Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Long-Range Prethermal Phases of Nonequilibrium Matter

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Long-range periodically driven systems can host prethermal phases of matter for any power-law exponent $\alpha>d$, including a disorder-free one-dimensional prethermal time crystal.

desk verdict Real new construction, solid numerics; abstract overstates what is proven for d<alpha<2d. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07530 v2 pith:TRE6VTOI submitted 2019-08-20 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Francisco Machado , Dominic V. Else , Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer , Chetan Nayak , Norman Y. Yao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elquant-ph PACS 05.30.-d05.70.Ln64.60.Cn
keywords prethermalizationdiscretetimecrystalslong-rangeinteractionsFloquetphasesofmatterpower-lawemergentsymmetrynonequilibriummany-bodylocalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that a periodically driven quantum system whose interactions decay as a power law can host long-lived, non-equilibrium phases of matter before it heats, as long as the decay exponent $\alpha$ exceeds the spatial dimension $d$. Previous proofs of prethermal phases required short-range interactions because the effective prethermal Hamiltonian could only be shown to generate local dynamics in that setting. The paper removes that restriction for $\alpha>2d$ and, under one stated assumption about relaxation, for all $\alpha>d$. It then predicts a disorder-free prethermal discrete time crystal in one dimension for $1<\alpha<2$, a phase that equilibrium physics, many-body localization, and short-range prethermal Floquet systems all forbid. The predicted crystal is distinguished from an MBL time crystal by an energy-density phase transition and an exponentially long but finite lifetime.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a class of range-indexed potentials built from $R$-ranged sets: a set of lattice sites is $R$-ranged if any two of its sites can be joined by a chain of in-set hops of length at most $R$. Hamiltonian terms are organized by range $R_l=e^{\sigma l}$ and weighted by a two-parameter norm that penalizes support size exponentially and spatial range as a power law. Iterating the frame-rotation construction for prethermalization while tracking this norm shows that $D^*$, $E^*$, and $V^*(t)$ inherit the original power-law decay, so the prethermal Hamiltonian stays local in the relevant sense. For $\gamma>d$, this makes a power-law-light-cone Lieb-Robinson bound applicable, which is what upgrades energy conservation to genuine approximation of local observables. For $\gamma<d$, only a short-time estimate follows, and the phase argument rests on the assumption that the system thermalizes to the canonical ensemble of $D^*$.

What would settle it

Prepare the one-dimensional long-range Floquet spin chain described in the paper with $1<\alpha<2$, choose an initial state below the ferromagnetic critical energy density, and measure the period-doubling magnetization and a local observable's evolution for times up to $e^{\omega/J}$. If the exact Floquet dynamics deviate from the evolution generated by $D^*$ on a time scale much shorter than the heating time, or if the period-doubling order decays at the prethermalization time instead of surviving to $\tau_*\sim e^{\omega/J}$, the central claim is falsified. More directly, compare the local reduced state at intermediate times with the canonical ensemble of $D^*$ at the initial energy density; a mismatch in the $d<\alpha<2d$ regime disproves the assumed relaxation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Floquet prethermalization extends to long-range power-law interacting systems: for $\alpha>d$, the system possesses a prethermal Hamiltonian $D^*$ whose energy is conserved for an exponentially long time, and which, for $\alpha>2d$, also correctly generates the dynamics of local observables throughout the prethermal window. For $d<\alpha<2d$, the paper proves only short-time accuracy of local dynamics and assumes that local observables relax to the canonical ensemble of $D^*$ because that state maximizes entropy under the conserved energy. Under that assumption, prethermal phases exist for all $\alpha>d$. The paper further predicts that in one dimension with $1<\alpha<2$, where the prethermal Hamiltonian has a finite-temperature ferromagnetic transition, the driven system realizes a disorder-free prethermal discrete time crystal whose period-doubling order survives until the heating time $\tau_*\sim e^{\omega/J}$, rather than melting at the prethermalization time.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, for $d<\alpha<2d$, local observables in the prethermal window relax to the thermal equilibrium state of the prethermal Hamiltonian because that state maximizes entropy under the conserved energy; the paper proves only short-time accuracy in this regime, so if that relaxation fails, the existence proof for these phases, including the one-dimensional disorder-free prethermal time crystal, does not go through.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $\alpha>2d$, long-range Floquet systems will host prethermal phases whose local dynamics are generated by $D^*$ for exponentially long times, with no disorder or many-body localization required.
  • In finite-size systems, the paper proves prethermal phases for every $\alpha>d$ without the relaxation assumption, provided the drive frequency is large compared with the logarithm of the system volume.
  • A one-dimensional spin chain with interactions $\propto |i-j|^{-\alpha}$, $1<\alpha<2$, should show period doubling that survives until the heating time whenever the initial state has energy density below the ferromagnetic critical value.
  • The prethermal time crystal and the trivial phase are separated by a sharp transition in initial energy density, unlike the MBL time crystal, which exists for generic initial states.
  • Platforms with power-law interactions, such as trapped-ion-style spin chains, can in principle observe the prethermal time crystal without introducing disorder.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the assumed relaxation in the $d<\alpha<2d$ window is confirmed, the same range-indexed construction should carry other prethermal phases, including symmetry-protected topological order, to long-range interactions.
  • The same technique extends to undriven static systems with a near-integer spectral operator, so a prethermal continuous time crystal should also exist in long-range interacting systems.
  • One clean test of the assumption is to compare the reduced density matrix of a small subsystem under exact Floquet evolution with the canonical ensemble of $D^*$ at the same energy density; agreement only for $\alpha>2d$ and breakdown in $1<\alpha<2$ would mark exactly where the proof relies on unproven relaxation.
  • The two-parameter norm may be useful beyond driven systems, wherever few-body terms act across arbitrarily large distances and one needs separate control of support size and spatial range.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytic construction of a prethermal Floquet Hamiltonian D* for periodically driven, long-range interacting systems, while keeping track of the spatial locality of the interactions. Theorem 1 provides a locality-preserving rotation such that the driven evolution is exponentially well approximated by X exp(-iD*T). Theorem 2 proves that local observables follow D* throughout the prethermal window when the effective range exponent satisfies gamma* > d, which for two-body power-law interactions corresponds to alpha > 2d. Theorem 3 gives a short-time approximation for d < alpha < 2d, and the paper argues that in this regime local observables should relax to the Gibbs state of D* by entropy maximization under approximate energy conservation. The authors also present Krylov-subspace numerics for a one-dimensional long-range spin chain, reporting a disorder-free prethermal discrete time crystal for 1 < alpha < 2, together with quantum Monte Carlo estimates of the energy-density transition. The abstract and conclusion claim a proof of prethermal phases for all alpha > d.

Significance. If the analytic results are correct, this is a substantial step: it extends the emergent-symmetry framework for prethermal Floquet phases from short-range to long-range interactions, and it explains why a disorder-free one-dimensional prethermal discrete time crystal can exist. The paper's strengths include the explicit R-ranged operator formalism, the improved short-range iteration with n* free of logarithmic corrections, the detailed bounds in Appendices A-D, and the large-scale numerical study with independent QMC input. However, the rigorous proof of local-dynamics approximation is confined to alpha > 2d; the flagship 1 < alpha < 2 prediction rests on an explicitly stated but unproved entropy-maximization/Gibbs-relaxation assumption. The manuscript would be fully appropriate for publication once the claims are restated precisely and the conditional nature of the d < alpha < 2d phase is acknowledged in the abstract and conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. II.3; Sec. III.4.3; Conclusion] The headline claim "we prove the existence of non-equilibrium phases ... with power-law exponent alpha > d" is not supported by the theorems as stated. Theorem 2 (Sec. III.4.2, Eq. (40)) requires gamma* > d, which for two-body power-law interactions corresponds to alpha > 2d. In the complementary regime d < alpha < 2d, Theorem 3 (Sec. III.4.3, Eq. (41)) bounds local observables only for m lambda <= C7, i.e. a few periods, and the extension to the full prethermal window explicitly invokes the unproven assumption that local observables relax to the Gibbs state of D* (Sec. II.3; star in Fig. 1(c)). The 1D PDTC prediction lives precisely in 1 < alpha < 2, so the abstract and conclusion overstate the rigorous content. I recommend rewording the claim to "prove for alpha > 2d and predict, under a stated entropy-maximization assumption, for d < alpha < 2d."
  2. [Sec. II.1 and Sec. III.4.3] Even granting the Gibbs-relaxation assumption, the argument that the system exhibits period-doubled magnetization until tau* requires that the prethermal dynamics select a single symmetry-breaking sector of D*. The paper asserts this in Sec. II.1 ("rho can instead approach the equilibrium state within a particular symmetry-breaking sector"), but supplies no argument for why the driven dynamics, which has the symmetric Gibbs state as a fixed point of X exp(-iD*T), breaks this symmetry in the thermodynamic limit within the prethermal window. Since this sector selection is the mechanism underlying the PDTC, it should be explicitly identified as part of the conjecture for d < alpha < 2d rather than presented as an immediate consequence of energy conservation.
  3. [Sec. IV.3; Appendix H; Fig. 4] The numerical inference of an energy-density phase transition in the PDTC is indirect. The quantum Monte Carlo estimate in Appendix H computes the transition for the zeroth-order Hamiltonian D, not for the full frequency-dependent D*, and uses sign-flipped couplings and a modified long-range profile (Eq. (H2)). The comparison in Fig. 4(b) therefore tests whether the onset of exponential tau_TC tracks the transition of D, which is plausible only to the extent that D* is close to D. The paper does not provide a direct numerical construction or estimate of D*'s transition, so the statement that the observed crossover matches the D* transition should be softened or supplemented with a D*-based check.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A32)-(A33)] The bounds on ||V*|| and ||E*|| are written as mu (1/2)^{-n*}, which grows exponentially in n*; from the surrounding text and Eq. (A46) the intended exponent is (1/2)^{n*}.
  2. [Sec. III.2, Eq. (27)] In the geometric-series evaluation following Eq. (26), a factor e^{sigma(gamma - alpha + d)} appears to be missing in the numerator; the numerical value of the bound should be checked.
  3. [Appendix A, Eq. (A14)] Theorem 4 states a bound with norm ||.||_{kappa*,gamma*} although the short-range norm introduced in this appendix has only a kappa parameter; this appears to be a typographical carryover from Theorem 1.
  4. [Sec. IV.2; Fig. 3] The caption and text report that the extracted J_local is larger in the long-range model, but no explicit values or fitting ranges are given; stating the extracted J_local would make the exponential scaling in Fig. 3 quantitatively reproducible.
  5. [Sec. III.4.3, Eq. (41)] The statement "for small enough lambda, m_max > 1, so one can at least accurately describe the dynamics ... during a single driving period" is correct but should be accompanied by the observation that this window is parametrically shorter than the prethermal window tau* ~ 2^{n*}, since otherwise the reader may overestimate what Theorem 3 establishes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained and the d < alpha < 2d limitation is explicitly flagged, not assumed into existence.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain and found no step in which a predicted quantity is equivalent by construction to a fitted input, or in which a load-bearing premise is justified solely by a self-citation. The central analytic result, Theorem 1, constructs D* from the Floquet Hamiltonian via an iterative frame rotation; Theorem 2 then uses long-range Lieb-Robinson bounds to show that local observables follow D* for alpha > 2d. Although the Lieb-Robinson bound is cited to the authors' own prior work (Ref. [80]), that bound is a parameter-free mathematical theorem whose assumptions (finite two-parameter norm with gamma > d) do not include the prethermal result, so it qualifies as independent support rather than circular self-citation. The numerical PDTC lifetime is not fitted to the period-doubling data; it is compared with the independently extracted heating time tau*, and the phase-boundary location is computed separately by quantum Monte Carlo on D (Appendix H), not inferred from Delta M(t). The only significant gap is the regime d < alpha < 2d that contains the 1D PDTC. There the paper explicitly states a limitation rather than hiding it: Sec. II.3 says 'we are not be able to directly invoke such power-law-light-cone Lieb-Robinson bounds' and 'one expects that the approximate conservation of energy density means that local observables still relax to the Gibbs state of D*... Under this assumption, we show...', and Fig. 1(c) marks the row with a star. Theorem 3 in this regime only bounds local dynamics for m lambda <= C7, i.e. a few drive periods, so the existence of prethermal phases for d < alpha < 2d is conditional on the Gibbs-relaxation assumption. That is an openly acknowledged assumption and an overstatement in the abstract's unconditional wording, but it is not a circular reduction: the assumption is not defined in terms of the predicted time crystal, and the paper does not claim to have proven the assumption. Correctness risk from the unproven Gibbs-relaxation step is real and should be weighed separately, but under the circularity rubric the derivation is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analytic theorem is parameter-free; the numerical model uses specific couplings to illustrate the phase, but the central claim is not fitted to those values. The main external premises are the self-cited Lieb-Robinson bound (Ref. [80]), Dyson's finite-temperature SSB theorem, and the explicit Gibbs-relaxation assumption for d < alpha < 2d.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math The Lieb-Robinson bound for many-body power-law Hamiltonians from Ref. [80] applies to the range-indexed potentials generated by the construction.
    Used in Appendix C to prove Theorem 2. Ref. [80] is by three of the present authors, but it is an independent mathematical theorem, not machine-checked in this paper.
  • domain assumption For d < alpha < 2d, local observables relax to the Gibbs state of the prethermal Hamiltonian D* during the prethermal regime, by entropy maximization subject to conserved energy density.
    Explicitly stated in Sec. II.3 and starred in Fig. 1(c). Needed to extend prethermal phases from alpha > 2d to d < alpha < 2d, including the 1D PDTC.
  • domain assumption D* possesses a finite-temperature spontaneous symmetry breaking phase in 1D for 1 < alpha < 2, inherited from D (the long-range Ising model with additional generic terms).
    Needed for the PDTC. Supported by Dyson's 1969 result for the pure long-range Ising model and by the paper's QMC calculation for D, but D* itself is not directly simulated beyond the high-frequency approximation D* approximately D.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-Range Prethermal Phases of Nonequilibrium Matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TRE6VTOI

@misc{pith2026190807530,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-Range Prethermal Phases of Nonequilibrium Matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TRE6VTOI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07530}
}
abstract

We prove the existence of non-equilibrium phases of matter in the prethermal regime of periodically-driven, long-range interacting systems, with power-law exponent $\alpha > d$, where $d$ is the dimensionality of the system. In this context, we predict the existence of a disorder-free, prethermal discrete time crystal in one dimension -- a phase strictly forbidden in the absence of long-range interactions. Finally, using a combination of analytic and numerical methods, we highlight key experimentally observable differences between such a prethermal time crystal and its many-body localized counterpart.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07530 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Evolution of an L=22 spin chain under the short-range model (left column) and the long-range model. For the latter, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic explanation of the behavior near the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Analysis of the evolution of different single spin operators— [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Example of the fitting procedure for extracting the decay times for a particular initial state evolved with the long-range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: While the dynamics of σ z in this case are also very well described by D, the same is not true when con￾sidering σ x . We can attribute this to the effect of the small change of frame U; in the original lab frame, the system is really evolving under UD∗U † rather than …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Analogous to Fig. 7, but considering an initial state time evolved with the short-range Floquet evolution. As in Fig. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Evolution of the half-chain entanglement entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Quantum Monte Carlo calculation exhibiting a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Prethermalization without temperature

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2019-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    An emergent approximate conservation of magnetization creates a long-lived prethermal time-crystal regime at infinite temperature, and tuning the drive field can exponentially extend the NMR time-crystal signal.

  2. Locality and Heating in Periodically Driven, Power-law Interacting Systems

    quant-ph 2019-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Power-law interacting, periodically driven systems exhibit heating times exponential in drive frequency for alpha > D in linear response and alpha > 2D in general, with the gap attributed to the absence of tight Lieb-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    bad part

    The iteration Following Ref. [36], the idea is to construct the neces- sary rotations iteratively. At stepn of the iteration, there is a slightly rotated frame where the Floquet evolution operator Uf is in the form U† nUfUn =U(n) f =XT exp ( −i ∫ T 0 dtHn(t) ) , (A15) with XN = 1. (A16) We are interested in performing a unitary transforma- tion, such that...

  2. [2]

    Our first result is Lemma 1, a slightly modified form of Theorem 4 (Theorem 4 itself will eventually arise as a collorary), in which the constants more explicitly stated

    Analysis of bounds Now we prove bounds on the result of the iteration. Our first result is Lemma 1, a slightly modified form of Theorem 4 (Theorem 4 itself will eventually arise as a collorary), in which the constants more explicitly stated. Lemma 1. There are order 1 constants u and v (not depending on any other parameters) with the following properties. S...

  3. [3]

    Let Uj(t) =T exp [ −i ∫t 0 Φj(t) ] be the corresponding time evolutions, and define ∆(t) = Φ1(t)− Φ2(t). Then, the difference in time evolved local operator O (initially support on the set X⊆ Λ) under Φ1 and Φ2 is bounded by: ‖‖‖U† 1(t)OU1(t)−U† 2(t)OU2(t)] ‖‖‖≤|X|‖O‖‖∆‖0,0t × { K3(1 +τd/(1−η))|X| +K4(τ +τβ)|X|n∗+2 } , (C19) where we defined ‖∆‖0,0 = 1 t ∫ t...

  4. [4]

    cold” initial state in the long-range model (b), (e), (h) and (k), and a “hot

    (C25) Integrating this result, we obtain: U1(t)U† 2(t)OU2(t)U† 1(t)−O = (C26) −i ∫ t 0 ds U1(s)[∆(s),U† 2(s)OU2(s)]U† 1(s), (C27) and, thus, ‖U† 1(t)OU1(t)−U† 2(t)OU2(t)‖ (C28) ≤ ∫ t 0 ds‖[∆(s),U† 2(s)OU2(s)]‖ (C29) ≤ ∫ t 0 ds ∑ Z ‖[∆Z(s),U† 2(s)OU2(s)]‖, (C30) 24 where we defined ∆Z(s) =∑∞ l=0 ∆Z,l(s). Now to bound the commutator we consider ∫ t 0 ∑ Z ‖[∆...

  5. [5]

    Ap- proach to high-resolution nmr in solids,

    J. S. Waugh, L. M. Huber, and U. Haeberlen, “Ap- proach to high-resolution nmr in solids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 180 (1968)

    1968

  6. [6]

    Symmetrized pulse sequences in high res- olution nmr in solids,

    P Mansfield, “Symmetrized pulse sequences in high res- olution nmr in solids,” J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 4, 1444 (1971)

    1971

  7. [7]

    Analysis of multiple pulse nmr in solids,

    W-K. Rhim, D. D. Elleman, and R. W. Vaughan, “Analysis of multiple pulse nmr in solids,” The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 59, 3740 (1973)

    1973

  8. [8]

    Creation of effective magnetic fields in optical lattices: the hofstadter butterfly for cold neutral atoms,

    D Jaksch and P Zoller, “Creation of effective magnetic fields in optical lattices: the hofstadter butterfly for cold neutral atoms,” New J. Phys. 5, 56 (2003), arXiv:quant- ph/0304038

    arXiv 2003

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Experimental realization of strong effective magnetic fields in an optical lattice,

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, S. Nascimb` ene, S. Trotzky, Y.-A. Chen, and I. Bloch, “Experimental realization of strong effective magnetic fields in an optical lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 255301 (2011), arXiv:1110.5314

    2011 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quan- tum wells,

    Netanel H. Lindner, Gil Refael, and Victor Galitski, “Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quan- tum wells,” Nature Phys7, 490 (2011), arXiv:1008.1792

    2011 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Four-body ring-exchange interac- tions and anyonic statistics within a minimal toric- code hamiltonian,

    Han-Ning Dai, Bing Yang, Andreas Reingruber, Hui Sun, Xiao-Fan Xu, Yu-Ao Chen, Zhen-Sheng Yuan, and Jian-Wei Pan, “Four-body ring-exchange interac- tions and anyonic statistics within a minimal toric- code hamiltonian,” Nature Phys 13, 1195 (2017), arXiv:1602.05709

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Equilibration and or- der in quantum floquet matter,

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, “Equilibration and or- der in quantum floquet matter,” Nature Phys 13, 424 (2017), arXiv:1701.08056

    2017 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Discrete time crystals,

    Dominic V. Else, Christopher Monroe, Chetan Nayak, and Norman Y. Yao, “Discrete time crystals,” (), arXiv:1905.13232

    1905 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Topology and broken symmetry in floquet sys- tems,

    Fenner Harper, Rahul Roy, Mark S. Rudner, and S. L. Sondhi, “Topology and broken symmetry in floquet sys- tems,” arXiv:1905.01317

    1905 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Time evolution of a quantum many- body system: Transition from integrability to ergodicity in the thermodynamic limit,

    Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Time evolution of a quantum many- body system: Transition from integrability to ergodicity in the thermodynamic limit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1808 (1998), arXiv:cond-mat/9707180

    1998 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ergodic properties of a generic nonin- tegrable quantum many-body system in the thermody- namic limit,

    Tomaˇ z Prosen, “Ergodic properties of a generic nonin- tegrable quantum many-body system in the thermody- namic limit,” Phys. Rev. E 60, 3949 (1999), arXiv:cond- mat/9808150

    1999

  9. [17]

    Many- body energy localization transition in periodically driven systems,

    Luca D’Alessio and Anatoli Polkovnikov, “Many- body energy localization transition in periodically driven systems,” Annals of Physics 333, 19 (2013), arXiv:1210.2791

    2013 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Equilibrium states of generic quantum systems subject to periodic driving,

    Achilleas Lazarides, Arnab Das, and Roderich Moess- ner, “Equilibrium states of generic quantum systems subject to periodic driving,” Phys. Rev. E 90, 012110 (2014), arXiv:1403.2946

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Long-time behav- ior of isolated periodically driven interacting lattice sys- tems,

    Luca D’Alessio and Marcos Rigol, “Long-time behav- ior of isolated periodically driven interacting lattice sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. X 4, 041048 (2014), arXiv:1402.5141

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabi- lization to floquet engineering,

    Marin Bukov, Luca D’Alessio, and Anatoli Polkovnikov, “Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabi- lization to floquet engineering,” Advances in Physics 64, 139 (2015), arXiv:1407.4803

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Periodically driven ergodic and many-body localized quantum systems,

    Pedro Ponte, Anushya Chandran, Z. Papi´ c, and Dmitry A. Abanin, “Periodically driven ergodic and many-body localized quantum systems,” Annals of Physics 353, 196 (2015), arXiv:1403.6480

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Prethermal floquet steady states and instabilities in the periodically driven, weakly in- teracting bose-hubbard model,

    Marin Bukov, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, Michael Knap, and Eugene Demler, “Prethermal floquet steady states and instabilities in the periodically driven, weakly in- teracting bose-hubbard model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 205301 (2015), arXiv:1507.01946

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Periodically driv- ing a many-body localized quantum system,

    Pranjal Bordia, Henrik L¨ uschen, Ulrich Schneider, Michael Knap, and Immanuel Bloch, “Periodically driv- ing a many-body localized quantum system,” Nature Phys 13, 460 (2017), arXiv:1607.07868

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Floquet prethermalization and regimes of heating in a period- ically driven, interacting quantum system,

    Simon A. Weidinger and Michael Knap, “Floquet prethermalization and regimes of heating in a period- ically driven, interacting quantum system,” Sci Rep 7, 45382 (2017), arXiv:1609.09089

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Absence of dynamical localization in inter- acting driven systems,

    David J. Luitz, Yevgeny Bar Lev, and Achilleas Lazarides, “Absence of dynamical localization in inter- acting driven systems,” SciPost Phys. 3, 029 (2017), arXiv:1706.09429

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    On- set of floquet thermalization,

    Asmi Haldar, Roderich Moessner, and Arnab Das, “On- set of floquet thermalization,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 245122 (2018), arXiv:1803.10331

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Dicke time crystals in driven-dissipative quantum many-body systems,

    Bihui Zhu, Jamir Marino, Norman Yao, Mikhail D Lukin, and Eugene Demler, “Dicke time crystals in driven-dissipative quantum many-body systems,” New Journal of Physics (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics,

    Rahul Nandkishore and David A. Huse, “Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015), arXiv:1404.0686

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Colloquium : Many-body local- ization, thermalization, and entanglement,

    Dmitry A. Abanin, Ehud Altman, Immanuel Bloch, and Maksym Serbyn, “Colloquium : Many-body local- ization, thermalization, and entanglement,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019), arXiv:1804.11065

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Many-body localization in period- ically driven systems,

    Pedro Ponte, Z. Papi´ c, Fran¸ cois Huveneers, and Dmitry A. Abanin, “Many-body localization in period- ically driven systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 140401 (2015), arXiv:1410.8518

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Theory of many-body localization in pe- riodically driven systems,

    Dmitry A. Abanin, Wojciech De Roeck, and Fran¸ cois Huveneers, “Theory of many-body localization in pe- riodically driven systems,” Annals of Physics 372, 1 (2016), arXiv:1412.4752

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Phase structure of driven quan- tum systems,

    Vedika Khemani, Achilleas Lazarides, Roderich Moess- ner, and S. L. Sondhi, “Phase structure of driven quan- tum systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250401 (2016), arXiv:1508.03344

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Phase struc- ture of one-dimensional interacting floquet systems. i. abelian symmetry-protected topological phases,

    C. W. von Keyserlingk and S. L. Sondhi, “Phase struc- ture of one-dimensional interacting floquet systems. i. abelian symmetry-protected topological phases,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 245145 (2016), arXiv:1602.02157

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Phase struc- ture of one-dimensional interacting floquet systems. ii. symmetry-broken phases,

    C. W. von Keyserlingk and S. L. Sondhi, “Phase struc- ture of one-dimensional interacting floquet systems. ii. symmetry-broken phases,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 245146 (2016), arXiv:1602.06949

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Absolute stability and spatiotemporal long- range order in floquet systems,

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, Vedika Khemani, and S. L. Sondhi, “Absolute stability and spatiotemporal long- range order in floquet systems,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 085112 (2016), arXiv:1605.00639

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Classification of topological phases in periodically driven inter- acting systems,

    Dominic V. Else and Chetan Nayak, “Classification of topological phases in periodically driven inter- acting systems,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 201103 (2016), 32 arXiv:1602.04804

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Classification of interacting topological floquet phases in one dimension,

    Andrew C. Potter, Takahiro Morimoto, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Classification of interacting topological floquet phases in one dimension,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 041001 (2016), arXiv:1602.05194

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Floquet time crystals,

    Dominic V. Else, Bela Bauer, and Chetan Nayak, “Floquet time crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 090402 (2016), arXiv:1603.08001

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Discrete time crystals: Rigidity, criticality, and realizations,

    N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vish- wanath, “Discrete time crystals: Rigidity, criticality, and realizations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 030401 (2017), arXiv:1608.02589

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Prethermal phases of matter protected by time- translation symmetry,

    Dominic V. Else, Bela Bauer, and Chetan Nayak, “Prethermal phases of matter protected by time- translation symmetry,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 011026 (2017), arXiv:1607.05277

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Exponentially slow heating in periodically driven many-body systems,

    Dmitry A. Abanin, Wojciech De Roeck, and Fran¸ cois Huveneers, “Exponentially slow heating in periodically driven many-body systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 256803 (2015), arXiv:1507.01474

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Floquet–magnus theory and generic transient dynam- ics in periodically driven many-body quantum systems,

    Tomotaka Kuwahara, Takashi Mori, and Keiji Saito, “Floquet–magnus theory and generic transient dynam- ics in periodically driven many-body quantum systems,” Annals of Physics 367, 96 (2016), arXiv:1508.05797

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Rigorous bound on energy absorption and generic re- laxation in periodically driven quantum systems,

    Takashi Mori, Tomotaka Kuwahara, and Keiji Saito, “Rigorous bound on energy absorption and generic re- laxation in periodically driven quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 120401 (2016), arXiv:1509.03968

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    A rigorous theory of many-body prethermalization for periodically driven and closed quantum systems,

    Dmitry Abanin, Wojciech De Roeck, Wen Wei Ho, and Fran¸ cois Huveneers, “A rigorous theory of many-body prethermalization for periodically driven and closed quantum systems,” Commun. Math. Phys. 354, 809 (2017), arXiv:1509.05386

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Effective hamiltonians, prethermalization, and slow energy absorption in peri- odically driven many-body systems,

    Dmitry A. Abanin, Wojciech De Roeck, Wen Wei Ho, and Fran¸ cois Huveneers, “Effective hamiltonians, prethermalization, and slow energy absorption in peri- odically driven many-body systems,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 014112 (2017), arXiv:1510.03405

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bounds on energy absorption and prethermalization in quantum systems with long-range interactions,

    Wen Wei Ho, Ivan Protopopov, and Dmitry A. Abanin, “Bounds on energy absorption and prethermalization in quantum systems with long-range interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200601 (2018), arXiv:1706.07207

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Experimental realization of the topological haldane model with ultracold fermions,

    Gregor Jotzu, Michael Messer, R´ emi Desbuquois, Mar- tin Lebrat, Thomas Uehlinger, Daniel Greif, and Tilman Esslinger, “Experimental realization of the topological haldane model with ultracold fermions,” Na- ture 515, 237 (2014), arXiv:1406.7874

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Floquet engineering of correlated tunneling in the bose-hubbard model with ultracold atoms,

    F. Meinert, M. J. Mark, K. Lauber, A. J. Daley, and H.- C. N¨ agerl, “Floquet engineering of correlated tunneling in the bose-hubbard model with ultracold atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 205301 (2016), arXiv:1602.02657

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Floquet engineering of quantum materials,

    Takashi Oka and Sota Kitamura, “Floquet engineering of quantum materials,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 387 (2019), arXiv:1804.03212

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Prethermal quantum many-body kapitza phases of periodically driven spin systems,

    Alessio Lerose, Jamir Marino, Andrea Gambassi, and Alessandro Silva, “Prethermal quantum many-body kapitza phases of periodically driven spin systems,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 104306 (2019), arXiv:1803.04490

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Floquet symmetry- protected topological phases in cold-atom systems,

    I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, M. Schleier-Smith, A. Vishwanath, and N. Y. Yao, “Floquet symmetry- protected topological phases in cold-atom systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 123601 (2017), arXiv:1610.07611

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Anomalous floquet-anderson insulator as a nonadiabatic quantized charge pump,

    Paraj Titum, Erez Berg, Mark S. Rudner, Gil Refael, and Netanel H. Lindner, “Anomalous floquet-anderson insulator as a nonadiabatic quantized charge pump,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 021013 (2016), arXiv:1506.00650

    2016 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Radical chiral floquet phases in a periodically driven kitaev model and beyond,

    Hoi Chun Po, Lukasz Fidkowski, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Andrew C. Potter, “Radical chiral floquet phases in a periodically driven kitaev model and beyond,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 245116 (2017), arXiv:1701.01440

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Floquet hopf insulators,

    Thomas Schuster, Snir Gazit, Joel E. Moore, and Nor- man Y. Yao, “Floquet hopf insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 266803 (2019), arXiv:1903.02558

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Anomalous floquet insulators,

    Frederik Nathan, Dmitry Abanin, Erez Berg, Ne- tanel H. Lindner, and Mark S. Rudner, “Anomalous floquet insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 195133 (2019), arXiv:1712.02789

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Quantum simula- tions with trapped ions,

    Rainer Blatt and Christian F Roos, “Quantum simula- tions with trapped ions,” Nature Physics 8, 277 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    Localization goes long,

    Chris R. Laumann and Norman Y. Yao, “Localization goes long,” Nature Phys 12, 894 (2016)

    2016

  50. [58]

    Critical thermalization of a disordered dipolar spin system in diamond,

    G. Kucsko, S. Choi, J. Choi, P. C. Maurer, H. Zhou, R. Landig, H. Sumiya, S. Onoda, J. Isoya, F. Jelezko, E. Demler, N. Y. Yao, and M. D. Lukin, “Critical thermalization of a disordered dipolar spin system in diamond,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 023601 (2018), arXiv:1609.08216

    2018 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Observation of a symmetry-protected topo- logical phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms,

    Sylvain de L´ es´ eleuc, Vincent Lienhard, Pascal Scholl, Daniel Barredo, Sebastian Weber, Nicolai Lang, Hans Peter B¨ uchler, Thierry Lahaye, and Antoine Browaeys, “Observation of a symmetry-protected topo- logical phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms,” Science 365,...

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    New frontiers for quantum gases of polar molecules,

    Steven A. Moses, Jacob P. Covey, Matthew T. Miec- nikowski, Deborah S. Jin, and Jun Ye, “New frontiers for quantum gases of polar molecules,” Nature Phys 13, 13 (2016), arXiv:1610.07711

    2016 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Observa- tion of a discrete time crystal,

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, “Observa- tion of a discrete time crystal,” Nature 543, 217 (2017), arXiv:1609.08684

    2017 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules,

    Bo Yan, Steven A. Moses, Bryce Gadway, Jacob P. Covey, Kaden R. A. Hazzard, Ana Maria Rey, Deb- orah S. Jin, and Jun Ye, “Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules,” Nature 501, 521 (2013), arXiv:1305.5598

    2013 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Prob- ing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simu- lator,

    Hannes Bernien, Sylvain Schwartz, Alexander Keesling, Harry Levine, Ahmed Omran, Hannes Pichler, Soon- won Choi, Alexander S. Zibrov, Manuel Endres, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuleti´ c, and Mikhail D. Lukin, “Prob- ing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simu- lator,” Nature ...

    2017 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Observation of discrete time- crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body sys- tem,

    Soonwon Choi, Joonhee Choi, Renate Landig, Georg Kucsko, Hengyun Zhou, Junichi Isoya, Fedor Jelezko, Shinobu Onoda, Hitoshi Sumiya, Vedika Khemani, Curt von Keyserlingk, Norman Y. Yao, Eugene Demler, and Mikhail D. Lukin, “Observation of discrete time- crystalline order in a d...

    2017 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Observation of discrete-time-crystal signatures in an ordered dipolar many-body system,

    Jared Rovny, Robert L. Blum, and Sean E. Barrett, “Observation of discrete-time-crystal signatures in an ordered dipolar many-body system,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 180603 (2018), arXiv:1802.00126

    2018 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system,

    J. M. Deutsch, “Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system,” Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991)

    1991

  59. [67]

    Chaos and quantum thermalization,

    Mark Srednicki, “Chaos and quantum thermalization,” Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994), arXiv:cond-mat/9403051. 33

    1994 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Thermalization and its mechanism for generic iso- lated quantum systems,

    Marcos Rigol, Vanja Dunjko, and Maxim Olshanii, “Thermalization and its mechanism for generic iso- lated quantum systems,” Nature 452, 854 (2008), arXiv:0708.1324

    2008 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Counter-examples of this broad phenomenology are in- tegrable models or those displaying a many-body local- ized phase

  62. [70]

    Throughout this work we work in natural units ℏ = 1 and thus frequency carries units of energy

  63. [71]

    An example occurs in models with near integer spectrum [36, 40, 101–103]

    In special cases, however, it can depend exponentially on the ratio of the energy scales. An example occurs in models with near integer spectrum [36, 40, 101–103]

  64. [72]

    Floquet prethermalization in periodi- cally driven classical spin systems,

    Takashi Mori, “Floquet prethermalization in periodi- cally driven classical spin systems,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 104303 (2018), arXiv:1804.02165

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    In the former, proofs exist for short [36, 38, 40] and long-range inter- acting systems with power-law α >2d [38]

    Previous proofs that the dynamics of local observables are correctly captured by the prethermal Hamiltonian (within the prethermal regime) can be divided into two categories: those applicable in prethermal regimes with no emergent symmetry, and those applicable in prether- mal...

  66. [74]

    As long as τpre diverges at most algebraically near the transition, we are guaranteed (owing to the exponential scaling of τ∗) that the transition will be exponentially sharp in the frequency of the drive

  67. [75]

    Or a disorder-like potential such as a quasi-periodic po- tential

  68. [76]

    Spectral features of a many-body- localized system weakly coupled to a bath,

    Rahul Nandkishore, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, and David A. Huse, “Spectral features of a many-body- localized system weakly coupled to a bath,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 064203 (2014), arXiv:1402.5971

    2014 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Many-body localization in dipolar systems,

    N. Y. Yao, C. R. Laumann, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Knap, M. M¨ uller, E. A. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, “Many-body localization in dipolar systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 243002 (2014), arXiv:1311.7151

    2014 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Stability and instability towards delocalization in many-body lo- calization systems,

    Wojciech De Roeck and Fran¸ cois Huveneers, “Stability and instability towards delocalization in many-body lo- calization systems,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 155129 (2017), arXiv:1608.01815

    2017 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Existence of a phase-transition in a one-dimensional ising ferromagnet,

    Freeman J. Dyson, “Existence of a phase-transition in a one-dimensional ising ferromagnet,” Commun.Math. Phys. 12, 91 (1969)

    1969

  72. [80]

    This is a crucial point when attempting to describe phases of matter within the prethermal regime, because without it, one cannot precisely determine the equilib- rium properties of the system during prethermalization

  73. [81]

    Nearly linear light cones in long-range interacting quantum systems,

    Michael Foss-Feig, Zhe-Xuan Gong, Charles W. Clark, and Alexey V. Gorshkov, “Nearly linear light cones in long-range interacting quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 157201 (2015), arXiv:1410.3466

    2015 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Improving the lieb–robinson bound for long-range interactions,

    Takuro Matsuta, Tohru Koma, and Shu Nakamura, “Improving the lieb–robinson bound for long-range interactions,” Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 18, 519 (2016), arXiv:1604.05809

    2016 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Locality and digital quantum simulation of power-law interactions,

    Minh C. Tran, Andrew Y. Guo, Yuan Su, James R. Gar- rison, Zachary Eldredge, Michael Foss-Feig, Andrew M. Childs, and Alexey V. Gorshkov, “Locality and digital quantum simulation of power-law interactions,” Phys. Rev. X 9, 031006 (2019), arXiv:1808.05225

    2019 arXiv

  76. [84]

    An improved lieb-robinson bound for many-body hamiltonians with power-law interac- tions,

    Dominic V. Else, Francisco Machado, Chetan Nayak, and Norman Y. Yao, “An improved lieb-robinson bound for many-body hamiltonians with power-law interac- tions,” (), arXiv:1809.06369

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Spectral gap and exponential decay of correlations,

    Matthew B. Hastings and Tohru Koma, “Spectral gap and exponential decay of correlations,” Commun. Math. Phys. 265, 781 (2006), arXiv:math-ph/0507008

    2006 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions,

    Philip Richerme, Zhe-Xuan Gong, Aaron Lee, Crys- tal Senko, Jacob Smith, Michael Foss-Feig, Spyridon Michalakis, Alexey V. Gorshkov, and Christopher Mon- roe, “Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions,” Nature 511, 198 (2014), arXiv...

    2014 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Uni- versal scaling laws for correlation spreading in quantum systems with short- and long-range interactions,

    Lorenzo Cevolani, Julien Despres, Giuseppe Carleo, Luca Tagliacozzo, and Laurent Sanchez-Palencia, “Uni- versal scaling laws for correlation spreading in quantum systems with short- and long-range interactions,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 024302 (2018), arXiv:1706.00838

    2018 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Exponentially slow heating in short and long-range interacting floquet systems,

    Francisco Machado, Gregory D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, Dominic V. Else, Chetan Nayak, and Norman Y. Yao, “Exponentially slow heating in short and long-range interacting floquet systems,” Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033202 (2019), arXiv:1708.01620

    2019 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Emergent locality in systems with power-law interactions,

    David J. Luitz and Yevgeny Bar Lev, “Emergent locality in systems with power-law interactions,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 010105 (2019), arXiv:1805.06895

    2019 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Finite speed of quantum scrambling with long range interactions,

    Chi-Fang Chen and Andrew Lucas, “Finite speed of quantum scrambling with long range interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 250605 (2019), arXiv:1907.07637

    2019 arXiv

  83. [91]

    For more information, see https://zenodo.org/ record/3606826

  84. [92]

    Roman, and Vicente Vidal, “Slepc,” ACM Trans

    Vicente Hernandez, Jose E. Roman, and Vicente Vidal, “Slepc,” ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 31, 351 (2005)

    2005

  85. [93]

    J. E. Roman, C. Campos, E. Romero, and A. Tomas, SLEPc Users Manual , Tech. Rep. DSIC-II/24/02 - Re- vision 3.7 (D. Sistemes Inform` atics i Computaci´ o, Uni- versitat Polit` ecnica de Val` encia, 2016)

    2016

  86. [94]

    Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software li- braries,

    Satish Balay, William D. Gropp, Lois Curfman McInnes, and Barry F. Smith, “Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software li- braries,” in Modern Software Tools in Scientific Com- puting, edited by E. Arge, A. M. Bruaset, and H. P. Langtangen (Birkh¨ au...

    1997

  87. [95]

    Average entropy of a subsystem,

    Don N. Page, “Average entropy of a subsystem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9305007

    1993 arXiv

  88. [96]

    We then choose the limit of Tx→ 0 (the global π-pulse is infinitely fast) where Ttot → T and the drive-frequency becomes ω = 2π/T

    Although the period of the evolution is given by Ttot = T +Tx, the evolution of the system does not depend on our choice of Tx. We then choose the limit of Tx→ 0 (the global π-pulse is infinitely fast) where Ttot → T and the drive-frequency becomes ω = 2π/T

  89. [97]

    We slightly modify the long-range profile of the inter- action to match the system’s periodicity by replacing |i−j|−α with [(L/π) sin|i−j|π/L]−α

  90. [98]

    Owing to our choice of antiferromagnetic coupling, the ferromagnetic phase exists at the top of the spectrum

  91. [99]

    Prethermal time crystals in a one-dimensional periodically driven flo- quet system,

    Tian-Sheng Zeng and D. N. Sheng, “Prethermal time crystals in a one-dimensional periodically driven flo- quet system,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 094202 (2017), arXiv:1707.00404

    2017 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Discrete time crystal in globally driven interacting quantum systems without disorder,

    Wing Chi Yu, Jirawat Tangpanitanon, Alexander W. Glaetzle, Dieter Jaksch, and Dimitris G. Angelakis, “Discrete time crystal in globally driven interacting quantum systems without disorder,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 34 033618 (2019), arXiv:1807.07738

    2019 arXiv

  93. [101]

    High-frequency expansion for floquet prethermal phases with emergent symmetries: Application to time crystals and floquet engineering,

    Kaoru Mizuta, Kazuaki Takasan, and Norio Kawakami, “High-frequency expansion for floquet prethermal phases with emergent symmetries: Application to time crystals and floquet engineering,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 020301 (2019), arXiv:1902.01126

    2019 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Locality and heating in periodically driven, power-law- interacting systems,

    Minh C. Tran, Adam Ehrenberg, Andrew Y. Guo, Paraj Titum, Dmitry A. Abanin, and Alexey V. Gorshkov, “Locality and heating in periodically driven, power-law- interacting systems,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 052103 (2019), arXiv:1908.02773

    2019 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Specifically, [36] neglected to take into account that their modified definition of norm for time-dependent po- tentials – the time-average of the instantaneous norm rather than the supremum – necessitates an additional factor of 2 in the first equation of Section 4.2 in Ref. [40]

  96. [104]

    Emergent hydrodynamics in floquet quantum sys- tems,

    Bingtian Ye, Francisco Machado, Christopher David White, Roger S. K. Mong, and Norman Y. Yao, “Emergent hydrodynamics in floquet quantum sys- tems,” arXiv:1902.01859

    1902 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Long coherence times for edge spins,

    Jack Kemp, Norman Y Yao, Christopher R Lau- mann, and Paul Fendley, “Long coherence times for edge spins,” J. Stat. Mech. 2017, 063105 (2017), arXiv:1701.00797

    2017 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Prethermal strong zero modes and topological qubits,

    Dominic V. Else, Paul Fendley, Jack Kemp, and Chetan Nayak, “Prethermal strong zero modes and topological qubits,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 041062 (2017), arXiv:1704.08703

    2017 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Topologically protected long edge coherence times in symmetry-broken phases,

    Daniel E. Parker, Romain Vasseur, and Thomas Scaf- fidi, “Topologically protected long edge coherence times in symmetry-broken phases,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 240605 (2019), arXiv:1808.07485

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.