Exploring the Capabilities of Prompted Large Language Models in Educational and Assessment Applications
Reviewed by Pithpith:TI6DFPS2open to challenge →
read the original abstract
In the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the fusion of large language models (LLMs) offers unprecedented opportunities for innovation in the field of modern education. We embark on an exploration of prompted LLMs within the context of educational and assessment applications to uncover their potential. Through a series of carefully crafted research questions, we investigate the effectiveness of prompt-based techniques in generating open-ended questions from school-level textbooks, assess their efficiency in generating open-ended questions from undergraduate-level technical textbooks, and explore the feasibility of employing a chain-of-thought inspired multi-stage prompting approach for language-agnostic multiple-choice question (MCQ) generation. Additionally, we evaluate the ability of prompted LLMs for language learning, exemplified through a case study in the low-resource Indian language Bengali, to explain Bengali grammatical errors. We also evaluate the potential of prompted LLMs to assess human resource (HR) spoken interview transcripts. By juxtaposing the capabilities of LLMs with those of human experts across various educational tasks and domains, our aim is to shed light on the potential and limitations of LLMs in reshaping educational practices.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Small, Private Language Models as Teammates for Educational Assessment Design
SLMs achieve competitive performance with LLMs on pedagogically grounded metrics for assessment design but exhibit biases in model-based evaluation versus experts, supporting bounded AI use with human oversight.
-
A Tree-of-Thoughts Inspired Hybrid Approach for Legal Case Judgement Summarization using LLMs
A tree-of-thoughts inspired hybrid extractive-abstractive LLM prompt yields better legal case judgment summaries than standard extractive or abstractive prompts.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.