REVIEW 2 cited by
Safe Neurosymbolic Learning with Differentiable Symbolic Execution
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We study the problem of learning worst-case-safe parameters for programs that use neural networks as well as symbolic, human-written code. Such neurosymbolic programs arise in many safety-critical domains. However, because they can use nondifferentiable operations, it is hard to learn their parameters using existing gradient-based approaches to safe learning. Our approach to this problem, Differentiable Symbolic Execution (DSE), samples control flow paths in a program, symbolically constructs worst-case "safety losses" along these paths, and backpropagates the gradients of these losses through program operations using a generalization of the REINFORCE estimator. We evaluate the method on a mix of synthetic tasks and real-world benchmarks. Our experiments show that DSE significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art DiffAI method on these tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Composing Linear Layers from Irreducibles
A rotor-based layer built from bivector exponentials approximates LLM attention projections with O(log^2 d) parameters and competitive downstream performance.
-
Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Review
A systematic review of 158 Neuro-Symbolic AI papers finds research concentrated in learning and inference, with explainability, trustworthiness, and Meta-Cognition as underrepresented gaps.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.