 drive in Eq. (15) retains a residual phase factor of the form e^{-2iΩ_a z} (up to sign, depending on convention). The statement in Section II that 'we neglect rapidly oscillating terms' is not sufficient: for Ω_a of order unity and soliton formation over z≈6, as seen in Figs. 6 and 7, this phase advances by ~2Ω_a per unit z and is not rapidly oscillating on the soliton-formation scale. Consequently, the stability diagrams in the (Ω_a, Ω_b) plane (Fig. 3(b)) and the H and β curves versus detuning (Fig. 5) may not correspond to the original physical system. The Ω_a=Ω_b=Ω_3=0 results are not affected, but the detuning branches of the paper need either an explicit smallness condition on Ω_a and Ω_b (showing that the dropped phases are negligible) or a re-simulation that retains the residual phases.
  2. [Section III, Figs. 3(b) and 5] The detuning stability maps are the only support for the claim that the solitons can be controlled by the detuning parameters, and they inherit the uncertainty described above. As written, the manuscript asks the reader to accept the reduced model (14)-(16) as exact for all Ω_a, Ω_b in the scanned ranges, but this is not established. At minimum, the authors should display the full intermediate reduction, identify precisely which Fourier harmonics are kept, and state the parameter range in which the RWA is controlled. If the residual phases are genuinely negligible for the scanned parameters, a quantitative check (e.g., comparing a few full-model simulations of Eqs. (1)-(3) with the reduced model at representative Ω_a, Ω_b) would resolve the concern.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (9)] The transformation is written only as u_j = (ω_1/(n_1 I_0))^{-1/2} A_j e^{i(...)Z}, but the inverse transformation (A_j in terms of u_j) is not stated; this makes the sign convention ambiguous and complicates verification of the linear terms in Eqs. (14)-(16).
  2. [Section III, stability simulations] The perturbation protocol for the 'perturbed evolution' used to test stability is not specified; please state the perturbation type and amplitude, and the number of independent realizations, so that the stability region boundaries in Fig. 3 are reproducible.
  3. [Section III, text near Fig. 3(a)] The sentence 'Outside of the stability regions, unstable solutions have not been found' is potentially confusing in view of the later statement that unstable solitons exist outside the boundaries in Fig. 3(b); clarify that the former refers to the (P,D) plane only.
  4. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several typographical and grammatical errors, e.g., 'as a chains of rectangles' in the abstract, 'once again' in Section III, and 'shaoe'/'sahped' in the caption of Fig. 5.
  5. [Reference [66]] The nonlinear coefficient d33 is cited to a Wikipedia article; please replace this with a primary or standard reference for lithium niobate's nonlinear tensor.
  6. [Section IV and Table I] The conversion from z=1300 to a physical distance of 1 m is not stated explicitly in Table I (which gives z=1000 as 76.5 cm); please add the z=1300 conversion to make the 'up to ~1 m' claim directly traceable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the composite vortex solitons, their anti-vortex TH cascade pattern, and their stability are computed directly from the stated model; the only notable weakness (rotating-wave reduction at nonzero detuning) is an approximation-validity issue, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central claims — existence and stability of composite FF/SH/TH vortex solitons in the dual-period QPM checkerboard photonic crystal, with the TH anti-vortex arising from the cascade — are obtained by direct numerical solution of the stated scaled model (14)-(16) via imaginary-time propagation, with stability checked by perturbed real-time evolution to z=1000 (not assumed, not fitted). The topological charges s=1, 2, -1 are read from the phase distributions of the computed solutions (Fig. 2), with the phase relations (23)-(26) following from the model's coupling structure (the u1^2 drive fixes phi2 = 2*phi1 - phi_d, the u1*u2 drive fixes phi3 = phi1 + phi2 - phi_d) rather than being imposed as an ansatz; the D4-symmetry vorticity cutoff used to assign |s|=1 to the TH is cited to external work (Ferrando, Ref. [62]), not to the authors' own papers. No parameter is fitted to a data subset and then renamed as a prediction; the material inputs (LiNbO3 d33, refractive indices, wavelengths) are external, and the P-to-power and z-to-length conversions are explicit unit bookkeeping. Self-citations (Refs. [16, 33, 38, 53, 54, 56]) supply background context (the prior checkerboard-QPM vortex-soliton platform) and notation pointers; the model derivation and all stability conclusions are stated and executed in this paper, so no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation. The nearest substantive weakness is the rotating-wave reduction at nonzero detuning: under the gauge (9), the u1^2 drive in Eq. (15) retains a residual carrier phase e^(-2i*Omega_a*z) in the physical three-wave system (1)-(3), which is dropped with only the blanket statement 'we neglect rapidly oscillating terms' and no validity condition, so the detuning scans (Fig. 3(b), Fig. 5) may not correspond to the physical model; however, this is an approximation-validity/correctness risk, not circularity (no prediction reduces to its input by construction), and the headline result at exact phase matching (Omega_a = Omega_b = Omega_3 = 0) is unaffected by that residual phase.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the three-wave RWA model plus its numerical solution. No free parameters are fitted to a target result: P, D, Omega_a, Omega_b, Omega_3 are scanned control parameters. Hand-chosen inputs are the characteristic amplitude A0 = 200 kV/cm and the unstated LG input beam width. The load-bearing axioms are: (i) the lossless paraxial model represents the crystal; (ii) the near-resonance RWA with only m,l = ±1 harmonics and dropped residual phases remains valid over the scanned detunings; (iii) discrete phase circulation is an acceptable definition of topological charge without conserved angular momentum; (iv) a 100-diffraction-length window with unstated perturbations defines 'stable'. No invented entities are introduced; the anti-vortex is a derived phase pattern of the computed TH component.

free parameters (2)
  • LG input beam width = not stated numerically
    The width of the input FF Laguerre-Gaussian beam selects rhombic versus square output solitons in Figs. 6 and 7, but no value is given in the text or captions, so the excitation protocol cannot be exactly reproduced.
  • Characteristic field amplitude A0 = 200 kV/cm
    Hand-chosen in Section IV to convert scaled units to physical units; the derived total power (about 3.8 kW) and peak intensities (0.21 to 0.52 GW/cm^2) depend on this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The lossless paraxial slowly-varying-envelope three-wave model, Eqs. (1)-(3), adequately represents propagation in the QPM crystal.
    The entire study runs on this model; absorption, scattering, photorefraction, and non-paraxial effects are excluded, which matters for the 1 m feasibility claim at lambda3 = 474 nm in LiNbO3 (Section IV).
  • domain assumption The near-resonance RWA keeps only the m,l = ±1 Fourier components of the dual-period poling and drops residual phase oscillations e^(±i*Omega*z) at nonzero detunings.
    Stated as 'we neglect rapidly oscillating terms' (Section II, after Eq. (7)); the model (14)-(16) is exact at Omega_a = Omega_b = Omega_3 = 0 but only approximately valid for the Omega scans in Figs. 3(b) and 5; no validity condition is given.
  • domain assumption Topological charges are defined by discrete phase circulation along closed paths connecting intensity peaks, not by conserved orbital angular momentum.
    Section III notes 'the angular momentum is not conserved'; the s = 1, 2, -1 assignments and the D4-lattice vorticity cutoff (Ref. [62]) rely on this discrete definition.
  • domain assumption Stability is concluded from finite-window perturbed evolution (z = 1000, about 100 diffraction lengths) without a stated perturbation amplitude or spectral check.
    Section III, stability verification paragraph; asymptotic stability is not proven, and the perturbation protocol is unspecified, so the stability boundaries in Fig. 3 carry hidden numerical assumptions.
  • standard math The Fourier expansion of sgn[cos(.)] and the phase-matching relations (Eqs. (7), (12), (13)) are standard and correct.
    Used to derive the scaled system; textbook material, not in dispute.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vortex solitons in quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals with the third harmonic generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T2OR4FJR

@misc{pith2026250700818,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vortex solitons in quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals with the third harmonic generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T2OR4FJR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00818}
}
abstract

We report stable composite vortex solitons in the model of a three-dimensional photonic crystal with the third-harmonic (TH) generation provided by the quasi-phase-matched quadratic nonlinearity. The photonic crystal is designed with a checkerboard structure in the $\left( x\text{,}% y\right) $ plane, while the second-order nonlinear susceptibility, $d(z)$, is modulated along the propagation direction as a chains of rectangles with two different periods. This structure can be fabricated by means of available technologies. The composite vortex solitons are built of fundamental-frequency (FF), second-harmonic (SH), and TH components, exhibiting spatial patterns which correspond to vortex with topological charges $s=1$, a quadrupole with $s=2$, and an anti-vortex structure with $s = -1$, respectively. The soliton profiles feature rhombic or square patterns, corresponding to phase-matching conditions $\varphi =0$ or $\pi $, respectively, the rhombic solitons possessing a broader stability region. From the perspective of the experimental feasibility, we show that both the rhombic and square-shaped composite vortex solitons may readily propagate in the photonic crystals over distances up to $\sim 1$ m. The TH component of the soliton with $s=\mp 1$ is produced by the cascaded nonlinear interactions, starting from the FF vortex component with $s=\pm 1$ and proceeding through the quadrupole SH one with $s=2$. These findings offer a novel approach for the creation and control of stable vortex solitons in nonlinear optics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00818 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The schematic of the nonlinear optical lattice struc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The rhombic and square-shaped vortex solitons are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Dependences of Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: A typical example of the simulated creation of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. A. Malomed, Multidimensional Solitons (AIP Publish- ing LLC, 2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Guo and L

    Z. Guo and L. Ran, Rotational motions of optically trapped microscopic particles by a vortex femtosecond laser, Chin. Phys. B 21, 104206 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    W. Yu, Z. Ji, D. Dong, X. Yang, Y. Xiao, Q. Gong, P. Xi, and K. Shi, Super-resolution deep imaging with hollow Bessel beam STED microscopy, Laser & Photonics Reviews 10, 147 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Therefore, the Kerr nonlinearity may be neglected in the present setting

    21 GW/ cm2, respectively, all of which are significantly below the threshold for triggering the Kerr nonlinearity (1 ≃ GW/ cm2). Therefore, the Kerr nonlinearity may be neglected in the present setting. It is worth to note that the spatial scale of the structures listed in Table I falls within fabrication capabilities of current QPM tech- niques. These res...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Note also that both soliton types satisfy the VK criterion

    In the case of Ω a = Ω b = Ω 3, and ( P, D ) = (50 , 4), the numerical results reveal that the rhombic solitons pro- duce lower values of the Hamiltonian values, enabling their stable existence in a broader parameter range. Note also that both soliton types satisfy the VK criterion. Fur- ther, it is worthy to note that, at Ω a = 0, both soli- tons are sta...

    work page

  6. [6]

    A. V. Buryak, P. D. Trapani, D. V. Skryabin, and S. Trillo, Optical solitons due to quadratic nonlinearities: From basic physics to futuristic applications, Phys. Rep. 370, 63 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    W. E. Torruellas, Z. Wang, D. J. Hagan, E. W. VanStry- land, G. I. Stegeman, L. Torner, and C. R. Menyuk, Ob- servation of Two-Dimensional Spatial Solitary Waves in a Quadratic Medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5036 (1995)

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    Z. Zhou, Y. Li, D. Ding, Y. Jiang, W. Zhang, S. Shi, B. Shi, and G. Guo, Generation of light with controllable spatial patterns via the sum frequency in quasi-phase matching crystals, Sci. Rep. 4, 5650 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    J. Wang, J. Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y. Yan, H. Huang, Y. Ren, Y. Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing, Nature Photon- ics 6, 488 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Torner and D

    L. Torner and D. V. Petrov, Azimuthal instabilities and self breaking of beams into sets of solitons in bulk second harmonic generation, Electron. Lett. 33, 608 (1997)

    1997

  3. [11]

    D. V. Petrov, L. Torner, J. Martorell, R. Vilaseca, J. P. Torres, and C. Cojocaru, Observation of azimuthal mod- ulational instability and formation of patterns of optical solitons in a quadratic nonlinear crystal, Opt. Lett. 23, 1444 (1998)

    1998

  4. [12]

    W. E. Torruellas, Z. Wang, L. Torner, and G. I. Stege- man, Observation of mutual trapping and dragging of two dimensional spatial solitary waves in a quadratic medium, Opt. Lett. 20, 1949 (1995). 8

    1995

  5. [13]

    W. J. Firth and D. V. Skryabin, Optical Solitons Car- rying Orbital Angular Momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2450 (1997)

    1997

  6. [14]

    P. D. Trapani, W. Chinaglia, S. Minardi, A. Piskarskas, and G. Valiulis, Observation of Quadratic Optical Vortex Solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3843 (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    D. Wu, J. Li, X. Gao, Y. Shi, Y. Zhao, L. Dong, B. A. Malomed, N. Zhu, and S. Xu, Multicore vortex solitons in cubic-quintic nonlinear media with a Bessel lattice po- tential, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 192, 116057 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Towers, A

    I. Towers, A. V. Buryak, R. A. Sammut, and B. A. Mal- omed, Stable localized vortex solitons, Phys. Rev. E 63, 055601(R) (2001)

    2001

  9. [17]

    Mihalache, D

    D. Mihalache, D. Mazilu, B. A. Malomed, and F. Lederer, Stable vortex solitons supported by competing quadratic and cubic nonlinearities, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066614 (2004)

    2004

  10. [18]

    Bosshard, R

    Ch. Bosshard, R. Spreiter, M. Zgonik, and P. G¨ unter, Kerr Nonlinearity via Cascaded Optical Rectification and the Linear Electro-optic Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2816 (1995)

    1995

  11. [19]

    Trillo, A

    S. Trillo, A. V. Buryak, and Y. S. Kivshar, Modula- tional instabilities and optical solitons due to competiti on of χ (2) and χ (3) nonlinearities, Optics Communications 122, 200 (1996)

    1996

  12. [20]

    X. Xu, F. Zhao, J. Huang, H. He, L. Zhang, Z. Chen, Z. Nie, B. A. Malomed, and Y. Li, Semidiscrete optical vor- tex droplets in quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals, Opt. Express 31, 38343 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    DeSalvo, D

    R. DeSalvo, D. J. Hagan, M. Sheik-Bahae, G. Stegeman, E. W. V. Stryland, and H. Vanherzeele, Self-focusing and self-defocusing by cascaded second-order effects in KTP, Opt. Lett. 17, 28 (1992)

    1992

  14. [22]

    Torner, C

    L. Torner, C. R. Menyuk, and G. I. Stegeman, Excitation of solitons with cascaded χ (3) nonlinearities, Opt. Lett. 19, 1615 (1994)

    1994

  15. [23]

    Etrich, F

    C. Etrich, F. Lederer, B. A. Malomed, T. Peschel, and U. Peschel, Optical Solitons in Media with a Quadratic Nonlinearity, Progress in Optics 41, 483-568 (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    A. V. Buryak, Y. S. Kivshar, and S. Trillo, Optical soli- tons supported by competing nonlinearities, Opt. Lett. 20, 1961 (1995)

    1995

  17. [25]

    Mihalache, D

    D. Mihalache, D. Mazilu, L.-C. Crasovan, B. A. Mal- omed, and F. Lederer, Three-dimensional spinning soli- tons in the cubic-quintic nonlinear medium, Phys. Rev. E 61, 7142 (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    B. A. Malomed, Vortex solitons: Old results and new perspectives, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 399, 108 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    B. A. Malomed, Optical Solitons and Vortices in Frac- tional Media: A Mini-Review of Recent Results, Photon- ics 8, 9 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    C. Kong, J. Li, X. Tang, X. Li, J. Jiao, J. Cao, and H. Deng, Composite solitary vortices of three-wave mixing in quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals, Chaos, Soli- tons & Fractals 187, 115358 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    W. Peng, L. Wang, L. Xiao, Y. Liao, Y. Zhao, D. Wu, and S. Xu, Vortex solitons in a Rydberg-dressed triangular optical lattice, Physics Letters A 534, 130249 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Li and Y

    C. Li and Y. V. Kartashov, Stable Vortex Solitons Sus- tained by Localized Gain in a Cubic Medium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 213802 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Li and H

    J. Li and H. Zhang, Stability and adaptive evolution of higher-order vector vortex solitons in thermally nonlinea r media with tunable transverse size, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 177, 114195 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Zhang, Stabilization of higher-order vortex solito ns by means of nonlocal nonlinearity, Phys

    H. Zhang, Stabilization of higher-order vortex solito ns by means of nonlocal nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. A 105, (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Zhang, Z

    H. Zhang, Z. Weng, Q. Shou, Q. Guo, and W. Hu, In- stability suppression of vector vortex solitons in nonloca l nonlinear media, Phys. Rev. A 101, 033842 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    S. Zhu, Y. Zhu, and N. Ming, Quasi-Phase-Matched Third-Harmonic Generation in a Quasi-Periodic Optical Superlattice, Science 278, 843 (1997)

    1997

  27. [35]

    Z. Fan, W. Liu, L. Wang, W. Peng, D. Wu, S. Xu, and Y. Zhao, Vortex solitons in quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals with competing quadratic and cubic nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. E 111, 034208 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Q. Shou, Z. Weng, S. Guan, H. Han, H. Huang, Q. Guo, and W. Hu, Stable propagation of cylindrical-vector vor- tex solitons in strongly nonlocal media, Opt. Lett. 46, 2807 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    F. Zhao, X. Xu, H. He, L. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Z. Chen, B. A. Malomed, and Y. Li, Vortex Solitons in Quasi- Phase-Matched Photonic Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 157203 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Y. Guo, X. Xu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhou, B. Liu, H. He, Y. Li, and J. Xie, Three-Wave Mixing of Dipole Solitons in One-Dimensional Quasi-Phase-Matched Nonlinear Crys- tals, Chinese Phys. Lett. 41, 014204 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    T. Xu, K. Switkowski, X. Chen, S. Liu, K. Koynov, H. Yu, H. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Sheng, and W. Krolikowski, Three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystal in ferro- electric barium calcium titanate, Nature Photonics 12, 591 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    J. He, Y. Jiao, B. Zhou, Y. Zhao, Z. Fan, and S. Xu, Vor- tex light bullets in rotating Quasi-Phase-Matched pho- tonic crystals, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 188, 115514 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    S. Chen, B. Zhou, Y. Jiao, L. Wang, Y. Zhao, and S. Xu, Vortex solitons in rotating quasi-phase-matched photonic crystals, Opt. Express 32, 39963 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Arie, Storing and retrieving multiple images in 3D nonlinear photonic crystals, Light Sci

    A. Arie, Storing and retrieving multiple images in 3D nonlinear photonic crystals, Light Sci. Appl. 10, 202 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Arie and N

    A. Arie and N. Voloch, Periodic, quasi-periodic, and ra n- dom quadratic nonlinear photonic crystals, Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews 4, 355 (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    D. Wei, C. Wang, H. Wang, X. Hu, D. Wei, X. Fang, Y. Zhang, D. Wu, Y. Hu, J. Li, S. Zhu, and M. Xiao, Ex- perimental demonstration of a three-dimensional lithium niobate nonlinear photonic crystal, Nat. Photonics 12, 596 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Keren-Zur and T

    S. Keren-Zur and T. Ellenbogen, A new dimension for nonlinear photonic crystals, Nature Photonics 12, 575 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Houe and P

    M. Houe and P. D. Townsend, An introduction to method of periodic poling for 2nd-harmonic generation, J. Phys. D 28, 1747 (1995)

    1995

  39. [47]

    Hatanaka, K

    T. Hatanaka, K. Nakamura, T. Taniuchi, H. Ito, Y. Fu- rukawa, and K. Kitamura, Quasi-phase-matched optical parametric oscillation with periodically poled stoichio- metric LiTaO3, Opt. Lett. 25, 651 (2000)

    2000

  40. [48]

    Li and B

    H. Li and B. Ma, Research development on fabrication and optical properties of nonlinear photonic crystals, Front. Optoelectronics 13, 35 (2020). 9

    2020

  41. [49]

    S. Liu, L. Wang, L. M. Mazur, K. Switkowski, B. Wang, F. Chen, A. Arie, W. Krolikowski, and Y. Sheng, Highly Efficient 3D Nonlinear Photonic Crystals in Fer- roelectrics, Advanced Optical Materials 11, 2300021 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Karnieli and A

    A. Karnieli and A. Arie, Fully controllable adiabatic g e- ometric phase in nonlinear optics, Opt. Express 26, 4920 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Karnieli, Y

    A. Karnieli, Y. Li, and A. Arie, The geometric phase in nonlinear frequency conversion, Front. Phys. 17, 12301 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Chowdhury, H

    A. Chowdhury, H. M. Ng, M. Bhardwaj, and N. G. Weimann, Second-harmonic generation in periodically poled GaN, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 1077 (2003)

    2003

  45. [53]

    J. P. Torres, A. Alexandrescu, S. Carrasco, and L. Torne r, Quasi-phase-matching engineering for spatial control of entangled two-photon states, Opt. Lett. 29, 376 (2004)

    2004

  46. [54]

    Li, Adiabatic geometric phase in fully nonlinear thr ee- wave mixing, Phys

    Y. Li, Adiabatic geometric phase in fully nonlinear thr ee- wave mixing, Phys. Rev. A 3, 101 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    G. G. Luther, M. S. Alber, J. E. Marsden, and J. M. Robbins, Geometric analysis of optical frequency conver- sion and its control in quadratic nonlinear media, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 17, 932 (2000)

    2000

  48. [56]

    C. R. Phillips, C. Langrock, D. Chang, Y. W. Lin, L. Gallmann, and M. M. Fejer, Apodization of chirped quasi-phase-matching devices, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 1551 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    F. Zhao, J. L¨ u, H. He, Y. Zhou, S. Fu, and Y. Li, Ge- ometric phase with full-wedge and half-wedge rotation in nonlinear frequency conversion, Opt. Exp. 29, 21820 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    F. Ye, Y. V. Kartashov, and L. Torner, Stabilization of dipole solitons in nonlocal nonlinear media, Phys. Rev. A 77, 043821 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    Skupin, O

    S. Skupin, O. Bang, D. Edmundson, and W. Krolikowski, Stability of two-dimensional spatial solitons in nonlocal nonlinear media, Phys. Rev. E 73, 066603 (2006)

    2006

  52. [60]

    J. L¨ u, F. Zhao, W. Pang, and Y. Li, Constant adiabatic geometric phase in three-wave mixing under different de- pletion levels, Phys. Lett. A 397, 127266 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    Porat and A

    G. Porat and A. Arie, Efficient, broadband, and robust frequency conversion by fully nonlinear adiabatic three wave mixing, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 1342 (2013)

    2013

  54. [62]

    Ferrando, Vorticity Cutoff in Nonlinear Photonic Crystals, Phys

    A. Ferrando, Vorticity Cutoff in Nonlinear Photonic Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 043901 (2005)

    2005

  55. [63]

    Krupa, K

    K. Krupa, K. Nithyanandan, U. Andral, P. Tchofo- Dinda, and P. Grelu, Real-Time Observation of Inter- nal Motion within Ultrafast Dissipative Optical Soliton Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 243901 (2017)

    2017

  56. [64]

    B. B. Baizakov, B.A. Malomed, and M. Salerno, Multidi- mensional solitons in periodic potentials, Europhys. Lett . 63, 642 (2003)

    2003

  57. [65]

    Yang and Z

    J. Yang and Z. H. Musslimani, Fundamental and vortex solitons in a two-dimensional optical lattice, Opt. Lett. 28, 2094 (2003)

    2003

  58. [66]

    Generally, d0 = (2 /π )d33

    27 pm/V is the largest value of the lithium niobate’s nonlinear tensor, d33. Generally, d0 = (2 /π )d33. In Eq. (5), the coefficient of (2 /π ) is separated, hence we set d0 = d33 in this Letter; http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Lithium_niobate

  59. [67]

    D. E. Zelmon, D. L. Small, and D. Jundt, Infrared corrected Sellmeier coefficients for congruently grown lithium niobate and 5 mol. % magnesium oxide-doped lithium niobate, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14, 3319 (1997)

    1997

  60. [68]

    J. W. Fleischer, T. Carmon, M. Segev, N. K. Efremidis, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of Discrete Soli- tons in Optically Induced Real Time Waveguide Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 023902 (2003)

    2003

  61. [69]

    N. G. Vakhitov and and A. A. Kolokolov, Stationary solu- tions of the wave equation in a medium with nonlinear- ity saturation, Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 16, 783 (1973)

    1973

  62. [72]

    I. A. Kulagin, R. A. Ganeev, V. A. Kim, A. I. Ryasnyan- sky, R. I. Tugushev, T. Usmanov, and A. V. Zinoviev, Nonlinear refractive indices and third-order susceptibil - ities of nonlinear-optical crystals, in Proceedings of the SPIE 4972, Nonlinear Frequency Generation and Con-...

    2003

  63. [76]

    The third-order nonlinear sus- ceptibility of lithium niobate is χ (3) = 36

    5 cm in physical units, which as mentioned above, ≃ 100 diffraction lengths. The third-order nonlinear sus- ceptibility of lithium niobate is χ (3) = 36. 6×10− 22 m2/ V2 [68]. In Fig. 2, the peak intensities of the FF, SH, and TH components are ≈ 0. 42 GW/ cm2, 0. 52 GW/ cm2, a...

  64. [1000]

    The parameters are D = 3 and (Ω a, Ω b, Ω 3) = (0 , 0, 0). 7

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.