pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21507 · v1 · pith:T2PKRFJ4new · submitted 2026-06-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.str-el

Nontrivial Boundary-Mediated Superconducting Transport in a TRSB Topological Iron-Based Superconductor

Wenyao Liu , Gabriel Natale , Camron Farhang , Michael Geiwitz , Qishuo Tan , Xingyao Guo , Mason Gray , Vincent LambertiJazzmin Victorin
show 17 more authors
Huairuo Zhang James L. Hart Vsevolod Belosevich Xi Ling Qiong Ma Wan Kyu Park Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Judy J. Cha Albert V. Davydov Kin Chung Fong Ethan Arnault Genda Gu Rui-Xing Zhang Enrico Rossi Jing Xia Kenneth S. Burch
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 12:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el
keywords topological superconductivityiron-based superconductorstime-reversal symmetry breakingboundary statesconductance plateauFeTeSenonlocal transportexfoliated devices
0
0 comments X

The pith

FeTe0.55Se0.45 devices exhibit a conductance plateau along sharp edges that tracks the TRSB temperature scale and appears only in topologically nontrivial compositions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents transport measurements on exfoliated flakes of the iron-based superconductor Fe(Te,Se) that also hosts band topology and spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking below a temperature TKerr. In samples with continuous, crystallographically sharp edges contacted on the side surfaces, an anomalous conductance plateau develops that is missing in topologically trivial compositions measured under the same conditions. The plateau survives over micrometer distances far beyond the bulk coherence length, requires an uninterrupted edge path between contacts, shows weak thermal broadening, and vanishes near TKerr rather than the superconducting transition temperature Tc. These doping-selective, geometry-dependent, and TRSB-correlated features are presented as experimental signatures of boundary-mediated superconducting transport.

Core claim

Topological FeTe0.55Se0.45 exhibits boundary-mediated superconducting transport, shown by a conductance plateau that requires sharp continuous edges, persists over long distances, collapses when contacts move to the top surface, and follows the TRSB onset temperature TKerr instead of Tc, while the same plateau is absent in topologically trivial FeTe0.40Se0.60 and Fe1.02Te0.55Se0.45.

What carries the argument

The anomalous conductance plateau measured with side-surface-dominant contacts along uninterrupted crystallographically sharp edges.

If this is right

  • The plateau requires an uninterrupted sharp edge path between source and drain.
  • It survives over micrometer separations much larger than the bulk coherence length.
  • Its temperature dependence follows the TRSB scale TKerr rather than Tc.
  • It vanishes when the drain contact is moved from the side surface to the top surface.
  • The signatures are absent in topologically trivial compositions under comparable edge conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar edge-selective transport measurements could be applied to other candidate topological superconductors to test for boundary states without requiring fabricated junctions.
  • The long-range nature of the plateau implies that any mediating states maintain coherence over distances where bulk quasiparticles would be gapped.
  • Phase-sensitive experiments that probe the symmetry of the boundary states would help distinguish between possible microscopic origins such as chiral Majorana modes or other TRSB-induced boundary modes.

Load-bearing premise

The plateau is produced by topological boundary states rather than conventional mechanisms such as Andreev reflection or disorder-induced states.

What would settle it

Observation of the same plateau in topologically trivial FeTe0.40Se0.60 devices that also have continuous sharp edges connecting source and drain contacts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21507 by Albert V. Davydov, Camron Farhang, Enrico Rossi, Ethan Arnault, Gabriel Natale, Genda Gu, Huairuo Zhang, James L. Hart, Jing Xia, Judy J. Cha, Kenji Watanabe, Kenneth S. Burch, Kin Chung Fong, Mason Gray, Michael Geiwitz, Qiong Ma, Qishuo Tan, Rui-Xing Zhang, Takashi Taniguchi, Vincent LambertiJazzmin Victorin, Vsevolod Belosevich, Wan Kyu Park, Wenyao Liu, Xi Ling, Xingyao Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Edge-geometry-dependent conductance spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Circuit-configuration-dependent transport measurement. (a) Optical image of FeTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Nonlocal transport response of edge-state conduc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temperature evolution of edge-related and surface differential conductance. (a) Temperature-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The interplay of superconductivity, band topology, and spontaneous time-reversal-symmetry breaking (TRSB) is expected to enable topological superconducting boundary states. FeTe0.55Se0.45 provides a promising single-material platform because it combines superconductivity, nontrivial band topology, and spontaneous magnetization in the superconducting state. Here we report evidence for a boundary-mediated superconducting transport response in exfoliated Fe(Te,Se) devices. Polar Kerr measurements show that TRSB emerges below TKerr < Tc and coexists with superconductivity across multiple compositions, providing an independent symmetry-breaking scale for transport. Using crystallographically sharp, continuous edges and side-surface-dominant contacts, we find that topological FeTe0.55Se0.45 exhibits an anomalous conductance plateau absent in topologically trivial FeTe0.40Se0.60 and Fe1.02Te0.55Se0.45 under comparable measurements. This plateau requires uninterrupted sharp edges connecting source and drain, persists over micrometer-scale separations far exceeding the bulk coherence length, shows strongly suppressed thermal broadening, and collapses when the drain is moved to the top surface. Its temperature evolution follows the TRSB scale: the plateau remains weakly broadened below T*Kerr and disappears near TKerr rather than Tc. These doping-selective, edge-geometry-dependent, TRSB-correlated, and long-range nonlocal signatures establish experimental criteria for identifying boundary-mediated superconducting transport in FeTe0.55Se0.45 and motivate phase-sensitive and theoretical studies of its microscopic origin.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental evidence from polar Kerr and transport measurements on exfoliated Fe(Te,Se) devices, claiming that FeTe0.55Se0.45 exhibits a doping-selective, edge-geometry-dependent conductance plateau that is long-range (micrometer scale), shows suppressed thermal broadening, collapses when the drain contact is moved to the top surface, and tracks the TRSB temperature scale TKerr rather than Tc; this plateau is absent in topologically trivial compositions (FeTe0.40Se0.60 and Fe1.02Te0.55Se0.45), establishing criteria for boundary-mediated superconducting transport.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the work would supply concrete experimental signatures (doping selectivity, edge continuity requirement, TRSB correlation, and nonlocal character) for identifying boundary-mediated transport in a single-material platform that combines superconductivity, band topology, and spontaneous TRSB. The use of multiple orthogonal controls is a positive feature, though the absence of quantitative modeling or simulations weakens the ability to claim the signatures are unique to topological boundary states.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and transport results] The central claim that the observed conductance plateau originates from topological boundary states (rather than conventional Andreev reflection or disorder-induced states) is load-bearing for the interpretation but rests on indirect controls; the manuscript contrasts compositions and edge geometries but does not provide a microscopic model or simulation demonstrating that expected conventional signals would be absent or qualitatively different under the reported contact positions, edge sharpness, and micrometer separations (see abstract description of plateau properties and the comparison to trivial compositions).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Transport measurements] The manuscript should include quantitative error bars, full raw datasets, and statistical measures of the plateau robustness to allow readers to assess the strength of the reported features.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for TKerr and T*Kerr should be clarified for consistency across the text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on the manuscript. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and transport results] The central claim that the observed conductance plateau originates from topological boundary states (rather than conventional Andreev reflection or disorder-induced states) is load-bearing for the interpretation but rests on indirect controls; the manuscript contrasts compositions and edge geometries but does not provide a microscopic model or simulation demonstrating that expected conventional signals would be absent or qualitatively different under the reported contact positions, edge sharpness, and micrometer separations (see abstract description of plateau properties and the comparison to trivial compositions).

    Authors: The manuscript is an experimental study whose central claim rests on a combination of orthogonal controls rather than a single indirect indicator. The anomalous plateau is observed exclusively in the topologically nontrivial composition FeTe0.55Se0.45, is absent under identical measurement conditions in the two trivial compositions, requires uninterrupted crystallographically sharp edges between source and drain, persists over micrometer separations far beyond the bulk coherence length, collapses when the drain contact is relocated to the top surface, and tracks the independently measured TRSB scale TKerr (with suppressed thermal broadening) rather than Tc. Conventional Andreev processes or disorder-induced states are not expected to exhibit this specific combination of doping selectivity, geometric requirement, nonlocal character, and TRSB correlation. While a quantitative microscopic model or simulation would strengthen uniqueness arguments, the work is experimental in scope and explicitly motivates such theoretical studies in the abstract. We therefore maintain that the reported controls are sufficient to establish the stated experimental criteria without requiring additional modeling in the present manuscript. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental report with no derivation chain

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental study reporting measured conductance plateaus, Kerr rotation, and comparisons across doping levels and device geometries in Fe(Te,Se). No equations, fitted parameters, theoretical derivations, or self-citation chains are invoked to derive the central claims; the evidence consists of direct observations (doping selectivity, edge dependence, temperature evolution relative to TKerr) contrasted against control samples. The attribution to boundary-mediated transport relies on these empirical controls rather than any reduction to inputs by construction. This is the standard case of a self-contained experimental paper with no load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard condensed-matter assumptions about coherence length, contact transparency, and the meaning of Kerr rotation as TRSB; no free parameters are fitted to produce the plateau, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of superconductivity (finite coherence length) and band topology in iron-based materials
    Invoked when stating that the plateau persists far beyond the bulk coherence length and when distinguishing topological vs trivial compositions.
  • domain assumption Polar Kerr rotation measures spontaneous time-reversal symmetry breaking
    Used to establish TKerr as an independent scale below Tc.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5915 in / 1351 out tokens · 30683 ms · 2026-06-26T12:39:54.396430+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator, Physical review letters100, 096407 (2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. D. Sarma, Majo- rana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures, Phys- ical review letters105, 077001 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Reviews of Modern Physics83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    Linder and J

    J. Linder and J. W. Robinson, Superconducting spin- tronics, Nature Physics11, 307 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    R. Cai, I. Žutić, and W. Han, Superconduc- tor/ferromagnet heterostructures: a platform for super- conducting spintronics and quantum computation, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies6, 2200080 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Yi, Y.-F

    H. Yi, Y.-F. Zhao, Y.-T. Chan, J. Cai, R. Mei, X. Wu, Z.-J. Yan, L.-J. Zhou, R. Zhang, Z. Wang,et al., Interface-induced superconductivity in magnetic topo- logical insulators, Science383, 634 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    P. Wan, O. Zheliuk, N. F. Yuan, X. Peng, L. Zhang, M. Liang, U. Zeitler, S. Wiedmann, N. E. Hussey, T. T. Palstra,et al., Orbital fulde–ferrell–larkin–ovchinnikov state in an ising superconductor, Nature619, 46 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    N. F. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    K. Chen, B. Karki, and P. Hosur, Intrinsic supercon- ducting diode effects in tilted weyl and dirac semimet- als, Physical Review B109, 064511 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Kallin, Chiral p-wave order in sr2ruo4, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 042501 (2012)

    C. Kallin, Chiral p-wave order in sr2ruo4, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 042501 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Reports on progress in physics75, 076501 (2012)

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Reports on progress in physics75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  12. [12]

    Yazdani, F

    A. Yazdani, F. von Oppen, B. I. Halperin, and A. Ya- coby, Hunting for majoranas, Science380, eade0850 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    M. Z. Hasan, S.-Y. Xu, and G. Bian, Topological in- sulators, topological superconductors and weyl fermion semimetals: discoveries, perspectives and outlooks, Physica Scripta164, 014001 (2015)

    2015

  14. [14]

    S. Kim, S. Lei, L. M. Schoop, R. Cava, and N. Ong, Edge supercurrent reveals competition between conden- sates in a weyl superconductor, Nature Physics20, 261 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Kayyalha, D

    M. Kayyalha, D. Xiao, R. Zhang, J. Shin, J. Jiang, F. Wang, Y.-F. Zhao, R. Xiao, L. Zhang, K. M. Fi- jalkowski,et al., Absence of evidence for chiral majo- rana modes in quantum anomalous hall-superconductor devices, Science367, 64 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    S. D. Sarma and H. Pan, Disorder-induced zero-bias peaks in majorana nanowires, Physical Review B103, 195158 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    H.-Y. Hui, J. D. Sau, and S. D. Sarma, Bulk disorder in the superconductor affects proximity-induced topolog- ical superconductivity, Physical Review B92, 174512 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    Gifford, G

    J. Gifford, G. Zhao, B. Li, J. Zhang, D. Kim, and T. Chen, Zero bias anomaly in andreev reflection spec- troscopy, Journal of Applied Physics120(2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    Serban, B

    I. Serban, B. Béri, A. Akhmerov, and C. Beenakker, Do- main wall in a chiral p-wave superconductor: A path- way for electrical current, Physical review letters104, 147001 (2010)

    2010

  20. [20]

    J. J. He, J. Wu, T.-P. Choy, X.-J. Liu, Y. Tanaka, and K. T. Law, Correlated spin currents generated by resonant-crossed andreev reflections in topological su- perconductors, Nature communications5, 3232 (2014)

    2014

  21. [21]

    Zhang, Z

    Y.-T. Zhang, Z. Hou, X. Xie, and Q.-F. Sun, Quantum perfect crossed andreev reflection in top-gated quan- tum anomalous hall insulator–superconductor junc- tions, Physical Review B95, 245433 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    S.Ikegaya, Y.Asano,andD.Manske,Anomalousnonlo- cal conductance as a fingerprint of chiral majorana edge states, Physical Review Letters123, 207002 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Z. Wang, P. Zhang, G. Xu, L. Zeng, H. Miao, X. Xu, T. Qian, H. Weng, P. Richard, A. V. Fedorov,et al., Topological nature of the fese 0.5 te 0.5 superconductor, Physical Review B92, 115119 (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    Zhang, K

    P. Zhang, K. Yaji, T. Hashimoto, Y. Ota, T. Kondo, K. Okazaki, Z. Wang, J. Wen, G. Gu, H. Ding,et al., Observationoftopologicalsuperconductivityonthesur- face of an iron-based superconductor, Science360, 182 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    Y. Li, N. Zaki, V. O. Garlea, A. T. Savici, D. Fobes, Z. Xu, F. Camino, C. Petrovic, G. Gu, P. D. John- son,et al., Electronic properties of the bulk and surface states of fe1+ y te1- x se x, Nature Materials20, 1221 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Lohani, T

    H. Lohani, T. Hazra, A. Ribak, Y. Nitzav, H. Fu, B. Yan, M. Randeria, and A. Kanigel, Band inver- sion and topology of the bulk electronic structure in FeSe0.45Te0.55, Physical Review B101, 245146 (2020), 1910.01128

    arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    E.-M. Choi, K. I. Sim, K. S. Burch, and Y. H. Lee, Emergent multifunctional magnetic proximity in van der waals layered heterostructures, Advanced Science9, 2200186 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    Hatefipour, J

    M. Hatefipour, J. J. Cuozzo, J. Kanter, W. M. Strick- land, C. R. Allemang, T.-M. Lu, E. Rossi, and J. Sha- bani,InducedSuperconductingPairinginIntegerQuan- tum Hall Edge States, Nano Letters22, 6173 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    Z. Wang, J. O. Rodriguez, L. Jiao, S. Howard, M. Gra- ham, G. Gu, T. L. Hughes, D. K. Morr, and V. Mad- havan, Evidence for dispersing 1d majorana channels in an iron-based superconductor, Science367, 104 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Jenkins, N

    M.J.Gray, J.Freudenstein, S.Y.F.Zhao, R.O’Connor, S. Jenkins, N. Kumar, M. Hoek, A. Kopec, S. Huh, T. Taniguchi,et al., Evidence for helical hinge zero modes in an fe-based superconductor, Nano letters19, 4890 (2019)

    2019

  31. [31]

    N. Zaki, G. Gu, A. Tsvelik, C. Wu, and P. D. Johnson, Time-reversal symmetry breaking in the fe-chalcogenide superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2007241118 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    N. J. McLaughlin, H. Wang, M. Huang, E. Lee-Wong, L. Hu, H. Lu, G. Q. Yan, G. Gu, C. Wu, Y.-Z. You, et al., Strong correlation between superconductivity and ferromagnetism in an fe-chalcogenide superconductor, Nano Letters21, 7277 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    Matsuura, M

    K. Matsuura, M. Roppongi, M. Qiu, Q. Sheng, Y. Cai, 14 K. Yamakawa, Z. Guguchia, R. P. Day, K. M. Ko- jima, A. Damascelli,et al., Two superconducting states with broken time-reversal symmetry in fese1- x s x, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2208276120 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Farhang, N

    C. Farhang, N. Zaki, J. Wang, G. Gu, P. D. Johnson, and J. Xia, Revealing the origin of time-reversal sym- metry breaking in fe-chalcogenide superconductor fete 1- x se x, Physical Review Letters130, 046702 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Roppongi, Y

    M. Roppongi, Y. Cai, K. Ogawa, S. Liu, G. Zhao, M. Oudah, T. Fujii, K. Imamura, S. Fang, K. Ishihara, et al., Topology meets time-reversal symmetry breaking in fese1- x te x superconductors, Nature communica- tions16, 6573 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Meng and L

    T. Meng and L. Balents, Weyl superconductors, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics86, 054504 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    J. D. Sau and S. Tewari, Topologically protected surface majorana arcs and bulk weyl fermions in ferromagnetic superconductors, Physical Review B—Condensed Mat- ter and Materials Physics86, 104509 (2012)

    2012

  38. [38]

    X. Wu, S. B. Chung, C. Liu, and E.-A. Kim, Topological orders competing for the dirac surface state in fesete surfaces, Physical Review Research3, 013066 (2021)

    2021

  39. [39]

    Hu and R.-X

    L.-H. Hu and R.-X. Zhang, Dislocation majorana bound states in iron-based superconductors, Nature Communi- cations15, 2337 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Daghero and R

    D. Daghero and R. Gonnelli, Probing multiband super- conductivity by point-contact spectroscopy, Supercon- ductor Science and Technology23, 043001 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    F. Tang, P. Wang, P. Wang, Y. Gan, G. D. Gu, W. Zhang, M. He, and L. Zhang, Quasi-2d supercon- ductivity in fete0. 55se0. 45 ultrathin film, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter31, 265702 (2019)

    2019

  42. [42]

    Zalic, S

    A. Zalic, S. Simon, S. Remennik, A. Vakahi, G. D. Gu, and H. Steinberg, Fete 0.55 se 0.45 van der waals tun- neling devices, Physical Review B100, 064517 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Sheet, S

    G. Sheet, S. Mukhopadhyay, and P. Raychaudhuri, Role of critical current on the point-contact andreev reflec- tion spectra between a normal metal and a supercon- ductor, Physical Review B69, 134507 (2004)

    2004

  44. [44]

    Russo, M

    S. Russo, M. Kroug, T. Klapwijk, and A. Morpurgo, Experimental observation of bias-dependent nonlocal andreev reflection, Physical review letters95, 027002 (2005)

    2005

  45. [45]

    Cadden-Zimansky and V

    P. Cadden-Zimansky and V. Chandrasekhar, Nonlocal correlations in normal-metal superconducting systems, Physical review letters97, 237003 (2006)

    2006

  46. [46]

    J. P. Morten, A. Brataas, and W. Belzig, Circuit theory of crossed andreev reflection, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics74, 214510 (2006)

    2006

  47. [47]

    Galluzzi, K

    A. Galluzzi, K. Buchkov, E. Nazarova, V. Tomov, G. Grimaldi, A. Leo, S. Pace, and M. Polichetti, Trans- port properties and high upper critical field of a fe (se, te) iron based superconductor, The European Physical Journal Special Topics228, 725 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    W. Park, C. Hunt, H. Arham, Z. Xu, J. Wen, Z. Lin, Q. Li, G. Gu, and L. Greene, Strong coupling super- conductivity in iron-chalcogenide fete0.55se0.45, arXiv preprint arXiv:1005.0190 (2010)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  49. [49]

    Deutscher, Andreev–saint-james reflections: A probe of cuprate superconductors, Reviews of modern physics 77, 109 (2005)

    G. Deutscher, Andreev–saint-james reflections: A probe of cuprate superconductors, Reviews of modern physics 77, 109 (2005)

    2005

  50. [50]

    L. Zhao, E. G. Arnault, A. Bondarev, A. Seredinski, T. F. Larson, A. W. Draelos, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Amet,et al., Interference of chiral an- dreev edge states, Nature Physics16, 862 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    Daghero, M

    D. Daghero, M. Tortello, G. Ummarino, and R. Gonnelli, Directional point-contact andreev- reflection spectroscopy of fe-based superconductors: Fermi surface topology, gap symmetry, and electron– boson interaction, Reports on Progress in Physics74, 124509 (2011)

    2011

  52. [52]

    D. Wang, L. Kong, P. Fan, H. Chen, S. Zhu, W. Liu, L. Cao, Y. Sun, S. Du, J. Schneeloch,et al., Evidence for majorana bound states in an iron-based supercon- ductor, Science362, 333 (2018)

    2018

  53. [53]

    Daghero, M

    D. Daghero, M. Tortello, G. Ummarino, J.-C. Griveau, E. Colineau, R. Eloirdi, A. Shick, J. Kolorenc, A. Licht- enstein, and R. Caciuffo, Strong-coupling d-wave super- conductivity in pucoga5 probed by point-contact spec- troscopy, Nature communications3, 786 (2012)

    2012

  54. [54]

    Ghanbarian, A

    B. Ghanbarian, A. G. Hunt, R. P. Ewing, and M. Sahimi, Tortuosity in porous media: a critical re- view, Soil science society of America journal77, 1461 (2013)

    2013

  55. [55]

    W. G. Vandenberghe and M. V. Fischetti, Imperfect two-dimensional topological insulator field-effect tran- sistors, Nature communications8, 14184 (2017)

    2017

  56. [56]

    P. N. Argyres, Theory of the Faraday and Kerr Effects in Ferromagnetics, Phys. Rev.97, 334 (1955), publisher: American Physical Society

    1955

  57. [57]

    A. Duif, A. Jansen, and P. Wyder, Point-contact spec- troscopy, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter1, 3157 (1989)

    1989

  58. [58]

    T. Chen, S. Huang, and C. Chien, Pronounced effects of additional resistance in andreev reflection spectroscopy, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics81, 214444 (2010)

    2010

  59. [59]

    M. J. Gray, N. Kumar, R. O’Connor, M. Hoek, E. Sheri- dan, M. C. Doyle, M. L. Romanelli, G. B. Osterhoudt, Y. Wang, V. Plisson,et al., A cleanroom in a glovebox, Review of Scientific Instruments91(2020)

    2020

  60. [60]

    S. Lee, V. Stanev, X. Zhang, D. Stasak, J. Flowers, J. S. Higgins, S. Dai, T. Blum, X. Pan, V. M. Yakovenko, et al.,Perfectandreevreflectionduetothekleinparadox in a topological superconducting state, Nature570, 344 (2019)

    2019

  61. [61]

    Z. Y. Zeng, L. Zhou, J. Hong, and B. Li, Local and nonlocal entanglement for quasiparticle pairs induced by andreev reflection, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics74, 085312 (2006)

    2006

  62. [62]

    K. T. Law, P. A. Lee, and T. K. Ng, Majorana fermion induced resonant andreev reflection, Physical review let- ters103, 237001 (2009)

    2009

  63. [63]

    Casas-Barrera, S

    O. Casas-Barrera, S. Gómez Páez, and W. J. Herrera, Long-range cooper pair splitting by chiral majorana edge states, Physical Review B110, 045415 (2024)

    2024

  64. [64]

    T. L. Hughes, H. Yao, and X.-L. Qi, Majorana zero modes in dislocations of sr 2 ruo 4, Physical Review B90, 235123 (2014)

    2014

  65. [65]

    Mascot, S

    E. Mascot, S. Cocklin, M. Graham, M. Mashkoori, S. Rachel, and D. K. Morr, Topological surface su- perconductivity in fese0. 45te0. 55, Communications Physics5, 188 (2022)

    2022

  66. [66]

    M. Kim, S. Choi, W. H. Brito, and G. Kotliar, Orbital- Selective Mott Transition Effects and Nontrivial Topol- 15 ogy of Iron Chalcogenide, Physical Review Letters132, 136504 (2024), 2304.05002

    arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum hall effect, Physical Review B61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  68. [68]

    Zareapour, A

    P. Zareapour, A. Hayat, S. Y. F. Zhao, M. Kreshchuk, Z. Xu, T. S. Liu, G. D. Gu, S. Jia, R. J. Cava, H.-Y. Yang, Y.Ran, andK. S.Burch, Andreevreflection with- out Fermi surface alignment in high-T c van der Waals heterostructures, New Journal of Physics19, 043026 (2017), 1705.03518

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. D. Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  70. [70]

    Vignaud, D

    H. Vignaud, D. Perconte, W. Yang, B. Kousar, E. Wag- ner, F. Gay, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Courtois, Z. Han, H. Sellier, and B. Sacépé, Evidence for chiral supercurrent in quantum Hall Josephson junctions, Na- ture , 1 (2023)

    2023

  71. [71]

    S. M. Albrecht, A. P. Higginbotham, M. Madsen, F.Kuemmeth, T.S.Jespersen, J.Nygård, P.Krogstrup, and C. Marcus, Exponential protection of zero modes in majorana islands, Nature531, 206 (2016)

    2016

  72. [72]

    D. J. Clarke, J. Alicea, and K. Shtengel, Exotic non- abelian anyons from conventional fractional quantum hall states, Nature communications4, 1348 (2013)

    2013

  73. [73]

    N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, G. Refael, and A. Stern, Frac- tionalizing majorana fermions: Non-abelian statistics on the edges of abelian quantum hall states, Physical Review X2, 041002 (2012)

    2012

  74. [74]

    D. J. Clarke, J. Alicea, and K. Shtengel, Exotic circuit elements from zero-modes in hybrid superconductor– quantum-hall systems, Nature Physics10, 877 (2014)

    2014

  75. [75]

    F. Amet, C. T. Ke, I. V. Borzenets, J. Wang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, R. S. Deacon, M. Yamamoto, Y. Bomze, S. Tarucha,et al., Supercurrent in the quan- tum hall regime, Science352, 966 (2016)

    2016

  76. [76]

    Veyrat, C

    L. Veyrat, C. Déprez, A. Coissard, X. Li, F. Gay, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Han, B. A. Piot, H. Sel- lier,et al., Helical quantum hall phase in graphene on srtio3, Science367, 781 (2020)

    2020

  77. [77]

    R. S. Mong, D. J. Clarke, J. Alicea, N. H. Lindner, P. Fendley, C. Nayak, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, E. Berg, K. Shtengel,et al., Universal topological quantum com- putation from a superconductor-abelian quantum hall heterostructure, Physical Review X4, 011036 (2014)

    2014

  78. [78]

    J. Wang, Q. Zhou, B. Lian, and S.-C. Zhang, Chi- ral topological superconductor and half-integer conduc- tance plateau from quantum anomalous hall plateau transition, Physical Review B92, 064520 (2015)

    2015

  79. [79]

    Trang, N

    C. Trang, N. Shimamura, K. Nakayama, S. Souma, K. Sugawara, I. Watanabe, K. Yamauchi, T. Oguchi, K. Segawa, T. Takahashi,et al., Conversion of a conven- tional superconductor into a topological superconductor by topological proximity effect, Nature communications 11, 159 (2020)

    2020

  80. [80]

    Y. Hao, G. Zhang, D. Liu, and D. E. Liu, Anomalous universal conductance as a hallmark of non-locality in a majorana-hosted superconducting island, Nature Com- munications13, 6699 (2022)

    2022

Showing first 80 references.